Should Iraqi Christians be offered asylum in the UK?
#36
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think them being Christian has anything to do with it as we are a secular country. Also we have enough nut job christian imports from Africa already, I work with quite a few of them. Their literal interpretation of the bible is disturbing, manifested for example, in their views towards homosexuals.
I work with one such nurse who does not believe the world is millions of years old. When I asked what he then made of carbon dating, dinosaur fossils etc he said that all such evidence had been planted/faked by anti christian forces!!
I work with one such nurse who does not believe the world is millions of years old. When I asked what he then made of carbon dating, dinosaur fossils etc he said that all such evidence had been planted/faked by anti christian forces!!
The fact is Britain has had a significant hand in creating the vacuum that's led to the rise and rise of I.S. Because of that, we are duty bound to open our doors to one of the oldest Christian groups on the planet.
#38
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Turkish Christians have not been told to pay Jizya, convert to Islam, leave (with nothing more than the clothes in which they stand) or face death. Do you have a scintilla of insight as to what the Iraqi Christians are facing? I.S. Have literally crucified Christians for failing to comply. We owe it to them to help.
#41
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#43
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#45
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#47
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To liken Him and His sovereignty to "pre-enlightenment Panglossian claptrap" you ought to present me and anyone reading with a definition of both God and Sovereignty. Without this, I and others can't be sure that you understand the concepts you dismiss. Good word, though.
#50
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're likening me or what I say? It can't be me so you must mean what I have said and if the latter is true then it must be the notion that "God is sovereign" is "pre-enlightenment Panglossian claptrap". I put it to you that in order for your statement to stand-up you must first define God and then define His sovereignty. If you fail to do this you're simply refuting and dismissing words, not concepts.
Last edited by JTaylor; 06 August 2014 at 01:10 PM.
#51
Scooby Regular
You're likening me or what I say? It can't be me so you must mean what I have said and if the latter is true then it must be the notion that "God is sovereign" is pre-enlightenment Panglossian claptrap". I put it to you that in order for your statement to stand-up you must first define God and and then define His sovereignty. If you fail to do this you're simply refuting and dismissing words, not concepts.
the laughable irony is that born on the other side of the cultural divide you would be strapping on a suicide vest to do "gods will"
deep down you know it too
#52
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well, you're perfectly entitled to duck the challenge, Hodgy. You always do.
#53
You're likening me or what I say? It can't be me so you must mean what I have said and if the latter is true then it must be the notion that "God is sovereign" is "pre-enlightenment Panglossian claptrap". I put it to you that in order for your statement to stand-up you must first define God and then define His sovereignty. If you fail to do this you're simply refuting and dismissing words, not concepts.
#55
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Both, they aren't mutually exclusive (despite what fundamental atheists would have us believe). As a human, I believe in extending a hand to those in need, as a Christian, I believe in extending a hand to those in need.
#59
God also granted us free will and as such we, on our beautiful island, have the ability to grant asylum to the persecuted.
Both, they aren't mutually exclusive (despite what fundamental atheists would have us believe). As a human, I believe in extending a hand to those in need, as a Christian, I believe in extending a hand to those in need.
Both, they aren't mutually exclusive (despite what fundamental atheists would have us believe). As a human, I believe in extending a hand to those in need, as a Christian, I believe in extending a hand to those in need.
#60
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The reason we should help is because they are Christian, yes. It's absolutely because they are Christian that they are being persecuted. I'd extend that to Shia Muslims; whilst they have Iran, Southern Iraq, Kurdish controlled Iraq, Lebanon and other places to take refuge, if they came knocking on the UK's door I for one would like to see it opened. Same for atheists and Sunni apostates and moderates who can't tolerate the fundamentalism of I.S. I'll repeat: we helped create the vacuum, therefor we have a moral obligation to help those affected.