Show me your sc46 on a 2.0
#32
#34
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 30
From: The 2dr club
I'm a big fan of those precision units, they are a great turbo I agree. I also agree that the 46 was designed for the 2.5 engine. The precision was also designed for the larger engines.
To be honest irrespective of figures every single one of those graphs looks laggy as hell! None of those would be great on the road.
Not gonna lie, now I've seen a 46 on 2.0 I don't think it's a good option, but neither is that precision
Surely to get to achieve your 450bhp target there are much better options out there?
To be honest irrespective of figures every single one of those graphs looks laggy as hell! None of those would be great on the road.
Not gonna lie, now I've seen a 46 on 2.0 I don't think it's a good option, but neither is that precision
Surely to get to achieve your 450bhp target there are much better options out there?
If my car goes bang, I've still go a turbo that I could achieve 550+ on a built block with meth.
From what I've gathered though is, the PT sits in the middle of 42 and 46 IMO.
Look at the power it makes at 4500rpm compared to 46.
And I do like to be different in trying a less popular/newish turbo to subarus and see how it goes.
And if I'm not happy, i won't be shy to say, yes you told me so.
P.s the price on pt from a certain supplier I've found is also encouraging
#38
#39
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 30
From: The 2dr club
As they say, if you've got lag, you're in the wrong gear.
That's the old units I belive
#40
#41
Looks very laggy to me? From what you posted before would the turbo dynamics unit be better suited?
Also just looked atmy graph, and I'm makingdouble the hp at. 4k rpm on a larger turbo!
Also just looked atmy graph, and I'm makingdouble the hp at. 4k rpm on a larger turbo!
Last edited by JGlanzaV; 09 November 2015 at 07:00 PM.
#42
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 30
From: The 2dr club
If so, the t36 I have been waiting well over 2months now for them to be revised with oil seal sorted and BB upgrade.
But it's getting very tiresome waiting.
But apparently they are testing them as we speak and should be with ET this week.
Well, I'm not holding my hopes up as been waiting a while already, but if it does arrive with et this week then I will buy it. That turbo should easily make 450+ with meth and would be ideal for the price.
Last edited by bustaMOVEs; 09 November 2015 at 07:09 PM.
#44
#48
T38 (s206) turbo dynamics.
2.1. Standard heads etc.
There are a couple of 2.0graphs around. Baring in mind mine is a 500hp turbo, and comparing that to the sc46 it is much more responsive.
The t36 is going tobe a good unit, let's just hope. They come out soon!
2.1. Standard heads etc.
There are a couple of 2.0graphs around. Baring in mind mine is a 500hp turbo, and comparing that to the sc46 it is much more responsive.
The t36 is going tobe a good unit, let's just hope. They come out soon!
#49
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 30
From: The 2dr club
You're all mashed my head up now lol.
Yes I do too, but I've been waiting too long now, but as said if it does come this week then I'll buy it.
#50
Originally Posted by S204Darren
There doesn't seem to be many for a twinscroll set up Joe. Any ideas?
#52
Are these turbos ok to fit to a standard uk 2.0 sti. Blobeye ? Got FMIC decat ? What can stock headers be used too ?
Any other vital mods ? Or is that too high anpower on stock internals ?
Any other vital mods ? Or is that too high anpower on stock internals ?
#53
I opted for more top end power on my current 2.0 setup with compromise to spool chosing an md321t as i drive mainly on major roads and dual carriage ways. My graph is similar to those above in that its not making maximum torque until 5k but after almost a year with this setup i find it great to drive in town with no issue with lag, its pulls hard after 4k and once its on boost it hits harder and pulls through the redline without dropping off.
Im planning on doing the same again on my new 2.35 build, as ive had the most fun on the dragstrip this year and the type of roads and tracks i mainly drive on im thinking of the same compromise again and thinking of going with a gt40 rather than the gt35 i planned on. Will be getting some major head work done to increase the power band though.
Im planning on doing the same again on my new 2.35 build, as ive had the most fun on the dragstrip this year and the type of roads and tracks i mainly drive on im thinking of the same compromise again and thinking of going with a gt40 rather than the gt35 i planned on. Will be getting some major head work done to increase the power band though.
Last edited by Dubzy; 10 November 2015 at 12:24 AM.
#54
Around 450 is what most rate the stock sti engine at. Tubular headers would be beneficial too at that power.
#55
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 12,979
Likes: 30
From: The 2dr club
Ive just been shown this, any thoughts LOL
http://www.hks-power.co.jp/en/product_db/turbo/db/13857
http://www.hks-power.co.jp/en/product_db/turbo/db/13857
Last edited by bustaMOVEs; 10 November 2015 at 08:28 AM.
#56
Originally Posted by TimH
Litchfield LM are twin entry not twinscroll btw.
Or am I getting confused with another turbo...memory isn't what it was lol
#57
I believe the Owen Developments turbo is a genuine twinscroll as are, I think, the SC twinscrolls.
I remember being mildly miffed when Litchfield introduced the LMs - mine was one of the very first - and discovering that it was twin entry not twin scroll: especially as it was headlined as being twinscroll.
Iain argued that there was a good reason for this (I don't recall what) but it is definitely twin entry not twinscroll.
The LM's were introduced as a (very nearly almost) bolt on for the JDMs to make upgrades easier for us JDM owners, rather than being done for purist twinscroll reasons (if that makes sense).
The spool on mine is not at all bad, but I do feel for a "twinscroll" it perhaps should be better: on my 525bhp 2.5l, I see 1 bar at 3400 rpm in 6th and full boost at around 3700/3800rpm; in lower gears there's not a lot happening below 4000rpm - but once it's on song there is mininal - I'd say no - lag during gear changes and the power just keeps coming and coming and I LOVE it
At the time the observations for JGM and others was that for the money I would probably have got better and more cost effective results changing to a decent single scroll.
I would love to try an Owen twinscroll but it's an awful lot of money to maybe gain a few 100rpm spool, so I just drive it and enjoy it. Just passed 45,000 miles on this engine by the way!
#58
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
The problem here guys you're all comparing apples with oranges.
It's no good comparing a 2 litre with a 2.1, or an AVCS equipped car with a non AVCS equipped car, or a Killer B header car with a GT Spec header car.
I'll post a graph in a moment comparing the Precision with a 42 Billet + car both using 2.1 litre AVCS equipped engines that I mapped.
Chilli first
It's no good comparing a 2 litre with a 2.1, or an AVCS equipped car with a non AVCS equipped car, or a Killer B header car with a GT Spec header car.
I'll post a graph in a moment comparing the Precision with a 42 Billet + car both using 2.1 litre AVCS equipped engines that I mapped.
Chilli first
#59
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Here you go.
42 Billet + in Red, Precision Blue.
Boost profiles for both.
As you can clearly see there isn't that much in it in terms of spool but the Precison makes a chunk more power and at less boost too.
42 Billet + in Red, Precision Blue.
Boost profiles for both.
As you can clearly see there isn't that much in it in terms of spool but the Precison makes a chunk more power and at less boost too.