BBC. They really aren't doing themselves any favours
#31
Scooby Regular
#33
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
TV license is £13 a month, so not massively more expensive and still a damn site cheaper than a Sky subscription (which you also need a TV license for!). For £9 Netflix subscription, you can only watch two streams at a time, so not great if you're a family with several older kids each watching something different.
How many license fee haters on here love all the David Attemborough nature documentaries, or Fawlty towers, Blackadder etc. or Dr Who? The Beeb has been producing exceptional programming for years and no other non-subscription UK channel has ever come close to the sheer quantity of great programs produced by the BBC. Its been doing it for years and still doing it today and all thanks to the license fee.
How many license fee haters on here love all the David Attemborough nature documentaries, or Fawlty towers, Blackadder etc. or Dr Who? The Beeb has been producing exceptional programming for years and no other non-subscription UK channel has ever come close to the sheer quantity of great programs produced by the BBC. Its been doing it for years and still doing it today and all thanks to the license fee.
The BBC are just a load of bullies,**** their licence. I have a sky dish and no licence and when I 1st got sky I was never asked if I had a licence.
I've never entered into an agreement with the BBC so I shall not be paying them a ****ing penny.
P.s does anybody know when eastenders starts again as im missing it
The following users liked this post:
#34
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
<slow clap>
https://www.essexlive.news/news/esse...eekers-4439371
I’m sure you can search for Serco by yourself.
https://www.essexlive.news/news/esse...eekers-4439371
I’m sure you can search for Serco by yourself.
:
That link is NOT BBC...that’s what I asked for.
Didn’t realise the licence paid for essex live
The following users liked this post:
#37
Scooby Regular
Why not hop off to somewhere Better like the States where you can pay as you go for everything , and defend your views with a handgun , from the loony left presumably
#42
Scooby Regular
Bad harvest this year . going to have import flour from abroad - likely to be more expensive following brexit
oh dear ,bbc biased reporting again !
Or just stating the obvious
oh dear ,bbc biased reporting again !
Or just stating the obvious
Last edited by IdonthaveaScooby; 27 August 2020 at 07:04 AM.
#44
Scooby Senior
Here you go, can't be arsed with your excuses https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla...-west-53811572
Last edited by JackClark; 27 August 2020 at 08:34 AM.
#45
Scooby Senior
#46
Scooby Senior
"The state" is currently the Conservative government.
The Conservative government is pro-Brexit.
So, you're telling me, the state/conservative government are telling the BBC to be Anti-Brexit? So how does that work exactly?
Or is this a deep-state tin-hat kind of thing?
#47
Scooby Regular
#48
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
As I said you can search yourself, the link shows why Farage's propaganda wasn't reported elsewhere.
Here you go, can't be arsed with your excuses https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla...-west-53811572
Here you go, can't be arsed with your excuses https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotla...-west-53811572
No excuse: The BBC have failed to report on issues in my localities. That is all there is to it. I pointed out one example. Here is another that you can easily see for yourself; Search ‘Bromsgrove Migrants’ google top results from local rag (full of clickbait ad : ). Search BBC; Nothing. Twitter; Good lord! (I don’t use twitter or have an account, but I often receive links from friends family etc.)
It is you that is making the excuses, implying that its my fault for not using google and deflecting by using my example as a means to undermine my opinion of the BBC, rather understand it. What is the purpose of regional news if it omits areas or issues that maybe important or informative to those living there?
I hinted that this is a institutional issue, I call it institutional bias but there are other buzzwords that could be used, either way it’s not reported because either they don’t want to or they felt no need. Both are wrong in my opinion.
As I said earlier I should not have to be informed from sources like Farage or whatever racist right wing propaganda outlet.
If no reliable news source is out there to counteract or challenge what Farage has found on a local level, then the only information publicised nationally is potentially misinformation resulting in concerns spreading. If I am funding a news organisation, then I expect it to report on local issues with as much effort as it does on say, exam results, viruses or whatever Trump is up to. By that I don’t mean front page, just a mention the regional sections would do.
Maybe I should have picked another reason favoured by the Mail reading Gammons of this country, say the number of weather presenters they employ, or Lineker’s salary. Not that I care for either, but it’s almost a Godwin’s law of HYS comments.
Last edited by ALi-B; 27 August 2020 at 12:40 PM.
#50
Scooby Senior
#51
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Forget Farage for a moment, this was just mentioned in this one particular example.
I am wondering had I substituted the name ‘Farage’ for something else like ‘social media’ would the reaction be the same? All news should be fact based, so fact checking is part of good journalism, however let’s not digress on that.
Last edited by ALi-B; 27 August 2020 at 04:11 PM.
#52
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
I thought you were on par with Gandhi
https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby...s-9yrs-on.html
Jokes aside it actually would be interesting on his opinion of the BBC
Last edited by ALi-B; 27 August 2020 at 04:17 PM.
#53
Scooby Senior
I thought you were on par with Gandhi
https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby...s-9yrs-on.html
Jokes aside it actually would be interesting on his opinion of the BBC
https://www.scoobynet.com/non-scooby...s-9yrs-on.html
Jokes aside it actually would be interesting on his opinion of the BBC
#54
Scooby Senior
No: It’s quite simple..They have failed to report on issues local in the areas I live and work. Repeatedly.
Forget Farage for a moment, this was just mentioned in this one particular example.
I am wondering had I substituted the name ‘Farage’ for something else like ‘social media’ would the reaction be the same? All news should be fact based, so fact checking is part of good journalism, however let’s not digress on that.
Forget Farage for a moment, this was just mentioned in this one particular example.
I am wondering had I substituted the name ‘Farage’ for something else like ‘social media’ would the reaction be the same? All news should be fact based, so fact checking is part of good journalism, however let’s not digress on that.
If you want local news, go to the local newspaper. If you want to read about right wing propaganda stories, the BBC is also not the place to go because they are simply going to fail the fact checking.
Most "news" stories about migrants are simply not newsworthy, but part of truly biased news agencies promoting the culture of racial hatred in the hope to create genuinely newsworthy stories such as large scale protests or even better riots, significant racial attacks and to steer public political pressure for issues such as Brexit, points based immigration etc.
#55
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Since when was the BBC a local news outlet? They are regional at best! Whether regional or national, they only ever report on the most important stories. Bromsgrove itself is a pretty insignificant place on the scale of the whole West Middlands region! Clearly Farage drumming up racial hatred at a hotel used to temporarily house migrants (which is nothing new) clearly was deemed important enough for the BBC to invest their regional or national reporters into and no doubt there were much more interesting stories going on in the wider region.
If you want local news, go to the local newspaper. If you want to read about right wing propaganda stories, the BBC is also not the place to go because they are simply going to fail the fact checking.
Most "news" stories about migrants are simply not newsworthy, but part of truly biased news agencies promoting the culture of racial hatred in the hope to create genuinely newsworthy stories such as large scale protests or even better riots, significant racial attacks and to steer public political pressure for issues such as Brexit, points based immigration etc.
If you want local news, go to the local newspaper. If you want to read about right wing propaganda stories, the BBC is also not the place to go because they are simply going to fail the fact checking.
Most "news" stories about migrants are simply not newsworthy, but part of truly biased news agencies promoting the culture of racial hatred in the hope to create genuinely newsworthy stories such as large scale protests or even better riots, significant racial attacks and to steer public political pressure for issues such as Brexit, points based immigration etc.
Ignoring specifics for the moment I do agree in part. Importance of stories is a case of cherry picking. But I do have concerns on the processes involved with selecting stories. There are facts about the one story I mentioned, and there is public interest, ‘cancelling’ a complete story for whatever reason needs a bit more transparency that that of present (if that is the case).
The regional local problem is another issue; The BBC was more localised, it pretends to be; You can list news based on your your exact geolocation. That Hotel actually isn’t Bromsgrove it’s actually in Marlbrook which is part of the Birmingham commuter conurbations. It was once called the Birmingham Hilton for that reason (until Hilton built a hotel nearer to Birmingham). So, Local? Regional? Significance? If it’s Birmingham or Worcestershire suddenly Bromsgrove isn’t that tiny (it’s actually a very large constituency). Regardless, nothing much happens in Worcestershire...yoofs today, pikeys dumping rubbish, rural thefts and someone crashing a car somewhere is about all that happens. So, becoming part of a right wing propaganda stunt is kind of a big deal to those living round there.
Especially when national papers pick up on it; The Independent have done a nice piece on it. So if it reaches national newspaper but not BBC regional nor national is it fair to question the cherry picking processes?
Coverage is less regional/local that it used to be. That a certainty; Closure of regional production facilities, funding cut backs etc ensure that has become more London centric at a cost of it becoming less relevant to people in poorly represented areas. So IMHO it needs to give up on regional news entirely or separate the national news from the licence fee; Midlands Today generally is a mix of someone being stabbed in Nechells (a daily occurrence), someone being shot round Handsworth (usually weekly) and Liz Copper doing her rural piece solely in Staffordshire/Shropshire about some parents being concerned about Dog poo in the front gardens (which turns out to be fox poo)...is the latter really worthy of putting on TV in precedence to other news?
Anyway. In today’s news:
https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...-station-in-uk
Probably just Murdoch click bait, although I thought we already had opinionated news...in the form of channel4 news.
#56
Scooby Regular
Anyway. In today’s news:
https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...-station-in-uk
Probably just Murdoch click bait, although I thought we already had opinionated news...in the form of channel4 news.
https://www.theguardian.com/media/20...-station-in-uk
Probably just Murdoch click bait, although I thought we already had opinionated news...in the form of channel4 news.
#57
Scooby Senior
#59
Scooby Senior
They released the schedule for the new 'unbiased' news channel!
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/01/farage-ferrari-bafta-fox-news-uk-rightwing-beeb
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/01/farage-ferrari-bafta-fox-news-uk-rightwing-beeb