Tidy Cossie in trader
#31
Funny enough nigsy most of us like perfomance cars for PERFORMANCE the R64`s a weapon it has a metro shell but thats where the simulalites start and end
Same with the cosworth no one comes upto me and says "nice sierra mate" its always "nice cossie" or cosworth
Same with the cosworth no one comes upto me and says "nice sierra mate" its always "nice cossie" or cosworth
#32
Being a car enthusiast isn't just about performance/power (despite what cossie owners may think), it's about the whole package. If I won the lottery a 6r4, integrale etc wouldnt even enter my head once.....would you would rather have a metro shell over Italian exotica like a Gallardo ? I think not
#36
Yes 700+bhp is really gutless isnt it
Begining to think this is a wind up post as surly no one can be that stupid to call it gutless regardless if you like it or not!!! or can they????LoL
Begining to think this is a wind up post as surly no one can be that stupid to call it gutless regardless if you like it or not!!! or can they????LoL
#37
the sierra is sooooo 80's
I never liked the Sierra hatchback shape personally but can appreciate the car for what it is/was. I did like the Sapphire though and the shape still looks fairly modern now, in my opinion.
#38
Hey I didn't write the gutless comment, the cossie maybe many things, but not gutless!!
There is no way on earth I would have a rally/touring car special over a Lambo Gallardo/Murcielago, it's my personal taste, one looks fantastic and the other looks functional (and ugly). But then again, I do like nice clothes and wouldn't be caught dead wearing "motoring" attire !
There is no way on earth I would have a rally/touring car special over a Lambo Gallardo/Murcielago, it's my personal taste, one looks fantastic and the other looks functional (and ugly). But then again, I do like nice clothes and wouldn't be caught dead wearing "motoring" attire !
#39
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm sure many of us would like to drive a Cossie or 6R4 but no way on earth would I want to own one. In fact there are a lot of cars that I'd love to drive but would never want to own. To me the best cars are the ones that make you want both (drive AND own). e.g. the Gallardo as pointed out above.
#40
Yes 700+bhp is really gutless isnt it
#41
Nigsy your a propa glip......
The "cossie" was and still is a quality car. I would have a 500 tomorrow if I had the readies.
And what sort of daft question is that "who would have a 6r4 erm.... ME
PS
Spender had a Magenta cossie but it got nicked (not like a cossie to get nicked in newcatsle) so they replaced it with the ebony one.
The "cossie" was and still is a quality car. I would have a 500 tomorrow if I had the readies.
And what sort of daft question is that "who would have a 6r4 erm.... ME
PS
Spender had a Magenta cossie but it got nicked (not like a cossie to get nicked in newcatsle) so they replaced it with the ebony one.
#42
What on earth is a glip? Is it a working class phrase?
Grovesy, you must have no style whatsoever, do you like to be openly laughed at in the street? I would NEVER EVER own a SIERRA cossie or METRO 6R4, too much of a stigma.
Grovesy, you must have no style whatsoever, do you like to be openly laughed at in the street? I would NEVER EVER own a SIERRA cossie or METRO 6R4, too much of a stigma.
#43
Cosworth427- my car can set off in 3rd gear proberly 4th as well but never tried thats how little low down power it has and am not running monster BHP and as for hills LoL effort less never need to drop down a cog the torque is amazing when tunned:-)
#44
Cosworth427- my car can set off in 3rd gear proberly 4th as well but never tried thats how little low down power it has and am not running monster BHP and as for hills LoL effort less never need to drop down a cog the torque is amazing when tunned:-)
Those YB engines are nothing special, they are as limited in usable power as any other 2.0 litre engine.
#46
next time am driving along at 2,000RPM and decide to put my foot down in 2nd or 3rd and get pinned to my seat i will remind myself how gutless it is
#47
2,500RPM is where my turbo kicks in the cosworths you seem to be on about are the 10 year old monster T4 set ups where they didnt boost on tell 4,000RPM, i can asure you a 330bhp car reacts pritty quickly to the right foot propelling it to 60mph in 4.2sec and even the big power cars arnt as laggy as they used to be one of the quickest doing 0-60mph in 2.8 sec and 0-100mph in 6sec.
[Edited by cossie@ste - 1/30/2004 3:48:36 PM]
[Edited by cossie@ste - 1/30/2004 3:48:36 PM]
#48
2,500RPM is where my turbo kicks in the cosworths you seem to be on about are the 10 year old monster T4 set ups where they didnt boost on tell 4,000RPM
#49
if you wanted to really take off at 30mph 3rd gear is what you would be in 2nd if you like seeing the rev needle climb very quickly you would have a tiny bit of turbo lag in 4th if crusing along at 30mph if the revs where under 3,000RPM if it was at the 3k power band you would be off like a shot
#50
if you wanted to really take off at 30mph 3rd gear is what you would be in 2nd if you like seeing the rev needle climb very quickly you would have a tiny bit of turbo lag in 4th if crusing along at 30mph if the revs where under 3,000RPM if it was at the 3k power band you would be off like a shot
#53
It looks like things need to be dumbed down to get the point across...
Try driving at 30 MPH, while in 4th gear. You decide that traffic in front is pulling away and there is mounting traffic behind you , so you slam open the throttle to even the gap back and front. I am certain the car will struggle and take longer to reach 40 MPH than it would in an ordinary 2.0 litre Mondeo. Try driving an M3 in 4th and it will shift even faster from 30 MPH. Try driving a 5.7 litre chevy powered Corvette, and it will go even faster than that. And guess what? You don't need to shift down to 1st or 2nd just to get going without being considered an obstacle.
That "low end torque" you hype on about simply isnt there, because you need maximum or near-maximum boost for that torque and power.
Dynographs for a typical 2.0 litre turbocharged engine (this is not just with the Cosworth YB), power is very poor at sensible revs. CARLOS THE JACKAL, I am talking about normal revs you would use when driving normally, for steady overtaking or for steady acceleration (if you on the other hand drive at 5000 RPM on a regular basis, then its obvious you don't get it).
Try driving at 30 MPH, while in 4th gear. You decide that traffic in front is pulling away and there is mounting traffic behind you , so you slam open the throttle to even the gap back and front. I am certain the car will struggle and take longer to reach 40 MPH than it would in an ordinary 2.0 litre Mondeo. Try driving an M3 in 4th and it will shift even faster from 30 MPH. Try driving a 5.7 litre chevy powered Corvette, and it will go even faster than that. And guess what? You don't need to shift down to 1st or 2nd just to get going without being considered an obstacle.
That "low end torque" you hype on about simply isnt there, because you need maximum or near-maximum boost for that torque and power.
Dynographs for a typical 2.0 litre turbocharged engine (this is not just with the Cosworth YB), power is very poor at sensible revs. CARLOS THE JACKAL, I am talking about normal revs you would use when driving normally, for steady overtaking or for steady acceleration (if you on the other hand drive at 5000 RPM on a regular basis, then its obvious you don't get it).
#54
Mate if i wanted to go fast why would i put my foot down in 4th at 30mph???? i would drop down to 3rd which would put me on the 3k power band where the turbo is coming into play nicely, every car is differnt and i like the fact i can cruise around off boost and then effortlessly go really fast if i want to, can we pleae leave it here now as am sure we have bored everyone to tiers LoL
#55
Cosworth427 your argument is one of the strangest i've ever seen.
So you have to change gear to get more acceleration sometimes?!
You will find you need to do with most cars!
[Edited by Carlos The Jackel - 1/31/2004 5:00:21 PM]
So you have to change gear to get more acceleration sometimes?!
You will find you need to do with most cars!
[Edited by Carlos The Jackel - 1/31/2004 5:00:21 PM]
#56
That just proves my point that you always need to drop a few gears to move the car, otherwise it is just gutless. This is not a problem with cars that actually have usable low end torque.
Need I say more??
Need I say more??
#58
At the end of the day what ever car I am in, I will ALWAYS drop down a gear or 2 to accelerate quickly. Doesn't matter what car it is because I instinctively go for the gear that will allow the car to accelerate the fastest.
#59
So you have to change gear to get more acceleration sometimes?!
You will find you need to do with most cars!
You will find you need to do with most cars!
A 3 litre BMW M3 can go even quicker without much effort, and guess what?? All that instant low end torque is there so I don't have to drop a gear and build boost to move!
What ever mate it pulls to 60mph in 4.2sec from a standing start so it really struggles for low down power
At the end of the day what ever car I am in, I will ALWAYS drop down a gear or 2 to accelerate quickly.