Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

Power graph of VF34 turbo :)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 29 December 2004 | 09:27 PM
  #91  
bighead's Avatar
bighead
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 17
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Daveo
Pavlo,

I have Mike's MD304 dyno run print out's from prosport. The turbo is getting fitted to my v6 wagon as we speak.

I can verify his figures are correct.

Dave
Thanks Daveo for the support
Old 29 December 2004 | 11:41 PM
  #92  
AndrewC's Avatar
AndrewC
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,209
Likes: 0
From: Lancashire
Default

Originally Posted by StickyMicky
rolling roads are only good to use as ammo to wind up your mates IMO

i have a mate whos car did 250bhp at well lane and it does 13.1/13.2 1/4miles
i cant rember his torque but it wasnt very high, thats with a hard launch, but its still a fast time for a low powerd lardy uk car

i deathed my wrx when it just had a cat back system/pannel filter and managed 12.97 as a best , and theres not much in the 2 times, when his car was RR`d at 250 mine was RR`d at 280/258lbft (276bhp wrx on 100 fuel, running on optimax and booster)

does that mean my figure was off, or his? we launch the cars exactly the same way, i dont think the drag times could be improved without car mods

that to me says that a rolling road is just to inconsistent to be taken seriously
What were your terminals?
Old 30 December 2004 | 12:13 AM
  #93  
Pavlo's Avatar
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 2
From: home
Default

Originally Posted by Daveo
Pavlo,

I have Mike's MD304 dyno run print out's from prosport. The turbo is getting fitted to my v6 wagon as we speak.

I can verify his figures are correct.

Dave
Dave,

What you can confim is the figures mentioned are those on the dyno sheet.

Can you see what the temperature is on the MD304 dyno plot?

I am confused why a turbo which is generally identical to the VF34, except it has a higher flowing exhaust housing and a physically larger, higher flowig compressor wheel, has a lower power potential.

Paul
Old 30 December 2004 | 09:42 AM
  #94  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Question

Originally Posted by Pavlo
I am confused why a turbo which is generally identical to the VF34, except it has a higher flowing exhaust housing and a physically larger, higher flowig compressor wheel, has a lower power potential.

Paul
Me too My experience is that the MD304 is very similar to the TD05 in spool/power capability. The VF34 generally spools slightly quicker due to the smaller exhaust housing but can't match the power of the TD05 or 304

Andy
Old 30 December 2004 | 11:32 AM
  #95  
Daveo's Avatar
Daveo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: 352bhp at 1.3 bar heaven
Default

I'll dig out the dyno plot and report the temperature figures as soon as i can.

I think Mike (Bighead) changed to a VF 34 because he didn't like the spool characteristics of the MD304, that's why he sold it to me.

Am I right in thinking the MD304 is a good turbo, and is gonna add to my sti wagon over the standard VF28? All I've read is good press bout this turbo.


Originally Posted by Pavlo
Dave,

What you can confim is the figures mentioned are those on the dyno sheet.

Can you see what the temperature is on the MD304 dyno plot?

I am confused why a turbo which is generally identical to the VF34, except it has a higher flowing exhaust housing and a physically larger, higher flowig compressor wheel, has a lower power potential.

Paul
Old 30 December 2004 | 12:00 PM
  #96  
chrome's Avatar
chrome
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,285
Likes: 0
From: Nottingham
Default

the MD304 served P20spd very well...
Old 30 December 2004 | 02:05 PM
  #97  
T-uk's Avatar
T-uk
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,998
Likes: 0
From: uk
Default

Am I right in thinking the MD304 is a good turbo, and is gonna add to my sti wagon over the standard VF28
IMO, the md304 spools similar to a TD05/06-20g with the power at the top similar to a TD05-16g.

on a UK car , for my driving preference I find the md304 and 20g a bit to peaky higher up for a standard(ish) rev limit , however on a sti unit both are more suited to the stretched rev limit.

it is hard to know how it will perform compared to a vf28 until back to back tests are done on the same car. I do not know what state of tune your car is in at the moment but it might be worth finding out how much you can get out the vf28 before the swap. harvey had a few vf28 figures which where very high but his attention to detail helps as did I believe , his ion headers with large bore up-pipe which I found make a turbo perform bigger. (I ran large bore gruppe-s headers for a while and had a better top-end than I do now with the smaller bore phase 2 set, the smaller bore set feel livelier in the mid range with better spool though so I prefer them).
Old 30 December 2004 | 05:44 PM
  #98  
bighead's Avatar
bighead
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,033
Likes: 17
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by Daveo
I'll dig out the dyno plot and report the temperature figures as soon as i can.

I think Mike (Bighead) changed to a VF 34 because he didn't like the spool characteristics of the MD304, that's why he sold it to me.

Am I right in thinking the MD304 is a good turbo, and is gonna add to my sti wagon over the standard VF28? All I've read is good press bout this turbo.
Yes Daveo.... the MD is a very good turbo, as you have stated " I did not like the spool up on it so hence the change .

when it had made 340bhp on the car it was without the Gruppe-S headers and Motec ( only the Tek3 by Bob ) ......just a thoughts
Old 30 December 2004 | 06:33 PM
  #99  
Daveo's Avatar
Daveo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: 352bhp at 1.3 bar heaven
Default

My car has had the following mods:

hks 2.2 stroker kit (pistons and crank)
GGR H section con rods
sti 8 intercooler
motorsport fuel pump
mocal oil cooler
helix group n clutch
fidanza lightened flywheel
hks evc 5 boost controller
hks fcd
Magnex turbo back exhaust
Standard sti injectors

Getting a Power FC fitted week after next by Andy (at last) to hopefully bring it all together

My VF28 was on it's way out and when the MD came up for sale I thought it would be a good time to change.

I'm looking for about 360bhp but that might be pushing it on the standard injectors, from what i can gather.



Originally Posted by T-uk
IMO, the md304 spools similar to a TD05/06-20g with the power at the top similar to a TD05-16g.

on a UK car , for my driving preference I find the md304 and 20g a bit to peaky higher up for a standard(ish) rev limit , however on a sti unit both are more suited to the stretched rev limit.

it is hard to know how it will perform compared to a vf28 until back to back tests are done on the same car. I do not know what state of tune your car is in at the moment but it might be worth finding out how much you can get out the vf28 before the swap. harvey had a few vf28 figures which where very high but his attention to detail helps as did I believe , his ion headers with large bore up-pipe which I found make a turbo perform bigger. (I ran large bore gruppe-s headers for a while and had a better top-end than I do now with the smaller bore phase 2 set, the smaller bore set feel livelier in the mid range with better spool though so I prefer them).
Old 30 December 2004 | 06:52 PM
  #100  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

If anything I think an MD304 is a bit small for a 2.2 revving to 8000 RPM, which has similar turbo sizing requirements to a 2.5 revving to 7000 RPM. Should be nice and torquey, but the power will peak early and flatten if you run decent boost. No bad thing if that is what you want, but the turbine is a bit on the weeny side to make the most of your engine IMHO.
Old 30 December 2004 | 11:40 PM
  #101  
Daveo's Avatar
Daveo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: 352bhp at 1.3 bar heaven
Default

Ok John I'll see how i get on with the md and maybe upgrade at a later date if it's not what i'm after.

Dave


Originally Posted by john banks
If anything I think an MD304 is a bit small for a 2.2 revving to 8000 RPM, which has similar turbo sizing requirements to a 2.5 revving to 7000 RPM. Should be nice and torquey, but the power will peak early and flatten if you run decent boost. No bad thing if that is what you want, but the turbine is a bit on the weeny side to make the most of your engine IMHO.
Old 31 December 2004 | 12:17 AM
  #102  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

Do you still have the modified cams in it Dave ?

Andy
Old 31 December 2004 | 01:00 AM
  #103  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Default

Personally I would go for a gt30 or similar on the 2.2
Old 31 December 2004 | 11:27 AM
  #104  
Daveo's Avatar
Daveo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 553
Likes: 0
From: 352bhp at 1.3 bar heaven
Default

Yeah forgot to mention the piper repro cams...they're the reason for the car being delayed (shims??). Not sure what spec they are..fast road I think.

Looking forward to visiting you week after next!!


Originally Posted by Andy.F
Do you still have the modified cams in it Dave ?

Andy
Old 31 December 2004 | 11:49 AM
  #105  
Pavlo's Avatar
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 2
From: home
Default

Originally Posted by David_Wallis
Personally I would go for a gt30 or similar on the 2.2
I don't honestly think the GT30 series is necessarily worth it on a 2.2. Having seen a 2.2 with all the cams, headwork, custom ex manifold, custom intercooler on the rollers at power engineering, I didn't think it was that good. Given what you can get from a bolt on turbo, that in theory should be poor, but in practice works really well, the GT series needs a little more work IMHO.

Sometimes they work really well, but I think they need a little more playing with cartridges and exhaust housings when used in anything but the big build 2.5s and larger.

Having gone from a mitsubishi bolt on hybrid to a 52 trim GT30 myself, I can't honestly say it was worth the upgrade in sheer power terms. Although it has other benefits, such as wider range of boost control, surge free operation, enough exhaust flow to run nitrous, slightly better pipework, and the ability to swap for a much larger turbo.

If you haven't already spent money on things like (normal) up and downpipe, inlet pipes etc, the GT turbo route is much more economical, and worth persuing.

Paul
Old 31 December 2004 | 12:11 PM
  #106  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

Interesting Paul. What do you think would be the best bolt on turbo then to avoid the surge and creep issues? The P450 has neither of these vices, but is no fireball either. Is there a Superzilla that would be about right do you think without being too compressor biased?
Old 31 December 2004 | 12:18 PM
  #107  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Default

possibly so paul, but the good thing is with the GT series, if and when you need to, you can just swap bits
Old 31 December 2004 | 12:19 PM
  #108  
Pavlo's Avatar
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 2
From: home
Default

I think the plain Superzilla with the 49lb comp wheel is going to be there or there abouts, ie, probably the same performance as the P450 but for less money. On a 2.2 creep in general isn't going to be an issue anyway (with correct porting).

I also think the version with the 52trim Garrett wheel, as used in your P450 should work. This is what Jan has in sweden after I recommended it (I didn't supply though), and with proper porting the creep is sorted, and I don't think he has any surge issues either.

My GT30 would be a good I think on a 2.2 with the 0.63 housing.

Paul
Old 31 December 2004 | 12:20 PM
  #109  
Pavlo's Avatar
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 2
From: home
Default

Originally Posted by David_Wallis
possibly so paul, but the good thing is with the GT series, if and when you need to, you can just swap bits
That is the main reason I purchased mine. I can go as low as 400 and as high as 600+ potential in the same format now.

David,
Any idea of the housing Cord uses?

Also, I had a chance to look at an HKS version of the 3037s. Their 0.86 housing (with T25 inlet flange), was about the same size as the Garrett 0.63 housing, which i found interesting. It certainly explains how people were getting away with the 1.06 HKS housing, which I imagine is about the same size as he Garrett 0.82 part.

Paul

Last edited by Pavlo; 31 December 2004 at 12:51 PM.
Old 31 December 2004 | 01:07 PM
  #110  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Default

What about the AVO 500 and 600?
Old 31 December 2004 | 03:09 PM
  #111  
Pavlo's Avatar
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 2
From: home
Default

I don't understand quite why they don't seem to work. Perhaps the housing isn't quite right somehow, but they always seem very laggy for the power they make.

Paul
Old 31 December 2004 | 04:48 PM
  #112  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Default

I dunno what trim, but I belive its a 3037..

David
Old 31 December 2004 | 05:37 PM
  #113  
Pavlo's Avatar
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 2
From: home
Default

David,

Cord's turbo is a garrett GT30R AFAIK, but either way there are a number of housings available for the garrett and HKS variants. i would be interested to know which housing he has. Will PM him or post on his 22b thread.

Paul
Old 31 December 2004 | 08:42 PM
  #114  
StickyMicky's Avatar
StickyMicky
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
From: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Default

Originally Posted by AndrewC
What were your terminals?
approx 95 to 106 from memory?? (over a year ago i will have the cards sumwhere)
1.773 60foot time as well (also from memory)

could be miles out lol

Last edited by StickyMicky; 31 December 2004 at 08:45 PM.
Old 31 December 2004 | 08:51 PM
  #115  
StickyMicky's Avatar
StickyMicky
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
From: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Default

Originally Posted by StickyMicky
approx 95 to 106 from memory?? (over a year ago i will have the cards sumwhere)
1.773 60foot time as well (also from memory)

could be miles out lol
found it online in my photobucket album



got a 13.11 @ 104 with a 60ft time of 1.857
13.17 @ 103 mph with a 60ft time of 1.836
13.12 @ 104 mph 60ft time 1.910
13.06 @ 102 mph 60ft 1.749

all the above times were on the stock vf 22

times should be improved sumwhat now i rekon (full decat, vf 23 running more boost, flywheel and grippy clutch )
Old 31 December 2004 | 08:58 PM
  #116  
StickyMicky's Avatar
StickyMicky
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
From: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Default

another

13.07 @ 99mph - 1.863

i have 49 timed cards here, who said scoobys had choclate pistons
current max out on the 1.25mile thingy is 146mph but im not that kean on doing these with the TMIC and stuff
Old 31 December 2004 | 09:19 PM
  #117  
Pavlo's Avatar
Pavlo
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,316
Likes: 2
From: home
Default

Those elvington terminals are often suspect. I was getting an 8mph difference between lanes at the shootout and about 6mph difference at TOTB

Paul
Old 31 December 2004 | 11:24 PM
  #118  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

If you want good terminals get a dose of N2O (nawz) A 50 shot only dropped my terminals by 0.2 secs but added a whopping 8mph to the terminal speed

Andy
Old 02 February 2005 | 08:10 PM
  #119  
JonathanWR1's Avatar
JonathanWR1
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Yorkshire
Default

Hi guys, About this thread, Ive read most of it and its got me very interested. This VF 34 TURBO. Is it a remap and turbo just for Seats Ibizas and Subarus? I have a 2.0 Turbo Astra and i am wanting to put some serious power into her. Do you know if Prosport do this turbo for Vauxhalls.?

Sorry to go off topic a bit. Does anyone have a link to the Prosport site where you get it done.
Old 09 June 2005 | 07:11 PM
  #120  
RR's Avatar
RR
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
From: Teesside
Default

As long as it fits in the space available and you have the manifold and all the other bits to fit and someone who can map it anything is possible. Scooby owners seem to favour the Td05. I cant complain i like the way my vf34 performs.


Quick Reply: Power graph of VF34 turbo :)



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:59 PM.