one law for one
26 June 2014, 11:21 AM
#31
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
26 June 2014, 04:47 PM
#33
Scooby Regular
26 June 2014, 07:25 PM
#34
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
26 June 2014, 09:19 PM
#38
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: weymouth
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The British justice system works relatively well for peasants like you and I, however the more powerful you are then the injustices don't even go as far as a courthouse door.
You or I would end up in court and fined for non tv licence, not paying council tax or similar, but mr blair the biggest war criminal of our generation and mass murderer of innocent civilians is living a very wealthy life of luxury. Wait a minute??? Never, can't be true lol
You or I would end up in court and fined for non tv licence, not paying council tax or similar, but mr blair the biggest war criminal of our generation and mass murderer of innocent civilians is living a very wealthy life of luxury. Wait a minute??? Never, can't be true lol
Last edited by stipete75; 26 June 2014 at 09:21 PM.
27 June 2014, 10:05 AM
#39
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its not just about the jury, but also throwing out evidence that could sway them before the jury even gets to see or here it, then discredit anything remaining with careful wording and interpretation.
I very much doubt there was any need for corruption was required by friends in high places; If there was any evidence, it would have been destroyed before the police even came calling.
I very much doubt there was any need for corruption was required by friends in high places; If there was any evidence, it would have been destroyed before the police even came calling.
) can't wait to jump to the defence of his mates the Tories before thinking things through in a more logical manner and realising that just maybe some people aren't exactly accusing the PM of directly threatening the jury! 
27 June 2014, 10:17 AM
#40
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: I'll check my gps
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
where is he 
27 June 2014, 12:12 PM
#41
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re the phone hacking: I havn't studied the case enough to give an opinion one way or another to be honest. My guess is that there was grounds for reasonable doubt.
27 June 2014, 12:34 PM
#42
Sums it up quite nicely....
Phone-hacking trial was officially about crime; but in reality, it was about power
Phone-hacking trial was officially about crime; but in reality, it was about power
27 June 2014, 06:52 PM
#46
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: I'll check my gps
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
With regards to phone hacking and Blair, were you alluding to Blairs only involvement was giving Rebecca Brooks and Murdoch advice, hence he has grounds for reasonable doubt.
Last edited by Carnut; 27 June 2014 at 06:56 PM. Reason: typo
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SDB
ScoobyNet General
21
15 July 2001 08:45 PM