Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

ISIS sinks to new depths of depravity

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04 February 2015, 12:11 PM
  #61  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
Theres Muslims the world over , they're not all intent on enforcing sharia
IIRC a recent poll of young British Muslims revealed that 40% want sharia law.
Old 04 February 2015, 12:17 PM
  #62  
Maz
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (34)
 
Maz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Yorkshire.
Posts: 15,884
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
IIRC a recent poll of young British Muslims revealed that 40% want sharia law.
So 60% don't.
Old 04 February 2015, 12:21 PM
  #63  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
The vast majority were killed by extremists, yet you failed even mention this.
No they weren't, you need to read beyond the Western propaganda machine.
Old 04 February 2015, 12:22 PM
  #64  
f1_fan
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
f1_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: .
Posts: 20,035
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
IIRC a recent poll of young British Muslims revealed that 40% want sharia law.
Poll conducted by the EDL?
Old 04 February 2015, 12:23 PM
  #65  
Jamie
Super Muppet
 
Jamie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Inside out
Posts: 33,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neil-h
How can you beat an ideology? Guns and bombs certaintly aren't the answer.
Killing the ideology In the heart will work ie troops the kurds are getting there.
Old 04 February 2015, 12:25 PM
  #66  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Maz
So 60% don't.
That doesn't make 60% secularists. They may just not advocate Sharia law outside of Muslim lands, or they make be indifferent or apathetic.
Old 04 February 2015, 12:26 PM
  #67  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by f1_fan
No they weren't, you need to read beyond the Western propaganda machine.
Who were they killed by then?
Old 04 February 2015, 12:34 PM
  #68  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,642
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by An0n0m0us
You aren't taking into consideration that Bashad's chemical stock pile was/is real and now at leat some if not most of it is in the hands of ISIS. That is fact, not debatable iffy inteligence on whether it exists or not like Saddam's WMD's were. The only question on that fact now is how capable are ISIS in making use of it hence the active operations against their known recruited chemical weapons engineers, the main one who has already been killed by a drone strike. They aren't going after them for nothing, there is a credible threat there and any chemical weapons developed will be used on foreign soil as they have no need for it on home turf.

How long does the World sit back and wait before it gets bad enough to go in and take more proactive action against them? Wait for that very terrorist attack to happen? Won't there then be cries of why wasn't something done sooner?

ISIS may not be in one place or a conventional army wearing a uniform complying with the Geneva Convention however it is known where their strongholds are, where there main bases of operations are and these need destroying and air strikes aren't being effective enough. What do you do then, just sit back and let them continue doing what they are doing and expanding further and further afield allowing them to increase in power and size?

They should have been crushed before they ever got this big and the World sat back and let them grow, letting them continue to do so in my opinion is a huge misjudgement.
Any "evidence" to suggest IS is developing chemical weapons is based purely suppostion; Syria had chemical weapons IS is in Syria. There is no concrete evidence proving that they have in possession the Syrian chemical stockpile, knowledge of handling such chemicals/weapons and the capability and the capacity to make active and deliver such weapons. I'm pretty sure the western intelligence services have more information than we do as to whether they have such weapons and their ability to use them. Without credible and concrete evidence I would err on the side of caution and continue monitoring IS activities rather that committ our forces and this country to yet another costly and lengthy invasion on the pretext that they might have chemical weapons.

Last edited by jonc; 04 February 2015 at 12:37 PM.
Old 04 February 2015, 01:37 PM
  #69  
Jamie
Super Muppet
 
Jamie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Inside out
Posts: 33,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

We know what they have the intel says no chemical weapons saying that it's not hard to make them.
Old 04 February 2015, 01:55 PM
  #70  
Shaid
Scooby Regular
 
Shaid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a solution that would work.

Everyone join ISIS.

I mean everyone, even Jamal Taylor (born again ****) and Tony De Wonderful (bra salesman) to join ISIS. Even WarrenD (lol @ him) and Maz (master of Taqiyya according to Jamal).

Then change it from the inside. You know how all the immigrants have ruined being British. We can all do the same to ISIS
Old 04 February 2015, 02:00 PM
  #71  
Shaid
Scooby Regular
 
Shaid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tony de wonderful
IIRC a recent poll of young British Muslims revealed that 40% want sharia law.
What wrong with that? If 40% want sharia law then they can create a party and follow the democratic process to change to sharia law. This also means anyone else who wants to oppose it can do so.

It is the democratic process, sometimes you might not agree with people who choose to use it. That's moronic behaviour on your part.
Old 04 February 2015, 02:43 PM
  #72  
Devildog
Scooby Regular
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Away from this place
Posts: 4,430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Shaid
What wrong with that? If 40% want sharia law then they can create a party and follow the democratic process to change to sharia law. This also means anyone else who wants to oppose it can do so.

It is the democratic process, sometimes you might not agree with people who choose to use it. That's moronic behaviour on your part.
There's a fine line between the democratic process and opression Shaid, especially when it comes to radically changing the culture of an entire country.

I say country because Scotland would never let that **** go down, and I doubt very much Northern Ireland would either. Can't speak for the Welsh.

Before you know it it will be Palestine all over again and English Christians will all be forced to live in Cornwall under sanction, having to smuggle in non halal meat.

If 40% of young muslims want sharia law they can all f*ck off and live somewhere else.
Old 04 February 2015, 02:44 PM
  #73  
tony de wonderful
Scooby Regular
 
tony de wonderful's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 10,329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shaid
What wrong with that? If 40% want sharia law then they can create a party and follow the democratic process to change to sharia law. This also means anyone else who wants to oppose it can do so.

It is the democratic process, sometimes you might not agree with people who choose to use it. That's moronic behaviour on your part.
You'd have to change the constitution of a liberal democracy to go to Sharia law, since it violates all sorts of protections of minorities, separation of powers, separation of Church and state.

There is nothing to debate with people who see democracy as one vote once.
Old 04 February 2015, 02:44 PM
  #74  
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
neil-h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Berks
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jamie
Killing the ideology In the heart will work ie troops the kurds are getting there.
I think we've already covered why that won't work

Originally Posted by Shaid
I have a solution that would work.

Everyone join ISIS.

I mean everyone, even Jamal Taylor (born again ****) and Tony De Wonderful (bra salesman) to join ISIS. Even WarrenD (lol @ him) and Maz (master of Taqiyya according to Jamal).

Then change it from the inside. You know how all the immigrants have ruined being British. We can all do the same to ISIS
As much as I imagine that's fairly tongue in cheek, it's not a bad point.
Old 04 February 2015, 02:46 PM
  #75  
Jamie
Super Muppet
 
Jamie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Inside out
Posts: 33,364
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Shaid not sure what you are banging on about is that supposed to be funny?

Last edited by Jamie; 04 February 2015 at 02:47 PM.
Old 04 February 2015, 03:24 PM
  #76  
T25 DOC
Scooby Regular
 
T25 DOC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newark
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Devildog
There's a fine line between the democratic process and opression Shaid, especially when it comes to radically changing the culture of an entire country.

I say country because Scotland would never let that **** go down, and I doubt very much Northern Ireland would either. Can't speak for the Welsh.

Before you know it it will be Palestine all over again and English Christians will all be forced to live in Cornwall under sanction, having to smuggle in non halal meat.

If 40% of young muslims want sharia law they can all f*ck off and live somewhere else.




100% with you on this one fella
Old 04 February 2015, 03:34 PM
  #77  
An0n0m0us
Scooby Regular
 
An0n0m0us's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,600
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jonc
Any "evidence" to suggest IS is developing chemical weapons is based purely suppostion; Syria had chemical weapons IS is in Syria. There is no concrete evidence proving that they have in possession the Syrian chemical stockpile, knowledge of handling such chemicals/weapons and the capability and the capacity to make active and deliver such weapons. I'm pretty sure the western intelligence services have more information than we do as to whether they have such weapons and their ability to use them. Without credible and concrete evidence I would err on the side of caution and continue monitoring IS activities rather that committ our forces and this country to yet another costly and lengthy invasion on the pretext that they might have chemical weapons.
There is no supposition. Many of the military facilities in Northern Syria held stock piles of chemicals for use in the production of chemical weapons and those military facilities are now in the control of ISIS. They didn't suddenly evaporate as soon as ISIS took control of them. Their capacity to make use of those stock piles is dependant on the chemical weapons engineers they have working for them, one of whom was recently targetted and killed in a drone strike like I already said. They have these engineers working for them then they aren't playing chemistry sets with it are they? I think the drone strike targetting that one individual speaks enough about the concern the intelligence services have over what they know is happening on the chemical weapon front with ISIS.
Old 04 February 2015, 03:59 PM
  #78  
Shaid
Scooby Regular
 
Shaid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devildog
There's a fine line between the democratic process and opression Shaid, especially when it comes to radically changing the culture of an entire country.

I say country because Scotland would never let that **** go down, and I doubt very much Northern Ireland would either. Can't speak for the Welsh.

Before you know it it will be Palestine all over again and English Christians will all be forced to live in Cornwall under sanction, having to smuggle in non halal meat.

If 40% of young muslims want sharia law they can all f*ck off and live somewhere else.
Again, you are undermining the diplomatic process again. All that bile you just spouted is knee jerk at best. All this 'I'm ard and you can **** off' gives you the credibility only a complete ****wit would be proud of.

Moving on...

Tell me... What do you know about sharia law?

If tomorrow I wanted to make law stating that only cars with engines over 2500cc were allowed on the M6 I could start a campaign and party towards it and equally everyone else could vote against it. This IS how democracy and voting works.
Old 04 February 2015, 04:13 PM
  #79  
Blue by You
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (23)
 
Blue by You's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: In the fast lane
Posts: 3,458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shaid
Tell me... What do you know about sharia law?
I don't think anybody needs to know anything about Sharia law to know they want to be ruled by English Law Shaid.
Old 04 February 2015, 04:21 PM
  #80  
Devildog
Scooby Regular
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Away from this place
Posts: 4,430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Shaid
more idealistic crap and other pish


Last edited by Devildog; 04 February 2015 at 04:22 PM.
Old 04 February 2015, 04:23 PM
  #81  
Shaid
Scooby Regular
 
Shaid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devildog
Then why ****ing comment then?
Old 04 February 2015, 04:28 PM
  #82  
Devildog
Scooby Regular
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Away from this place
Posts: 4,430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

PS - and being quite blunt, you can take your Sharia Law and shove it up your ****.

According to the Sharia law:

• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above).
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah, the moon god of Islam is punishable by death.
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls' clitoris should be cut (per Muhammad's words in Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, but a man can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband's consent to divorce.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman's testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man's.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah - i.e., be Halal.
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
• The list goes on.


Not quite the same as having to avoid the M6 in your 1.6 Focus, is it?
Old 04 February 2015, 04:33 PM
  #83  
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Martin2005's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Type 25. Build No.34
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devildog
There's a fine line between the democratic process and opression Shaid, especially when it comes to radically changing the culture of an entire country.

I say country because Scotland would never let that **** go down, and I doubt very much Northern Ireland would either. Can't speak for the Welsh.

Before you know it it will be Palestine all over again and English Christians will all be forced to live in Cornwall under sanction, having to smuggle in non halal meat.

If 40% of young muslims want sharia law they can all f*ck off and live somewhere else.
This is such a red herring.
Old 04 February 2015, 04:36 PM
  #84  
Devildog
Scooby Regular
 
Devildog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Away from this place
Posts: 4,430
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
This is such a red herring.
FFS Martin, its Hyperbole.

For one, the Cornish would NEVER let the English settle there en mass.
Old 04 February 2015, 04:43 PM
  #85  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,642
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by An0n0m0us
There is no supposition. Many of the military facilities in Northern Syria held stock piles of chemicals for use in the production of chemical weapons and those military facilities are now in the control of ISIS. They didn't suddenly evaporate as soon as ISIS took control of them. Their capacity to make use of those stock piles is dependant on the chemical weapons engineers they have working for them, one of whom was recently targetted and killed in a drone strike like I already said. They have these engineers working for them then they aren't playing chemistry sets with it are they? I think the drone strike targetting that one individual speaks enough about the concern the intelligence services have over what they know is happening on the chemical weapon front with ISIS.
What Northern Syian chemical weapons facilities have been seized by IS? Do you have a source?

I stand by what I said, there is no evidence that IS has any credible chemical weapons capability. According to officials IS seized a chemical weapons facility northern Iraq last June and it that contained a stockpile of old,contaminated and difficult to move weapons that contained material that they believe not suitable to create a functional chemical weapon. The IS chemical engineer that was killed by a drone several hundreds of miles away in Mosul, Iraq, not Syria, was believed to be preparing chlorine gas bombs, nothing as deadly as sarin or other nerve agent or mustard gas. If IS do have these chemicals, then we need to see evidence first. The only people who are still using banned bombs and chemical attacks are Bashar al-Assad's forces where 330 Syrian civillians have been killed since the start of this year alone. But this has largely gone unnoticed with IS grabbing the headlines by the killing of Westerners.
Old 04 February 2015, 04:51 PM
  #86  
lozgti1
Scooby Regular
 
lozgti1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,916
Received 71 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

still don't know how anyone could saw someones head off :-(
Old 04 February 2015, 05:00 PM
  #87  
jonc
Scooby Regular
 
jonc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,642
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Decapitation is so last year, burning them in cages in the new thing to grab the headlines.
Old 04 February 2015, 05:06 PM
  #88  
lozgti1
Scooby Regular
 
lozgti1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 3,916
Received 71 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

I know this is the burning thread 'just not really seen anything so horrific as in all their methods.

Funny how you can be religious and yet prepared to undertake such barbaric acts :-(
Old 04 February 2015, 05:33 PM
  #89  
Shaid
Scooby Regular
 
Shaid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Devildog
PS - and being quite blunt, you can take your Sharia Law and shove it up your ****.

According to the Sharia law:

• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above).
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah, the moon god of Islam is punishable by death.
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls' clitoris should be cut (per Muhammad's words in Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, but a man can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband's consent to divorce.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman's testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man's.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah - i.e., be Halal.
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
• The list goes on.


Not quite the same as having to avoid the M6 in your 1.6 Focus, is it?
Well done. I mean scholars spend decades traveling the world and learning about Sharia however all that has been a waste. They should have logged onto SN where they would find a lund who hides behind the name devildog who publicly demonstrates he has **** all knowledge hence why he thinks bollocks copied from some anti muslamic site is what sharia is all about. Well done you.
Old 04 February 2015, 05:50 PM
  #90  
Shaid
Scooby Regular
 
Shaid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kwik
Is this another attempt at integration?
I take it we aren't friends then

I'm see you edited your comment. I am not guilty by association. ISIS don't represent me, they are part of me so **** em.... And **** anyone who sees guilt by association too!

Last edited by Shaid; 04 February 2015 at 05:52 PM.


Quick Reply: ISIS sinks to new depths of depravity



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:22 AM.