Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Save the Children staff furious over ‘global legacy’ award for Tony Blair

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28 November 2014, 10:55 AM
  #31  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Islamism's the problem, not aggressive liberalism. The Arab Spring was hijacked by Islamists.
Old 28 November 2014, 11:27 AM
  #32  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
In your opinion which is not fact despite what your ego tells you!



Whereas your 'it would have happened anyway' (well actually it's 'it would of (sic) happened anyway' according to you ) statement is based on you being an apologist and a bit of a egotistical ****!



Where have I tried to rewrite history? You made a statement that is clearly nonsense and I suggested otherwise. If I had said the illegal invasion of Iraq was a roaring success... that would be rewriting history. Pull me up all you want, but don't stoop to putting words in my mouth that I have clearly not said!
So to be clear, you are suggesting that Bush would not have invaded Iraq if the UK were not on board?

I can't see what logic you are following

Last edited by Martin2005; 28 November 2014 at 11:28 AM.
Old 28 November 2014, 11:31 AM
  #33  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JTaylor
Islamism's the problem, not aggressive liberalism. The Arab Spring was hijacked by Islamists.
the problem is a toxic mix of poverty, ignorance and backward tribalism,
Old 28 November 2014, 11:38 AM
  #34  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
the problem is a toxic mix of poverty, ignorance and backward tribalism,
Agreed, and it's given birth to Islamism which is a by-product of Islam which led to and was born out of poverty, ignorance and tribalism. They're not, in my view, independent of one another, rather they're corrosively symbiotic.
Old 28 November 2014, 12:00 PM
  #35  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
So to be clear, you are suggesting that Bush would not have invaded Iraq if the UK were not on board?

I can't see what logic you are following
I already suggested what may have happened in a different scenario a few posts back!
Old 28 November 2014, 12:09 PM
  #36  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
I already suggested what may have happened in a different scenario a few posts back!
So that's your answer is it?

So no matter how unlikely your scenario was, you are calling my argument, which is based upon the facts as they were at the time 'bollocks' and 'apologist'?

Kind of difficult to argue against that kind of pigheadedness
Old 28 November 2014, 12:19 PM
  #37  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
So that's your answer is it?

So no matter how unlikely your scenario was, you are calling my argument, which is based upon the facts as they were at the time 'bollocks' and 'apologist'?

Kind of difficult to argue against that kind of pigheadedness
Martin, when you learn to stop confusing your opinion with fact then we can have a sensible discussion. Until then this is pointless. I am genuinely unsure whether you are deliberately misinterpreting the angle of the discussion here or whether you have developed a 'thick' gene like half of the posters here!
Old 28 November 2014, 12:27 PM
  #38  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
Martin, when you learn to stop confusing your opinion with fact then we can have a sensible discussion. Until then this is pointless. I am genuinely unsure whether you are deliberately misinterpreting the angle of the discussion here or whether you have developed a 'thick' gene like half of the posters here!
Not sure it's me that has misinterpreted anything. I was originally responding to the point that 'if it wasn't for Blair Iraq wouldn't be the mess it is'.
My point (again), the US were going to invade Iraq regardless. That really isn't speculative, it's the logical argument based upon the politics of the US in the early 2000s. Not to mention statements by senior neo-con members of the Bush administration.
Amongst the neo-cons Blair was actually quite unpopular as he was seen as someone slowing down the invasion,. The most clear example of this was Cheney's frustration at Blair for insisting they went through the UN. Again this isn't speculation, it is well documented fact.
Old 28 November 2014, 12:31 PM
  #39  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The invasion could have led to many duffernt scenarios for the future of the country. Sadly Blair and Bush were more interested in grabbing short term glory for themselves than thinking how best to approach the whole situation.
Old 28 November 2014, 12:36 PM
  #40  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
The invasion could have led to many duffernt scenarios for the future of the country. Sadly Blair and Bush were more interested in grabbing short term glory for themselves than thinking how best to approach the whole situation.
It was Islamism that destroyed post-Saddam Iraq, Chris.
Old 28 November 2014, 01:40 PM
  #41  
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Nothing to do with basic rivalry Sunni v Shai?
Old 28 November 2014, 01:48 PM
  #42  
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
JTaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
Nothing to do with basic rivalry Sunni v Shai?
Yes, certainly sectarian, a promotion of one branch of Islam over another, both with Islamist groups tearing down any hope of a pluralistic society.

Last edited by JTaylor; 28 November 2014 at 01:57 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
61
11 January 2021 03:08 PM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
55
05 August 2018 07:02 AM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
7
14 December 2015 08:16 AM
dpb
Non Scooby Related
14
03 October 2015 10:37 AM
mmcw
Computer & Technology Related
1
25 September 2015 10:18 PM



Quick Reply: Save the Children staff furious over ‘global legacy’ award for Tony Blair



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:48 AM.