sharp i wont be racing at totb 3 coz im sh1te at it



and bat sure mate God willing soon as i get my rs diff and driveshafts etc etc i will def race at crail and edzell


but bring the ladies after i do a few launches i do get thirsty for wimmin and 4 wimmin at that

 

You would of loved today then there was plenty of them going about .

 

lol i like it i like fit birds off all races i should have been born 600 yrs ago and got myself a nice harem with all the wifeys of the world

 

Can anyone confirm if this was the case?

It would take a huge power increase to get from 10.8 down to 10.2.


Moses, stop being such a wimp and put your car in for TOTB, there is more than plenty of time for you to learn how to launch between now and 1st August.

 

Bat: couldn't get under the 13.6's today for some reason m8... best time i ran was a 13.65 @ 98.9mph - was pretty dissapointed with my times, but the day was good.

 

i rather be a wimp than a cvnt who looses his bottle when he see;s the crowds and gets his *** kicked from a nova

 

The good thing about TOTB is there is a qualification criteria, therefore there is no real shame in getting beaten by anything there as it must already have proven itself to be quick. Based on lots of the launches last year fear gets the better of most people when there is a crowd watching.

 

crowd is my problem and expense

i cant afford to waste another few grand on driveshafts and broken diffs and problems mate


im gonna take it easy till i get good luck on my side and practice at the scottish strips only

when im ready hmm then it shall be fun

 

correct ... the best time i have run with around 500bhp is 10.88 with 131mph terminal...i need around 100bhp extra to run 10.3/10.4 1/4,s and 142mph terminals

 

kev mate i want to ask u a question mate

your terminal is far too good its for cars that normally have over 700 bhp


tell the truth mate i bet u have over 700 bhp

 

Maybe he just has a realistic power figure and black dyno results

Nice one to Sam's old Evo

What was the terminal?

 

john i dunno mate i need to speak to keith about that i forgot that part

and yes mate kevs terminal is far too good some skylines with 700 bhp dont come close and some do just touch 148 with 800 bhp


and as u know keiths his was over 150


so kevs got a mean machine that is wooo

 

Robertio i can't confirm the time its just what i think i heard from the announcer.

 

Terminal was strange it was only 11.7 @ 111mph.

 

mo,like john says i,m just realistic with figures.

i could spout a load of crap claiming i had more power and most folk would beleive it, but the truth of the matter is my times tie in with a GENUINE 600bhp.

its never been on a rr or dyno because i dont care about figures..its what they do in car that counts

i fully beleive keiths car was 800bhp to do 153mph terminal i recon i,d need another 100bhp to match his 9.9 1/4
or better traction to help....... but i have that in hand

 

Was out in Keith's car a couple of weeks ago before his manifold went and that car is feckin rapid. He is such a sound bloke, I guess he will be looking to dabble more with the engine so God knows what sort of power he is going to get

 

kev mate the reason i asked was as u know yourself thats too good of a terminal


and all the cars with 600 bhp dont come close

only manuels go with 700 bhp does a quarter in 10.72 miles as i posted a vid standard gearbox and his terminal was 144 but he has 100 bhp more than u

and 142 is a very good terminal

 

I still say that these days are as much use as rolling road days , same day comparisons and being able to reproduce similar results at a few different days/events.

at totb2 , the terminals were "out" in one lane. at crail last weekend the times and terminals got questioned . this is not a problem when it is the same for everyone on the day but could lead to arguments when comparing to other results from different days/venues.

 

times
1 st keith's evo7 11.726 111.726 ???????
2nd dave pulsar 12.004 116.044
3rd martin evo5 13.056 107.900
4th g swan scooby 13.211 104.900
5th neil calibra 13.425 83.00
well done to us all
the terminal speed is funny for a 11.726 run at only 111.726 as below davids time was slower but top speed faster.
going on the times e.t.c never the less keith still wins on the day well done
( did you know we built that engine with agra)
not alot of people know that did you know !!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Must of been my imagination the calder supra was a 10.9 not a 10.2 that i thought it was.

 

grant what r u talking about be a man mate



it was assembled by u and built by agra coz of sam and all the stroker, valves and pistons and rods all came from sam and extreme and crower america

all u did was take the engine out and put it back in, everything else was done by sam and agra and sam told them what to do

u didnt build the engine

this is sams own spec i bet u didnt tell anyone that

 

We did a lot more than just take the engine in and out the car moses that you should know buy now.
I'm only just having a laugh about things dont take it to seriously EH!!!!!

 

hi all we got a terminal speed of 128mph last weekend at crail but with a 1/4 of 12.3 thats due to the launches not being too hard 0-60 was like 2.3

K

 

no probs then grant u woken the freedomfighter moses mode their for a minute


and cheers

coz sams spec was the one i passed on to him ages ago from an idea from my mate in new zealand andy evotrack


only difference was sam used his own turbo and different valves to andys and mines



and sti nutter bros mashallah 12.3 your cars capable of 10's but u need traction thats a big prob with the mr2's

and nice terminal for a car that must have took ages to get off line

 

Moses i believe sams old car now runs an HKS 3037s.

 

hks manifold kit mate

the turbo is sams own gt3037 created by him and his supplier


only the hks manifold kit is an hks one

 

Alright i thought sams turbo was something else oooppps. I think keith should bolt on one the same spec as your old GT32 iirc.

 

no he cant gt3240 will coz him the same prob as mines and he will loose power and make plenty of back pressure as mines did

he needs a g3540 with a 0.82 housing i have both housings to test


if its too laggie i will use only the 0.82 i need a 106 for nos maybe


and u have to remember our stroker crank is the same only the valves are different and my pistons are different compression and other mods

basically the rest is the same internally

and
sam has 3 turbos a gt30 2 versions and a gt3037 his version better than the hks one and makes more power and faster spool up

 

Would he still not be up on bhp with the gt3240 surely it will flow more than the HKS 3037s.

I can't remember the figures than you got with the GT3240??? I thought it was more BHP/Torque than keiths with his 3037.

 

yes their was mate 1.7 bar with 610 bhp and 511 ft torque but alot of restriction 2.5 bar back pressure it was making the same power at 2 bar


problem starts at 1.5 , housing is too small for the 2.3 stroker i was the first one to test it with the bigger turbo

so why do that if u cant run more than 1.6 do get good boost


i rather run 2 bar and 2.2 bar


so if he fits a gt3540 im telling u 700 bhp here i come