Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Ok, Fox Hunting.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 15 September 2004, 09:07 PM
  #121  
unclebuck
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
unclebuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jason Crozier
Are you debating Fox Hunting or your pet subject 'Tony Blair and the erosion of civil liberties' ?
Both, because, as I see it one leads directly to the other.

UB
Old 15 September 2004, 09:08 PM
  #122  
paulr
Scooby Regular
 
paulr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RecordProduction.com
Ban it.It's mostly snobby, loud, boorish people that are involved (in my experience) who mostly spend the week in their BMW's pushing people out of their important way.



Mike
I thought the issue was animal welfare?
Old 15 September 2004, 09:10 PM
  #123  
gareth123
Scooby Regular
 
gareth123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: California
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by unclebuck
Do you think the many folk whose livelyhoods and way of life will be destroyed by this are being treated in a humane way?
I don't give a ****.

I've had three businesses collapse on me, the first sold slave chains, the second asbestos roof tiles, and the third lead additives for petrol. Where's my sympathy?
Old 15 September 2004, 09:11 PM
  #124  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

Why dont we just kill all the foxes just like we killed all the wolves and bears? Then we can move on to any other 'vermin' that gives us 'problems', like ourselves for instance.
Old 15 September 2004, 09:12 PM
  #125  
unclebuck
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
unclebuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by paulr
I thought the issue was animal welfare?
So did I, apparently not though. This is what it's really about....



The class struggle.

UB

Last edited by unclebuck; 15 September 2004 at 09:15 PM.
Old 15 September 2004, 09:12 PM
  #126  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gareth123
When we started hunting with rifles and shotguns didn't we upset this delicate balance? Looks like the balance survived to me, so I'm sure it can cope with excess foxes being shot instead of hunted with dogs.
Firstly, as hunting has become rarer, shooting has become more prevalent, there has been no sudden overnight change. Shooting is an effective method of controlling foxes and one that gives no incentive to maintain any sort of fox levels at all. To turn off hunting over night in favour of only shooting and expect there not to be a significant effect on numbers of foxes, and consequently prey and so on down the food chain is folly.

How *exactly* is The Balance upset by a fox being shot as opposed to killed by dogs? How does The Balance know? Is there a weekly report sent to The Balance on the specific method of death for all wildlife?
You are being flippant here, but I'll humour you... hunting is and always has been an effective way to keep fox numbers to a naturally balanced level, i.e. enough such that prey species stay stable and livestock predation is at an acceptable level.
Old 15 September 2004, 09:14 PM
  #127  
gareth123
Scooby Regular
 
gareth123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: California
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jye
Then we can move on to any other 'vermin' that gives us 'problems', like ourselves for instance.

Do you mean Socttish people? Where do I sign up? Tally ho!
Old 15 September 2004, 09:14 PM
  #128  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ajm, is that the same prey species we tried to wipe out with myxomatosis?
Old 15 September 2004, 09:15 PM
  #129  
gsm1
Scooby Regular
 
gsm1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Jack City
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You are being flippant here, but I'll humour you... hunting is and always has been an effective way to keep fox numbers to a naturally balanced level, i.e. enough such that prey species stay stable and livestock predation is at an acceptable level.
I don't get it. How does chasing the fox and killing it make any difference from just shooting it and scrapping the chase?
Old 15 September 2004, 09:16 PM
  #130  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gareth123
Do you mean Socttish people? Where do I sign up? Tally ho!
Never heard of that species, have you shot any yet?
Old 15 September 2004, 09:17 PM
  #131  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think this is going to be one of 'those' threads
Old 15 September 2004, 09:17 PM
  #132  
paulr
Scooby Regular
 
paulr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

How about a few facts.

*The fox is a pest*
*Life and death is a fact in the animal kingdom*
*Fox hunting is NOT cruel*
*Tony Blair is the best Prime Minister in our lifetime*
Old 15 September 2004, 09:17 PM
  #133  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gareth123
It's a rational action for a humane people to take. Or are we not humane? And if we're not, shouldn't we strive to be so?
It seemed a humane thing to do when activists relelased hundreds of mink from a mink farm. The result for the local wildlife was devastating and the mink had to be trapped or shot.


Originally Posted by gareth123
I don't give a ****.

I've had three businesses collapse on me, the first sold slave chains, the second asbestos roof tiles, and the third lead additives for petrol. Where's my sympathy?
So your way of repaying the cruel old world is to support actions that will make others suffer in the same way. Bitter, as I thought.
Old 15 September 2004, 09:18 PM
  #134  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Amen paul
Old 15 September 2004, 09:18 PM
  #135  
unclebuck
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
unclebuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gsm1
I don't get it. How does chasing the fox and killing it make any difference from just shooting it and scrapping the chase?
I think the point is that hunting generally involves some natural selection. The weak, old or sick foxes are the ones culled, whereas shooting is indiscriminate an over time will weaken the fox poulation. Might be wrong though.

UB
Old 15 September 2004, 09:20 PM
  #136  
gareth123
Scooby Regular
 
gareth123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: California
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajm
Shooting is an effective method of controlling foxes and one that gives no incentive to maintain any sort of fox levels at all. To turn off hunting over night in favour of only shooting and expect there not to be a significant effect on numbers of foxes, and consequently prey and so on down the food chain is folly.
You give permits to shoot foxes. An expert makes a call as to what is the 'correct' number of foxes for the environment and issues permits accordingly. Same as they do here with deer.

Again, I no problem with foxes being killed. I have a problem with the method.
Old 15 September 2004, 09:21 PM
  #137  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gsm1
I don't get it. How does chasing the fox and killing it make any difference from just shooting it and scrapping the chase?
Because people want to maintain levels of foxes for the hunts, the tradition, the way of life etc. They like doing it. If that goes what reason will people have to maintain any foxes at all?
Old 15 September 2004, 09:21 PM
  #138  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ajm would shoot everything but a fish I guess.

Crossbows over ajm's pond anyone
Old 15 September 2004, 09:23 PM
  #139  
T5NYW
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
T5NYW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: MY99UK-MY02STi-MY99Type R-MY06 T20-MY11 340R-MY05 TYPE25
Posts: 11,468
Received 22 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gareth123
When we started hunting with rifles and shotguns didn't we upset this delicate balance? Looks like the balance survived to me, so I'm sure it can cope with excess foxes being shot instead of hunted with dogs.

How *exactly* is The Balance upset by a fox being shot as opposed to killed by dogs? How does The Balance know? Is there a weekly report sent to The Balance on the specific method of death for all wildlife?
Because Foxes are Protected whilst on 'Farmers land' because their agreement with the Hunt. Now the Farmer sees they are no longer needed, so will shoot them all.

Work it out

30 toffs 30 hounds yahhoooing it arround = 0-2 Foxes
3 farmers 2 Gun's and 2 spaniels around = 5-30 Foxes

Most City accountants will be able to work out the percentage difference

Originally Posted by Jason Crozier
So ...unwanted vermin not at all ...
Your absoulutely correct the Fox is a preditor and require and that's my piont .............but in Farmers eyes only while fox Hunting exists.............after that, they just become vermin and soon extinct.
Old 15 September 2004, 09:24 PM
  #140  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

When to we start killing stoats and weasels, eh? And a damn hedgehog disturbed my sleep the other night, grubbing about my nice lawn for worms, nasty flea ridden critters, wheres the bloody hounds now I ask??????
Old 15 September 2004, 09:25 PM
  #141  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

253-to-0, the beauty of democracy
Old 15 September 2004, 09:26 PM
  #142  
gareth123
Scooby Regular
 
gareth123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: California
Posts: 458
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajm
It seemed a humane thing to do when activists relelased hundreds of mink from a mink farm. The result for the local wildlife was devastating and the mink had to be trapped or shot.
I know. It was a moronic thing to do. I'm not going to excuse morons like that and I hope you don't excuse morons who dog fight or badger bait. Let's keep out of the moron ends of the spectrum.

Originally Posted by ajm
So your way of repaying the cruel old world is to support actions that will make others suffer in the same way. Bitter, as I thought.
Humour sunshine, humour.
Old 15 September 2004, 09:26 PM
  #143  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Fox corner

Will be deemed tortuous in a court of law, the beauty of our legal system
Old 15 September 2004, 09:31 PM
  #144  
gsm1
Scooby Regular
 
gsm1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Jack City
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ajm
Because people want to maintain levels of foxes for the hunts, the tradition, the way of life etc. They like doing it. If that goes what reason will people have to maintain any foxes at all?
So all other wildlife is maintained because people like to hunt it? I think the pro-hunt argument is scraping the barrel.
Old 15 September 2004, 09:32 PM
  #145  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gareth123
You give permits to shoot foxes. An expert makes a call as to what is the 'correct' number of foxes for the environment and issues permits accordingly. Same as they do here with deer.

Again, I no problem with foxes being killed. I have a problem with the method.
Here it comes, you advocate replacing a proven self governing system with beaurocracy? Also, if you are going license foxes you will also have to do prey species such as rabbits because the two species are interdependant.

By the way, deer hunting is not licensed by numbers, if you have a firearm, a game licence (not needed on private land) and you have land on which you have permission to shoot then you can hunt deer.
Old 15 September 2004, 09:36 PM
  #146  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gsm1
So all other wildlife is maintained because people like to hunt it? I think the pro-hunt argument is scraping the barrel.
The fact that I am having to explain this in so much detail only serves to prove my point - you people know nothing about the ecology of the countryside, and yet your opinions are affecting the way important decisions are being made.

No, of course not ALL wildlife is maintained by hunting. Hunting is a small but significant part of maintaining population levels, however in the case of the fox it is more significant because we, human beings, are the only predators it has.
Old 15 September 2004, 09:37 PM
  #147  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

By the way, deer hunting is not licensed by numbers, if you have a firearm, a game licence (not needed on private land) and you have land on which you have permission to shoot then you can hunt deer.
And that is NOT beaurocracy?? Why do I need a licence? Why do I need permission? Barrel scrape bottom deffo..............
Old 15 September 2004, 09:39 PM
  #148  
Jye
Scooby Regular
 
Jye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Dumbartonshire
Posts: 5,896
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

we, human beings, are the only predators it has.
I wonder why......
Old 15 September 2004, 09:40 PM
  #149  
wheeler_dealer
Scooby Regular
 
wheeler_dealer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There will be a lot of ways around this anyway.
But I do think the Government should also ban the killing of animals by slashing the throat alive and draining the blood like they do for some religion. Can't think what that it is. Then all of the ******* would have to leave the European dumping ground and go to france or some where else !!

What about shooting the fox with a gun then letting the hounds eat it ?!?? Does that count because legally you haven't killed it with the hounds you have killed it with the gun!!

How will they police it ?? What is stopping the hunt just saying they are going for a ride and taking the dogs for a walk ?!?

Is a police man on horse back going to be with them to make sure they don't go after a fox ?
Just imaging how many permits the PIG will have to have to go across all the farmers fields. It will be hilarious !!!!
Old 15 September 2004, 09:42 PM
  #150  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jye
And that is NOT beaurocracy?? Why do I need a licence? Why do I need permission? Barrel scrape bottom deffo..............
I didn't say I agree with the licencing, and besides, a game licence has nothing to do with controlling numbers of deer or shooters, it is like a TV licence, merely a revenue earner. You pop into the post office, pay and off you go.


Quick Reply: Ok, Fox Hunting.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:07 PM.