Can't Believe the People I Work With
#31
![Post](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Your blatantly a bit of a silly cow for even considering asking for an apology. Considering you hang around on the muppets forum I imagine your the type of person who gets the **** taken out of at work quite alot, along with the rest of you muppets.
Get used to it.
Get used to it.
#41
![Post](images/icons/icon1.gif)
YOu want to find yourself an article with people getting fired about this type of thing.... and email it back to the respective persons ![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
All of a sudden the joke becomes very stale. You could do it so your "Co-Workers" are not sure about your level of seriousness...![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
The following article is not totally relevant, but a quick search could find something. The following was talking about the top 2o Times careers that were ended....
PS... if you get a million, I would like a free tank of petrol![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
"Why are the Times and other companies so concerned about e-mail? One reason is their liability in harassment suits. One or two explicit e-mail messages typically aren’t enough by themselves to prove that a workplace environment was hostile. But such e-mail can bolster other damaging evidence. At a subsidiary of Chevron Corp., e-mail containing such jokes as '25 reasons beer is better than women' were used along with other evidence in a sexual-harassment claim that was settled in 1995 for $2.2 million." (Ann Cairns, "That bawdy e-mail was good for a laugh — until the ax fell", MSNBC (highlights from WSJ.com), Feb. 4, link now dead). Also see Lisa Fried, "Employers Crack Down on Personal Internet Use", New York Law Journal, Jan. 3; Christine A. Amalfe and Kerrie R. Heslin, "Courts start to rule on online harassment", National Law Journal, Jan. 24).
![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
All of a sudden the joke becomes very stale. You could do it so your "Co-Workers" are not sure about your level of seriousness...
![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
The following article is not totally relevant, but a quick search could find something. The following was talking about the top 2o Times careers that were ended....
PS... if you get a million, I would like a free tank of petrol
![Smile](images/smilies/smile.gif)
"Why are the Times and other companies so concerned about e-mail? One reason is their liability in harassment suits. One or two explicit e-mail messages typically aren’t enough by themselves to prove that a workplace environment was hostile. But such e-mail can bolster other damaging evidence. At a subsidiary of Chevron Corp., e-mail containing such jokes as '25 reasons beer is better than women' were used along with other evidence in a sexual-harassment claim that was settled in 1995 for $2.2 million." (Ann Cairns, "That bawdy e-mail was good for a laugh — until the ax fell", MSNBC (highlights from WSJ.com), Feb. 4, link now dead). Also see Lisa Fried, "Employers Crack Down on Personal Internet Use", New York Law Journal, Jan. 3; Christine A. Amalfe and Kerrie R. Heslin, "Courts start to rule on online harassment", National Law Journal, Jan. 24).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
61
11 January 2021 03:08 PM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
55
05 August 2018 07:02 AM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
7
14 December 2015 08:16 AM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
20
22 October 2015 06:12 AM