Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Unemployment figures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16 May 2015, 11:53 AM
  #61  
Edmondo
Scooby Regular
 
Edmondo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Swindon
Posts: 1,171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Makes me smile reading people's views on CO2 etc when they drive decatted cars lol
Old 16 May 2015, 12:04 PM
  #62  
Chip
Scooby Regular
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

http://www.ukenergywatch.org/Electricity/Realtime

As you will see coal provides only 20% of our electricity needs now and will get less over the coming years as more solar and wind farms come on line.

Last edited by Chip; 16 May 2015 at 12:06 PM.
Old 16 May 2015, 02:26 PM
  #63  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

LOL, and when the wind doesn't blow and the sky is dark or cloudy?

What then?

Oh, powercuts, of course.
Old 16 May 2015, 05:08 PM
  #64  
dpb
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I know they make money out of us , but we run on a knife edge as it sometimes


So.......
Old 16 May 2015, 06:09 PM
  #65  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,342
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by borat52
There is an abundance of gas both in Russia, the middle east and the USA, and if we frack there will be an abundance of Gas here too. The reason Gas is favoured is becuase it's proven, cheap and its got far lower CO2 emmisions than coal. Clean coal at the moment is unproven anywhere in the world. As for capture, the German greens think a sudden release of stored CO2 is a bigger human health danger than pollution (sudden suffocation of people in the affected area)

Read the link below it's extremely interesting:
"Lignite emits far more CO2 than other fossil fuels — 1,100 grams per kilowatt-hour, compared to between 150 and 430 grams for natural gas. It is the main reason why German CO2 emissions have started rising"

http://e360.yale.edu/feature/on_the_...rty_coal/2769/
Lignite is the very low-grade brown coal that used to be open-cast mined in abundance mostly in the East of Germany. It bears little resemblance in either appearance or combustion efficiency to good quality deep-mined anthracite.
Old 16 May 2015, 07:32 PM
  #66  
borat52
Scooby Regular
 
borat52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by markjmd
Lignite is the very low-grade brown coal that used to be open-cast mined in abundance mostly in the East of Germany. It bears little resemblance in either appearance or combustion efficiency to good quality deep-mined anthracite.
The point I'm making is that anyone who holds Germany up as an example of clean energy has not read the facts. CO2 emmissions in Germany are increasing because of lignite coal, which they are using because they need fast and cheap generation due to committing to phasing out nuclear and the renewables they are experimenting with being an unknown quantity.


Your also point blank wrong about the CO2 from Anthracite (see below), and this is where the problem with these kind of discussion and policy comes from - if we just stick to the facts instead of what we want or think to be true then government policy would be much more congruent.

If we just switched all of our coal generation over to gas, this would probably reduce CO2 by more than all the renewables put together, and be far less costly.


Pounds of CO2 emitted per million Btu of energy for various fuels:

Coal (anthracite) 228.6
Coal (bituminous) 205.7
Coal (lignite) 215.4
Coal (subbituminous) 214.3
Diesel fuel & heating oil 161.3
Gasoline 157.2
Propane 139.0
Natural gas 117.0

http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=73&t=11
Old 16 May 2015, 07:34 PM
  #67  
borat52
Scooby Regular
 
borat52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
Where is this less carbon dioxide than coal coming from?

Natural gas is methane, a hydrocarbon, coal is the same, a hydrocarbon, although long-chain.
It comes from a fact of the way the Universe we live in works, this is the way it looks in table form, its a fact:

Pounds of CO2 emitted per million Btu of energy for various fuels:

Coal (anthracite) 228.6
Coal (bituminous) 205.7
Coal (lignite) 215.4
Coal (subbituminous) 214.3
Diesel fuel & heating oil 161.3
Gasoline 157.2
Propane 139.0
Natural gas 117.0
Old 16 May 2015, 08:03 PM
  #68  
dpb
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Oh well that's settled then , we'll just keep on using our natural gas up until the country is 1/8 covered in solar panels , im all for it
Old 16 May 2015, 10:05 PM
  #69  
borat52
Scooby Regular
 
borat52's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gloucestershire
Posts: 985
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
Oh well that's settled then , we'll just keep on using our natural gas up until the country is 1/8 covered in solar panels , im all for it
We're not using ours up, we're importing it through here, the biggest Liquified Gas port in Europe:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Hook_LNG_terminal
Would you seriously prefer to open the mines up, hope that the unemployed brits will go down and work in dirty and dangerous conditions for minimum wage, subsidised by the tax payer (because the coal they dig would not be competitive the open cast mines from Eastern Europe in price terms) and then we feed our power stations with it and pollute the air we breath?

I'd personally rather come up with something more hopeful than that, and I suspect that in reality the mines would be staffed by Eastern European migrants.


Solar is about to grind to a halt in the UK, no ones going to bother with it once the subsidies are pulled very soon. If the UK is serious about lowering carbon we're probably talking a complete switch to Gas in the short/medium term, and something like the Severn Barage (which should be a no brainer - it could produce 10-15% of the UK's total electricity requirement and the tide flows twice a day, every day), as well as facing up to the fact that zero carbon today can only be provided by Nuclear. Hopefully fusion will work some time in the next 100 years and then we've got no worries.
Old 16 May 2015, 10:21 PM
  #70  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by borat52
It comes from a fact of the way the Universe we live in works, this is the way it looks in table form, its a fact:

Pounds of CO2 emitted per million Btu of energy for various fuels:

Coal (anthracite) 228.6
Coal (bituminous) 205.7
Coal (lignite) 215.4
Coal (subbituminous) 214.3
Diesel fuel & heating oil 161.3
Gasoline 157.2
Propane 139.0
Natural gas 117.0

You say fact, I say, whose figures, where from?
Old 16 May 2015, 10:26 PM
  #71  
dpb
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

I think we've discovered the flip side to all that investment Tb Lair made in student numbers
Old 17 May 2015, 01:24 AM
  #72  
markjmd
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
markjmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 4,342
Received 70 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by borat52
The point I'm making is that anyone who holds Germany up as an example of clean energy has not read the facts. CO2 emmissions in Germany are increasing because of lignite coal, which they are using because they need fast and cheap generation due to committing to phasing out nuclear and the renewables they are experimenting with being an unknown quantity.


Your also point blank wrong about the CO2 from Anthracite (see below), and this is where the problem with these kind of discussion and policy comes from - if we just stick to the facts instead of what we want or think to be true then government policy would be much more congruent.

If we just switched all of our coal generation over to gas, this would probably reduce CO2 by more than all the renewables put together, and be far less costly.


Pounds of CO2 emitted per million Btu of energy for various fuels:

Coal (anthracite) 228.6
Coal (bituminous) 205.7
Coal (lignite) 215.4
Coal (subbituminous) 214.3
Diesel fuel & heating oil 161.3
Gasoline 157.2
Propane 139.0
Natural gas 117.0

http://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.cfm?id=73&t=11
The fact that lignite has a broadly similar CO2 output per BTU as other coals is one thing, the amount of effort and the complexity of technology required to get it to yield those BTUs without giving off much higher amounts of other (more toxic) pollutants is quite another.

As for sticking to the facts, don't those tell us that Germany's problems all started with its hasty decision to phase out nuclear?
Old 17 May 2015, 07:45 AM
  #73  
Chip
Scooby Regular
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
LOL, and when the wind doesn't blow and the sky is dark or cloudy?

What then?

Oh, powercuts, of course.
No, gas fired powered power stations would kick in obviously
Old 17 May 2015, 05:55 PM
  #74  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

With IMPORTED gas that thr Riussians sell us at top wack and can withold any time they like...or we **** them off.

Personally, I don't want to be in thrall to Putin. And you?

PS: any mention of fracking at this point loses you the argument, since it's pie in the sky........
Old 17 May 2015, 07:53 PM
  #75  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
With IMPORTED gas that thr Riussians sell us at top wack and can withold any time they like...or we **** them off.

Personally, I don't want to be in thrall to Putin. And you?

PS: any mention of fracking at this point loses you the argument, since it's pie in the sky........
What is pie in the sky about fracking

The science?, the water contamination issues?

Or simple politics
Old 17 May 2015, 08:08 PM
  #76  
dpb
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Do you see stock broker surrey being happy with this possible polluting of the water table ??
Old 17 May 2015, 08:12 PM
  #77  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
What is pie in the sky about fracking

The science?, the water contamination issues?

Or simple politics
The second two........it will be VERY unpopular and will depend on where it's done. As mentioned, Surrey etc won't allow it, the north of England will be fine

And, so far, there's none....nor a guarantee it will give us the gas we need.
Old 17 May 2015, 08:30 PM
  #78  
Chip
Scooby Regular
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
With IMPORTED gas that thr Riussians sell us at top wack ......
No, the LNG that comes into South Hook in West Wales
Old 17 May 2015, 08:49 PM
  #79  
dpb
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Well I never , African people are earning more than eastern europeans
Old 17 May 2015, 08:52 PM
  #80  
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
hodgy0_2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: K
Posts: 15,633
Received 21 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
Do you see stock broker surrey being happy with this possible polluting of the water table ??
Originally Posted by alcazar
The second two........it will be VERY unpopular and will depend on where it's done. As mentioned, Surrey etc won't allow it, the north of England will be fine

And, so far, there's none....nor a guarantee it will give us the gas we need.
Mmm, yes I tend to agree, a tough sell in the home counties, much like HS2

And most experts I have heard say it would not really reduce domestic energy prices
Old 17 May 2015, 10:32 PM
  #81  
Chip
Scooby Regular
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar

PS: any mention of fracking at this point loses you the argument, since it's pie in the sky........
Really.?

http://frack-off.org.uk/locations/
Old 17 May 2015, 10:44 PM
  #82  
Chip
Scooby Regular
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar

PS: any mention of fracking at this point loses you the argument, since it's pie in the sky........
Really.?

http://frack-off.org.uk/locations/
Old 18 May 2015, 11:58 AM
  #83  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

And it's happening on a large scale, actually paying off?

Thought not

Come back when it starts making a difference.

PS: those tankers arriving in Wales are but a small portion, most comes from Russia, or what used to be the USSR...afaik.

And you STILL seem happy that we import almost all our energy while sitting on 300 years' worth of coal? Mad.
Old 18 May 2015, 03:03 PM
  #84  
Chip
Scooby Regular
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar

PS: those tankers arriving in Wales are but a small portion, most comes from Russia, or what used to be the USSR...afaik.
I would hardly call supplying 20% of the UK's gas needs a small portion.

We currently receive LNG from Algeria, Egypt, Trinidad and Malaysia. Not mostly from Russia as you wrongly state.
Old 18 May 2015, 06:30 PM
  #85  
legb4rsk
Scooby Regular
 
legb4rsk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: If you're not braking or accelerating you're wasting time.
Posts: 2,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Chip
Sounds like a balanced site with no axe to grind.
Old 18 May 2015, 06:52 PM
  #86  
dpb
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
dpb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: riding the crest of a wave ...
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Trinidad ..!!!?
Old 18 May 2015, 08:33 PM
  #87  
Chip
Scooby Regular
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
Trinidad ..!!!?
6th biggest producer of LNG in the world.
Old 18 May 2015, 09:38 PM
  #88  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

OK, I give in, 20% is the majority.........

Welsh maths, makes about as much sense as their dead language.
Old 18 May 2015, 10:14 PM
  #89  
Chip
Scooby Regular
 
Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Location: Cardiff. Wales
Posts: 11,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alcazar
OK, I give in, 20% is the majority.........

Welsh maths, makes about as much sense as their dead language.
I was referring to one plant, south hook which was mentioned earlier in the thread, fact is 44%of our gas was imported in 2014.

As for the Welsh language, at least it stems from Brittonic or Celtish rather than the West germanic group that your English derives from. Not that anyone can understand the indecipherable ****e that you Northerners spout anyway
Old 19 May 2015, 09:12 AM
  #90  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

LOL...what's the Welsh for computer again?

At least my language is living, and, I'll have you know, the closest to Anglo Saxon is spoken around here.


Quick Reply: Unemployment figures



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:16 AM.