View Poll Results: Straight line, Clio 172 or uk turbo (std)
Scoob is quicker....
74
84.09%
Get Tae, it's the clio every day...
14
15.91%
Voters: 88. You may not vote on this poll
Poll: Clio cup 172 or standard uk turbo straight line speed
#31
Originally Posted by mrklaw
I had a fiesta Xr2i behind me from Ascot to Windsor early this morning. Clear road, NSL. Couldn't shake him, even through the twisties.
Oh, I was doing 45 because I was knackered and didn't want to drive off the road. What does that prove? Nothing? Exactly.
Oh, I was doing 45 because I was knackered and didn't want to drive off the road. What does that prove? Nothing? Exactly.
#32
When my WRX (classic, not bug-eye) was making 250bhp I had a play against a 172 from about 50 or 60mph and up, I could only pull a few car lengths in the space we had and didn't pull on him at all below 85mph (nice big, but laggy TD05). I reckon a UK Turbo would be monstered in a similar test, IMHO, IIRC, etc
#33
Come to think of it, my car was at 240bhp with a tdo4 at the time..... So maybe it wasn't such a fair test.
I never thought my car was that slow though even when it was standard.
It's funny how this should just be a fact, but the difference of opinion is huge.
Possibly there's quite a few scoobs out there just not making the power they should, more likely to be half the clio's broken though given they're french and all.
'New Renault.... automatic weight saving device..... not quite perfected though as it sometimes removes important bit's and throws them on to the floor'
Should be about perfect now though since all french cars have had this since year dot
Dave
I never thought my car was that slow though even when it was standard.
It's funny how this should just be a fact, but the difference of opinion is huge.
Possibly there's quite a few scoobs out there just not making the power they should, more likely to be half the clio's broken though given they're french and all.
'New Renault.... automatic weight saving device..... not quite perfected though as it sometimes removes important bit's and throws them on to the floor'
Should be about perfect now though since all french cars have had this since year dot
Dave
#34
Originally Posted by weeb
try this site,it was on sidc forum, just pick the cars u wanna race then watch how it pans out over a simulated 1/4 mile!! www.jsread.com/tvr/quartermile.htm
dont know how accurate it is but the clio cup beats a wrx just at the line!!
dont know how accurate it is but the clio cup beats a wrx just at the line!!
how cool is that site?! just done the P1 V WR1, it was close but the P1 won by a whisker, but then we all know the WR1 is a slow pig anyway don't we
#35
I've obliterated badly (very large gaps) various clio 172s whenever they've tried to keep up before in mine at various different inital starting speeds, but that's with an imported wrx sti v2 555 - somewhat quicker than the current standard uk wrx and sti...
Still cant see the 172 Cups being quicker than a properly driven uk wrx though.
Still cant see the 172 Cups being quicker than a properly driven uk wrx though.
#36
All this talk of slow WRX's makes me agree with RB5 245,
there seems to be a huge difference of opinion on standard performance,
I have a mate with an STI 7 PPP, now, it isn't running perfectly at the moment because of up-pipe problems, but it still gave 260 BHP at a recent PE rolling road test (well down I know !) but still much more power than a my standard MY03 WRX !
My only mods are a WR Sport back box, & a Green pannel fillter, (which i'm shure isn't as good as the standerd paper element), so lets say I have an extra 10 to 15 BHP ....+ the 225 from standard, makes a total of 240 BHP.
We drive the same way home three times a week, and race EVERY TIME, and there is never anything in it upto 120 MPH (faster than I should be going I know !)
But the fact remains that he is driving an STI, and my WRX has exactly the same performance .......... !
I also had an encounter with a WR1 a few days ago, again upto 100 MPH +, and once more there wasn't any difference to speak of
(cannock area, up past sainbrys to the tip, if it was you)
I also spoke to a chap who was dissapointed with the performance of his MY03 WRX, we ended up driving each others cars, only to find that they felt totaly different, both in power & in suspention feel, and also gear change feel.
My car pulled much further down the revs, and a lot harder through the rest of the way.
His front suspention dived alarmingly, were mine was stiff.
His gear change was quite "notchy", where mine is smooth.
But most importantly, he was well down on power compared to me !
From my experience's I have come to think that there must be a lot of Scoobs not making the full power that they should be (& most seem to be NEW AGE models),
But if you are lucky .... you might just get a "good' en",
I have been as honest as I can be in this post,
And anyone who knows me, knows I don't BULLSH#T.
It just concerns me, because I won't to go on to an STI after this ....... but will it really be much different ?
I live in hope !
G TOMO
there seems to be a huge difference of opinion on standard performance,
I have a mate with an STI 7 PPP, now, it isn't running perfectly at the moment because of up-pipe problems, but it still gave 260 BHP at a recent PE rolling road test (well down I know !) but still much more power than a my standard MY03 WRX !
My only mods are a WR Sport back box, & a Green pannel fillter, (which i'm shure isn't as good as the standerd paper element), so lets say I have an extra 10 to 15 BHP ....+ the 225 from standard, makes a total of 240 BHP.
We drive the same way home three times a week, and race EVERY TIME, and there is never anything in it upto 120 MPH (faster than I should be going I know !)
But the fact remains that he is driving an STI, and my WRX has exactly the same performance .......... !
I also had an encounter with a WR1 a few days ago, again upto 100 MPH +, and once more there wasn't any difference to speak of
(cannock area, up past sainbrys to the tip, if it was you)
I also spoke to a chap who was dissapointed with the performance of his MY03 WRX, we ended up driving each others cars, only to find that they felt totaly different, both in power & in suspention feel, and also gear change feel.
My car pulled much further down the revs, and a lot harder through the rest of the way.
His front suspention dived alarmingly, were mine was stiff.
His gear change was quite "notchy", where mine is smooth.
But most importantly, he was well down on power compared to me !
From my experience's I have come to think that there must be a lot of Scoobs not making the full power that they should be (& most seem to be NEW AGE models),
But if you are lucky .... you might just get a "good' en",
I have been as honest as I can be in this post,
And anyone who knows me, knows I don't BULLSH#T.
It just concerns me, because I won't to go on to an STI after this ....... but will it really be much different ?
I live in hope !
G TOMO
#37
I raced a MY99 Turbo (exhaust mod) at Crail in my standard Cup we were totally equal in every gear (got a much better reaction time so he lost out on his 4x4 advantage) Since then i've added a de-cat,magnex and r sport ecu and even tho last time I went I did a 2.6 60 ft I terminald @ 98 mph (i.e I would pushing a standard classic turbo along in-gear)
#38
Originally Posted by weeb
the chap next door to me has just got a clio 182 but he is no the kinda guy to give it a good skanking, but mite try n wind him up wan day and give it a wee race! going to crail 1/4m at the end of the month, 1st shot of my scooby on track!!!
#39
Scooby Regular
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
From: The infamous 'Subaru Impreza Story' DVD Motor!
Originally Posted by jd
Interesting... Seems the WRX slowwwwwsss down and loses to most of the cars on that simulator. What happens half way down the track? Too much weight?
#40
According to the official figures for both cars the standard UK Turbo (classic shape) is about a second quicker at 0-60 than the 172 cup.
172 cup figures stated 0-60 in 6.8s I think the UK Turbo is about 5.8s isnt it?
The cup is quicker than a standard 172 due to tweaked ECU, less sound deadening, thinner front glass,less interior trim, better suspension setup and a few other mods (in case you didnt already know).
Its still a Clio.
172 cup figures stated 0-60 in 6.8s I think the UK Turbo is about 5.8s isnt it?
The cup is quicker than a standard 172 due to tweaked ECU, less sound deadening, thinner front glass,less interior trim, better suspension setup and a few other mods (in case you didnt already know).
Its still a Clio.
#42
Originally Posted by cheeky69er
According to the official figures for both cars the standard UK Turbo (classic shape) is about a second quicker at 0-60 than the 172 cup.
172 cup figures stated 0-60 in 6.8s I think the UK Turbo is about 5.8s isnt it?
The cup is quicker than a standard 172 due to tweaked ECU, less sound deadening, thinner front glass,less interior trim, better suspension setup and a few other mods (in case you didnt already know).
Its still a Clio.
172 cup figures stated 0-60 in 6.8s I think the UK Turbo is about 5.8s isnt it?
The cup is quicker than a standard 172 due to tweaked ECU, less sound deadening, thinner front glass,less interior trim, better suspension setup and a few other mods (in case you didnt already know).
Its still a Clio.
No leather. No ABS & no Aircon also.
Darren
#43
Originally Posted by G TOMO
My only mods are a WR Sport back box, & a Green pannel fillter, (which i'm shure isn't as good as the standerd paper element), so lets say I have an extra 10 to 15 BHP ....+ the 225 from standard, makes a total of 240 BHP.
G TOMO
G TOMO
Not disagreeing with your quote of being able to keep up with STi’s though... as EVO quoted(MY03): 0-100 = 15.5 not bad for a standard motor.
Having said that.. if you want 240+ from just an exhaust.. check out powerstations website... a nice full Milltek system with sports cat downpipe and new up-pipe..... Next on my shopping list!!!!
#44
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
From: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Jas03, the 03WRX are underquoted....my car has been rolling roaded twice, with just a panel filter and backbox and has got 248bhp and 252bhp (with a drop of booster).
I would suggest you get your RR'd before you do your exhaust mods to see the difference too
Neil.
P.S. im going to do the full H&S system with a sports cat DP myself.....should be fairly similar!
I would suggest you get your RR'd before you do your exhaust mods to see the difference too
Neil.
P.S. im going to do the full H&S system with a sports cat DP myself.....should be fairly similar!
#45
My 03WRX already has a Janspeed BB and STi (JAP) Panel filter and to be honest I haven’t had it dyno’d... Sounds fab and pulls alittle stronger when High up in the rev range (5500 - 6000rpm) but I cant say it feels like an extra 15bhp... if it is I stand to be corrected. Maybe the MY03’s are underquoted, but what I was trying to say was that I cant see a WR BBox and Green Panel giving an extra 15Bhp... not in my mind anyway or in the advice I got from the guys up at Powerstation.
Anyone else out there with a MY03 fairly standard that’s had it on the rollers??
Anyone else out there with a MY03 fairly standard that’s had it on the rollers??
#47
Originally Posted by jas03WRX
My 03WRX already has a Janspeed BB and STi (JAP) Panel filter and to be honest I haven’t had it dyno’d... Sounds fab and pulls alittle stronger when High up in the rev range (5500 - 6000rpm) but I cant say it feels like an extra 15bhp... if it is I stand to be corrected. Maybe the MY03’s are underquoted, but what I was trying to say was that I cant see a WR BBox and Green Panel giving an extra 15Bhp... not in my mind anyway or in the advice I got from the guys up at Powerstation.
Anyone else out there with a MY03 fairly standard that’s had it on the rollers??
Anyone else out there with a MY03 fairly standard that’s had it on the rollers??
I came to the 15 BHP figure by looking at all of the rolling road stats in the dyno section.
A few guys have the mods that I have, and seem to put out 240 + BHP.
You say you have the ability to feel BHP !
How much do you charge ?, and where do I put my wheels ?
Don't be a Doubting Thomas, SUBARU might have given you more power than you thought.
Lets live in hope.
G TOMO (Mr Glass is half full !)
#48
Originally Posted by Neilo
more or less your right chris, although the 03's, and i quote from a technician "drive like a PPPd 01/02", and from what i experienced last weekend i would agree....as would the owner of the bugeye. The power delivery is very different from the 01/02 to the 03. Try it. The 01/02 is by no means a slow car at all, but the way it delivers it power is more at the top end, the 03 starts to get going a little lower down (torque). The bugeye that i drove was decatted as well, and it still felt a little sluggish, but as i said.....its the power delivery, as im sure i was still going just as fast!!!
Neil.
Neil.
but I ve only played with one my03 but my bugeye is not std
having followed quite a few classics I can fairly say they pull away
about the clio, I had fun with one last week on a nice windy road I pulled away quite easy on the streight but he caught me up in the twisties with all three wheels on the ground
he pulled on to his driveway 10 ish miles along this road - the car is not everything this lad could drive and he really knew the road
this is the same road I pulled away from a maserati......
time to forget the mods, and book some driving lessons
Last edited by WRX_Rich; 22 June 2004 at 11:49 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
61
11 January 2021 03:08 PM
ATWRX
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
88
01 February 2016 07:28 PM
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
7
14 December 2015 08:16 AM
blockhead
Subaru Parts
19
07 November 2015 11:50 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
20
22 October 2015 06:12 AM