Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Advice on WRXs - new to subaru!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12 November 2015 | 10:04 PM
  #31  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Originally Posted by BrownPantsRacing
No offense Matt, but you are deluded. I own a WRX and am very pleased with it but am under no illusion that it's better than an STI. As I said above, if you want a user friendly every day car then personally I'd buy the WRX. If you want to eventually modify it and want fun then buy an STI every time.

If you're running steel WRX brakes on a 330bhp car then we have nothing more to discuss. This is dangerous. Full stop. I've been there with grooved WRX discs all round, unrated pads, braided lines, race fluid, brake stopper etc and when my car got to 340bhp it was quite frankly still not safe to drive. I upgraded to Brembos the week after my remap and should have done it sooner.

You're only saying WRX brakes are OK for one of 2 reasons, 1. You have never driven a car with better brakes and have no idea or 2. You can't afford to upgrade your car so you are making excuses.
...and here's me thinking the WRX brakes are a good upgrade for the classic. (My car weighs the same as a classic) tbh the car expenses with other cars so quickly I can afford to brake early. I'm under the impression STI drivers are relying on handling and braking to match a WRX an imho that is dangerous on UK roads!!!!!

Hand on heart the V-Limited WRX is the best Subaru as it is basically an STI/WRX hybrid. OE JDM is cool too, just lacks the STI styling that's on the V-L.

All I'm bothered about is being fast, light and efficient. So I want an Impreza with the smaller hubs?/disks. clutch, gearbox and box oil pump, but also want the larger injectors and Turbo off the STI. V-limited is a bonus due to having AVCS, better pistons and the 5 speed that's far more manageable for power close to 350bhp or above. If the V-Limited/JDM has stronger piston rings than the UK spec WRX then I can't see why you couldn't run a rod/box protecting 400bhp 350lbft. Now that would be a supercar.

Does the JDM WRX come with 2 cats?
Old 12 November 2015 | 10:21 PM
  #32  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Traction and gear shifting gets harder with increased power, some big power builds have chronic lag. I'm always hitting the limiter now with just a 110hp increase. I think this is why most 300-700bhp Subarus are getting similar 0-60 foots and to some extent 0-60mph.

I think 300bhp Mickywrx got a 1.7, I got 1.8 and 700bhp owners Big ARF/P1HARDY 1.8/1.9. I suspect both Micky and I are inferior drivers!

I've seen a hell of a lot of STI's bog down that don't run launch control, maybe the transmission weight difference and lighter flywheel etc etc.

I had country lane blast against mates R1, I think they are 1000bhp per ton, my mate, who is quite a serious individual, said he thinks I'd take him if I could find another 150bhp but I'm pretty sure I wouldn't.
Old 13 November 2015 | 07:20 AM
  #33  
ditchmyster's Avatar
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,624
Likes: 7
From: Living the dream
Default

Much like high powered bikes high powered cars take some skill to get the best out of them, it's one thing to have some passion for cars and bikes and the money to throw at them, but it's a totally different thing to actually be able to ride / drive them to their full capability.

I'd say in my experience in the region of 90% of those that own either a super bike or a highly modded vehicle are average at best and that's being polite to avoid everyone getting butt hurt, and the other 10% range from those that have some idea to the last 1% that are reasonably skilled/experienced.

Most think they are not in front because they don't have enough power so go chasing horses under the bonnet, the unfortunate reality is the problem lies with the donkey behind the wheel.

You only have to see the vid of the kid that took a 260bhp WRX around the ring in 8.30 to cries of bs / my mate in his gazillion bhp evo can't do that time, until he posted the vid and everyone shut up.

STI or WRX matters not as the performance difference between the 2 isn't that great, when all said and done 90% of people that own them won't get anywhere near what the car is actually capable of in standard tune let alone modified.

I'll say it again for the hard of hearing and those at the back, if you're really into modding and want to do track days buy an STI, if you want a quick daily that's reasonable to live with on a day to day basis then it's the WRX you want, if you find yourself reaching the limits with it on the road then there are a few subtle things you can do for very little money to improve it significantly.

And if you find yourself still reaching it's limits on the road, you're an idiot and want banning.
Old 13 November 2015 | 10:51 AM
  #34  
Brun's Avatar
Brun
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 14,230
Likes: 5
From: Harrogate
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster
Much like high powered bikes high powered cars take some skill to get the best out of them, it's one thing to have some passion for cars and bikes and the money to throw at them, but it's a totally different thing to actually be able to ride / drive them to their full capability.

I'd say in my experience in the region of 90% of those that own either a super bike or a highly modded vehicle are average at best and that's being polite to avoid everyone getting butt hurt, and the other 10% range from those that have some idea to the last 1% that are reasonably skilled/experienced.

Most think they are not in front because they don't have enough power so go chasing horses under the bonnet, the unfortunate reality is the problem lies with the donkey behind the wheel.

You only have to see the vid of the kid that took a 260bhp WRX around the ring in 8.30 to cries of bs / my mate in his gazillion bhp evo can't do that time, until he posted the vid and everyone shut up.

STI or WRX matters not as the performance difference between the 2 isn't that great, when all said and done 90% of people that own them won't get anywhere near what the car is actually capable of in standard tune let alone modified.

I'll say it again for the hard of hearing and those at the back, if you're really into modding and want to do track days buy an STI, if you want a quick daily that's reasonable to live with on a day to day basis then it's the WRX you want, if you find yourself reaching the limits with it on the road then there are a few subtle things you can do for very little money to improve it significantly.

And if you find yourself still reaching it's limits on the road, you're an idiot and want banning.
Actually find myself agreeing
On the last point I think it's fair to say that if you are finding the limit on any car on the road, you're an idiot and want banning
Old 13 November 2015 | 11:32 AM
  #35  
Linksfahrer's Avatar
Linksfahrer
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 677
Likes: 48
From: Torpoint
Default

Originally Posted by Norman Dog
You will most likely find a WRX a bit underwhelming if you're used to a Skyline, The standard brakes are absolutely shocking for a start.
Agreed , Sti Brembo's / or min FR 335mm on 17 inch rim + syntered pads + higher boil temp fluid are essential , a tuned WRX is a death trap otherwise.
Old 13 November 2015 | 11:44 AM
  #36  
Linksfahrer's Avatar
Linksfahrer
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 677
Likes: 48
From: Torpoint
Default

Originally Posted by Brun
Here we go again!
Calling Tubbs and ditchy

Personal opinion having driven both but owned neither - STi by a country mile.
The WRX may be slower or may be faster but the simple fact is that the STi feels way quicker!
In standard form Id be dissapointed for Subaru if a 2.0 Sti cannot outbrake and handle v WRX.

Making a car quick for twisty roads is not about adding 50-80 hp , its about staying on the road as you increase cornering speeds.

I had an early lesson from a Audi s4 on this. It simply outcornerd / out braked my WRX. I realised that an dropped it 30mm added coil overs and changed to larger brake discs/braided lines/5.1Dot/Ds2500/RCL5 pads/stiffer suspension rubber unions and now I have a much safer car.
Old 13 November 2015 | 12:20 PM
  #37  
neil-h's Avatar
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Berks
Default

Originally Posted by BoozyDave
It looks like the OP isn't bothered to reply because only jebi se has answered his question


Why the hell does every thread turn into a wrx vs sti debate?

the OP said he wanted a wrx, so why can't people just give civilized answers?

I'd probably go for the blobeye
It's usually about the point RSM turns up, just unfortunately this thread only managed 3 posts before he got in.
Old 13 November 2015 | 12:27 PM
  #38  
Linksfahrer's Avatar
Linksfahrer
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 677
Likes: 48
From: Torpoint
Default

Originally Posted by Band!t
Hi everyone,

I recently sold my skyline and as i got engaged i decided i needed something a bit less modded and high maintainence so i can do grown up things

I'm interested in the Hawkeye shape WRX but put off by engine troubles. I've done plenty of research and it seems mainly the hatchback sti is the 2.5 that suffers the most from engine failure??
I also heard the engine differences between the WRX and STI aren't much.

So do the Hawkeye WRXs suffer the same engine problems as the STis?
Or if you keep them standard will they run on with no issues?

Any Info or knowledge welcome!

Cheers
After look at the rest of our answers you are probably a little perplexed. Lot of good advice already above , but I can remember how I was 3 years ago, So Im going back to your original questions 1:1 .

Firstly very few on here keep the car standard.
So we don't know much about that the fun is doing the improvements.

2.0 is generally considered more reliable than 2.5 (Bearing size).
Sti is better for Brakes ( WRX can be changed to Sti Brembo AP/Tarox etc)
5 speed WRX are more lesuirely 6 spd more hectic but faster through gears
Cost WRX is normal 2k-3k cheaper used than the more desirable Sti's
If your going to tune over 350bhp Sti essential for durable Gearbox/Brakes.

If you have the cash, my opinion take a 2.0 Sti if your short but want to go the uprgade path later take a 2.0 WRX MY01 05 later ones are slightly better) do the brakes/suspension before the engine.

Later cars logically on 2.5 's have lower milages,
rebuilds of any will cost 2k upward skys the limit here.

The joy of them all is the sound and nearly all of us love the 22b
Old 13 November 2015 | 12:38 PM
  #39  
Brun's Avatar
Brun
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 14,230
Likes: 5
From: Harrogate
Default

Originally Posted by Linksfahrer
Agreed , Sti Brembo's / or min FR 335mm on 17 inch rim + syntered pads + higher boil temp fluid are essential , a tuned WRX is a death trap otherwise.
It's only a death trap if you drive like a ****.
I ran 320bhp on OE brakes and never once experienced brake fade or found myself in a position where the braking wasn't up to it.
I would have no problem running way more power on standard brakes either.
Some people have no interest (myself included) braking at the last moment into a corner so therefore massive brakes are a total waste.
I used to love coming out of a corner or off a round about and feeling the power - that was my fix.
A 500bhp Scoob car will stop just as fast as a 200bhp Scoob from any given speed. If that given speed is too much for your brakes then you are driving like a tit.
Old 13 November 2015 | 07:31 PM
  #40  
south_scoob's Avatar
south_scoob
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
From: england
Default

Originally Posted by stonejedi
Talk to "ANY" Subaru specialist and see what model they would start with,especially if it is going to be modified.Have a look at this video its old but the fella knows what he is talking about...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=foazJbCdOnU
.SJ.
I thought sti wheels were only half an inch wider.. 7.5 vs wrx 7
Old 13 November 2015 | 07:36 PM
  #41  
south_scoob's Avatar
south_scoob
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 566
Likes: 0
From: england
Default

Also im prety sure a wrx has better aerodynamic efficancy with smaller scoop and spoiler so he dosent realy know what hes talking about
Old 13 November 2015 | 08:34 PM
  #42  
Norman Dog's Avatar
Norman Dog
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,039
Likes: 24
From: South Shields Tyne & Wear
Default

Originally Posted by Brun
Some people have no interest (myself included) braking at the last moment into a corner so therefore massive brakes are a total waste.
I used to love coming out of a corner or off a round about and feeling the power - that was my fix.
The oem brakes on the WRX are crap even at standard power levels, a couple of hard stops and they're gone.

If you're upgrading the acceleration it's pretty much common sense to fit something that will increase the deceleration.
Old 13 November 2015 | 10:42 PM
  #43  
Brun's Avatar
Brun
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 14,230
Likes: 5
From: Harrogate
Default

Originally Posted by Norman Dog
The oem brakes on the WRX are crap even at standard power levels, a couple of hard stops and they're gone.

If you're upgrading the acceleration it's pretty much common sense to fit something that will increase the deceleration.
One the assumption that you plan to hammer into corners faster then of course - like I say, not every one is looking for the same thing! Monster brakes would be wasted on me!
Old 14 November 2015 | 08:35 AM
  #44  
neil-h's Avatar
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Berks
Default

Originally Posted by Brun
One the assumption that you plan to hammer into corners faster then of course - like I say, not every one is looking for the same thing! Monster brakes would be wasted on me!
That's some scary logic there. The standard brakes on the newage Wrx aren't good for a car with that weight/performance, upgrading the power but not the brakes on the basis "I'm not interested in late braking" is bizarre. what happens when your "using that extra performance" and find yourself needing to stop sharpish?
Old 14 November 2015 | 09:50 AM
  #45  
ditchmyster's Avatar
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,624
Likes: 7
From: Living the dream
Default

WRX brakes work as well as say brembos for the first couple of stamps and will haul the car to a reasonable stop from speed, it's after that when the problems start which are down to disc and caliper heat dissipation.

I think the point brun is making is that he doesn't hammer his brakes so there's not much point in him changing them, which is ultimately a fair one.

As you say though if you're upping the power it's wise to do something about the brakes, I would go so far as to say brakes before power.
Old 14 November 2015 | 10:29 AM
  #46  
mikeblackett's Avatar
mikeblackett
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2014
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: aberdeen
Default

Good point, because one things for sure a tree or a wall will certainly stop your car quicker than a set of brembos, so why take the risk ?
Old 14 November 2015 | 07:09 PM
  #47  
Brun's Avatar
Brun
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 14,230
Likes: 5
From: Harrogate
Default

Originally Posted by neil-h
That's some scary logic there. The standard brakes on the newage Wrx aren't good for a car with that weight/performance, upgrading the power but not the brakes on the basis "I'm not interested in late braking" is bizarre. what happens when your "using that extra performance" and find yourself needing to stop sharpish?
Having covered 80k miles in my Scoob, not once did I find myself in a situation where the brakes were not upto the job. Of course there were a few moments where I had to stamp on them due to circumstances out of my control but again, they were upto the job and disaster was averted!

I'll say again - not everyone's driving requires big brakes and I think 80k miles proves my point!
Old 14 November 2015 | 09:42 PM
  #48  
RS_Matt's Avatar
RS_Matt
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 19
From: Wakefield
Default

Originally Posted by Linksfahrer
In standard form Id be dissapointed for Subaru if a 2.0 Sti cannot outbrake and handle v WRX.

Making a car quick for twisty roads is not about adding 50-80 hp , its about staying on the road as you increase cornering speeds.

I had an early lesson from a Audi s4 on this. It simply outcornerd / out braked my WRX. I realised that an dropped it 30mm added coil overs and changed to larger brake discs/braided lines/5.1Dot/Ds2500/RCL5 pads/stiffer suspension rubber unions and now I have a much safer car.
Sometimes a car that can handle brilliantly on smooth roads is a pig on UK roads, which car has stiffer suspension in OE form?
Old 15 November 2015 | 04:00 PM
  #49  
Linksfahrer's Avatar
Linksfahrer
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 677
Likes: 48
From: Torpoint
Default

Originally Posted by Brun
It's only a death trap if you drive like a ****.
I ran 320bhp on OE brakes and never once experienced brake fade or found myself in a position where the braking wasn't up to it.
I would have no problem running way more power on standard brakes either.
Some people have no interest (myself included) braking at the last moment into a corner so therefore massive brakes are a total waste.
I used to love coming out of a corner or off a round about and feeling the power - that was my fix.
A 500bhp Scoob car will stop just as fast as a 200bhp Scoob from any given speed. If that given speed is too much for your brakes then you are driving like a tit.
We have motorways here that are prettys safe , and many of us like to try the car out once in a while.

I would not dream of driving like I do in Germany in the UK the roads / space and traffice levels and the speedlimits dont allow it.

But for every safe mile driven there is always a slim chance something might happen in front of you. That's when you are glad to have that bit of extra brake capacity,

I have done some tests just pulling up from 1 km before my autobahn exit from 130 mph down to 30 mph, with the standard disks (mintex)
you can just about do it , ( you can always drive straight on it things go wrong) but you will end up with fade and if you kept full on them and you just warp them.

With the new ones / pads I have over 200 meters to spare.

I am not suggesting anyone to go haring about the UK doing this , all Im trying to say is you have to be very careful with standard brakes , as Norman said , you can stop a couple of times with them then its all over and done.
Old 15 November 2015 | 04:41 PM
  #50  
Brun's Avatar
Brun
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 14,230
Likes: 5
From: Harrogate
Default

Originally Posted by Linksfahrer
We have motorways here that are prettys safe , and many of us like to try the car out once in a while.

I would not dream of driving like I do in Germany in the UK the roads / space and traffice levels and the speedlimits dont allow it.

But for every safe mile driven there is always a slim chance something might happen in front of you. That's when you are glad to have that bit of extra brake capacity,

I have done some tests just pulling up from 1 km before my autobahn exit from 130 mph down to 30 mph, with the standard disks (mintex)
you can just about do it , ( you can always drive straight on it things go wrong) but you will end up with fade and if you kept full on them and you just warp them.

With the new ones / pads I have over 200 meters to spare.

I am not suggesting anyone to go haring about the UK doing this , all Im trying to say is you have to be very careful with standard brakes , as Norman said , you can stop a couple of times with them then its all over and done.
If I have to stop hard twice in quick succession due to something happening in front of me then I'd be having one unlucky day on the road would I not!

God only knows how I never had an accident or even survived my 6 years of owning my Scoob!
Seemingly my luck should have meant I'd be guaranteed 6 numbers on the lotto at some point over that period but unfortunately not
Old 15 November 2015 | 05:05 PM
  #51  
ditchmyster's Avatar
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 13,624
Likes: 7
From: Living the dream
Default

Originally Posted by Brun
If I have to stop hard twice in quick succession due to something happening in front of me then I'd be having one unlucky day on the road would I not!

God only knows how I never had an accident or even survived my 6 years of owning my Scoob!
Seemingly my luck should have meant I'd be guaranteed 6 numbers on the lotto at some point over that period but unfortunately not
I have to say, I have AP4pots and I wouldn't be without them, but for 95% of the time standard discs and pads would suffice as I mostly potter to the shops and back, however on those occasions when I'm in the mood to have a mad 15 mins the standard brakes wouldn't last 2mins.

Horses for courses.
Old 15 November 2015 | 07:53 PM
  #52  
Linksfahrer's Avatar
Linksfahrer
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 677
Likes: 48
From: Torpoint
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster
I have to say, I have AP4pots and I wouldn't be without them, but for 95% of the time standard discs and pads would suffice as I mostly potter to the shops and back, however on those occasions when I'm in the mood to have a mad 15 mins the standard brakes wouldn't last 2mins.

Horses for courses.
Despite all the mods I have done to my Std calipers Id swap for your AP's tomorrow.

Paradoxically I am not allowed to use them on the road without an expensive special dispensation from the TÜV. So in order to stay more or less legal , I have to swap back to standard discs and pads every 2 years.

As my car is a WRX I would have to do the same for Brembos as they are only recorded on the Sti.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
scottydouk
Subaru Parts
5
10 November 2015 07:29 PM
adge
Subaru Parts
1
12 October 2015 11:59 PM



Quick Reply: Advice on WRXs - new to subaru!



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:29 PM.