Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

What mods required for sub 3 sec 0-60

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05 November 2014 | 11:17 AM
  #91  
wms-racing's Avatar
wms-racing
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Holywell
Default

Originally Posted by Rob Day
Wasn't John Felstead once running around 380bhp, but over 500ftlb of torque?

Also a new M sport Fiesta is £400k

Rob
My rally car is 330bhp at 4200 and 435ftlbs at 3800, it runs out of puff at 6k though due to the restrictor.
Ive built a 2.6 for my Bug STI, that made 350/400 at 3500 on the running in map (actuator pressure) I'm just wating for the ecu to be sorted and she will be back on the dyno :-)
Old 05 November 2014 | 01:56 PM
  #92  
scoobymatto's Avatar
scoobymatto
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
From: Somerset
Default

This is mine from a recent drag event, Classic RB5 running a 2.1 with standard location GT30/76 at 550/520. looks to me to be around 3 seconds 0-60

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZXy...ature=youtu.be

Last edited by scoobymatto; 05 November 2014 at 02:34 PM.
Old 05 November 2014 | 02:13 PM
  #93  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Sounded like a gentle launch too matto.

Are these right guys?

Newage WRX Manual transmission gear ratios:
1st - 3.454
2nd - 1.947
3rd - 1.366
4th - 0.972
5th - 0.738
reverse - 3.333
final drive ratio - 3.90

Newage STI manual transmission gear ratios:
1st - 3.636
2nd - 2.375
3rd - 1.761
4th - 1.346
5th - 0.971
6th - 0.756
reverse - 3.545
final drive ratio - 3.90

STI even has a shorter reverse lol, looking at the gearing the STI must feel very rapid in 3rd. Somewhere between the extremes (1.560) would be nice :/
Old 05 November 2014 | 02:27 PM
  #94  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

My WRX



Tubby's STI



Can't be right? Most people say they get to around 45mph in 2nd in an STI.
Old 05 November 2014 | 02:34 PM
  #95  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

1994 WRX Jap gearbox

1st - 3.454
2nd - 2.062
3rd - 1.448
4th - 1.088
5th - 0.825

Save for 5th being a bit short that could be a great box if mine goes caput. Are those ratios specific to the 1994 model or all Classic WRX's?
Old 05 November 2014 | 02:43 PM
  #96  
fat-thomas's Avatar
fat-thomas
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 2
From: fawor's car wash
Default

Originally Posted by johnfelstead
Last years spec I had 473BHP and 540ftlb at 2BAR on Surrey Rolling Road's rollers.

This year I have a slightly different spec Twin Scroll turbo built by Owen Developments again. I haven't had it on SRR yet but I would expect based on the info I have that it will be about 485BHP and 510lbft when put on their rollers, but I am only running 1.8BAR at peak torque and 1.55BAR at Peak Power to produce that.

Owen now offer a stock position GT35 size turbo, which is what Graeme from Whiteline and Fred had on their cars in the sprint series this year. They are producing at least 180BHP more than I have.
with a top mount too
Old 05 November 2014 | 02:53 PM
  #97  
banny sti's Avatar
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,598
Likes: 22
From: Type R
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
My WRX



Tubby's STI



Can't be right? Most people say they get to around 45mph in 2nd in an STI.
UK STi does not have a redline of 8k, its 7.2k rpm
Old 05 November 2014 | 02:58 PM
  #98  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Originally Posted by banny sti
UK STi does not have a redline of 8k, its 7.2k rpm
I put in my limiter rpm for the WRX (changing point rather as I think the last mapper has increased it past 7600.) Is 8k the limiter on a Newage STI?
Old 05 November 2014 | 03:01 PM
  #99  
banny sti's Avatar
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 16,598
Likes: 22
From: Type R
Default

on the jdm's the limiter is 8200, think the uk's is 7.5k
Old 05 November 2014 | 03:02 PM
  #100  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Cheers fella.
Old 05 November 2014 | 03:11 PM
  #101  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Still seems way too fast. Not I'm hitting 69 in the WRX either. 59 maybe.



changing at 39, 60 and 81 must be a right challenge when you take power 100 bhp over stock levels!!
Old 05 November 2014 | 03:48 PM
  #102  
Maz's Avatar
Maz
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,884
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire.
Default

Originally Posted by banny sti
on the jdm's the limiter is 8200, think the uk's is 7.5k
8250.
Old 05 November 2014 | 04:22 PM
  #103  
scoobyJim2's Avatar
scoobyJim2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
From: welling,kent
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
My WRX

Tubby's STI

Can't be right? Most people say they get to around 45mph in 2nd in an STI.
Sti has to be in 3rd to hit 60mph
Old 05 November 2014 | 04:25 PM
  #104  
scoobyJim2's Avatar
scoobyJim2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
From: welling,kent
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
Still seems way too fast. Not I'm hitting 69 in the WRX either. 59 maybe.

changing at 39, 60 and 81 must be a right challenge when you take power 100 bhp over stock levels!!
My uk wagon does 69 in second
Old 05 November 2014 | 04:25 PM
  #105  
fat-thomas's Avatar
fat-thomas
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 2
From: fawor's car wash
Default

Originally Posted by scoobyJim2
Sti has to be in 3rd to hit 60mph
just ignore him most do.

the ratios and rev limiter etc arent even correct for my car, no idea why im involved as drag racing bores the hell out of me
Old 05 November 2014 | 04:39 PM
  #106  
FMJ's Avatar
FMJ
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2012
Posts: 980
Likes: 4
From: Salisbury
Default

Originally Posted by scoobyJim2
My uk wagon does 69 in second
Yeah 99/00 Uk turbo about the same.
Old 05 November 2014 | 04:45 PM
  #107  
fat-thomas's Avatar
fat-thomas
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 2
From: fawor's car wash
Default

Originally Posted by FMJ
Yeah 99/00 Uk turbo about the same.
just to point out that calculator is utter b0llocks look at the top speed in 6th
Old 05 November 2014 | 05:04 PM
  #108  
scoobyJim2's Avatar
scoobyJim2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
From: welling,kent
Default

Originally Posted by FMJ

Yeah 99/00 Uk turbo about the same.
I do prefer the long ratios of uk 5mt boxes.I had a 98/s-reg turbo 2000 that was the same.it was a very fast car for standard. I remember hitting rev limiter in 1st all the time because i couldn't change gear quick enough lol i did go from driving cavalier gsi to an impreza though! I've also had two wrx/import classics which had shorter gear ratios and no way near as fast as the uk cars I've owned. In fairness to the classic wrx's they were MY95 and subaru had upped the torque dramatically in 3rd gear by about MY97-98 models.
Old 05 November 2014 | 08:47 PM
  #109  
mickywrx's Avatar
mickywrx
Unmapped 12.4s @ 105
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,777
Likes: 4
From: Newcastle. 330bhp-289lb/ft @ 1bar boost - 12.4s @ 105mph
Post

Originally Posted by scoobyJim2
i did go from driving cavalier gsi to an impreza
Same here.
Old 05 November 2014 | 08:49 PM
  #110  
mickywrx's Avatar
mickywrx
Unmapped 12.4s @ 105
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,777
Likes: 4
From: Newcastle. 330bhp-289lb/ft @ 1bar boost - 12.4s @ 105mph
Post

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
1994 WRX Jap gearbox

1st - 3.454
2nd - 2.062
3rd - 1.448
4th - 1.088
5th - 0.825

Save for 5th being a bit short that could be a great box if mine goes caput. Are those ratios specific to the 1994 model or all Classic WRX's?
Wouldn't bother with an early TY752 box. They are very weak, I blew a few up. The ratio's aren't very good either, you go through the box quick, but, the speed you're doing isn't very high.
Old 05 November 2014 | 08:51 PM
  #111  
mickywrx's Avatar
mickywrx
Unmapped 12.4s @ 105
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,777
Likes: 4
From: Newcastle. 330bhp-289lb/ft @ 1bar boost - 12.4s @ 105mph
Post

Originally Posted by scoobyJim2
My uk wagon does 69 in second
My MY94 WRX does similar. It does have a late UK Turbo box fitted though.
Old 05 November 2014 | 08:53 PM
  #112  
mickywrx's Avatar
mickywrx
Unmapped 12.4s @ 105
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 11,777
Likes: 4
From: Newcastle. 330bhp-289lb/ft @ 1bar boost - 12.4s @ 105mph
Post

Originally Posted by mickywrx
Your 60' is slower than mine.

I asked Steven Darley, and the 1.7 is the 60 foot time.
Old 05 November 2014 | 09:19 PM
  #113  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Originally Posted by mickywrx
I asked Steven Darley, and the 1.7 is the 60 foot time.
b*****d.
Old 05 November 2014 | 09:21 PM
  #114  
scoobyJim2's Avatar
scoobyJim2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
From: welling,kent
Default

Originally Posted by mickywrx

Same here.
i used too love a chavalier,had a good handful of them over the years! And the astra gte's i never owned a turbo one though,the C20LET
Old 05 November 2014 | 09:24 PM
  #115  
Maz's Avatar
Maz
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,884
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire.
Default

They were good cars the Cavaliers, mk 3s anyway. The first time I drove an SRI it felt like a feckin rocketship!
Old 05 November 2014 | 09:25 PM
  #116  
scoobyJim2's Avatar
scoobyJim2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
From: welling,kent
Default

Originally Posted by mickywrx

My MY94 WRX does similar. It does have a late UK Turbo box fitted though.
I do like the uk ratios better. They're faster to about 80mph.
Old 05 November 2014 | 09:28 PM
  #117  
scoobyJim2's Avatar
scoobyJim2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,103
Likes: 0
From: welling,kent
Default

Originally Posted by Maz
They were good cars the Cavaliers, mk 3s anyway. The first time I drove an SRI it felt like a feckin rocketship!
They had 130bhp and it felt great! They was pretty torquey though! Now i have 320bhp and want more lol
Old 05 November 2014 | 09:35 PM
  #118  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

My mate Parry from up the road had a 326bhp Cav 4x4 with NOS 400bhp, good power at the time, think he ran 12's. Wish I know exactly '12 what' as he can't remember.



Originally Posted by fat-thomas
just ignore him most do.

the ratios and rev limiter etc arent even correct for my car, no idea why im involved as drag racing bores the hell out of me
Vaz: "How many drag races have you done Tubby?"
fat-thomas: "Thirty eight...





























































fat-thomas: ...simulated."

Last edited by RS_Matt; 07 November 2014 at 01:29 PM.
Old 05 November 2014 | 09:36 PM
  #119  
Maz's Avatar
Maz
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 15,884
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire.
Default

Originally Posted by RS_Matt
My mate Parry from up the road had a 326bhp Cav 4x4 with NOS, think he ran 12's. Wish I know exactly '12 what' as he can't remember.

He must have gone through a few transfer boxes.
Old 05 November 2014 | 09:41 PM
  #120  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Originally Posted by Maz
He must have gone through a few transfer boxes.
I'll ask him next time I see him. He sold it and got a 2.0 converted Corsa then just seemed to calm own over night and got a Vectra.

Shame because he was pretty serious with his modding.


Quick Reply: What mods required for sub 3 sec 0-60



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:23 PM.