Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Impreza WRX s CTR

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15 January 2004 | 06:35 PM
  #31  
stanmo's Avatar
stanmo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: Suffolk
Post

I personally think the CTR is great value (not so sure about the owner who had to drive into the 4ft of space I left from the car in front after I fairly beat him at the lights when he was in gear and I was at standstill); around 16kish ?

Not so sure as a long term car, I'd be worried about whether the tuning ceiling has been reached already as standard.

Anybody know if the engine can withstand more abuse and be modded ?
Old 15 January 2004 | 06:46 PM
  #32  
richie,7,RA,spec C's Avatar
richie,7,RA,spec C
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Red face

SHE HAS GOT 332 HOOVES IN IT
Old 15 January 2004 | 07:10 PM
  #33  
NickyWRX's Avatar
NickyWRX
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Post

Those times on the scan show a MY01 WRX (the slower Impreza of all time, it's sad but it´s true, I had one). Now I have a MY03 WRX and I've made time of 14.5 standard with only a back box!! So... CTR ??? What is that ?? Eh eh...


Nicky
Old 15 January 2004 | 07:42 PM
  #34  
richie,7,RA,spec C's Avatar
richie,7,RA,spec C
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Cool

YOU LOT MUST BE ON DRUGS OR NEED TO BE
MY C SPEC WILL SUCK THAT UP THE BACK BOX AND THAT'S A STANDARD ONE
Old 15 January 2004 | 07:44 PM
  #35  
richie,7,RA,spec C's Avatar
richie,7,RA,spec C
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Cool

YOU LOT MUST BE ON DRUGS OR NEED TO BE
MY C SPEC WILL SUCK THAT UP THE BACK BOX AND THAT'S A STANDARD ONE
Old 15 January 2004 | 08:01 PM
  #36  
chrisp's Avatar
chrisp
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
From: In wrxshire
Post

Arent CTR nearly 17 seconds to a ton thats about 5 seconds too slow
Old 15 January 2004 | 08:19 PM
  #37  
mr flibble's Avatar
mr flibble
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From: Gloucestershire
Smile

The 'crock classic' Impreza 0-100mph 14.6 according to Evo mag.

hmmmm.............is that not quicker than a PPP bugeye?

M.
Old 15 January 2004 | 08:26 PM
  #38  
chrisp's Avatar
chrisp
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
From: In wrxshire
Wink

yep and a little over 12 for a full spec 280ps wrx classic
Old 15 January 2004 | 09:41 PM
  #39  
Dark Blue Mark's Avatar
Dark Blue Mark
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,333
Likes: 0
From: Bournemouth - 5x Ex Impreza owner. 997 GT3 CS.
Post

When was a WRX ever 280ps

STi was 280, WRX 260, I thought.

MB
Old 15 January 2004 | 09:53 PM
  #40  
richie,7,RA,spec C's Avatar
richie,7,RA,spec C
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Cool

i,m a bit new on the tintanet to put pictures of me beast on here but let me tell you that that ctr would never stand a chance with me little rice rocket
Old 15 January 2004 | 09:56 PM
  #41  
sugar04's Avatar
sugar04
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Post

well whats the MY03 sti to 100
Old 15 January 2004 | 10:05 PM
  #42  
chrisp's Avatar
chrisp
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
From: In wrxshire
Post

4 door saloon wise standard JDM wrxs:

MY93 WRX - 240PS
MY94 WRX - 240PS
MY95 WRX - 260PS
MY96 WRX - 260PS
MY97-00 WRX - 280ps



[Edited by chrisp - 1/15/2004 9:08:09 PM]
Old 15 January 2004 | 10:10 PM
  #43  
chrisp's Avatar
chrisp
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
From: In wrxshire
Post

well whats the MY03 sti to 100
Standard 261bhp UK one about 14 seconds IIRC
Old 15 January 2004 | 10:13 PM
  #44  
sugar04's Avatar
sugar04
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Unhappy

so beware of the classic wrx then ?? well until the PPP 320 comes out !!
Old 15 January 2004 | 10:17 PM
  #45  
chrisp's Avatar
chrisp
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
From: In wrxshire
Post

The new STI is heavier due to strengthening and crash regulation and is nearly 200kgs heavier than a classic WRX. When youhave less power 261bhp and weighes 200kgs more then you dont stand much of a chance in a straight line. The PPP obviously gives the new STI more power (approx 40bhp extra, 25bhp more than the classic wrx) to offset the weight. The power to weight is still on the 280ps classics side though.

[Edited by chrisp - 1/15/2004 9:19:01 PM]
Old 15 January 2004 | 10:24 PM
  #46  
sugar04's Avatar
sugar04
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Post

is it worth it then ??
Old 15 January 2004 | 10:29 PM
  #47  
chrisp's Avatar
chrisp
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
From: In wrxshire
Post

Dont know I own a classic but most people seem to like the PPP on the new STI. A lot of Subaru dealers have an STI PPP so you can always try before you buy.
Old 15 January 2004 | 10:33 PM
  #48  
sugar04's Avatar
sugar04
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Thumbs up

cheers, prob is i have just ordered one without ppp and the dealer only had a wrx for a test drive, so being a previous RS owner (boooo) i here u say, i will comparing !! but thanks
Old 16 January 2004 | 10:13 AM
  #49  
DJ Dunk's Avatar
DJ Dunk
Moderator
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 17,864
Likes: 0
From: Not all those who wander are lost
Talking

FAO: richie,7,RA,spec C

sar·casm (P)Pronunciation Key (särkzm)
n.
A cutting, often ironic remark intended to wound.
A form of wit that is marked by the use of sarcastic language and is intended to make its victim the butt of contempt or ridicule.
The use of sarcasm. See Synonyms at wit1.

Old 16 January 2004 | 11:02 AM
  #50  
mplaczek's Avatar
mplaczek
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
Smile

Perhaps I'm wrong. But aren't the Jap bhp ratings slightly different than the uk bhp. The JDM CTR is a little tweaked in comparison to the UK CTR, but I think the power difference not as great as it would appear on paper for this reason.
Old 16 January 2004 | 11:31 AM
  #51  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Wink

DJ, i like it
Anyway, some of us do actually own Spec C's (well when the registration document comes through the post) and know exactly what BHP these cars put out (and its not 332bhp )

Tony
Old 16 January 2004 | 01:50 PM
  #52  
chrisp's Avatar
chrisp
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 6,725
Likes: 0
From: In wrxshire
Post

All impreza are rated in PS to convert to bhp divide by 1.014 (approx)

ie. 280ps is about 276bhp

218ps (MY01 WRX UK) is about 215bhp

Old 16 January 2004 | 02:31 PM
  #53  
richie,7,RA,spec C's Avatar
richie,7,RA,spec C
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Post

i'm sorry if i upset anyone ,i will try to hold back on the playfull banter.
Old 16 January 2004 | 05:05 PM
  #54  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Question

Richie,
Have you got the 16 or 17 inch version Spec C?

Tony
Old 16 January 2004 | 06:01 PM
  #55  
richie,7,RA,spec C's Avatar
richie,7,RA,spec C
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Post

Nice 17"bbs's with bridgestone potenza tyres
Old 16 January 2004 | 06:46 PM
  #56  
TonyBurns's Avatar
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 2
From: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Wink

Yup but is it the 16 inch or 17 inch version (there are more subtle differences than just the alloys )
See if the brakes are subaru items or not, does the car have a center diff control etc.
Some cars are imported as 17 inch versions but are 16 inch with the alloys added etc.

Tony
Old 16 January 2004 | 06:52 PM
  #57  
richie,7,RA,spec C's Avatar
richie,7,RA,spec C
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
Post

they'r brembo
Old 16 January 2004 | 09:04 PM
  #58  
keevster's Avatar
keevster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
From: the Shire.
Post

well i'll put my two pence in. i owned a CTR up until two weeks ago. picked up my 04 WRX 2 days ago. so i am pretty fresh with both of them. as the stats speak 0-60 the WRX takes a second off the CTR, same as 0-100 another second. 1st and 2nd i feel the WRX is quicker but past that 3rd and 4rth gear there will be virtually nothing in it, the CTR really moves in 4rth gear which i feel at present the WRX does not do to well. this could be due to the fact its not fully run in and loosened up. my CTR was well run in and quick, i could keep on the tail of a MY03 WRX, so the answer to the original question no the CTR wont stay with a jap spec Scooby, it will keep with a UK WRX. as for handling there's no comparison the WRX on B roads will wipe the floor with the CTR, however on track different story, this is where the CTR is at home. and i know, i've tried it.

Keevster
Old 16 January 2004 | 09:17 PM
  #59  
sugar04's Avatar
sugar04
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Talking

another one to pitch in ! i have got rid ov my RS for a MY04 Sti which will be here in 6wks and i went after a mates CTR, not much in 2 be fair but the RS came out on top, but compared to the sti its nothing ! Bring on my new baby

Sugar !
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Harley87
Subaru
23
11 December 2015 10:54 AM
infomotive
ScoobyNet General
22
19 November 2015 02:24 PM
Belly07
Subaru
2
12 November 2015 04:46 PM
Danny0608
Subaru
6
27 September 2015 03:16 PM
Danny0608
Subaru Parts
0
12 September 2015 03:59 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:17 AM.