2.5 WRX - engine?
#124
The way I see it is that an engine is mechanical whichever make/model/version you get..
No matter what you do you will always get some that go wrong and they are the horror stories that people post on places like this..
Most people forget about all the people that have the same car with no problems whatsoever but dont broadcast it..
It will depend on how well a car has been maintained.
No matter what you do you will always get some that go wrong and they are the horror stories that people post on places like this..
Most people forget about all the people that have the same car with no problems whatsoever but dont broadcast it..
It will depend on how well a car has been maintained.
And going to what xdevil666 said, I don't think Subaru would continue putting that engine in cars if it was costing them a fortune in warranty work, surely it would be more cost effective to revert back to the 2.0 if it was already tried and tested and more reliable or just upgrade the head gaskets and internals of the 2.5??? Mmmmmm????
Last edited by SLHawkWagon; 12 August 2014 at 12:12 AM.
#125
In my opinion the 2.5 WRX engine does not suffer the failure rate of the 2.5 STI, the WRX still suffers from the headgasket problem, but at much higher mileage than the STI version.
The 2.5 WRX does have a different design cylinder head combustion chamber to the STI, it seems to give the piston a easier life, as does a slighly lower compression ratio.
The 2.5 WRX does have a different design cylinder head combustion chamber to the STI, it seems to give the piston a easier life, as does a slighly lower compression ratio.
Makes a lot of sense to me and explains why the WRX tends to fair better than the STI.
I still wouldn't buy one though.
#126
Ignore them mate, that Urbans engine didn't even go, he sold it because it had a rattle!
Could have been a billion and one reasons
If the 2.5 was awful there is no way they would still be using that same engine after all these years in multiple countries among multiple cars
Could have been a billion and one reasons
If the 2.5 was awful there is no way they would still be using that same engine after all these years in multiple countries among multiple cars
Could you explain perhaps why it used almost 2 litres of oil in about 7000 miles
Out of interest - what exactly do you own right now?
A 2.5 heap of shyte by any change
#127
Leave him alone urban, don't mock the afflicted. Think he is driving an old blob of some description.
#128
Quote:
Originally Posted by L.J.F View Post
The Forrester might be a option if you can't fit the equipment in the hawkeye...
Nah, I can't deal with the looks.
Anyway I am hoping it does all fit... will know very soon
Surely (or is it just me?) the Forester STi is better looking than a Volvo??
Originally Posted by L.J.F View Post
The Forrester might be a option if you can't fit the equipment in the hawkeye...
Nah, I can't deal with the looks.
Anyway I am hoping it does all fit... will know very soon
Surely (or is it just me?) the Forester STi is better looking than a Volvo??
#131
Might have look at that Spec B that was linked earlier otherwise I don't know. The Volvo is just so dull and I have owned it for 2 years now so want something a bit more engaging for the daily driver, but now my WRX wagon idea is gone I am at a bit of a loss to know where to go.
#134
May look into them, but my guess is they won't be even close to cheap to run and parts will be expensive.
#135
Indeed and they chew up front tyres and pads like you wouldn't believe. Nice sheep in wolfs clothing mind. I would have said the same, looks like the pull of ze krauts is the only way with an audi of some sorts.
#136
18 June 1815 - Waterloo
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 19,156
Likes: 14
From: To the valley men!
I revert to my statement on page one which I believe to be the point bioforger is trying to make,nobody has said they don't go wrong, some go more than others,more often than not it's down to maintenance and how the car has been treated,although some do just go,such is cars I'm afraid..
And going to what xdevil666 said, I don't think Subaru would continue putting that engine in cars if it was costing them a fortune in warranty work, surely it would be more cost effective to revert back to the 2.0 if it was already tried and tested and more reliable or just upgrade the head gaskets and internals of the 2.5??? Mmmmmm????
And going to what xdevil666 said, I don't think Subaru would continue putting that engine in cars if it was costing them a fortune in warranty work, surely it would be more cost effective to revert back to the 2.0 if it was already tried and tested and more reliable or just upgrade the head gaskets and internals of the 2.5??? Mmmmmm????
It's here because of emissions (2.5), the JDM 2.0 is not restricted in such a way.
#137
#139
#140
#144
even though in the u.s. subaru have caved in and admitted the engine is ****
#145
https://www.mrtperformance.com.au/ab...25l-turbo-cars
http://www.hngn.com/articles/36570/2...ent-models.htm
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/...suit/12859865/
http://www.autoblog.com/2014/07/22/s...xcess-oil-use/
http://wot.motortrend.com/1407_subar...nsumption.html
its fine, honest just internet talk..............strangely enough i couldnt find the same about the 2.0 turbo which is still in production in japan
http://www.hngn.com/articles/36570/2...ent-models.htm
http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/...suit/12859865/
http://www.autoblog.com/2014/07/22/s...xcess-oil-use/
http://wot.motortrend.com/1407_subar...nsumption.html
its fine, honest just internet talk..............strangely enough i couldnt find the same about the 2.0 turbo which is still in production in japan
Last edited by fat-thomas; 12 August 2014 at 06:00 PM.
#146
#147
In 2007 I bought the hawk WRX my brother Astra VXR, mum MX5 2.0 and boss in work 530d and all roughly the same mileage.
BMW clutch failure and now swirl flap failure resulting in damage to valves and pistons.
Astra VXR new turbo, new inlet manifold immobilser problems and seized caliper and electric window regulator
MX5 new battery. I now own this
Subaru no issues
BMW clutch failure and now swirl flap failure resulting in damage to valves and pistons.
Astra VXR new turbo, new inlet manifold immobilser problems and seized caliper and electric window regulator
MX5 new battery. I now own this
Subaru no issues
Last edited by scooby1929; 12 August 2014 at 09:28 PM.
#148
It was just a throwaway exclamation on simply how many cars owned per year - that's some going!
Last edited by joz8968; 12 August 2014 at 09:43 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ATWRX
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
88
01 February 2016 08:28 PM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
7
14 December 2015 09:16 AM
Bazil_SW
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
24
22 September 2015 12:55 AM