Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related
View Poll Results: How will you vote in the EU referendum?
Leave the EU
67.45%
Remain in the EU
22.75%
Don't know yet
5.49%
Won't be voting
4.31%
Voters: 255. You may not vote on this poll

EU Referendum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21 June 2016 | 11:19 AM
  #2011  
Turbohot's Avatar
Turbohot
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
yes I probably think that too

anyway I have already voted - am off to Moscow tomorrow to watch the Bolshoi

the masochist in me is quite looking forward to leave

it will be fun watching all the leavers explain why things aren't any rosier outside the EU
Hodgy, you make me laugh
Old 21 June 2016 | 11:21 AM
  #2012  
neil-h's Avatar
neil-h
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 4,224
Likes: 0
From: Berks
Default

Originally Posted by SwissTony
That will never happen, EU will renege on the deal Cameron made and we shall see a reduction in the UK's effectiveness to negotiate. Basically because we dared to even consider leaving they will make it uncomfortable for us or just pay lip services to our demands.
And yet there are people the leave side who believe the EU will be begging to trade with us if we leave. I think you're far closer to reality personally.
Old 21 June 2016 | 11:42 AM
  #2013  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,633
Likes: 21
From: K
Default

Originally Posted by neil-h
And yet there are people the leave side who believe the EU will be begging to trade with us if we leave. I think you're far closer to reality personally.
yes, this is what I find so extraordinary

do people really believe it - really

they must do, they think that the EU it is all one big con, offering nothing

and we can up sticks leave, and then nock back on the door, with a big "wad of folding" and simply ask to re-tarmac the drive - and carry on trading as if nothing has happened

I honestly can't wait for the mass recognition that they have been simply lied to
Old 21 June 2016 | 11:47 AM
  #2014  
Turbohot's Avatar
Turbohot
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 48,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
So what do people think the result is going to be?


My guess is a narrow win for Leave, something like 52-48 with about 70% turnout
I don't know what the result will be, but a lot of my friends can see some tough times ahead for the UK in the long run, if 'leave' wins. All the reasons have been previously put on the table here, so I'm not repeating.
They say that it will be like a marriage broken; like a thoughtless divorce.

Last edited by Turbohot; 21 June 2016 at 12:10 PM.
Old 21 June 2016 | 11:48 AM
  #2015  
dpb's Avatar
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 13
From: riding the crest of a wave ...
Default

Nonsense , were all going to be 6 quid a week better off

Well, at best
Old 21 June 2016 | 11:55 AM
  #2016  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
yes, this is what I find so extraordinary

do people really believe it - really

they must do, they think that the EU it is all one big con, offering nothing

and we can up sticks leave, and then nock back on the door, with a big "wad of folding" and simply ask to re-tarmac the drive - and carry on trading as if nothing has happened

I honestly can't wait for the mass recognition that they have been simply lied to

I think the argument goes...


They sell us more than we sell them, therefore they'd be mad not to give us the same access to the single market as we have now - sound logical doesn't it?


The difficulty is that our trade deficit is very large with a few countries (mainly Germany), but we have a trade surplus with many EU countries, so their motivations are going to be somewhat different to Germany's.


Whatever deal we do with the EU has to be done with 27 countries, the deal has to be unanimously agreed upon by those countries. For a lot of those nations freedom of movement (amongst other things) will be the over-riding issue, not trade. So what are we going to offer them?


The bottom-line is we will either have to pay for access and have freedom of movement, or leave the single market and accept the obvious economic consequences - THOSE ARE THE CHOICES. Anyone telling you different is not telling you the truth.
Old 21 June 2016 | 12:05 PM
  #2017  
JTaylor's Avatar
JTaylor
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
From: Home
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
I think the argument goes...


They sell us more than we sell them, therefore they'd be mad not to give us the same access to the single market as we have now - sound logical doesn't it?


The difficulty is that our trade deficit is very large with a few countries (mainly Germany), but we have a trade surplus with many EU countries, so their motivations are going to be somewhat different to Germany's.


Whatever deal we do with the EU has to be done with 27 countries, the deal has to be unanimously agreed upon by those countries. For a lot of those nations freedom of movement (amongst other things) will be the over-riding issue, not trade. So what are we going to offer them?


The bottom-line is we will either have to pay for access and have freedom of movement, or leave the single market and accept the obvious economic consequences - THOSE ARE THE CHOICES. Anyone telling you different is not telling you the truth.
The average Joe doesn't understand this.
Old 21 June 2016 | 12:14 PM
  #2018  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,633
Likes: 21
From: K
Default

Originally Posted by Martin2005
I think the argument goes...


They sell us more than we sell them, therefore they'd be mad not to give us the same access to the single market as we have now - sound logical doesn't it?


The difficulty is that our trade deficit is very large with a few countries (mainly Germany), but we have a trade surplus with many EU countries, so their motivations are going to be somewhat different to Germany's.


Whatever deal we do with the EU has to be done with 27 countries, the deal has to be unanimously agreed upon by those countries. For a lot of those nations freedom of movement (amongst other things) will be the over-riding issue, not trade. So what are we going to offer them?


The bottom-line is we will either have to pay for access and have freedom of movement, or leave the single market and accept the obvious economic consequences - THOSE ARE THE CHOICES. Anyone telling you different is not telling you the truth.
yes it's crazy

then they talk about "rational self interest"

its the same type of deluded b0ll0x that Alan Greenspan spun about the banking collapse of 2008

"the banks simply could not collapse because rational self interest simply would not allow it"

maybe these people are the same people that click the links to

"Wanna meet a housewife near you, no sign-up, no credit card, no bullsh1t"

Last edited by hodgy0_2; 21 June 2016 at 12:16 PM.
Old 21 June 2016 | 12:21 PM
  #2019  
SwissTony's Avatar
SwissTony
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 28,228
Likes: 12
From: In the Doghouse
Default

Bloody free loaders

Click image for larger version

Name:	eu contributions.jpg
Views:	0
Size:	31.5 KB
ID:	20934
Old 21 June 2016 | 12:31 PM
  #2020  
andy97's Avatar
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Default

Why does there have to be free movement? The rest of the world trade without this being a necessity.

I understand about a club and all that, also the theory of free movement is fine.

The reality is though is very much different. because that a few countries are doing much better than others, large amounts of people flock to countries and have overwhelmed their housing, social services, healthcare, causing concerns, fears from the invaded countries,

This has also caused a people drain on the poorer countries within the EU, which cant generate enough income due to lack of people, a vicious circle from unchecked, uncontrolled movement. They will never for the foreseeable future become desirable for their original population to return

The EU is not willing to allow individual countries some control over this, creating resentment. That shows to me that the EU is not working in the best interest of the member countries.

Last edited by andy97; 21 June 2016 at 12:33 PM.
Old 21 June 2016 | 12:34 PM
  #2021  
Martin2005's Avatar
Martin2005
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 8,222
Likes: 0
From: Type 25. Build No.34
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
Why does there have to be free movement? The rest of the world trade without this being a necessity.

I understand about a club and all that, also the theory of free movement is fine.

The reality is though is very much different. because that a few countries are doing much better than others, large amounts of people flock to countries and have overwhelmed their housing, social services, healthcare, causing concerns, fears from the invaded countries,

This has also caused a people drain on the poorer countries within the EU, which cant generate enough income due to lack of people, a vicious circle from unchecked, uncontrolled movement.

The EU is not willing to allow individual countries some control over this, creating resentment. That shows to me that the EU is not working in the best interest of the member countries.

Those are the challenges of the free-market


These things probably shouldn't be judged on the short-term impact, instead viewed through a much longer lens, then it all makes much more sense
Old 21 June 2016 | 12:53 PM
  #2022  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,633
Likes: 21
From: K
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
Why does there have to be free movement? The rest of the world trade without this being a necessity.

I understand about a club and all that, also the theory of free movement is fine.

The reality is though is very much different. because that a few countries are doing much better than others, large amounts of people flock to countries and have overwhelmed their housing, social services, healthcare, causing concerns, fears from the invaded countries,

This has also caused a people drain on the poorer countries within the EU, which cant generate enough income due to lack of people, a vicious circle from unchecked, uncontrolled movement. They will never for the foreseeable future become desirable for their original population to return

The EU is not willing to allow individual countries some control over this, creating resentment. That shows to me that the EU is not working in the best interest of the member countries.
yes I agree

the EU is FAR from perfect
Old 21 June 2016 | 01:02 PM
  #2023  
andy97's Avatar
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
yes I agree

the EU is FAR from perfect
It is, but more alarming is its unwillingness to alter and accommodate individual countries needs. Fuelling the backlash of resentment
Old 21 June 2016 | 01:18 PM
  #2024  
Geezer's Avatar
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
From: North Wales
Default

Originally Posted by SwissTony
That will never happen, EU will renege on the deal Cameron made and we shall see a reduction in the UK's effectiveness to negotiate. Basically because we dared to even consider leaving they will make it uncomfortable for us or just pay lip services to our demands.

I know both sides have said stupid things, but this is one of the most stupid yet, the threat of the EU reneging on the deal.


I mean, really, why would they? They want the UK to stay, either because they fear a Brexit will pave the way for other countries to leave, or because the UK is seen as key to the success, or the money we give is too much to lose, or whatever, it doesn't really matter.


So, we vote to remain, they say "well, we're not honouring that". What do you think the UK will do? Despite what the Leave campaign have you believe, we are a sovereign state, the ultimate authority for law in the UK is Parliament. There is nothing they can do to stop us leaving. Hell, if they did that, I would back a Leave vote.


To suggest otherwise it simply misleading.
Old 21 June 2016 | 01:23 PM
  #2025  
ALi-B's Avatar
ALi-B
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 38,046
Likes: 301
From: The hell where youth and laughter go
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
But you were an outer earlier in this thread Ali ?!?


I never said which way until now.
Old 21 June 2016 | 01:37 PM
  #2026  
SwissTony's Avatar
SwissTony
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 28,228
Likes: 12
From: In the Doghouse
Default

Originally Posted by Geezer
I know both sides have said stupid things, but this is one of the most stupid yet, the threat of the EU reneging on the deal.

You are welcome to your opinion, just like I am. But it seems you dont like my projection or gut feeling but then I couldn't give a flying **** either way.

If we remain then I will quite happily revisit this thread in 6 months-1 year time and lets see how we are doing. Quite happy to be proved wrong but I doubt it .
Old 21 June 2016 | 01:46 PM
  #2027  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,633
Likes: 21
From: K
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
It is, but more alarming is its unwillingness to alter and accommodate individual countries needs. Fuelling the backlash of resentment
but compared to others we get a pretty good deal, and we have quite a lot of influence

maybe, this vote will be a wake up call
Old 21 June 2016 | 01:48 PM
  #2028  
fat-thomas's Avatar
fat-thomas
BANNED
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 4,258
Likes: 2
From: fawor's car wash
Default

after watching a lot of stuff about it in my opinion it comes down to rich v poor.

the rich have fair reason to vote in as it benefits them and the poor want out as to them its all about immigration driving their wages down to them.

oh and the under 25s are clueless.
Old 21 June 2016 | 02:06 PM
  #2029  
andy97's Avatar
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
but compared to others we get a pretty good deal, and we have quite a lot of influence

maybe, this vote will be a wake up call
Wake up for whom?

You must have noticed and read/heard that the EU's ultimate aim is to merge all countries into one?

Do you want that?

I don't, when I go to Europe I want to see different things from each individual countries, not the same.

If the EU is to redeem itself it should take several step back and allow more autonomy from individual countries over what they see fit to control
Old 21 June 2016 | 02:18 PM
  #2030  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,633
Likes: 21
From: K
Default

Originally Posted by andy97
Wake up for whom?

You must have noticed and read/heard that the EU's ultimate aim is to merge all countries into one?
have you got a source for that?
Old 21 June 2016 | 02:20 PM
  #2031  
hodgy0_2's Avatar
hodgy0_2
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 15,633
Likes: 21
From: K
Default

Originally Posted by fat-thomas
after watching a lot of stuff about it in my opinion it comes down to rich v poor.

the rich have fair reason to vote in as it benefits them and the poor want out as to them its all about immigration driving their wages down to them.

oh and the under 25s are clueless.
yes, I made point a few pages ago, in connection with the nebulous idea of "freedom and control"

the richer you are the more freedom and control you have - simple
Old 21 June 2016 | 02:33 PM
  #2032  
Osimabu's Avatar
Osimabu
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,341
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Further evidence that it's in Britain's best interests to leave, following Mr Bliar saying we ought to remain, is that Mr Beckham, that well known footballing intellectual, also says today that we ought to remain.

For goodness sake, I saw someone in the Remain camp with a beard the other day. What more proof do you need?

Roll on Friday....
Old 21 June 2016 | 02:43 PM
  #2033  
Geezer's Avatar
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
From: North Wales
Default

Originally Posted by SwissTony
You are welcome to your opinion, just like I am. But it seems you dont like my projection or gut feeling but then I couldn't give a flying **** either way.

If we remain then I will quite happily revisit this thread in 6 months-1 year time and lets see how we are doing. Quite happy to be proved wrong but I doubt it .

It's not your projection, you have just repeated it, I wasn't having a go at you.


Instead of taking umbrage, why don't you address the point? Bearing in mind why I think it's unlikely, please explain why you think the EU would renege on it? What would they have to gain?
Old 21 June 2016 | 02:59 PM
  #2034  
SwissTony's Avatar
SwissTony
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 28,228
Likes: 12
From: In the Doghouse
Default

Originally Posted by Geezer
It's not your projection, you have just repeated it, I wasn't having a go at you.


Instead of taking umbrage, why don't you address the point? Bearing in mind why I think it's unlikely, please explain why you think the EU would renege on it? What would they have to gain?
When you said I repeated it, did you mean I had mentioned this before or I was repeating someone else's comment ?

And I took no umbrage ( though as you called me stupid yet said you were not having a go at me ) , as I mentioned I couldn't give a toss what you thought. I have nothing to suggest they will, I just feel that post vote and we remain in, then I think our position will be far shakier than currently.
And all the assurances that they gave to Cameron will be hotly contested or watered down.

As before it is my belief that is what will happen (amongst all the other backroom dealing that will go on) but quite happy to be proved wrong.

Last edited by SwissTony; 21 June 2016 at 03:10 PM.
Old 21 June 2016 | 03:19 PM
  #2035  
andy97's Avatar
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Default

Originally Posted by hodgy0_2
have you got a source for that?
Here is a recent one
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worl...-official.html

Jean Monnet(founder of the European project) was credited as to saying this

“Europe’s nations should be guided towards the superstate without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose, but which will eventually and irreversibly lead to federation.”

or

“Europe’s nations should be guided towards the superstate without their people understanding what is happening.”


https://eufundedproeutroll.wordpress...he-superstate/

Now it was either all bullsh!t or looking back at what has actually happened with treaty changes over the last 20 years or so. Do you think that there might be some weight by the argument?
Old 21 June 2016 | 03:19 PM
  #2036  
Geezer's Avatar
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
From: North Wales
Default

Originally Posted by SwissTony
When you said I repeated it, did you mean I had mentioned this before or I was repeating someone else's comment ?

And I took no umbrage ( though as you called me stupid yet said you were not having a go at me ) , as I mentioned I couldn't give a toss what you thought. I have nothing to suggest they will, I just feel that post vote and we remain in, then I think our position will be far shakier than currently.
And all the assurances that they gave to Cameron will be hotly contested or watered down.

As before it is my belief that is what will happen (amongst all the other backroom dealing that will go on) but quite happy to be proved wrong.

No, it's an old Leave thing, not that you repeated it from yourself or from someone earlier in this thread. Also, I said it was a stupid thing to say, I never said you were stupid. I can see why you may have thought that, but that was not my intention!


But, again, what have they to gain? The mood of roughly 50% of the population is leave, they cannot stop us leaving is we choose to.


What rationale (not gut feeling) have you for saying they will renege on it?
Old 21 June 2016 | 03:37 PM
  #2037  
SwissTony's Avatar
SwissTony
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 28,228
Likes: 12
From: In the Doghouse
Default

Originally Posted by Geezer
No, it's an old Leave thing, not that you repeated it from yourself or from someone earlier in this thread. Also, I said it was a stupid thing to say, I never said you were stupid. I can see why you may have thought that, but that was not my intention!

Glad we cleared that up


But, again, what have they to gain? The mood of roughly 50% of the population is leave, they cannot stop us leaving is we choose to.


What rationale (not gut feeling) have you for saying they will renege on it?
My rationale is that a) given the length of time it took to get those assurances and the outcome of those so called "fantastic " deals, the reality is that it has done nothing for us in the long term and in fact proved the opposite by polarising the other member states and b) the way the EU operates behind the scenes shows there is little they wont stop at rolling out their master plan . We the UK will just be the proverbial 'winging pom'

And what is wrong with having a gut feeling. It has stood me well in the past and really I dont trust those lot in Brussels as far as I could throw them.

On the flip side I dont exactly have much faith in a large portion of the current govt to hold true to their promises anyway. If I had to be 100% honest, the only nagging thing in the back of my mind is if we leave we would have to send out our crack team of trade negotiators to do deals with the rest of the world. And god I worry about the " crack team"
Old 21 June 2016 | 03:41 PM
  #2038  
dpb's Avatar
dpb
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 46,493
Likes: 13
From: riding the crest of a wave ...
Default

Would we be allowed proper light bulbs if we leave

Last edited by dpb; 21 June 2016 at 03:44 PM.
Old 21 June 2016 | 03:46 PM
  #2039  
andy97's Avatar
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,296
Likes: 118
From: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Default

What is not to like about LED technology apart from the price
Old 21 June 2016 | 03:57 PM
  #2040  
SwissTony's Avatar
SwissTony
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 28,228
Likes: 12
From: In the Doghouse
Default

Originally Posted by dpb
Would we be allowed proper light bulbs if we leave
you mean the ones that came on and provided instant light instead of the " oh lets warm up gradually like a ****ing 50's Grundig TV set whilst you stumble around the room in a dim light tripping over **** and standing on lego" style ?


Quick Reply: EU Referendum



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:18 AM.