lightly modded clio cup beats 240bhp scooby!!!
#61
Originally Posted by Dazza's-STi
Mmm... STI though... Bye bye...
I just drove past the last Clio 182 that had a tickle... a new one out of a roundabout...
Quarter mile times and the STI "at least mine" would have been a second in front! in distance a long way!
13.04 @ 99
nice little cars thoug... very nice turning car... I have a Clio DCi 80 a new one and that steers luvly...
Test drove a 172 cup though; and at 80mph floored it and nothing happend... in the STi it just takes off...
Dazza
I just drove past the last Clio 182 that had a tickle... a new one out of a roundabout...
Quarter mile times and the STI "at least mine" would have been a second in front! in distance a long way!
13.04 @ 99
nice little cars thoug... very nice turning car... I have a Clio DCi 80 a new one and that steers luvly...
Test drove a 172 cup though; and at 80mph floored it and nothing happend... in the STi it just takes off...
Dazza
....and the floodgates are opened!!!
#62
I'm sure the result would've been different if Mike Wood was driving.
You really think it's the hatchback owners who have the complex? They don't seem to be the ones that get bent out of shape when something faster comes along. But then I guess they don't think they own the fastest car on the road, unlike a lot of subaru owners.
210-240hp nowadays is nothing really is it? Not in a 1400kg car. I think 200-225hp in a 600kg car is too slow. Maybe I should get a WR1
These hatchback 'infants' have a real inferiority complex
210-240hp nowadays is nothing really is it? Not in a 1400kg car. I think 200-225hp in a 600kg car is too slow. Maybe I should get a WR1
#64
I didn't like your MY01, it was....well...slow. Just felt odd
and at 80mph floored it and nothing happend... in the STi it just takes off
#66
Originally Posted by davyboy
loud though
It was a good one, looked nice though. The 944 is a million times quicker - whatever the raod unless its ice/gravel/mud.
#68
Originally Posted by dannytwo
not another VS thead forming
why cant we be happy with the cars we've bought,whether it be a scoob or a lada or for that matter a clio
why cant we be happy with the cars we've bought,whether it be a scoob or a lada or for that matter a clio
I'm happy with my cars.
I'm not treating it as a VS thread.....some are though yeah.
#72
Originally Posted by jas03WRX
There’s me thinking this is a forum for subaru owners. Just becoming a forum to be hi-jacked with car owners that don’t have decent forums for their cars! I wonder why?
#73
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 0
From: Spec C - 12.5 @ 110(340/350)
I was on the camera for those runs. The reason we have posted the links is largely due to the in-fighting caused by a few Impreza trolls who would not believe a lightly modded Cup could do so much damage!!
The red WRX STi(apparently) in qustion did a 1.9 60ft time in the run shown in the vid clip, my bro's Cup just kept on pulling on it all the way up the strip.
A few unscientific tests on the way home found that I(P1) couldn't gain an inch from a rolling start in 1st and 2nd, only creeping up on him in 3rd.
The red WRX STi(apparently) in qustion did a 1.9 60ft time in the run shown in the vid clip, my bro's Cup just kept on pulling on it all the way up the strip.
A few unscientific tests on the way home found that I(P1) couldn't gain an inch from a rolling start in 1st and 2nd, only creeping up on him in 3rd.
Last edited by bluenose172; 26 July 2004 at 06:37 PM.
#74
Personally I'd opt for a Clio Cup (or the new 182) over a UK WRX any day of the week, I mean 85% of the performance for almost half the purchase price, cheaper insurance, lower fuel bills, and longer service intervals who wouldn't?
#75
Originally Posted by davyboy
You need a balanced argument, otherwise all Subaru drivers really would think they have the fastest car!
#77
Originally Posted by Danny B
Personally I'd opt for a Clio Cup (or the new 182) over a UK WRX any day of the week, I mean 85% of the performance for almost half the purchase price, cheaper insurance, lower fuel bills, and longer service intervals who wouldn't?
I’m not to bothered about running costs... blah, blah Im not saying MY03 is the fastest thing on the road... far from it. but getting to 60 in 5.5sec and to 100 in 15.5 is a good indication that it can mix with the best, and a few tweaks can make it even better, if the need.
#78
Originally Posted by Danny B
Personally I'd opt for a Clio Cup (or the new 182) over a UK WRX any day of the week, I mean 85% of the performance for almost half the purchase price, cheaper insurance, lower fuel bills, and longer service intervals who wouldn't?
#79
Originally Posted by MadMark
*Nothing* beats a Scoob in the twisties .......
Oh and wet braking might be fun in the Cup .......
Oh and wet braking might be fun in the Cup .......
#80
um.
14sec 1/4 mile clio cup? Big deal....
Neither of the two imprezas ran well, or where in good condition (hence the times) so hardly much of an accomplishment.
Find me a clio that ton up will shove you back in the seat when you accelerate and I might consider swapping my classic sti for it.
Fact one particular modded clio beat two knackered imprezas, doesnt mean overall it's a quicker car.
Sick of the clio boys continually bragging.
14sec 1/4 mile clio cup? Big deal....
Neither of the two imprezas ran well, or where in good condition (hence the times) so hardly much of an accomplishment.
Find me a clio that ton up will shove you back in the seat when you accelerate and I might consider swapping my classic sti for it.
Fact one particular modded clio beat two knackered imprezas, doesnt mean overall it's a quicker car.
Sick of the clio boys continually bragging.
#81
Originally Posted by stu_5
um.
14sec 1/4 mile clio cup? Big deal....
Neither of the two imprezas ran well, or where in good condition (hence the times) so hardly much of an accomplishment.
Find me a clio that ton up will shove you back in the seat when you accelerate and I might consider swapping my classic sti for it.
Fact one particular modded clio beat two knackered imprezas, doesnt mean overall it's a quicker car.
Sick of the clio boys continually bragging.
14sec 1/4 mile clio cup? Big deal....
Neither of the two imprezas ran well, or where in good condition (hence the times) so hardly much of an accomplishment.
Find me a clio that ton up will shove you back in the seat when you accelerate and I might consider swapping my classic sti for it.
Fact one particular modded clio beat two knackered imprezas, doesnt mean overall it's a quicker car.
Sick of the clio boys continually bragging.
#83
10 years ago this argument would have never taken place.
Scoobs have got slower.....Clio's have got quicker where they have now met each other face to face in the performance race.
I used to have a Mk1 Clio 172, it WAS quicker than any MY01, 02 bug eye effort. Not arguing....it was. The Clio was slower to 60 by a larger margin than it was slower to 100 THEREFORE in gear (where it matters) the Clio was quicker....as I proved a few times much to even my amazement.
I didn't like the Clio much. Speed isn't everything
IMO.
The new 172 Cup however, I DO like. Alot.
With all said, I'm not surprised why the Clio beat this Scoob...not that drag strip means anything though. On the open raod this older WRX was probably quicker though.....
I don't own a Clio and I don't hate Scoobies. Simply stating facts.
I agree with Davyboy on his balanced opinion argument.
Scoobs have got slower.....Clio's have got quicker where they have now met each other face to face in the performance race.
I used to have a Mk1 Clio 172, it WAS quicker than any MY01, 02 bug eye effort. Not arguing....it was. The Clio was slower to 60 by a larger margin than it was slower to 100 THEREFORE in gear (where it matters) the Clio was quicker....as I proved a few times much to even my amazement.
I didn't like the Clio much. Speed isn't everything
IMO.
The new 172 Cup however, I DO like. Alot.
With all said, I'm not surprised why the Clio beat this Scoob...not that drag strip means anything though. On the open raod this older WRX was probably quicker though.....
I don't own a Clio and I don't hate Scoobies. Simply stating facts.
I agree with Davyboy on his balanced opinion argument.
Last edited by Senior_AP; 26 July 2004 at 08:30 PM.
#85
I'm only chucking in my 10 pence worth about the MY01 car that I hammered in my ****box Mk1 172. It just made me laugh. Those earliy bug eyed WRX's were ****e.
Scoobs are wicked motors. Some of them simply awesome.
Scoobs are wicked motors. Some of them simply awesome.
#86
is a low 14 sec 1/4 mile that bad (for a scooby i mean)?
only been to santa pod once and did a 14.380 and a 14.260, personally i was quite pleased as i don't really know what it should do. just had a look at the time sheet and my 60ft time seems a bit **** at 2.260, a quick start seems to be a bit of an art then?
it was still good enough on the day to beat my mates RX7 though
still, the car's now running 270 bhp, roll on another RWYB day methinks
only been to santa pod once and did a 14.380 and a 14.260, personally i was quite pleased as i don't really know what it should do. just had a look at the time sheet and my 60ft time seems a bit **** at 2.260, a quick start seems to be a bit of an art then?
it was still good enough on the day to beat my mates RX7 though
still, the car's now running 270 bhp, roll on another RWYB day methinks
#87
I got 13.039 at the japshow last month at santapod......3rd fastest scoob on the sunday checkout www.japshow.co.uk to see what times cars were getting....
joe........
p.s. clio's...ha....please
joe........
p.s. clio's...ha....please
Last edited by jonjo; 26 July 2004 at 09:08 PM.
#88
Originally Posted by stu_5
grow up.
You can buy a secondhand impreza, quicker and faster than a clio 172 for less money.
Still a better car?
/shrugs.
You can buy a secondhand impreza, quicker and faster than a clio 172 for less money.
Still a better car?
/shrugs.
So for what I wanted it for, yes it is a better car.
Just ,not as good as my 944 Turbo, but better than my Astra.
#90
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 4,122
Likes: 12
From: Kent in a 396bhp Scoob/Now SOLD!
WHO?
Yeah I do - Why?
I used to drive a 220bhp 13.56qtr R5Turbo (Best place for an AXGT Boot spoiler I could think of )
And I used to think that car was the bollocks if I got the 'drop' on a Cossie or Monty Turbo. I never checked if it was standard or not.
We all 'grow up' sooner or later and learn from it. My experience was as Trax when I sheared all the teeth off the distributor drive overtaking a Escort Cossie id been chasing on Silverstone straight. The lesson, little uprated cars can only play big games for a short period.
And YES it was a professionally assembled engine, NOT some boosted up 60000 miler
These hatchback 'infants' have a real inferiority complex
You really think it's the hatchback owners who have the complex?
I used to drive a 220bhp 13.56qtr R5Turbo (Best place for an AXGT Boot spoiler I could think of )
And I used to think that car was the bollocks if I got the 'drop' on a Cossie or Monty Turbo. I never checked if it was standard or not.
We all 'grow up' sooner or later and learn from it. My experience was as Trax when I sheared all the teeth off the distributor drive overtaking a Escort Cossie id been chasing on Silverstone straight. The lesson, little uprated cars can only play big games for a short period.
And YES it was a professionally assembled engine, NOT some boosted up 60000 miler