Things that go bump in the night...
#61
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wildberg, Germany/Reading, UK
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 73 Likes
on
54 Posts
Originally Posted by **************
see above wurzel
#62
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The land of Daisies and Bubbles!
Posts: 5,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just because you can't prove something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Brain surgeons have been tinkering around inside peoples heads for years and they've still never seen a dream or a thought. We believe they exist because the vast majority of people experience them. Just because a minority of people experience something doesn't make it any less valid.
ajm could be right, B2Z could be right - or they could both be wrong. Our perceptions of this world are largely based on our own experiences.
Still, it's always amusing to watch them fight!
ajm could be right, B2Z could be right - or they could both be wrong. Our perceptions of this world are largely based on our own experiences.
Still, it's always amusing to watch them fight!
#64
#65
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
That's odd so it must be something hitherto un-observed and outside the realms of possibility as we know it, so it must be that?
A bit of critical thinking never hurt anybody and will do you more good than "faith", being able to admit "you don't know" is not a failing. I don't admit to be able to provide an explanation for every peculiar going on and I am happy to accept that. Many of the oddities relating to the paranormal / supernatural that I have looked in to don't hold water and generally do have a perfectly normal real world explanation.
If there was any (and I do mean any) concrete evidence to the contrary physicists and biologists would be very busy re-writing the physical laws to accommodate the new observations. Sadly what there is amounts to anecdotes, personal experiences (which are always very real and important to the person that has them, but worthless to science) and a lot of chicanery, lying and cheating.
There are believers, cynics and sceptics out there. The believers will accept with nothing more than a "story" they require no evidence to accept, just faith. The cynics are at the other end, no ammount of evidence will convince them and us sceptics are in the middle and the only ones with an open mind. We await to be convinced, we just need the evidence, the others will not change their minds no matter how much evidence there is or isn't to support something.
A bit of critical thinking never hurt anybody and will do you more good than "faith", being able to admit "you don't know" is not a failing. I don't admit to be able to provide an explanation for every peculiar going on and I am happy to accept that. Many of the oddities relating to the paranormal / supernatural that I have looked in to don't hold water and generally do have a perfectly normal real world explanation.
If there was any (and I do mean any) concrete evidence to the contrary physicists and biologists would be very busy re-writing the physical laws to accommodate the new observations. Sadly what there is amounts to anecdotes, personal experiences (which are always very real and important to the person that has them, but worthless to science) and a lot of chicanery, lying and cheating.
There are believers, cynics and sceptics out there. The believers will accept with nothing more than a "story" they require no evidence to accept, just faith. The cynics are at the other end, no ammount of evidence will convince them and us sceptics are in the middle and the only ones with an open mind. We await to be convinced, we just need the evidence, the others will not change their minds no matter how much evidence there is or isn't to support something.
#66
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Drunken Bungle *****
Just because you can't prove something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Brain surgeons have been tinkering around inside peoples heads for years and they've still never seen a dream or a thought. We believe they exist because the vast majority of people experience them. Just because a minority of people experience something doesn't make it any less valid.
ajm could be right, B2Z could be right - or they could both be wrong. Our perceptions of this world are largely based on our own experiences.
Still, it's always amusing to watch them fight!
ajm could be right, B2Z could be right - or they could both be wrong. Our perceptions of this world are largely based on our own experiences.
Still, it's always amusing to watch them fight!
"Dream" is the term given to a period of sleep time know as REM (Rapid Eye Movement). We know very well what dreams are, likewise we know what air is as well although we can't see that either.
#67
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The land of Daisies and Bubbles!
Posts: 5,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just because lots of people believe something does not make it so
(And how exactly is REM 'seeing' dreams?)
#69
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Drunken Bungle *****
No **** Sherlock - guess that's me put in my place........
(And how exactly is REM 'seeing' dreams?)
(And how exactly is REM 'seeing' dreams?)
Your claim was:
Just because you can't prove something doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
We believe they exist because the vast majority of people experience them
To prove something exists you do not have to "see" it, it can be tested in other ways (We know air exists but we can't see that either).
However, if you are making a claim that something new does exist then the scientific standpoint is that is does not exist until you can provide proof that it does. The burden of proof lies with the claimant.
If you unfamiliar with it, I can explain the process of scientific proof. Once something has been tested many times and the results are consistent then it becomes scientific fact (this is not absolute fact), by which we mean we are very confident of something, and we can now formulate other hypotheses based on it. However, it also allows for self correction that if new evidence comes along then we may have to review our standpoint. This is what happened to Newtonion physics when Einstein came along. He didn't shatter it, but he did show it was incorrect under some circumstances and refined the theory accordingly.
#72
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The land of Daisies and Bubbles!
Posts: 5,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you unfamiliar with it, I can explain the process of scientific proof.
#75
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Drunken Bungle *****
Actually - I'm unfamiliar with the phrase 'Patronising Git' too - could you help me there as well...?
Amazing how quickly some people resort to ad hominem attacks when they don't have a leg to stand on
#76
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Getting too "o" happy with proving stuff!!
Originally Posted by ajm
IPU?
#77
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The land of Daisies and Bubbles!
Posts: 5,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OllyK
Sure you'll find it here in Dictionary.com.
Amazing how quickly some people resort to ad hominem attacks when they don't have a leg to stand on
Amazing how quickly some people resort to ad hominem attacks when they don't have a leg to stand on
I don't feel the need to prove I'm right or anyone else is wrong - that was the whole point of my original post.....
#78
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by OllyK
Invisible Pink Unicorn. A common retort on the JREF forums when people try to shift the burden of proof. It usually takes the form "and I have a pink unicorn in my garage, proove I don't"
#79
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Drunken Bungle *****
And amazing how others resort to using long words to appear more intelligent than they actually are....
I don't feel the need to prove I'm right or anyone else is wrong - that was the whole point of my original post.....
Last edited by OllyK; 17 February 2005 at 02:52 PM. Reason: To sort the rat fink quotes out
#80
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ajm
LOL! That's a new one on me. Nice one!
#81
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The land of Daisies and Bubbles!
Posts: 5,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I poke fun at your intellect because it's fun to see how much it winds you up (which appears to be quite a lot!) and frankly I'm a bit bored this afternoon and...
Is not what I actully originally said. My original post said (when refering to dreams and ideas) "we believe they exist because a vast majority of people experience them" (To prove your point - lots of people thought Labour were right at the last election.....)
And my only argument about the paranormal was to say anyone could be right, but just because only a minority of people exerience something doesn't mean it doesn't exist and just because you can't prove something doesn't mean it isn't there.
If you want to fight at least quote me correctly...... (copy of original post below just to help)
Which as I said was flawed, you were suggesting that "because lots of people think it is right, it must be right". That's wrong, period. It's a logical fallacy and is used frequently in discussions of the paranormal to try and give weight to a statement that is worthless.
And my only argument about the paranormal was to say anyone could be right, but just because only a minority of people exerience something doesn't mean it doesn't exist and just because you can't prove something doesn't mean it isn't there.
If you want to fight at least quote me correctly...... (copy of original post below just to help)
Just because you can't prove something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Brain surgeons have been tinkering around inside peoples heads for years and they've still never seen a dream or a thought. We believe they exist because the vast majority of people experience them. Just because a minority of people experience something doesn't make it any less valid.
ajm could be right, B2Z could be right - or they could both be wrong. Our perceptions of this world are largely based on our own experiences.
Still, it's always amusing to watch them fight!
ajm could be right, B2Z could be right - or they could both be wrong. Our perceptions of this world are largely based on our own experiences.
Still, it's always amusing to watch them fight!
#83
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Drunken Bungle *****
I poke fun at your intellect because it's fun to see how much it winds you up (which appears to be quite a lot!) and frankly I'm a bit bored this afternoon and...
Is not what I actully originally said. My original post said (when refering to dreams and ideas) "[i]we believe they exist because a vast majority of people experience them"
"we know they exist because they have been the subject of significant scientific research and the hypothesis for their existence has stood up to repeated testing
Because "a vast majority" (as an aside, how can you have more than 1 majority?) thinks, believes or experiences something is irrelevant and anecdotal for the most part. It may be the basis for an observation which is the start of the process, but it proves nothing. I'm sorry to keep banging on about this, but this misconception about lots of people seeing, feeling, experiencing something being scientific evidence is just plain wrong.
And my only argument about the paranormal was to say anyone could be right,
but just because only a minority of people exerience something doesn't mean it doesn't exist and just because you can't prove something doesn't mean it isn't there.
You are working from the opposite end in that you believe I have an IPU in my garage, even if it can't be proved, because someday somebody may (or may not) be able to to prove the existence of an IPU. That is not how science works, it is how the woo-woo fraternity work, it allows them to say everything the want to believe is real and true as science hasn't dis-proved it yet (another fallacy there for you).
Last edited by OllyK; 17 February 2005 at 04:30 PM. Reason: Typo
#86
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The land of Daisies and Bubbles!
Posts: 5,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Indeed - all they need to do is provide scientific evidence to prove their case. Nobody has yet. What does that tell you?
but this misconception about lots of people seeing, feeling, experiencing something being scientific evidence is just plain wrong.
I'm not suggesting that ghosts and ghouls (or IPUs ) and the like do exist - maybe someone will prove them all to be a hoax or to have some rational explanation. I'm open minded either way - which is something I believe you were arguing in favour of in an earlier post.....
#87
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Drunken Bungle *****
All it tells me is that no one has proved it yet. Not that it can't be proven. Which is (and has been) my argument all along.
Science would be spend all its time trying to prove (fruitlessly I expect) the existence of Pink, Yellow, Green and any other colour of Unicorn because up until that point nobody had managed to disprove their existence (which you can't do anyway). If you start from that premise everything is possible, it may fuel the imagination but it doesn't lead to very focused research on how to prove any of it.
So science starts from the basis that until you can prove it, it doesn't exist. Lots of people "suspect" things exist, don't know what they are but they can observe them indirectly possibly or as a result of some effect they have on other things (You can't see XRays but you can detect them by the effect they have on photographic film. Consider Gravity, air, bacteria before microscopes etc)
The best scientific minds are the ones that remain open to posibilities of things not yet proven. At different points in time science has told us that we'd die if we travelled at over 30mph (and did the equations to prove it) and that travelling at the speed of sound was impossible (again - they had the maths to back that up). Einstein and Hawkin must be fully paid up members of your 'woo woo fraternity'. Long held scientific beliefs are being challenged every single day - and so they should be!
Of course I'm no scientist but surely experiements have to be seen, felt or experienced by more than one person to prove them? They usually then have to be repeatable in front of other people who would either see, feel or experience them....?
I appreciate I am nit picking but I hope you can now see the difference between "a belief based on a number of people saying / experiencing something in an uncontrolled manner" and "something being known as a result of controlled repeatable scientific testing" It's a subtle point but it's the difference between evidence and anecdotes! One has scientific value the other doesn't.
I'm not suggesting that ghosts and ghouls (or IPUs ) and the like do exist - maybe someone will prove them all to be a hoax
or to have some rational explanation.
I'm open minded either way - which is something I believe you were arguing in favour of in an earlier post.....
#88
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Nobody knows how to tie the simple knots that I know
Posts: 8,010
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
give it a rest! It's almost like having Claudius back and every last post has got a quote and nit-pick in!
Any results of experiments anyway B2Z - has W69 been trampled in the night?!?!?!
Any results of experiments anyway B2Z - has W69 been trampled in the night?!?!?!
#89
Mate, there must be a logical explantion. Not one credible scientific observation on record to suggest existance of ghosts etc.
E.g. One place to check would be the area of tsunami - sure one would find ghosts there. Didley-Squat.
All in the mind, if not in viable physical explantion (e.g. floor board expansion). Plus if you are convinced there is something there you are more likely to over-react to something minor but explanable...
E.g. One place to check would be the area of tsunami - sure one would find ghosts there. Didley-Squat.
All in the mind, if not in viable physical explantion (e.g. floor board expansion). Plus if you are convinced there is something there you are more likely to over-react to something minor but explanable...
#90
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tellins, Home of Super Leagues finest, and where a "split" is not all it seems.
Posts: 5,504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Eeeeeeeeeeeeee, I was in this place in June last year - Ive just been reading the "most haunted" thread again for posterity... A good thread indeed...
Whatever you type on this subject Olly will have a 1000 word essay in reply that doesnt really take you anywhere...
Olly good sir - when I pass, I shall hunt you down through the interweb (a la lawnmowerman) and haunt your house - heavy footsteps, bad bad bad smells, crockery flying and maybe even a bit of levitation - as long as you arent as heavy as your posts and see what ya think then
Whatever you type on this subject Olly will have a 1000 word essay in reply that doesnt really take you anywhere...
Olly good sir - when I pass, I shall hunt you down through the interweb (a la lawnmowerman) and haunt your house - heavy footsteps, bad bad bad smells, crockery flying and maybe even a bit of levitation - as long as you arent as heavy as your posts and see what ya think then