So, the ID cards march on...
#31
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
That's alright. It's the NSR "Is he really smart or does he just copy and paste someone else's arguments?" alert
#32
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TelBoy
Benefit fraud and illegal immigration to name but two. If those two are eradicated, bring in ID cards tomorrow, i say.
#33
some very good points on this thread.
Has such a scheme been implemented in other countries (meaning with Biometric scans)?
If this sort of ID was going to stop Asylum seekers
Seek out benefit fraudsters
Stop petty crime
Then I can see the point. But the point of it being optional kind of defies the purpose.
It wont stop terrorism - that is simply a stupid expectation. organised criminals have ways around such documents.
I am still not sure exactly how the ID cards are bad for our freedom and right?
Dont I already have a driving license? What about my NI card? What about my credit rating on the system? What about my record on the insurance database? What about my health record with the NHS and my private healthcare? What about my store cards? what about the ISP monitoring our internet activity? what about the organisations having the ability to record our telephone calls?
They already have more than enough info on us. If they are bringing it all together in a single orderly database to make it more effective, then what is wrong with that.
Has such a scheme been implemented in other countries (meaning with Biometric scans)?
If this sort of ID was going to stop Asylum seekers
Seek out benefit fraudsters
Stop petty crime
Then I can see the point. But the point of it being optional kind of defies the purpose.
It wont stop terrorism - that is simply a stupid expectation. organised criminals have ways around such documents.
I am still not sure exactly how the ID cards are bad for our freedom and right?
Dont I already have a driving license? What about my NI card? What about my credit rating on the system? What about my record on the insurance database? What about my health record with the NHS and my private healthcare? What about my store cards? what about the ISP monitoring our internet activity? what about the organisations having the ability to record our telephone calls?
They already have more than enough info on us. If they are bringing it all together in a single orderly database to make it more effective, then what is wrong with that.
#34
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You can't stop people coming in altogether, obviously, but it might go some way to stopping the UK being seen as the world's soft touch. The sooner the better.
#35
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TelBoy
You can't stop people coming in altogether, obviously, but it might go some way to stopping the UK being seen as the world's soft touch. The sooner the better.
If identification is needed then all the Government has to do is introduce legislation whereby Passports have to be carried at all times but this is about the Government having biometric information on all its law abiding citizens. The ones who don't want to be part of it will simply ignore it and in my opinion this will have the effect of creating an even larger black economy in the UK which isn't really part of our existing culture as it drives the illegal element underground.
#36
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TelBoy
You can't stop people coming in altogether, obviously, but it might go some way to stopping the UK being seen as the world's soft touch. The sooner the better.
Barcoding the population of the UK won't have any bearing on that!
#37
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I hear what you're both saying, but with the right implementation, rather than the namby pamby don't-upset-anyone approach we're likely to see, it has the ability to be a very useful tool, in my opinion. Whether it's beyond being defrauded i've no information, but it would be a shame if they made them possible to scam with all the technology available today.
#38
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TelBoy
I hear what you're both saying, but with the right implementation, rather than the namby pamby don't-upset-anyone approach we're likely to see, it has the ability to be a very useful tool, in my opinion. Whether it's beyond being defrauded i've no information, but it would be a shame if they made them possible to scam with all the technology available today.
Apart from the fact that there is no evidence to support the claims of this Government that ID cards will reduce crime and illegal immigration just think about why they want to introduce this system. Simply put, the administration and revenue generated by this system will be immense providing not only thousands of jobs but also offsetting Government spending because ID cards will subsidise (just as the Lotto does) any gaps where the Government has failed - ask yourself why the Tories are in the main supporting this system.
Secondly, the sheer volume of information that the Government will have on the (in the main) law abiding part of the population is so open to abuse by Government agencies in the future it's mind boggling - that cartoon Brendan posted is a lot closer to the mark than you think. It really is Big Brother coming home to roost.
#39
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The thing is, as one of many citizens who have nothing to hide, and who understand that most of the information on these cards is readily available elsewhere in any case, i just don't have a reason to oppose them.
Of course, if after they're introduced i'm adversely affected by a burgeoning black economy or whatever, then yes i might change my mind. But if it stops just ONE ****** claiming for something they're not entitled to, or identifies just ONE oik we can deport on the next plane back, i'll remain in favour of the proposals.
Of course, if after they're introduced i'm adversely affected by a burgeoning black economy or whatever, then yes i might change my mind. But if it stops just ONE ****** claiming for something they're not entitled to, or identifies just ONE oik we can deport on the next plane back, i'll remain in favour of the proposals.
#40
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TelBoy
But if it stops just ONE ****** claiming for something they're not entitled to, or identifies just ONE oik we can deport on the next plane back, i'll remain in favour of the proposals.
I've made the figures up but you take my point? Anyway, as I've already said I don't believe it's about immigration, fraud or preventing criminal activities.
#41
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
cost to implent - £1bn, amount saved through clamp down on benefit cheats -£50m
Good ol Labour
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/12...l_2nd_reading/
Good ol Labour
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/12...l_2nd_reading/
#42
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
These numbers are assumptions though - no Government in their right mind would advocate something like that if it was *such* a money loser, i refuse to believe it.
#44
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TelBoy
These numbers are assumptions though - no Government in their right mind would advocate something like that if it was *such* a money loser, i refuse to believe it.
"in their right mind" - now that was just deliberately inflammatory wasnt it?!
#45
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TelBoy
These numbers are assumptions though - no Government in their right mind would advocate something like that if it was *such* a money loser, i refuse to believe it.
#47
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by warrenm2
dont let the facts stand in the way of your arguement you mean?
"in their right mind" - now that was just deliberately inflammatory wasnt it?!
"in their right mind" - now that was just deliberately inflammatory wasnt it?!
Call me cynical, but NO government spends a billski just to put card in the pockets of its citizens. C'mon, either you lot are far too trusting or wet behind the ears!! They have a VERY good idea of what financial benefits they're likely to reap. Don't let naivety get in the way of a good story!!
#48
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: God's promised land
Posts: 80,907
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by unclebuck
New Labour aren't doing it to raise money. There are plenty of other ways to do that. They are doing it as part of a system of control over the lives of all citizens the in this country - except the illegals and other criminals of course.
I just don't get this angle though. I won't feel "controlled" by it, any more than i do when i have to show a passport to get in/out of the country, my driving licence for a five day wonder and so on. Aren't we all being a little bit alarmist??
#49
we'll have id cards in full use in 2016 (according to BladeRunner & im sure thats where they got the idea from) so we know theyll come into force & theyve got afew years to get it right yet...
#50
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TelBoy
I just don't get this angle though. I won't feel "controlled" by it, any more than i do when i have to show a passport to get in/out of the country, my driving licence for a five day wonder and so on. Aren't we all being a little bit alarmist??
The only way that cards will make a difference in finding wanted criminals or absconded immigrants is indiscriminate stopping in the street. In otherwords by chance. Therefore the moment ID cards are made complulsory to carry police will be stopping people indiscriminantly in the street under the guise of "protecting us by rooting out the criminals". The real reason will be to catch and fine you if you have left your card at home!
I don't want to have to carry around a piece of plastic with all my personal details on it. I don't want to be forced to carry anything at all! I'm not a beast of burden or a lost pet and if I want to leave my house with nothing in my pockets then I damn well will!
What will happen when we lose our cards? Will we have to walk around with a sign around our necks "New card in post"? You get done for failing to produce a card, then get dragged down to the local nick for a retinal scan and a DNA test.
How does that make us feel safer?
#52
Of course, the fact that benefits are usually overpaid by between 5-12% *may* have something to do with it. People lie about all sorts of things, and if you needed to produce an ID card which proves not only who you are, but your background details as well, there's a good chance that benefit fraud would be cut substantially - where the £50m mentioned above comes from I don't know, but it would be WAY more than that.
#54
yeah when they indiscriminately stop those who they think are criminals esp minorities, black/asian but are clean they are going to feel discriminated against & **** will hit the fan...
#55
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by the moose
where the £50m mentioned above comes from I don't know
Originally Posted by the moose
but it would be WAY more than that
#57
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Epsom
Posts: 5,832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TelBoy
What happens in countries where these things already operate?
F%$$**g B******ks S#!t w@**r$
#58
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Basically, it's taking advantage of the post-9/11 world of threat and security, with a little help from an absolute majority in Parliament. There were IRA bombings on mainland UK for 20 years but no government would manage to push through an ID scheme about making you feel safe, as we considered liberty more important than safety and "don't let the terrorists win". But killing 3000 in New York, 200 each in Madrid and Bali has changed the threat. Now they have the power and the opportunity, they would be fools not to. And the opposition are voting for it as they also see the benefits of it for when they get into power.
It's taking the opportunity to increase the level of central record-keeping and knowledge of the populace on a very rare occasion. They probably don't even know themselves what they'll do with the power. But they'd be foolish to refuse it when given it - it's something to keep and save for later.
Personally I find the comments about making money from the fines are quite piddling, much as I find the government's comments about it being voluntary are amazingly cynical. It's a long-term softening-up exercise - once you're used to the voluntary ones, we make them mandatory. Once you're used to mandatory possession at home, we make it mandatory to carry in the street. Otherwise, as I pointed out earlier, it's a waste of 4 billion. But they won't get mandatory cards in the street voted through immediately, so they do it the slow way.
I live in Portugal, and carry an ID card. So what? It's pretty useless. As said many times before, it hasn't stopped the Madrid bombings, or Spanish or French illegal immigration. That's just crap to sell it to the stupid populace, pandering to their Sun-reading fears. I think the real truth is, they don't know what they want it for. But if they get it now, they are at leisure to decide later.
It's taking the opportunity to increase the level of central record-keeping and knowledge of the populace on a very rare occasion. They probably don't even know themselves what they'll do with the power. But they'd be foolish to refuse it when given it - it's something to keep and save for later.
Personally I find the comments about making money from the fines are quite piddling, much as I find the government's comments about it being voluntary are amazingly cynical. It's a long-term softening-up exercise - once you're used to the voluntary ones, we make them mandatory. Once you're used to mandatory possession at home, we make it mandatory to carry in the street. Otherwise, as I pointed out earlier, it's a waste of 4 billion. But they won't get mandatory cards in the street voted through immediately, so they do it the slow way.
I live in Portugal, and carry an ID card. So what? It's pretty useless. As said many times before, it hasn't stopped the Madrid bombings, or Spanish or French illegal immigration. That's just crap to sell it to the stupid populace, pandering to their Sun-reading fears. I think the real truth is, they don't know what they want it for. But if they get it now, they are at leisure to decide later.
#60
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TelBoy
What happens in countries where these things already operate? Did they have the same concerns beforehand? I assume so?