2.5 WRX - engine?
#62
#63
OK here is my dilemma. I want a close to standard as possible Impreza WRX wagon! Ideally I wnat as new as possible and a 2l so that means 2004/2005, but I can't find any that are at a sensible price and haven't been majorly modded.
Tomorrow I am looking at a 2006 2.5 WRX wagon.... but of course I fear the dreaded 2.5!!!
What to do?
Tomorrow I am looking at a 2006 2.5 WRX wagon.... but of course I fear the dreaded 2.5!!!
What to do?
its not April the 1st, i double checked when i read this
#64
#66
Well it's all academic as sadly my trade show gear will not fit in it. I am massively disappointed as this was an absolute steal price wise and had it not been for the space issue it would now be mine.
Sadly this means I am unlikely to ever own another Scoob which is also quite sad
Anyway if anyone wants a decent WRX wagon at an unbelievable price checkout Mark's ad in the for sale section. The ad does not do the car justice to be honest!
2006 WRX wagon for sale
Sadly this means I am unlikely to ever own another Scoob which is also quite sad
Anyway if anyone wants a decent WRX wagon at an unbelievable price checkout Mark's ad in the for sale section. The ad does not do the car justice to be honest!
2006 WRX wagon for sale
#67
So, this is figures at the actual factory then?
Are they told about all failures, or only those that a warranty claim has been approved for?
#68
p.s if it's SN hearsay and forum scaremongering then I've seen it.
#69
its no hearsay its fact on the sti engine ask api or any engine builder, the wrx unit has better reliability.
#70
Well it's all academic as sadly my trade show gear will not fit in it. I am massively disappointed as this was an absolute steal price wise and had it not been for the space issue it would now be mine.
Sadly this means I am unlikely to ever own another Scoob which is also quite sad
Anyway if anyone wants a decent WRX wagon at an unbelievable price checkout Mark's ad in the for sale section. The ad does not do the car justice to be honest!
2006 WRX wagon for sale
Sadly this means I am unlikely to ever own another Scoob which is also quite sad
Anyway if anyone wants a decent WRX wagon at an unbelievable price checkout Mark's ad in the for sale section. The ad does not do the car justice to be honest!
2006 WRX wagon for sale
#71
Just look at the thread I started on here.
Also the recent example of the 2011 car that shat itself after only 19000 miles - fcuksake man, wake up.
#72
he's trying to convince himself it's not true just because he has one
#73
do you really think Subaru would still be using the same 2.5 if the failures were that large?
you got unlucky and so did everyone else that posts online, the fact is if the other huge percentage of 2.5 owners have no problems they WONT post online!
answer yourself these questions:
>Engine rev limits being constantly exceeded due to over speeding
>Vehicles being un-officially modified outside the design brief of the engine (unit is designed for around 300 BHP or 330 BHP in the case of the STI 330S, not more)
>Track use (racing, time trials, rallying etc)
>Incorrect maintenance procedures, causing engines to be run with insufficient or contaminated lubricating oils
>Use of incorrect fuel grade (RON97)
>Unofficial "grey" Imports of undetermined specification, ie. not supplied by Subaru (UK)
Last edited by XDevil666; 11 August 2014 at 02:46 PM.
#74
cause you drive like a muppet or you get mods done by your mate dave the tuner!
do you really think Subaru would still be using the same 2.5 if the failures were that large?
you got unlucky and so did everyone else that posts online, the fact is if the other huge percentage of 2.5 owners have no problems they WONT post online!
answer yourself these questions:
>Engine rev limits being constantly exceeded due to over speeding
>Vehicles being un-officially modified outside the design brief of the engine (unit is designed for around 300 BHP or 330 BHP in the case of the STI 330S, not more)
>Track use (racing, time trials, rallying etc)
>Incorrect maintenance procedures, causing engines to be run with insufficient or contaminated lubricating oils
>Use of incorrect fuel grade (RON97)
>Unofficial "grey" Imports of undetermined specification, ie. not supplied by Subaru (UK)
do you really think Subaru would still be using the same 2.5 if the failures were that large?
you got unlucky and so did everyone else that posts online, the fact is if the other huge percentage of 2.5 owners have no problems they WONT post online!
answer yourself these questions:
>Engine rev limits being constantly exceeded due to over speeding
>Vehicles being un-officially modified outside the design brief of the engine (unit is designed for around 300 BHP or 330 BHP in the case of the STI 330S, not more)
>Track use (racing, time trials, rallying etc)
>Incorrect maintenance procedures, causing engines to be run with insufficient or contaminated lubricating oils
>Use of incorrect fuel grade (RON97)
>Unofficial "grey" Imports of undetermined specification, ie. not supplied by Subaru (UK)
#75
cause you drive like a muppet or you get mods done by your mate dave the tuner!
do you really think Subaru would still be using the same 2.5 if the failures were that large?
you got unlucky and so did everyone else that posts online, the fact is if the other huge percentage of 2.5 owners have no problems they WONT post online!
answer yourself these questions:
>Engine rev limits being constantly exceeded due to over speeding
>Vehicles being un-officially modified outside the design brief of the engine (unit is designed for around 300 BHP or 330 BHP in the case of the STI 330S, not more)
>Track use (racing, time trials, rallying etc)
>Incorrect maintenance procedures, causing engines to be run with insufficient or contaminated lubricating oils
>Use of incorrect fuel grade (RON97)
>Unofficial "grey" Imports of undetermined specification, ie. not supplied by Subaru (UK)
do you really think Subaru would still be using the same 2.5 if the failures were that large?
you got unlucky and so did everyone else that posts online, the fact is if the other huge percentage of 2.5 owners have no problems they WONT post online!
answer yourself these questions:
>Engine rev limits being constantly exceeded due to over speeding
>Vehicles being un-officially modified outside the design brief of the engine (unit is designed for around 300 BHP or 330 BHP in the case of the STI 330S, not more)
>Track use (racing, time trials, rallying etc)
>Incorrect maintenance procedures, causing engines to be run with insufficient or contaminated lubricating oils
>Use of incorrect fuel grade (RON97)
>Unofficial "grey" Imports of undetermined specification, ie. not supplied by Subaru (UK)
Generally a brand new one every 3 years or so.
Last car was a 330S, which I sold at just over 3 years old. It had about 22K on it if I remember correctly.
I actually sold it back to the dealer as I wanted rid because I believed it to be showing signs of engine related issues.
I believe it has since unloaded in its bags with a new owner.
>Engine rev limits being constantly exceeded due to over speeding
Maybe a few times, but accidental as its pretty easy to do in the 2.5
>Vehicles being un-officially modified outside the design brief of the engine
(unit is designed for around 300 BHP or 330 BHP in the case of the STI 330S, not more)
No
>Track use (racing, time trials, rallying etc)
No
>Incorrect maintenance procedures, causing engines to be run with insufficient or contaminated lubricating oils
No - quite the contrary, because I got it a 1K mile service which you don't need to do
>Use of incorrect fuel grade (RON97)
No
>Unofficial "grey" Imports of undetermined specification, ie. not supplied by Subaru (UK)
No
The last one is a joke anyway, its just a way of finger pointing elsewhere.
I know first hand information on two other cars here on this small 3 other hatch STI's that failed.
One of those 3 were covered under warranty, the other two were told no - see ya!
Have a read at this.
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/07/s...with-turbod-2/
#77
and you don't know the 330 engine went, your just assuming, nor do you know how the new owner treated it
and that article you posted is over 6 years old lmao
Last edited by XDevil666; 11 August 2014 at 03:13 PM.
#78
well there you go then, im sure as they plugged there diag kit in and looked at your history - invalid warranty
and you don't know the 330 engine went, your just assuming, nor do you know how the new owner treated it
and that article you posted is over 6 years old lmao
and you don't know the 330 engine went, your just assuming, nor do you know how the new owner treated it
and that article you posted is over 6 years old lmao
Stick your fingers in your ears, close your eyes and say it isn't so maybe?
#79
To be perfectly frank, don't care, not my problem anyway.
How did new owner treat it - no idea, but it shouldn't really matter if he just just 'using' it.
Spot on, funny that the cars began failing 6 years ago too
Last edited by urban; 11 August 2014 at 03:35 PM.
#80
2008+2009's had the ECU/map issues, we all know that, which accounted for a lot of the failures on the infamous thread on here.
A lot of those cases were dealt with in appalling fashion by the dealers, fact. The 2.5 is not as strong as the 2ltr, fact, we all know this contrary to what IM will tell you.
However that does not mean the 2.5 is going to explode in any car its in, quite the opposite in fact.
Tracked And it was fixed under warranty no questions asked.
They don't all go pop. It depends on their history, age and whether they were maintained properly or not. You really don't need to redline a 2.5 at all as its torquey, i find with mine i don't go anywhere near it or need to go anyway near it as it makes most of its power/torque at 4-4.5K. Having said that it should not spill its guts if it has, that's what a rev limit is for. So maybe there were other factors involved before you got yours. Run on 97ron once or twice maybe by a dealer, very possible, who knows.
A lot of those cases were dealt with in appalling fashion by the dealers, fact. The 2.5 is not as strong as the 2ltr, fact, we all know this contrary to what IM will tell you.
However that does not mean the 2.5 is going to explode in any car its in, quite the opposite in fact.
They don't all go pop. It depends on their history, age and whether they were maintained properly or not. You really don't need to redline a 2.5 at all as its torquey, i find with mine i don't go anywhere near it or need to go anyway near it as it makes most of its power/torque at 4-4.5K. Having said that it should not spill its guts if it has, that's what a rev limit is for. So maybe there were other factors involved before you got yours. Run on 97ron once or twice maybe by a dealer, very possible, who knows.
#81
It's difficult to say exactly because there is some guess work involved but engine failures are common across ALL marques, the question is what is acceptable/expected.
It would seem that going off the number of 2.5 engins sold we need to find a minimum of about 300 in the UK before it can be seen abnormal.
It would seem that going off the number of 2.5 engins sold we need to find a minimum of about 300 in the UK before it can be seen abnormal.
#82
It's difficult to say exactly because there is some guess work involved but engine failures are common across ALL marques, the question is what is acceptable/expected.
It would seem that going off the number of 2.5 engins sold we need to find a minimum of about 300 in the UK before it can be seen abnormal.
It would seem that going off the number of 2.5 engins sold we need to find a minimum of about 300 in the UK before it can be seen abnormal.
every time you get in the poo.5 the clocks ticking until booooooooom
#83
#84
Get it into yor head, I KNOW THERE ARE ISSUES WITH THE 2.5, I will repeat this at the end so as not to forget.
The thing that I find difficult to understand is how many have failed or at what percentage. There are 138,000 members on this site and of course we will hear of failures, one failure will also create a lot of hearsay and those of them who know the person will speak of their experiences.
There will, and has been people that will join the site with the intention of asking about their 2.5 that has failed, it owners of every car that failed posted we would never buy a csr again, we would probably take up horse riding.
So were back to this point, I KNOW THERE ARE ISSUES WITH THE 2.5.
#85
Ignore the fatty he's a bitter, almost ex scooby owner (well from 1 day to the next who knows if he will ever sell his faketrack) with a chip on his shoulder and a massive sheep to boot
#86
You know the one's, they say they know what they are doing and if it goes bang then they will get it forged, the thing is though, they never do.
#88
lol I'm an enthusiast who knows about the poo.5, its a poorly designed and built engine this is fact.
#90
if you say so,I'm an owner from many years and ask any tuner or engine builder I.e. api what the issues are with the poo.5, just because I don't use an impreza anymore doesn't mean I don't know the issues with them.