Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Smoking to be banned in England

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16 November 2004, 05:37 PM
  #91  
Buckrogers
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Buckrogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jerome
I think many people have missed the fact that this proposal is to ban smoking in bars (as well as other places) that sell prepared food - not all pubs. At least then smokers and non-smokers, not to mention the landlords themselves, have a choice.

I am quite happy about smoking being banned from just about anywhere in public except dedicated sections of bars.
Typically, the majority of pubs need to sell food to survive. I guess working men’s clubs should be all right and the few bars in town centres that do drinks only. It is generally around the 50 / 50 mark – food / drink. Pubs make far more profit on food than they do on drink.



Who knows, some sharp people out there may decide to stop doing food to allow smoking, but this will only happen in town centre pubs.



Smoking has already been banned within the work place apart from set designated rooms. Why ban those rooms now? Smoking rooms have been put in place to allow people to smoke in those rooms. If you are a non-smoker and don’t like smoke you do not go in there. Why ban them?


Old 16 November 2004, 05:42 PM
  #92  
Buckrogers
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Buckrogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Senior_AP
Alcohol only (from a health point of view) affects the person consuming it, cigarettes on the other hand is the single most vile/anti-social thing one can do in public.
Alcohol affects masses of people. Anti social behavour, voilence direct outside pubs / clubs, voilence but at the home, drink driving being drunk at work the following day etc, etc, etc. It does not just affect the person drinking it from a health point of view.
Old 16 November 2004, 05:49 PM
  #93  
davegtt
Scooby Senior
 
davegtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Buckrogers
Alcohol affects masses of people. Anti social behavour, voilence direct outside pubs / clubs, voilence but at the home, drink driving being drunk at work the following day etc, etc, etc. It does not just affect the person drinking it from a health point of view.
OK I'll give u that to a certain extent, it is by far the best reponce to the debate so far IMO, I think alot of this could be cut out with better policing. not blaming the police but we need more numbers, people patrolling the streets on a saturday night NOT driving around the city centre HOPING they'll see something and penalising boy racers for having LED washer jets on etc..... OK there are some aspects that are much harder to police like the violence at home but its a start.
Old 16 November 2004, 05:52 PM
  #94  
milo
Scooby Regular
 
milo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 2,043
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dracoro
But they weren't legal in the first place. You can't miss what you never had.
yes they were legal in the first place! steroids for one thing used to be perfectly legal. im sure there are LOTS of other drugs that have had this done to them also. in fact - probably every drug... a drug had to exist (and be legal) before it could be made illegal!

the govt can do what they like with regards to making things illegal. right now they're planning on making lots of sports supplements illegal too.
Old 16 November 2004, 06:00 PM
  #95  
logiclee
Scooby Regular
 
logiclee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 4,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Buckrogers
Alcohol affects masses of people. Anti social behavour, voilence direct outside pubs / clubs, voilence but at the home, drink driving being drunk at work the following day etc, etc, etc. It does not just affect the person drinking it from a health point of view.
Most of the above is illegal, do them and you hurt other people and are breaking the law.

Currently you can smoke, hurt other people and it's totaly legal. Legislation is the way forward but the proposals don't go far enough.

If you got drunk and punched a barstaff you would be arrested, however ther is still scope in the new laws to breath smoke into barstaffs face. The effect f the smoke is not as instant as the punch but over time the end result could be far worse.

Lee
Old 16 November 2004, 06:10 PM
  #96  
Buckrogers
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Buckrogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by logiclee
Most of the above is illegal, do them and you hurt other people and are breaking the law.

Currently you can smoke, hurt other people and it's totaly legal. Legislation is the way forward but the proposals don't go far enough.

If you got drunk and punched a barstaff you would be arrested, however ther is still scope in the new laws to breath smoke into barstaffs face. The effect f the smoke is not as instant as the punch but over time the end result could be far worse.

Lee
Yes, most of it is illegal. Most of the people committing the offences get away with it as well.



I would be so bold to say that there are probably more victims of drink related incidents then there are cancer victims caused by passive smoking.
Old 16 November 2004, 06:18 PM
  #97  
matt85
Scooby Regular
 
matt85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dracoro
The ban (however lightly enforced) for this is already in place. It's illegal to sell alcohol in pubs/clubs to someone who is drunk, I kid you not.
Yep.

Also, it is actually illegal to be intoxicated in a public place.





BTW- Baning smoking, im all for it. Disgusting in every way IMO.
Old 16 November 2004, 07:17 PM
  #98  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Buckrogers
Alcohol affects masses of people. Anti social behavour, voilence direct outside pubs / clubs, voilence but at the home, drink driving being drunk at work the following day etc, etc, etc. It does not just affect the person drinking it from a health point of view.

These are all indirect issues.

Unlike smoking, I'm not forced to drink someone elses beer after they've spat it out.
Old 16 November 2004, 10:06 PM
  #99  
Buckrogers
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Buckrogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Senior_AP
These are all indirect issues.

Unlike smoking, I'm not forced to drink someone elses beer after they've spat it out.
You are not forced.

There are already non-smoking pubs, few, but there are. If they are so in demand why are there not more?

I am saying that you or anyone else is more likely to be affected, health wise, by an indirect drink related incident than by getting cancer as a result of passive smoking.
Old 17 November 2004, 09:11 AM
  #100  
Dream Weaver
Scooby Regular
 
Dream Weaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 9,844
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its not indirect if a drunk driver splats you
Old 17 November 2004, 09:20 AM
  #101  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Buckrogers
You are not forced.

There are already non-smoking pubs, few, but there are. If they are so in demand why are there not more?

I am saying that you or anyone else is more likely to be affected, health wise, by an indirect drink related incident than by getting cancer as a result of passive smoking.

Perhaps - but we gotta start somewhere.
Old 17 November 2004, 09:52 AM
  #102  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think the most important thing is that people should be in no doubt abouit the dangers of smoking both to the smoker and the person breathing in old smoke.

Maybe if there was a concerted effort to educate young chidren at school before they even get a chance to start, that might make a significant difference. And it might also stop those who have already started at a ridiculously young age. The road safety education that schools and other organisations used to give in the past made a big difference to the way children behaved at the roadside, maybe it might discourage them to try drugs and smoking if they were given the real facts and how nasty the eventual results can be.

I personally thing it is a duty for our educators to do this sort of thing, especially since so many parents can't be bothered now.

Les
Old 17 November 2004, 10:06 AM
  #103  
Dream Weaver
Scooby Regular
 
Dream Weaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 9,844
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

But that's down to the gov't to implement, not the educators, and as said the gov't like the smoking revenue too much, so they would prefer children to start smoking in all honesty, hence why you never see huge no smoking campaigns in school.
Old 17 November 2004, 10:11 AM
  #104  
m18use
Scooby Regular
 
m18use's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Yate/Bristol
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If they ban smoking ,how could you possibly police it.In a club for eg are they
gonna have 50 doormen?In a pub are they gonna employ people to watch to see if people smoke?It will never work ,and yes i smoke but if some one does not like it they can move,why should I.Its your choice to be in a pub/club if you dont like smoke dont go,its easy really
Old 17 November 2004, 10:12 AM
  #105  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by m18use
Its your choice to be in a pub/club if you dont like smoke dont go,its easy really
Old 17 November 2004, 10:14 AM
  #106  
m18use
Scooby Regular
 
m18use's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Yate/Bristol
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry was that difficult for you?
Old 17 November 2004, 10:16 AM
  #107  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by m18use
Sorry was that difficult for you?

Yes - in fact impossible to digest that.

"if you don't like farts, stay at home".

I'll fart in your vicinity then walk away???

Selfish??
Old 17 November 2004, 10:17 AM
  #108  
davegtt
Scooby Senior
 
davegtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by m18use
and yes i smoke but if some one does not like it they can move,why should I.Its your choice to be in a pub/club if you dont like smoke dont go,its easy really
That is the most ignorant thing Ive ever read on scoobynet. numnutts, if you want to smoke yourself into an early death fine by me, fine by alot of people but dont enforce it upon other people its your choice to smoke if your gonna take up that choice at least have some manners
Old 17 November 2004, 10:20 AM
  #109  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by davegtt
That is the most ignorant thing Ive ever read on scoobynet. numnutts, if you want to smoke yourself into an early death fine by me, fine by alot of people but dont enforce it upon other people its your choice to smoke if your gonna take up that choice at least have some manners

<applause>
Old 17 November 2004, 10:23 AM
  #110  
m18use
Scooby Regular
 
m18use's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Yate/Bristol
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by davegtt
That is the most ignorant thing Ive ever read on scoobynet. numnutts, if you want to smoke yourself into an early death fine by me, fine by alot of people but dont enforce it upon other people its your choice to smoke if your gonna take up that choice at least have some manners
Lol ,do you really think im ignorant ? do i give a toss ........no
Do you really think banning smokin is gonna make everyone live to be a 100,no i dont think so.everybody gives up smokin,where is the money gonna come from?would you be happy if tax was 50% because no one smokes
Old 17 November 2004, 10:25 AM
  #111  
Senior_AP
Scooby Regular
 
Senior_AP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by m18use
Lol ,do you really think im ignorant ? do i give a toss ........no

When in a hole.....

Davegtt - I think he's just verified our thoughts.
Old 17 November 2004, 10:27 AM
  #112  
urban
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
urban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Never you mind
Posts: 12,566
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by m18use
If they ban smoking ,how could you possibly police it.In a club for eg are they
gonna have 50 doormen?In a pub are they gonna employ people to watch to see if people smoke?It will never work
Want a bet, it worked in Ireland, the responsibility is on the bar staff/publican - huge fines if spotted/reported and validated. So for instance I can be in the pub and when a ******** like you lights up I can report the bar. He get a large fine, you get barred ta **** and the rest of us are all happy.

Originally Posted by m18use
and yes i smoke but if some one does not like it they can move,why should I.Its your choice to be in a pub/club if you dont like smoke dont go,its easy really
Selfish ba$tard.
I used to smoke, but I would never have smoked around people who didn't, It was my problem, not theirs so I went offside for a smoke.
I hated people smoking around me when I was eating, and probably hate it even more now.

Shaun

Last edited by urban; 17 November 2004 at 10:37 AM.
Old 17 November 2004, 10:27 AM
  #113  
davegtt
Scooby Senior
 
davegtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

its not about whether Im gonna live longer now people are not smoking around me. My life would be happier if I could enjoy a night out or even something simple like a game of snooker on a wednesday night without smelling the disgusting habit of others. waking up in the morning stinking of ****, u woke up to a woman after a night on the raz and smelt her hair? its disgusting. she doesnt smoke, neither do I so why should I stink of you?

People are still gonna smoke, there isnt a total ban, Im not asking for a total ban.
Old 17 November 2004, 10:28 AM
  #114  
urban
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
urban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Never you mind
Posts: 12,566
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by m18use
Lol ,do you really think im ignorant ? do i give a toss ........no
Do you really think banning smokin is gonna make everyone live to be a 100,no i dont think so.everybody gives up smokin,where is the money gonna come from?would you be happy if tax was 50% because no one smokes
But there will always be smokers
Old 17 November 2004, 10:42 AM
  #115  
m18use
Scooby Regular
 
m18use's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Yate/Bristol
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Yeah it worked in ireland but there irish so not really a good example is it
Thats why they have 100000 dogends in the st,is that better?
Old 17 November 2004, 10:44 AM
  #116  
Dream Weaver
Scooby Regular
 
Dream Weaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 9,844
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its a shame we never vote with our feet in this country, like the French do.

Instead of waiting for the gov't idiots to ban smoking, if all those people that dont like smokey pubs/bars never went in them, and "boycotted" those establishments, then they would soon go out of business and have to ban smoking in their bar/pub, as according to Senior and the likes "most people dont like smoking", so they would lose business because only the small minority of smokers would visit them.

If a ban on smoking was that important to people, then there would be protests to enforce it, but I never see anyone outside my local with a "ban smoking" sign.

I just wish they would make it illegal, would be easier to give up then, everyone would be healthier and the NHS would be a right laugh.

PS I *am* a considerate smoker, dont smoke around food/eating places, at home, or around non-smokers.
Old 17 November 2004, 10:45 AM
  #117  
davegtt
Scooby Senior
 
davegtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by m18use
Yeah it worked in ireland but there irish so not really a good example is it
Thats why they have 100000 dogends in the st,is that better?
again thats down to the smokers having no respect for their surroundings if you ask me. should be prosecuted for littering
Old 17 November 2004, 10:45 AM
  #118  
Jap2Scrap
Scooby Regular
 
Jap2Scrap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by m18use
Yeah it worked in ireland but there irish so not really a good example is it
Thats why they have 100000 dogends in the st,is that better?
Oh no. Don't mention dog-ends in the street! That one went on for a few days itself

here: http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/showthread.php?t=372653
Old 17 November 2004, 10:46 AM
  #119  
m18use
Scooby Regular
 
m18use's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Yate/Bristol
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by Dream Weaver
Its a shame we never vote with our feet in this country, like the French do.

Instead of waiting for the gov't idiots to ban smoking, if all those people that dont like smokey pubs/bars never went in them, and "boycotted" those establishments, then they would soon go out of business and have to ban smoking in their bar/pub, as according to Senior and the likes "most people dont like smoking", so they would lose business because only the small minority of smokers would visit them.

If a ban on smoking was that important to people, then there would be protests to enforce it, but I never see anyone outside my local with a "ban smoking" sign.

I just wish they would make it illegal, would be easier to give up then, everyone would be healthier and the NHS would be a right laugh.

PS I *am* a considerate smoker, dont smoke around food/eating places, at home, or around non-smokers.

Good point .
Old 17 November 2004, 10:46 AM
  #120  
davegtt
Scooby Senior
 
davegtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dream weaver, thats this country for you. nobody is happy with petrol prices and taxes but we still put up with it


Quick Reply: Smoking to be banned in England



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:18 PM.