Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

P1 vs Type R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16 December 2015 | 12:22 PM
  #121  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by elgassi
Hehe this is a good thread

The type r looks nice but.............

The P1

best Impreza ever built
best looking Impreza
best colour Impreza
the rear spoiler has you coming just looking at it
the front end is classy like Gisele bundchen

The Type r
looks like Jordan, all T1Ts and a mole on top

open your minds, look at the 2 cars, you'd have to be stupid or blind to think the r was the better looking Impreza

P1 every day
and do the exact opposite on the mechainicals.

P1, the poser's type r
Old 16 December 2015 | 12:28 PM
  #122  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by johnaldridge101
Are people no longer entitled to their opinions?
yes of course your allowed your clueless opinions, doesn't mean we wont mock you for being wrong though.


Old 16 December 2015 | 12:30 PM
  #123  
johnaldridge101's Avatar
johnaldridge101
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: telford
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
and do the exact opposite on the mechainicals.

P1, the poser's type r
Yea, because everybody knows the P1 is slow as ****

Did the type R have man sized Alcon brakes? (Optional extra on P1

Wasn't the type R restricted to 112mph?
Old 16 December 2015 | 12:33 PM
  #124  
johnaldridge101's Avatar
johnaldridge101
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: telford
Default

Also speedometer in kph and trip/distance in kph

Which is really handy in the uk with mph being the unit of measurement.
Old 16 December 2015 | 12:33 PM
  #125  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by johnaldridge101
Yea, because everybody knows the P1 is slow as ****

Did the type R have man sized Alcon brakes? (Optional extra on P1

Wasn't the type R restricted to 112mph?
wasn't a free option was it it though? brembo GT were option in japan iirc but if you have to pay for it you can fit anything you want

where is there a road in the uk thats 112mph?

Type r gets to 70mph quicker than the p1 so is far better suited to having fun on uk roads without breaking the speed limit
Old 16 December 2015 | 12:34 PM
  #126  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by johnaldridge101
Also speedometer in kph and trip/distance in kph

Which is really handy in the uk with mph being the unit of measurement.
converter does that

But having to convert a speedo from km to m doesnt really have a negative affect ont he car does it

Bit of a strecth for making the p1 better isnt it? lol
Old 16 December 2015 | 12:43 PM
  #127  
johnaldridge101's Avatar
johnaldridge101
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: telford
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
converter does that

But having to convert a speedo from km to m doesnt really have a negative affect ont he car does it

Bit of a strecth for making the p1 better isnt it? lol
So you fit a converter, then have to explain to new buyers, half is in km half in m blah blah blah
Service history is all over the shop.

I have never once said that a P1 is the better car, each to their own, both cars were intended for completely different environments and markets.

Being an adult allows me to create an unbiased opinion of two or more objects and respect other people's opinions "no matter how retarded or wrong".
Old 16 December 2015 | 12:48 PM
  #128  
johnaldridge101's Avatar
johnaldridge101
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: telford
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
wasn't a free option was it it though? brembo GT were option in japan iirc but if you have to pay for it you can fit anything you want

where is there a road in the uk thats 112mph?

Type r gets to 70mph quicker than the p1 so is far better suited to having fun on uk roads without breaking the speed limit

Quick, you better get on the phone to all the car manufacturers and tell them they are all complete idiots, makings cars capable of doing over 70mph!!!!!! What are they playing at
Old 16 December 2015 | 12:52 PM
  #129  
johnaldridge101's Avatar
johnaldridge101
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: telford
Default

And then there is the whole argument of traveling at 70mph on the motorway.
TypeR higher revs, more strain on engine, running gear, lower fuel economy.
Old 16 December 2015 | 01:04 PM
  #130  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by johnaldridge101
Quick, you better get on the phone to all the car manufacturers and tell them they are all complete idiots, makings cars capable of doing over 70mph!!!!!! What are they playing at
you were the one who pointed out the lower unusable top speed
Old 16 December 2015 | 01:06 PM
  #131  
johnaldridge101's Avatar
johnaldridge101
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: telford
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
you were the one who pointed out the lower unusable top speed

Yes, and?

It may come in use on a race track

Last edited by johnaldridge101; 16 December 2015 at 01:07 PM.
Old 16 December 2015 | 01:07 PM
  #132  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by johnaldridge101
And then there is the whole argument of traveling at 70mph on the motorway.
TypeR higher revs, more strain on engine, running gear, lower fuel economy.
see you were doing well, then you mentioned fuel economy

i know lets buy a performance car and worry about mpg

given the mpg isnt that different, your sacrificing alot of the performance parts to use a bit less fuel, which is still not great mpg

o dear o dear, do you dress up for your p1?

Old 16 December 2015 | 01:10 PM
  #133  
johnaldridge101's Avatar
johnaldridge101
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: telford
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
see you were doing well, then you mentioned fuel economy

i know lets buy a performance car and worry about mpg

given the mpg isnt that different, your sacrificing alot of the performance parts to use a bit less fuel, which is still not great mpg

o dear o dear, do you dress up for your p1?

Soooooo, you would be happy to fuel a car that only does 1mpg??

Or 1.6km per gallon so not to confuse your metric gauges.

A lot of performance parts??? Only thing different is the drive train, performance wise.

Last edited by johnaldridge101; 16 December 2015 at 01:18 PM.
Old 16 December 2015 | 01:17 PM
  #134  
johnaldridge101's Avatar
johnaldridge101
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: telford
Default

Where as, if you could fit a converter to a type R speedo and it be perfectly fine. What's stopping me fitting a 6speed DCCD box and all associated parts, then my P1 will be "better" than every typeR ever made!!!!!!!!
Old 16 December 2015 | 01:20 PM
  #135  
MattyB1983's Avatar
MattyB1983
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,716
Likes: 46
From: Around
Default

Originally Posted by johnaldridge101
As said earlier in the thread, Subaru wouldn't allow prodrive to remap the cars ( I'm unsure if this is true )
But as with the type r, you'd be a fool to even attempt high boost driving on standard fuel.
Why would Subaru not allow Prodrive to map the cars when they allowed them to map other imprezas ??

The type R wasn't designed to use UK fuel so holding that against it doesn't wash.
The P1 was developed to be the UK's version of a type R so deciding to use briquettes in the tank rather than writing a proper map for the car was a mistake in the cars development imo.
Old 16 December 2015 | 01:22 PM
  #136  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by johnaldridge101
Soooooo, you would be happy to fuel a car that only does 1mpg??

Or 1.6km per gallon so not to confuse your metric gauges.

A lot of performance parts??? Only thing different is the drive train
which is the gearbox ratios, diffs (R160 vs R180), drive shafts, hubs, suspension, dccd, factory rear tints, intercooler water spray, different rear brakes, No abs, air con not climate control,

actualy quite a bit when you list it

Dude, you bought the wrong car!!!
Old 16 December 2015 | 01:23 PM
  #137  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by MattyB1983
Why would Subaru not allow Prodrive to map the cars when they allowed them to map other imprezas ??

The type R wasn't designed to use UK fuel so holding that against it doesn't wash.
The P1 was developed to be the UK's version of a type R so deciding to use briquettes in the tank rather than writing a proper map for the car was a mistake in the cars development imo.
yeah, rare to find any on 60k+ with the original engine in.

So P1's are not only lower spec but also less reliable than a Type R
Old 16 December 2015 | 01:26 PM
  #138  
johnaldridge101's Avatar
johnaldridge101
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: telford
Default

Originally Posted by MattyB1983
Why would Subaru not allow Prodrive to map the cars when they allowed them to map other imprezas ??

The type R wasn't designed to use UK fuel so holding that against it doesn't wash.
The P1 was developed to be the UK's version of a type R so deciding to use briquettes in the tank rather than writing a proper map for the car was a mistake in the cars development imo.
I don't know why Subaru wouldn't let them but seems feasible, I would like to think prodrive would rather remap than use briquetts.

High octane fuel is available in the U.K so it is hardly a negative point against the P1 like most people point it out to be.
Companies like millers and redex make a lot of money making octane boosters.
Old 16 December 2015 | 01:28 PM
  #139  
johnaldridge101's Avatar
johnaldridge101
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: telford
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
yeah, rare to find any on 60k+ with the original engine in.

So P1's are not only lower spec but also less reliable than a Type R
TypeR are lower spec than a P1 in that case then.

Lower spec than many UK2000's
Old 16 December 2015 | 01:32 PM
  #140  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by johnaldridge101
I don't know why Subaru wouldn't let them but seems feasible, I would like to think prodrive would rather remap than use briquetts.

High octane fuel is available in the U.K so it is hardly a negative point against the P1 like most people point it out to be.
Companies like millers and redex make a lot of money making octane boosters.
whent he engines fail then its a pretty huge negative point
Old 16 December 2015 | 01:33 PM
  #141  
johnaldridge101's Avatar
johnaldridge101
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: telford
Default

Originally Posted by johnaldridge101
TypeR are lower spec than a P1 in that case then.

Lower spec than many UK2000's
It's rare to fine ANY Impreza's that haven't had a rebuild.

Considering your all against the P1 you seem to know a lot about them, the condition, market value, average miles covered.
Perhaps a little bit of envy or secret affection towards them that you have to hide it behind all this "hatred" and stubbornness.

Old 16 December 2015 | 01:33 PM
  #142  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by johnaldridge101
TypeR are lower spec than a P1 in that case then.

Lower spec than many UK2000's
If you go on ABS alone then yes, go on the whole thing and then the P1 is a much lower spec performance car
Old 16 December 2015 | 01:34 PM
  #143  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by johnaldridge101
It's rare to fine ANY Impreza's that haven't had a rebuild.

Considering your all against the P1 you seem to know a lot about them, the condition, market value, average miles covered.
Perhaps a little bit of envy or secret affection towards them that you have to hide it behind all this "hatred" and stubbornness.


more to do with a case of trying to understand the limited mentality of those that claim the P1 is better

Old 16 December 2015 | 01:41 PM
  #144  
johnaldridge101's Avatar
johnaldridge101
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: telford
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
more to do with a case of trying to understand the limited mentality of those that claim the P1 is better

Same here, at this moment in time I am also perplexed at the narrow mindedness that could lead anyone into thinking the P1 is inferior to a typeR.

Apart from the point mentioned previously (your a secret admirer) which is totally ok, you don't have to hide it and pretend in front of all your mates. I mean Gay marriage is now legal, so a typeR owner actually liking a P1 is not going to result in chemical castration.
Old 16 December 2015 | 01:44 PM
  #145  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Originally Posted by johnaldridge101
Same here, at this moment in time I am also perplexed at the narrow mindedness that could lead anyone into thinking the P1 is inferior to a typeR.

Apart from the point mentioned previously (your a secret admirer) which is totally ok, you don't have to hide it and pretend in front of all your mates. I mean Gay marriage is now legal, so a typeR owner actually liking a P1 is not going to result in chemical castration.
It's pretty simple, take a performance car (in this case the Type R), remove a load of the performance enhancing components, tart it it up with some stick on bits (halfords here we come) and call it a 'special' edition and some deluded fool will think its better.
Old 16 December 2015 | 01:47 PM
  #146  
johnaldridge101's Avatar
johnaldridge101
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: telford
Default


Just

Can't

Get

Any

Sense

Have you written to the CEO of Subaru and told him he fcuked up?
Old 16 December 2015 | 01:50 PM
  #147  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

Not at all, he's made more money from P1's than type r's because of people buying them cos they is 'special', so fair play to him.



Old 16 December 2015 | 01:50 PM
  #148  
johnaldridge101's Avatar
johnaldridge101
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: telford
Default

I have noticed all the other Impreza JDM car owners don't hate on the prodrive version of the same cars (often they are differently spec'd)

So again I'm lead to thinking it is just childish jealousy.
Old 16 December 2015 | 02:00 PM
  #149  
johnaldridge101's Avatar
johnaldridge101
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: telford
Default

Originally Posted by Tidgy
It's pretty simple, take a performance car (in this case the Type R), remove a load of the performance enhancing components, tart it it up with some stick on bits (halfords here we come) and call it a 'special' edition and some deluded fool will think its better.
The problem is it's not a Special edition. It's just a P1.

Very much like the RB5, terzo, cataluna blah blah blah, should all of these cars be treated the same as a P1?
Old 16 December 2015 | 02:05 PM
  #150  
ScoobP1's Avatar
ScoobP1
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Default

P1 all day every day for me.

Just reading through the posts makes me laugh, it all about opinions! Thats what makes life interesting.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:20 AM.