Top Gear - 2015 New Series
#393
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pottering around ...
Posts: 3,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Your better off just ignoring him ...
This place is going downhill fast .......
#394
Scooby Regular
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
but personally I would much rather these sorts of posts stand, for all sorts of reasons
not least so people can see what views others hold
obviously I was not personally offended, because I am not a "spade" or a woman - but I can imagine others would be
I believe in openness and hence people should be allowed to post this nonsense - but they should be held up to be ridiculed - by removing it, imo they have gained a little victory
just my thoughts on it
#396
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
sure, I understand
but personally I would much rather these sorts of posts stand, for all sorts of reasons
not least so people can see what views others hold
obviously I was not personally offended, because I am not a "spade" or a woman - but I can imagine others would be
I believe in openness and hence people should be allowed to post this nonsense - but they should be held up to be ridiculed - by removing it, imo they have gained a little victory
just my thoughts on it
but personally I would much rather these sorts of posts stand, for all sorts of reasons
not least so people can see what views others hold
obviously I was not personally offended, because I am not a "spade" or a woman - but I can imagine others would be
I believe in openness and hence people should be allowed to post this nonsense - but they should be held up to be ridiculed - by removing it, imo they have gained a little victory
just my thoughts on it
Last edited by f1_fan; 16 March 2015 at 11:09 AM.
#401
Scooby Regular
#403
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
RIP top gear,
http://onlymotors.com/top-gear-is-dead/
Roll on series one of full throttle on channel 4, with guess who lmao
http://onlymotors.com/top-gear-is-dead/
Roll on series one of full throttle on channel 4, with guess who lmao
#404
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yes, why did that happen?? I saw nothing offensively racist, homophobic or misogynist on this thread but there was a post where JC and his co-presenters were mocked for their bodies by someone, but that post (and a few more) seemed to have gone now. I'm just wondering whether JC and Co. RTM-ed, although they don't post in SN. Also, as JC himself is quite loose-tongued, I can't really see him complain tbh. I thought SN was quite liberal about all that, so what happened there?? I don't get it.
JC's 'pikey' insult has been ruled out by the BBC. I'm just thinking whether it may mean that he would be back on the job, as the BBC hasn't lost total sympathy for him?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/me...-10112115.html
![Ponder2](images/smilies/ponder2.gif)
JC's 'pikey' insult has been ruled out by the BBC. I'm just thinking whether it may mean that he would be back on the job, as the BBC hasn't lost total sympathy for him?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/me...-10112115.html
#405
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pottering around ...
Posts: 3,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yes, why did that happen?? I saw nothing offensively racist, homophobic or misogynist on this thread but there was a post where JC and his co-presenters were mocked for their bodies by someone, but that post (and a few more) seemed to have gone now. I'm just wondering whether JC and Co. RTM-ed, although they don't post in SN. Also, as JC himself is quite loose-tongued, I can't really see him complain tbh. I thought SN was quite liberal about all that, so what happened there?? I don't get it.
JC's 'pikey' insult has been ruled out by the BBC. I'm just thinking whether it may mean that he would be back on the job, as the BBC hasn't lost total sympathy for him?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/me...-10112115.html
![Ponder2](images/smilies/ponder2.gif)
JC's 'pikey' insult has been ruled out by the BBC. I'm just thinking whether it may mean that he would be back on the job, as the BBC hasn't lost total sympathy for him?
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/me...-10112115.html
Is no one safe from the wrath of Clarkson ?
I wonder if he is gonna run for UKIP ?
#407
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
He's not as bad tbh. He's just a bit of a hot-headed idiot who acts on his impulse for a laugh. He's also much more intelligent than a lot of his watchers that idolise him. He makes money from gripping their naïve pulse while they just laugh their head off and sign petitions blindfolded. I bet he laughs at this phenomenon, and makes money and fame out of this publicity as well.
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#408
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Thumb](images/smilies/thumb.gif)
It really is dissapointing. Take for example 'The Gadget Show'. Many years ago that used to be a good watch but it started to turn really stupid and they tried to make it "funny". What is these days? Why do channels have to dumb-down programs? My only guess is to make it appeal more to a wider audience... not sure why they dumb things down in order to do this though
![Ponder2](images/smilies/ponder2.gif)
![Freak3](images/smilies/freak3.gif)
Last edited by LSherratt; 17 March 2015 at 02:40 PM.
#409
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
LOL your wife needs to get out a bit more.
I see nothing in your posts that mirrors Jeremy Clarkson. I've never seen you calling anyone a pikey because they had a private number plate, or saying that Mitsubishi is way better than Subaru.
You come across nothing like JC in your posts, well, apart from cheering him up as his dedicated follower.
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
You come across nothing like JC in your posts, well, apart from cheering him up as his dedicated follower.
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#410
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
I watch Sir Brian *** sometimes. He's cute. He speaks as if he's smiling
![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
Last edited by Turbohot; 17 March 2015 at 08:31 PM. Reason: Second time, for correcting Kyle's spelling. :brickwall
#411
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
obviously I was not personally offended, because I am not a "spade" or a woman - but I can imagine others would be
I believe in openness and hence people should be allowed to post this nonsense - but they should be held up to be ridiculed - by removing it, imo they have gained a little victory
just my thoughts on it
Someone has just sent me a screenshot of that post, and I can see that it didn't just contain the comments on the TG presenters' body but also the offensive ridicule for certain sections of the society. That post was quite out of order, actually. It should have been left here, to offer an open opportunity for a public ridicule of that poster here.
#412
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Not the Wild West
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#414
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
LOL your wife needs to get out a bit more.
I see nothing in your posts that mirrors Jeremy Clarkson. I've never seen you calling anyone a pikey because they had a private number plate, or saying that Mitsubishi is way better than Subaru.
You come across nothing like JC in your posts, well, apart from cheering him up as his dedicated follower.![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
You come across nothing like JC in your posts, well, apart from cheering him up as his dedicated follower.
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#415
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
I totally agree. I mean, 100%.
Someone has just sent me a screenshot of that post, and I can see that it didn't just contain the comments on the TG presenters' body but also the offensive ridicule for certain sections of the society. That post was quite out of order, actually. It should have been left here, to offer an open opportunity for a public ridicule of that poster here.
Someone has just sent me a screenshot of that post, and I can see that it didn't just contain the comments on the TG presenters' body but also the offensive ridicule for certain sections of the society. That post was quite out of order, actually. It should have been left here, to offer an open opportunity for a public ridicule of that poster here.
#417
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Don't be silly, and let bygones be bygones. You two are like bunch of wimmins interested in gossip!
Oh, sh7t! Have I just been misogynistic?
Vape it, vape it!
PS: Don't take above^ in Jonathan Ross's accent, by the way.
Or I'll be in deeper trouble than the one whose post got vaped before. ![Frown](images/smilies/frown.gif)
![Mad](images/smilies/mad.gif)
Oh, sh7t! Have I just been misogynistic?
![EEK!](images/smilies/eek.gif)
![Brickwall](images/smilies/brickwall.gif)
Vape it, vape it!
PS: Don't take above^ in Jonathan Ross's accent, by the way.
![Nono](images/smilies/nono.gif)
![Frown](images/smilies/frown.gif)
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#419
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Just noticed that in my post #410 the surname of Dr. Brian *** reads as starred i.e. ***, if you aren't logged in. Same happens with Ed *****' surname here on SN. That's very strange, as neither ***** nor *** are swear words, as we know. If they were, why would they have them as their surnames, eh? I wonder is Sandra Bullock's surname also comes up as all starred for non-logged readers. I shall log off to check that.