Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

lightly modded clio cup beats 240bhp scooby!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29 July 2004 | 02:21 PM
  #331  
Senior_AP's Avatar
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Pavlo
to me, to you, to me......

sort it out lads, looks pathetic.

Paul

Funny as a (now) spectator.
Old 29 July 2004 | 02:30 PM
  #332  
stu_5's Avatar
stu_5
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Question

Originally Posted by pflowers
Interestingly the 94 Impreza Turbo is listed as 0-30 1.7 0-60 5.8 0-100 18.7 qtr 14.7. Which apart from the 0-30 is slower than a blobeye.
Where'd those figures come from? (The 0-100 in particular?)
Old 29 July 2004 | 02:39 PM
  #333  
pflowers's Avatar
pflowers
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
From: Cymru
Default

Originally Posted by stu_5
Where'd those figures come from? (The 0-100 in particular?)
www.syclone.freeserve.co.uk/rivals_cars.htm
Old 29 July 2004 | 02:48 PM
  #334  
jas03WRX's Avatar
jas03WRX
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by JDM
You'll find that the classic times were bettered by almost every road tester of the time, the current trend with new models seems to that the times quoted by IM/Subaru are optimistic and road testers are actually getting worse times.
No doubt though in my mind the blobeye is a better car than the classic in almost every way.
Subaru quotes for the standard WRX03:
0-60 = 5.6
0-100 = 16.1

Subaru quotes for WRX03 + PPP
0-60 = 4.8
0-100 = 14.1

EVO tested standard WRX03:
0-60 = 5.5
0-100 = 15.7

EVO tested the WRX03 PPP and rated it highly, so it cant all be bad.

Autocar tests are much the same as EVO, so the quotes from IM/Subaru sound quite reasonable to me.

As to the WRX PPP vs modded clio = depends on mods and how far you want to take them, as in all cars, not just these two.
Old 29 July 2004 | 02:49 PM
  #335  
stu_5's Avatar
stu_5
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by pflowers
Ah, yup there's some very funny results on that site.

Further up the list for instance,

Subaru Impreza Turbo 1998 208 1.8 5.5 15.8 14.2 87.

Subaru Impreza Turbo 1994 208 1.7 5.8 18.7 14.7 92

Last figure being 1/4 mile terminal with preceeding being 1/4 time and 0-100 before that.

Strange how it takes 4 seconds to gain 8mph from 92 to 100 for the 94 car, but the 98 one takes only 1.6 to gain 13mph!
Old 29 July 2004 | 02:50 PM
  #336  
Danny B's Avatar
Danny B
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,344
Likes: 0
From: Western Canada
Default

All this talk of 0-60 is really boring you know.
Old 29 July 2004 | 02:54 PM
  #337  
jas03WRX's Avatar
jas03WRX
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Danny B
All this talk of 0-60 is really boring you know.
Dont read it then... its quite simple!

Just shows comparsions thats all. I know it doesn’t mean everything, but it does show indidcation of speed.
Old 29 July 2004 | 02:57 PM
  #338  
davyboy's Avatar
davyboy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
From: Some country and western
Default

60 -100 is a better guide.
Old 29 July 2004 | 02:58 PM
  #339  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

Those figures are a mile out!
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:00 PM
  #340  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

Originally Posted by davyboy
60 -100 is a better guide.
now theres the views echoed by the those (unfortunates) without 4WD!
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:01 PM
  #341  
jas03WRX's Avatar
jas03WRX
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by davyboy
60 -100 is a better guide.
better guide to loosing your licence too.
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:02 PM
  #342  
jas03WRX's Avatar
jas03WRX
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BOB'5
Those figures are a mile out!
which figures bob... not sure the ones your talking about?
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:05 PM
  #343  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

Originally Posted by hawkeye
after reading all the comments in this thread and my wr1 vs my02sti race cockup being muppetted I have now officially lost the will to live!!!!!!!!!!!

scoobynet's killin me
here here...things have changed. Maybe something to do with the increase of inter-forum banter
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:07 PM
  #344  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

Originally Posted by jas03WRX
which figures bob... not sure the ones your talking about?
Quarter mile rivals
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:08 PM
  #345  
jas03WRX's Avatar
jas03WRX
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BOB'5
Quarter mile rivals
Miles out in which way,... seem alittle optimistic?
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:09 PM
  #346  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

SIDC:

"Performance Car (sadly no longer with us), as part of their 0-60 challenge timed the Impreza at a mind blowing 5.03 seconds for the 0-60 sprint, with the 1/4 mile being covered in 13.72 seconds at 100.6 mph"

Pre 97 uk turbo
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:12 PM
  #347  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

Compared with quater mile rivals:

0-100mph = 18.7

According to them it takes 4 secs to get from 92mph to 100mph.

Jokes!
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:12 PM
  #348  
pflowers's Avatar
pflowers
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
From: Cymru
Default

Originally Posted by jas03WRX

As to the WRX PPP vs modded clio = depends on mods and how far you want to take them, as in all cars, not just these two.
Exactly, which is why this whole thread stinks, you can't compare modded cars.

This thread started with the insinuation that a Clio 182 was quicker than a WRX, I tried to comment on the standard WRX vs standard Clio 182, but it has gradually turned into impreza vs impreza and whats the point in that ? I thought we were all on the same side ??

The figures were just given to try and prove a point, I drive 1000 miles per week in my WRX and all I know is IMO it is a perfect mix of power / handling / comfort / practicality / quality and value. I don't think in that respect there are many if any cars out there that can offer the same, and certainly not a bloody Clio.
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:14 PM
  #349  
jas03WRX's Avatar
jas03WRX
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BOB'5
SIDC:

"Performance Car (sadly no longer with us), as part of their 0-60 challenge timed the Impreza at a mind blowing 5.03 seconds for the 0-60 sprint, with the 1/4 mile being covered in 13.72 seconds at 100.6 mph"

Pre 97 uk turbo
shows what they can do with the right person behind the wheel and not some pleb just out of ache!!! I’ll look that one up a have a great pile of Performance Car mags in the attic.
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:15 PM
  #350  
scooby-tc's Avatar
scooby-tc
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 8,353
Likes: 0
From: Here and there
Default

Is this totally pointless thread still going
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:18 PM
  #351  
jas03WRX's Avatar
jas03WRX
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by scooby-tc
Is this totally pointless thread still going
Obviously... or you wouldn’t replying to it
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:18 PM
  #352  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

Pflowers:

Every classic is capable of running 13s (1/4mile) all day long. That Clio (albeit modded) only manages 14s absoulte best.

I think we've concluded the bad times were down to $hit driver/missed gears etc.

If clio driver raced many of us he would be able to tell us what times we ran as it flashes up on the board as he goes through (santa pod)!

He should save those vids and show em to his grankids etc as its a rare thing to happen indeed.
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:19 PM
  #353  
pflowers's Avatar
pflowers
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
From: Cymru
Default

Originally Posted by scooby-tc
Is this totally pointless thread still going
Yep, and you have just added another post to it..........
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:20 PM
  #354  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

Originally Posted by jas03WRX
shows what they can do with the right person behind the wheel and not some pleb just out of ache!!! I’ll look that one up a have a great pile of Performance Car mags in the attic.

http://www.sidc.co.uk/faq.htm#2.2
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:21 PM
  #355  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

cant believe people are still replying
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:21 PM
  #356  
pflowers's Avatar
pflowers
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
From: Cymru
Default

Originally Posted by BOB'5
Pflowers:

Every classic is capable of running 13s (1/4mile) all day long. That Clio (albeit modded) only manages 14s absoulte best.

I think we've concluded the bad times were down to $hit driver/missed gears etc.

If clio driver raced many of us he would be able to tell us what times we ran as it flashes up on the board as he goes through (santa pod)!

He should save those vids and show em to his grankids etc as its a rare thing to happen indeed.
I am on your side mate, not sure where those figures on that site came from but they are obviously a bit erratic.
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:25 PM
  #357  
jas03WRX's Avatar
jas03WRX
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 189
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by BOB'5
Cheers Bob,

looks like that’ll make some good reading. Quality article too.
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:38 PM
  #358  
davyboy's Avatar
davyboy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
From: Some country and western
Default

Originally Posted by BOB'5
cant believe people are still replying
They can't help it!

A Clio kicked Impreza *** all the way up a drag strip with evidence, and still there are those that will argue black is white!

You guys got a reeeeeaaal Clio bashing.

lol
Old 29 July 2004 | 03:42 PM
  #359  
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Default

Originally Posted by davyboy
They can't help it!

A Clio kicked Impreza *** all the way up a drag strip with evidence, and still there are those that will argue black is white!

You guys got a reeeeeaaal Clio bashing.

lol
I sooo feel like I'm going to get beat when I pull up next to a clio!












not!

Old 29 July 2004 | 03:44 PM
  #360  
Senior_AP's Avatar
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jas03WRX
Dont read it then... its quite simple!

Just shows comparsions thats all. I know it doesn’t mean everything, but it does show indidcation of speed.
0-60 shows nothing. Sweet FA.

Nothing at all. It is a historical way of proving a cars worth to people that don't know **** about cars. Pub talk crap.

0-60, yeah cos I often stop then start again on full cream just to se how fast my car is.

Last edited by Senior_AP; 29 July 2004 at 03:46 PM.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:21 AM.