ISIS sinks to new depths of depravity
04 February 2015, 06:01 PM
#91
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: weymouth
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PS - and being quite blunt, you can take your Sharia Law and shove it up your ****.
According to the Sharia law:
• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above).
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah, the moon god of Islam is punishable by death.
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls' clitoris should be cut (per Muhammad's words in Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, but a man can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband's consent to divorce.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman's testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man's.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah - i.e., be Halal.
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
• The list goes on.
Not quite the same as having to avoid the M6 in your 1.6 Focus, is it?
According to the Sharia law:
• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above).
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah, the moon god of Islam is punishable by death.
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls' clitoris should be cut (per Muhammad's words in Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, but a man can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband's consent to divorce.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman's testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man's.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah - i.e., be Halal.
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
• The list goes on.
Not quite the same as having to avoid the M6 in your 1.6 Focus, is it?
A Muslim will not get the death penalty if he kills a non-Muslim, but will get it for killing a Muslim.
04 February 2015, 06:09 PM
#92
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.answering-christianity.com/laws_of_murder.htm
See item 6 for the correct answer.
If you want to learn about islam then do so through the correct channels not through bigoted articles.
If you couldn't care less then fine, however one should not spread falsehood
04 February 2015, 06:20 PM
#95
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Do you think the Palestinians never find any humour even thought they are terrorised daily? Do you think the Iraqis never found humour whilst their country was raped by a load of invaders?
You might see bullying as petty name calling however there are a million odd people out there who don't find it so petty.
04 February 2015, 06:36 PM
#96
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: weymouth
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Incorrect.
http://www.answering-christianity.co..._of_murder.htm
See item 6 for the correct answer.
If you want to learn about islam then do so through the correct channels not through bigoted articles.
If you couldn't care less then fine, however one should not spread falsehood
http://www.answering-christianity.co..._of_murder.htm
See item 6 for the correct answer.
If you want to learn about islam then do so through the correct channels not through bigoted articles.
If you couldn't care less then fine, however one should not spread falsehood
I personally have no problem what so ever with Muslims and their laws, obviously so long as incorporating Sharia into British law doesn't happen.
Imo the MSM have a lot to answer for in regards to the "Muslim hate" plaguing the west.
04 February 2015, 06:48 PM
#97
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My bad Shaid, no offence meant, admittedly I'm not clued up on sharia law, I found this on a quick google search.
I personally have no problem what so ever with Muslims and their laws, obviously so long as incorporating Sharia into British law doesn't happen.
Imo the MSM have a lot to answer for in regards to the "Muslim hate" plaguing the west.
I personally have no problem what so ever with Muslims and their laws, obviously so long as incorporating Sharia into British law doesn't happen.
Imo the MSM have a lot to answer for in regards to the "Muslim hate" plaguing the west.
Mehdi Hassan made a comment once in a speech at the Oxford Union. He stated there is no one book about sharia law. It really is a deep subject and incorporates a lot. I'm not clued up enough about it to lecture but I do know that a lot of what is spread is nothing more than hate.
Anyway back to ISIS now...
Ps - who is MSM?
04 February 2015, 06:52 PM
#98
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: weymouth
Posts: 995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No offence taken or intended and to be fair I like it as it is. Okay we need some improvements over certain laws however there are much worse places to be. At least if you are poor in Britain you can still ultise the law and get justice.
Mehdi Hassan made a comment once in a speech at the Oxford Union. He stated there is no one book about sharia law. It really is a deep subject and incorporates a lot. I'm not clued up enough about it to lecture but I do know that a lot of what is spread is nothing more than hate.
Anyway back to ISIS now...
Ps - who is MSM?
Mehdi Hassan made a comment once in a speech at the Oxford Union. He stated there is no one book about sharia law. It really is a deep subject and incorporates a lot. I'm not clued up enough about it to lecture but I do know that a lot of what is spread is nothing more than hate.
Anyway back to ISIS now...
Ps - who is MSM?
04 February 2015, 08:09 PM
#99
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know if you are disgusted. You never come across that way and instead often your first comments on these sorts of subjects seems to be **** taking and never a mention of condemning the animals involved. Instead they are often digs at the British.
Hence my comment the other day when you said you attempt to integrate, but I replied that you often point the finger at the Brits instead, and you've proven my point.
As for the 1 million people who don't find name calling petty, are you meaning British Muslims?.
Hence my comment the other day when you said you attempt to integrate, but I replied that you often point the finger at the Brits instead, and you've proven my point.
As for the 1 million people who don't find name calling petty, are you meaning British Muslims?.
So then... Where was my British Dig in this thread then?
04 February 2015, 08:35 PM
#100
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, so racist taunts are more hurtful than being called fat, thin, short, spotty, lanky, ugly etc etc? - did I say that? Please stop making **** up.
If so, why?. Also if racist, or stereotypical taunts are so hurtful, why stereotype certain people yourself?
Your dig was about how immigrants had ruined being British.
If so, why?. Also if racist, or stereotypical taunts are so hurtful, why stereotype certain people yourself?
Your dig was about how immigrants had ruined being British.
04 February 2015, 08:52 PM
#101
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
However the names called have been very apt. Surely even you cannot deny that.
I get the message you're still upset over another topic now grow the **** up and move on. If you cannot handle a difference of opinion then frankly you need to grow up! In life people will have differences of opinion to you, accept it and move on. I also note you challenge nobody else over their stereotypes do you? Only me! Then you wonder why I have filed you under the '****' categorie
04 February 2015, 08:55 PM
#102
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
04 February 2015, 09:08 PM
#103
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which names, I'm not sure what you mean?.
I can handle a difference of opinion, do we have a difference of opinion over the OP? I'm disgusted over the actions of IS. I do genuinely hope you don't have a different opinion?
Stereotyping people is wrong in my opinion. Especially when the person doing it keeps crying about stereotyped themselves.
I can handle a difference of opinion, do we have a difference of opinion over the OP? I'm disgusted over the actions of IS. I do genuinely hope you don't have a different opinion?
Stereotyping people is wrong in my opinion. Especially when the person doing it keeps crying about stereotyped themselves.
Just remember to always have a sense of humour.
04 February 2015, 09:16 PM
#104
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which names, I'm not sure what you mean?.
I can handle a difference of opinion, do we have a difference of opinion over the OP? I'm disgusted over the actions of IS. I do genuinely hope you don't have a different opinion?
Stereotyping people is wrong in my opinion. Especially when the person doing it keeps crying about stereotyped themselves.
I can handle a difference of opinion, do we have a difference of opinion over the OP? I'm disgusted over the actions of IS. I do genuinely hope you don't have a different opinion?
Stereotyping people is wrong in my opinion. Especially when the person doing it keeps crying about stereotyped themselves.
I agree stereotyping is wrong. I will look out to see if you call up anyone else guilty of such a trait. If my expectation is wrong I will be very happy.
05 February 2015, 09:18 AM
#106
Scooby Regular
What Northern Syian chemical weapons facilities have been seized by IS? Do you have a source?
I stand by what I said, there is no evidence that IS has any credible chemical weapons capability. According to officials IS seized a chemical weapons facility northern Iraq last June and it that contained a stockpile of old,contaminated and difficult to move weapons that contained material that they believe not suitable to create a functional chemical weapon. The IS chemical engineer that was killed by a drone several hundreds of miles away in Mosul, Iraq, not Syria, was believed to be preparing chlorine gas bombs, nothing as deadly as sarin or other nerve agent or mustard gas. If IS do have these chemicals, then we need to see evidence first. The only people who are still using banned bombs and chemical attacks are Bashar al-Assad's forces where 330 Syrian civillians have been killed since the start of this year alone. But this has largely gone unnoticed with IS grabbing the headlines by the killing of Westerners.
I stand by what I said, there is no evidence that IS has any credible chemical weapons capability. According to officials IS seized a chemical weapons facility northern Iraq last June and it that contained a stockpile of old,contaminated and difficult to move weapons that contained material that they believe not suitable to create a functional chemical weapon. The IS chemical engineer that was killed by a drone several hundreds of miles away in Mosul, Iraq, not Syria, was believed to be preparing chlorine gas bombs, nothing as deadly as sarin or other nerve agent or mustard gas. If IS do have these chemicals, then we need to see evidence first. The only people who are still using banned bombs and chemical attacks are Bashar al-Assad's forces where 330 Syrian civillians have been killed since the start of this year alone. But this has largely gone unnoticed with IS grabbing the headlines by the killing of Westerners.
No there isn't any credible evidence they have functional chemical weapons and the means to deploy them but how do you think that credible evidence comes into being? Only through use of such a weapon can it actually be confirmed 100% that they have them. By then don't you think it's a little too late to question if they have them? You want to wait until they use chemical weapons before doing anything about it?
The fact they have the raw materials and have recruited chemical weapons engineers is clearly enough of a concern for the intelligence services to start using drone attacks to target these engineers. If they weren't a serious threat they wouldn't waste the resources targetting them.
With ISIS's track record on brutality and determination to cause the worst types of atrocities do you not think there's a very high probability that they are working towards producing chemical weapons? And whilst chlorine bombs may not be on the same level as sarin or mustard gas they are still lethal if made potent enough and lead to a horrific death for those it's used against.
Last edited by An0n0m0us; 05 February 2015 at 09:30 AM.
05 February 2015, 09:42 AM
#107
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I didn't say they were chemical weapons facilities and nor have I claimed anywhere that ISIS have control of any chemical weapons facilities. If you were to read it properly you would see I said they have control over Bashad's chemical stockpiles held at military facilities across Northern Syria.
No there isn't any credible evidence they have functional chemical weapons and the means to deploy them but how do you think that credible evidence comes into being? Only through use of such a weapon can it actually be confirmed 100% that they have them. By then don't you think it's a little too late to question if they have them? You want to wait until they use chemical weapons before doing anything about it?
The fact they have the raw materials and have recruited chemical weapons engineers is clearly enough of a concern for the intelligence services to start using drone attacks to target these engineers. If they weren't a serious threat they wouldn't waste the resources targetting them.
With ISIS's track record on brutality and determination to cause the worst types of atrocities do you not think there's a very high probability that they are working towards producing chemical weapons? And whilst chlorine bombs may not be on the same level as sarin or mustard gas they are still lethal if made potent enough and lead to a horrific death for those it's used against.
No there isn't any credible evidence they have functional chemical weapons and the means to deploy them but how do you think that credible evidence comes into being? Only through use of such a weapon can it actually be confirmed 100% that they have them. By then don't you think it's a little too late to question if they have them? You want to wait until they use chemical weapons before doing anything about it?
The fact they have the raw materials and have recruited chemical weapons engineers is clearly enough of a concern for the intelligence services to start using drone attacks to target these engineers. If they weren't a serious threat they wouldn't waste the resources targetting them.
With ISIS's track record on brutality and determination to cause the worst types of atrocities do you not think there's a very high probability that they are working towards producing chemical weapons? And whilst chlorine bombs may not be on the same level as sarin or mustard gas they are still lethal if made potent enough and lead to a horrific death for those it's used against.
05 February 2015, 10:15 AM
#108
Scooby Regular
Well done. I mean scholars spend decades traveling the world and learning about Sharia however all that has been a waste. They should have logged onto SN where they would find a lund who hides behind the name devildog who publicly demonstrates he has **** all knowledge hence why he thinks bollocks copied from some anti muslamic site is what sharia is all about. Well done you.
What part of that "bollocks" I admittedly cut and paste is, in fact, incorrect?
What you are catagorically failing to see is that the "democracy" argument you keep banging on about is only a valid one when it doesn't result in gross prejudices and inequalities. Perhaps you need to learn what democracy actually is.
Lets say UKIP get into power and hold a referrendum to deport all Muslims from the UK. Would you and all the other Muslims accept that and consider it fair just because 51% of people voting voted in favour of it?
I think not. Stop being such a persecuted hypocrite.
05 February 2015, 10:25 AM
#109
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, Shaid. Before I revert to "who gives a f*ck about what you have to say", I'll give you this opportunity.
What part of that "bollocks" I admittedly cut and paste is, in fact, incorrect?
What you are catagorically failing to see is that the "democracy" argument you keep banging on about is only a valid one when it doesn't result in gross prejudices and inequalities. Perhaps you need to learn what democracy actually is.
Lets say UKIP get into power and hold a referrendum to deport all Muslims from the UK. Would you and all the other Muslims accept that and consider it fair just because 51% of people voting voted in favour of it?
I think not. Stop being such a persecuted hypocrite.
What part of that "bollocks" I admittedly cut and paste is, in fact, incorrect?
What you are catagorically failing to see is that the "democracy" argument you keep banging on about is only a valid one when it doesn't result in gross prejudices and inequalities. Perhaps you need to learn what democracy actually is.
Lets say UKIP get into power and hold a referrendum to deport all Muslims from the UK. Would you and all the other Muslims accept that and consider it fair just because 51% of people voting voted in favour of it?
I think not. Stop being such a persecuted hypocrite.
05 February 2015, 10:39 AM
#110
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: I'll check my gps
Posts: 2,626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
05 February 2015, 10:45 AM
#111
Scooby Regular
I'll ask again Shaid, as you avoided the question.
What part of that "bollocks" I admittedly cut and paste is, in fact, incorrect?
05 February 2015, 11:00 AM
#112
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most of it. You want to learn about islam... Come over to gawaher.com and I'll be happy to debate. A subaru forum is not a place to learn of such things however I understand if you feel inadequate out of your comfort zone. It is a natural feeling. However please refrain from spreading lies, it makes you look rather daft.
05 February 2015, 11:05 AM
#113
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newark
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PS - and being quite blunt, you can take your Sharia Law and shove it up your ****.
According to the Sharia law:
• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above).
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah, the moon god of Islam is punishable by death.
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls' clitoris should be cut (per Muhammad's words in Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, but a man can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband's consent to divorce.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman's testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man's.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah - i.e., be Halal.
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
• The list goes on.
Not quite the same as having to avoid the M6 in your 1.6 Focus, is it?
According to the Sharia law:
• Theft is punishable by amputation of the right hand (above).
• Criticizing or denying any part of the Quran is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Muhammad is a prophet is punishable by death.
• Criticizing or denying Allah, the moon god of Islam is punishable by death.
• A Muslim who becomes a non-Muslim is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim who leads a Muslim away from Islam is punishable by death.
• A non-Muslim man who marries a Muslim woman is punishable by death.
• A man can marry an infant girl and consummate the marriage when she is 9 years old.
• Girls' clitoris should be cut (per Muhammad's words in Book 41, Kitab Al-Adab, Hadith 5251).
• A woman can have 1 husband, but a man can have up to 4 wives; Muhammad can have more.
• A man can unilaterally divorce his wife but a woman needs her husband's consent to divorce.
• A man can beat his wife for insubordination.
• Testimonies of four male witnesses are required to prove rape against a woman.
• A woman who has been raped cannot testify in court against her rapist(s).
• A woman's testimony in court, allowed only in property cases, carries half the weight of a man's.
• A female heir inherits half of what a male heir inherits.
• A woman cannot drive a car, as it leads to fitnah (upheaval).
• A woman cannot speak alone to a man who is not her husband or relative.
• Meat to be eaten must come from animals that have been sacrificed to Allah - i.e., be Halal.
• Muslims should engage in Taqiyya and lie to non-Muslims to advance Islam.
• The list goes on.
Not quite the same as having to avoid the M6 in your 1.6 Focus, is it?
Oooooush!!....lol....and I wonder why people wouldnt want it in the UK...... ultimately anybody that wants this in the UK - I ask why on earth live in the UK in the first place...??
05 February 2015, 11:12 AM
#114
Scooby Regular
Most of it. You want to learn about islam... Come over to gawaher.com and I'll be happy to debate. A subaru forum is not a place to learn of such things however I understand if you feel inadequate out of your comfort zone. It is a natural feeling. However please refrain from spreading lies, it makes you look rather daft.
Shaid, you called it "bollocks" so lets keep it here, rather than avoiding the issue yet again, shall we?
And as for coming over to the islamic forum, well thats hardly going to be neutral now, is it?
What exacty is it you are afraid of? Is it that some of your Sharia laws are, in fact, wholly unacceptable in the 21st century?
Line by line, what parts of that are factually incorrect, just so I can be "educated" and everyone here can be clear.
05 February 2015, 11:18 AM
#115
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Newark
Posts: 309
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'd like to be educated -I whole heartedly admit I know little about it - so as Devildog has asked, please share - a better understanding could avoid any misjudgement/assumptions.
Surely this is a perfect opportunity.......
Devildog - just a quick thing - the forum that Shaid has suggested is as far as I'm aware is not just Islamic - you'll find many other religions within that forum - although I believe the majority are Islamic.
Surely this is a perfect opportunity.......
Devildog - just a quick thing - the forum that Shaid has suggested is as far as I'm aware is not just Islamic - you'll find many other religions within that forum - although I believe the majority are Islamic.
Last edited by T25 DOC; 05 February 2015 at 11:29 AM.
05 February 2015, 11:35 AM
#116
Scooby Regular
I'd like to be educated -I whole heartedly admit I know little about it - so as Devildog has asked, please share - a better understanding could avoid any misjudgement/assumptions.
Surely this is a perfect opportunity.......
Devildog - just a quick thing - the forum that Shaid has suggested is as far as I'm aware is not just Islamic - you'll find many other religions within that forum - although I believe the majority are Islamic.
Surely this is a perfect opportunity.......
Devildog - just a quick thing - the forum that Shaid has suggested is as far as I'm aware is not just Islamic - you'll find many other religions within that forum - although I believe the majority are Islamic.
05 February 2015, 11:54 AM
#118
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,482
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Shaid, you called it "bollocks" so lets keep it here, rather than avoiding the issue yet again, shall we?
And as for coming over to the islamic forum, well thats hardly going to be neutral now, is it?
What exacty is it you are afraid of? Is it that some of your Sharia laws are, in fact, wholly unacceptable in the 21st century?
Line by line, what parts of that are factually incorrect, just so I can be "educated" and everyone here can be clear.
And as for coming over to the islamic forum, well thats hardly going to be neutral now, is it?
What exacty is it you are afraid of? Is it that some of your Sharia laws are, in fact, wholly unacceptable in the 21st century?
Line by line, what parts of that are factually incorrect, just so I can be "educated" and everyone here can be clear.
I take offence to you stating 'some of YOUR sharia laws'. Just like I would take offence at Mullah Omar telling me 'some of YOUR British laws'.
Anyway do you think discussing sharia law on SN is nuetral? I think not.
As I said outside your comfort zone you are nothing. Do not accuse me of avoiding th subject. I will discuss on the appropriate platform. All you want to know is that most of what you posted is BS don't you. Easy enough. Now as I said If you wish to discuss this come over. End of really.
05 February 2015, 11:57 AM
#119
I didn't say they were chemical weapons facilities and nor have I claimed anywhere that ISIS have control of any chemical weapons facilities. If you were to read it properly you would see I said they have control over Bashad's chemical stockpiles held at military facilities across Northern Syria.
No there isn't any credible evidence they have functional chemical weapons and the means to deploy them but how do you think that credible evidence comes into being? Only through use of such a weapon can it actually be confirmed 100% that they have them. By then don't you think it's a little too late to question if they have them? You want to wait until they use chemical weapons before doing anything about it?
The fact they have the raw materials and have recruited chemical weapons engineers is clearly enough of a concern for the intelligence services to start using drone attacks to target these engineers. If they weren't a serious threat they wouldn't waste the resources targetting them.
With ISIS's track record on brutality and determination to cause the worst types of atrocities do you not think there's a very high probability that they are working towards producing chemical weapons? And whilst chlorine bombs may not be on the same level as sarin or mustard gas they are still lethal if made potent enough and lead to a horrific death for those it's used against.
No there isn't any credible evidence they have functional chemical weapons and the means to deploy them but how do you think that credible evidence comes into being? Only through use of such a weapon can it actually be confirmed 100% that they have them. By then don't you think it's a little too late to question if they have them? You want to wait until they use chemical weapons before doing anything about it?
The fact they have the raw materials and have recruited chemical weapons engineers is clearly enough of a concern for the intelligence services to start using drone attacks to target these engineers. If they weren't a serious threat they wouldn't waste the resources targetting them.
With ISIS's track record on brutality and determination to cause the worst types of atrocities do you not think there's a very high probability that they are working towards producing chemical weapons? And whilst chlorine bombs may not be on the same level as sarin or mustard gas they are still lethal if made potent enough and lead to a horrific death for those it's used against.
What evidence do you have that IS have in control a chemical stockpile or even a stockpile of chemicals to make the most deadly and banned of chemical weapons? Under the UN Security Council's resolution in 2013, much of Syria's most deadly stockpile and equipment have been decommissioned or taken out of Syria and has been confirmed by the OPCW at the end of 2014. Therefore I would question IS's ability to get hold of such deadly chemicals, and if any exist in Syria, they would be hidden in the most secure locations away from the prying eyes of the UN Security Council and the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons. Unfortunately, because chlorine is not as deadly and not banned under international law, (Syria are still using this chemical on its own people), there will be no ground incursion to seize and destroy these weapons.
IS make no secret of the chemical weapons ambition and therefore all the intelligence agencies will be monitoring their activities very closely and will deal with the threat accordingly. The threat, however, as it currently stands is not enough to warrent a costly full scale military ground intervention that is likely to last several years. We tried that with the Talibans and Al-Qaeda and what did that acheive?
05 February 2015, 12:21 PM
#120
Scooby Regular
For which we have to take YOUR word.
I've done some research over the past couple of hours and you'd never guess, whilst what I posted is at the extreme end of Sharia law, it exists.
Aww diddums. Deal with it. I coped fine without offence being called a ***** (very mature of you Shaid, by the way 
)
And thats quite a telling comment. I'd not be offended about being told "some of YOUR Britsih laws" because they are the laws under which I live and I am happy to embrace and accept them. What is there for a British person to be offended about Shaid? So tell us, why would that offend YOU as a British person?
Oh, yeah, and and discussing it on an Islamic (to be 100% accurate) forum is going to be?? Lets add "dilusional" to "persecuted" and "hypocrite".
Your opinion of me is irrelevant Shaid. But I will accuse you of avoiding the subject for as long as you continue to do so. What I want to know is what parts of what I posted earlier are not part of Sharia Law?
Youve been given an opportunity to correct what you consider to be "sensasional bollox". Simply saying "most of it is BS" doesn't cut it.
You're avoiding the subject becase you cannot defend the indefensible.
"End of really" tells us all we need to know.
I've done some research over the past couple of hours and you'd never guess, whilst what I posted is at the extreme end of Sharia law, it exists.
I take offence to you stating 'some of YOUR sharia laws'. Just like I would take offence at Mullah Omar telling me 'some of YOUR British laws'.
) And thats quite a telling comment. I'd not be offended about being told "some of YOUR Britsih laws" because they are the laws under which I live and I am happy to embrace and accept them. What is there for a British person to be offended about Shaid? So tell us, why would that offend YOU as a British person?
Anyway do you think discussing sharia law on SN is nuetral? I think not.
As I said outside your comfort zone you are nothing. Do not accuse me of avoiding th subject. I will discuss on the appropriate platform. All you want to know is that most of what you posted is BS don't you. Easy enough. Now as I said If you wish to discuss this come over. End of really.
Youve been given an opportunity to correct what you consider to be "sensasional bollox". Simply saying "most of it is BS" doesn't cut it.
You're avoiding the subject becase you cannot defend the indefensible.
"End of really" tells us all we need to know.
Last edited by Devildog; 05 February 2015 at 12:30 PM.