Are the performance figures for ppp relistic ???
08 May 2003, 12:38 PM
#32
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: www.m-soc.com
Posts: 3,684
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This was a good thread started and ahaving input from Mike Wood of Prodrive. The tone has now lowered with the last comment started by the thread originator !
Just think about what you have just written because you didn't like a previous opinion. You did have Mike on here. What do you think he would now think.
We want the likes of Mike on here regularly and so we should all act responsibily using the english language in the manner it was mean't
Think about it
Say what you like back but I have made my point
Just think about what you have just written because you didn't like a previous opinion. You did have Mike on here. What do you think he would now think.
We want the likes of Mike on here regularly and so we should all act responsibily using the english language in the manner it was mean't
Think about it
Say what you like back but I have made my point
08 May 2003, 06:04 PM
#34
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: erm erm erm well it does lots to the gallon but it aint a scoob doh
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
not saying its a bad thread i think its fair question, but i do get a bit fed up with people on here putting some types of scoobys down and the 'mines better than yours thing'. i personally think the performance figures of the PPP are realistic and having PPP on your car would make it a better alround car to drive than just giving it better drag strip speed. sorry if i offended you in any way that wasnt my intention.
10 May 2003, 09:38 AM
#37
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: erm erm erm well it does lots to the gallon but it aint a scoob doh
Posts: 824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
tops
i know i didnt help matters by my stupid off the cuff coment done in a moment of temporary madness. mike wood please come back to this thread as you input is vital
i know i didnt help matters by my stupid off the cuff coment done in a moment of temporary madness. mike wood please come back to this thread as you input is vital
05 July 2003, 09:30 AM
#38
Diablo
Yes, the STI is gutless below 4K in non PPP trim, hence the 5.something 0-60 time.
However in PPP trim its definately not gutless, hence the 4.6 0-60 time.
Having not driven a WRX PPP, I reckon that there's probably not that much difference between it and the STI PPP in gears 1,2 & 3, but the STI is a different animal in gears 4,5 & 6, and I reckon that it would be a different ball game between the pair here.
My opinion only.
Shaun
[Edited by urban - 5/7/2003 9:31:58 AM]
Yes, the STI is gutless below 4K in non PPP trim, hence the 5.something 0-60 time.
However in PPP trim its definately not gutless, hence the 4.6 0-60 time.
Having not driven a WRX PPP, I reckon that there's probably not that much difference between it and the STI PPP in gears 1,2 & 3, but the STI is a different animal in gears 4,5 & 6, and I reckon that it would be a different ball game between the pair here.
My opinion only.
Shaun
[Edited by urban - 5/7/2003 9:31:58 AM]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM