Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Blair Pays Lip Service To Oliver

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21 March 2005, 01:35 PM
  #31  
Iain Young
Scooby Regular
 
Iain Young's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why is this any different to the number of bandwagons Howard has jumped on so far on the run up to the election? This is just typical pre-election behaviour, and all the parties do it.

Yes I think school dinners should be improved, but I also think there should be better education at home for the parents so the kids can eat properly there as well. also, they ought to put home economics back as a required subject IMO....
Old 21 March 2005, 01:43 PM
  #32  
03-CTR
Scooby Regular
 
03-CTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bucks
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tiggs
"as such i think that jamie has a point but he's missing the bigger picture."

dont want to spoil good TV with that though do they?
i think even "good tv" is a bit generous
Old 21 March 2005, 01:46 PM
  #33  
jasonius
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
jasonius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Half way up
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Jamie Oliver is a complete @rsehole. He has jumped on the bandwagon (just like he did with Fifteen..!) and makes out he's some kind of saint, when he is only doing this for his own popularity..!

All the ****e about how stressful it is, arguing with his wife, crying..! It was just the same with Fifteen. How many of you believe that he personally stumped up £1 million+ by remortgaging his family home to fund that programme..? It was all a publicity stunt, do you know how many of those 15 underpriviledged kids are still working at his restaurant..?

"he's a cheeky cockney barrow boy from the east end, a little bit worr a little bit eey..!" Yeh my ****, essex choir boy from a middle class family..!

It's just sad that it takes some TW@T like him to get the government showing some pre election 'interest'.

Sorry rant over. (you can probably tell I don't like him much)

Jason
Old 21 March 2005, 01:47 PM
  #34  
jasonius
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
jasonius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Half way up
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Iain Young
Why is this any different to the number of bandwagons Howard has jumped on so far on the run up to the election? This is just typical pre-election behaviour, and all the parties do it.

Yes I think school dinners should be improved, but I also think there should be better education at home for the parents so the kids can eat properly there as well. also, they ought to put home economics back as a required subject IMO....
Exactly
Old 21 March 2005, 01:47 PM
  #35  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 03-CTR
i'm all for good food (mine eat chips once a week for a treat) but jamie's quote was that it would only cost 15 pence per child, per day, for what he perceived to be a decent meal. that's fair enough but when you have a school with 500 kids that equates to £375 a week which is nigh on a new computer.

given this kind of investment i'm sure that a lot of people/parents would criticise a school for taking food as a priority over essentials such as books, computers etc. as such i think that jamie has a point but he's missing the bigger picture.
Food isn't essential? I didn't know that. Let's just not feed them at all then. Come on, I wouldn't suggest we feed the kids caviar and lobster everyday, but a balanced diet is important for healthy development, reduced e numbers lowers hyperactivity levels and leads to the kids being less disruptive and doing better in class.

my feeling is that most parents these days don't give a toss what their kids eat because food isn't generally a priority - hence ready meals sell by the truckload at tescos. in any case i'm shocked that most parents don't even ask their kids what they've had for lunch and if they did and kicked up a fuss then maybe the schools would do something about it. failing that then it's the parent's responsibility to feed their own kids.
That just shows that the parents need to be educated as well.
Old 21 March 2005, 01:50 PM
  #36  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jasonius
--snip--
do you know how many of those 15 underpriviledged kids are still working at his restaurant..?
Of the original lot?? None I expect, it was never supposed to be a permenant position, he trains them up, sends them on to other restaurants (if they can cut it) after 12 months and then takes on another bunch, what's your point?
Old 21 March 2005, 02:13 PM
  #37  
blueone
Scooby Regular
 
blueone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jasonius
Jamie Oliver is a complete @rsehole. He has jumped on the bandwagon (just like he did with Fifteen..!) and makes out he's some kind of saint, when he is only doing this for his own popularity..!

All the ****e about how stressful it is, arguing with his wife, crying..! It was just the same with Fifteen. How many of you believe that he personally stumped up £1 million+ by remortgaging his family home to fund that programme..? It was all a publicity stunt, do you know how many of those 15 underpriviledged kids are still working at his restaurant..?

"he's a cheeky cockney barrow boy from the east end, a little bit worr a little bit eey..!" Yeh my ****, essex choir boy from a middle class family..!

It's just sad that it takes some TW@T like him to get the government showing some pre election 'interest'.

Sorry rant over. (you can probably tell I don't like him much)

Jason
I think most of that is regurgitated spin from the tabloids.
Old 21 March 2005, 02:48 PM
  #38  
Tiggs
Scooby Regular
 
Tiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jasonius
Jamie Oliver is a complete @rsehole. He has jumped on the bandwagon (just like he did with Fifteen..!) and makes out he's some kind of saint, when he is only doing this for his own popularity..!

All the ****e about how stressful it is, arguing with his wife, crying..! It was just the same with Fifteen. How many of you believe that he personally stumped up £1 million+ by remortgaging his family home to fund that programme..? It was all a publicity stunt, do you know how many of those 15 underpriviledged kids are still working at his restaurant..?

"he's a cheeky cockney barrow boy from the east end, a little bit worr a little bit eey..!" Yeh my ****, essex choir boy from a middle class family..!

It's just sad that it takes some TW@T like him to get the government showing some pre election 'interest'.

Sorry rant over. (you can probably tell I don't like him much)

Jason


common sense at last...the mans a fool.

if sadam hussein started to campaign for schoold dinners it wouldnt make the school dinners situation right...and he's still be a nasty bloke!
Old 21 March 2005, 03:05 PM
  #39  
mynickers
Scooby Regular
 
mynickers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London(ish)
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thing is, even if Oliver was motivated by his own vanity to gain public approval, rather than purely as a selfless act to help the yoof of today, the end result is the same. And I really think it's poor taste to attack him for it, even if he is a mockney muppet sometimes! No one else addressed the issue, and it's been like that for years. So I can't fault him for it, at least he did it, and achieved something, which is more than anyone else has..
Old 21 March 2005, 03:08 PM
  #40  
03-CTR
Scooby Regular
 
03-CTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bucks
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OllyK
Food isn't essential? I didn't know that. Let's just not feed them at all then. Come on, I wouldn't suggest we feed the kids caviar and lobster everyday, but a balanced diet is important for healthy development, reduced e numbers lowers hyperactivity levels and leads to the kids being less disruptive and doing better in class.

That just shows that the parents need to be educated as well.
don't get me wrong, i think food is essential. i just don't think, in the grand scheme of things, food is perceived to be an "educational essential". the thing is it's easy to criticise if you're a biased food buff like jamie but things are rarely black and white.

when i went through the process of selecting a suitable school for my little one the offsted report only centred arround things like facilities, teaching quality, pupil to staff ratios etc. the menu's didn't even get a mention. whether this is because catering does not fall under offsted's analytical umbrella or whether they perceive food to be irrelevant i don't know but i doubt many schools will focus heavily on catering if they are not being judged on it (and their existence based on it).

with regard to parents i've had a tough time getting round this one but have to conclude that it's down to the individual. we all know what good food is but how many of us actually take responsibility for it ?? although most people know what you should eat even fewer people can be bothered to buy or cook it and instead go for the easy option. at the end of the day people are bloody lazy and that's no-one else's fault but the individual. sure the government could educate us but there's no way i want my tax going to educate some lazy sod that can't be bothered to think for himself or pick up a book. if people really are that crap then bring on the obesity and the early heart attack. it's all about survival of the fittest
Old 21 March 2005, 03:31 PM
  #41  
mynickers
Scooby Regular
 
mynickers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London(ish)
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blueone
I think most of that is regurgitated spin from the tabloids.
Defo, this is what I think, tabloid culture of attacking, and mud slinging. Moan when people do things wrong, then don’t' give them a chance to do anything right or mend their ways. Loose / loose scenario really hacks me off, so fricking negative.

Whether you like the bloke or not, he has done something good here, if nothing else to get the issue to such a high profile, about school dins and diet generally. And to cloud your objective judgement of that by your own prejudice towards the bloke is just childish.
Old 21 March 2005, 04:45 PM
  #42  
Spring Heeled Jack
Scooby Regular
 
Spring Heeled Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: was he a creature, an alien, or a man wearing some strange costume and a hidden jumping apparatus
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Looks like the Scoobynet Sun readers have turned up in force with their stereotypical responses.



Why is this any different to the number of bandwagons Howard has jumped on so far on the run up to the election?



Because (and you don't even need half a brain for this one...) all this is happening under Blair's stewardship. They've had 7 years do improve school meals but have done *nothing* but make them progressively worse. Now that JO has exposed them they are hurridly making up spin about all the alleged initiatives they are planning.


Too late Mr Blair. We are sick of your blatant lies and mismanagement.


Jack.
Old 21 March 2005, 04:50 PM
  #43  
Spring Heeled Jack
Scooby Regular
 
Spring Heeled Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: was he a creature, an alien, or a man wearing some strange costume and a hidden jumping apparatus
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by jasanus
Jamie Oliver is a complete @rsehole.
So what exactly has your wonderful contribution to society been then?

Bugger all? Thought so. Run along and buy your ready meal and your lottery ticket!
Old 21 March 2005, 05:36 PM
  #44  
joni
Scooby Regular
 
joni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Placing "Jamie Oliver the character" to one side, he has stirred up a worthwhile debate whatever the motivation.

To hear the teachers in the programme state that behaviour and concentration had markedly improved and that there was little or no need for medication for Asthma since the introduction of the meals was a bit of an eye opener. Suggests that improved diet could have far reaching implications for the whole of society?

To hear the Schools Minister today promising refurbished kitchens and training for dinner ladies suggests that the government has spectacularly missed the point.
Old 21 March 2005, 07:01 PM
  #46  
Vegescoob
Scooby Regular
 
Vegescoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Simple really this food thing. The "homo sapiens", us, is still biologically suited to the same diet our Neanderthal predecessors lived on, apart from some specific evolutions.
Now shoot me down.
Old 21 March 2005, 07:08 PM
  #47  
03-CTR
Scooby Regular
 
03-CTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bucks
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hutton_d
Or alternatively they know exactly what they are doing. Having an unhealthy poopulation helps them control *us* plus the kickbacks from the drug companies etc. Plus the money taken from the companies that supply all the cr&p masquerading as *food* in the supermarkets etc.
slightly paranoid view don't you think ??

soz if you're being dry
Old 21 March 2005, 08:19 PM
  #49  
03-CTR
Scooby Regular
 
03-CTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Bucks
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hutton_d
Paranoid? Moi??? :-)

In the same vane - report in the paper the other day about the proposed *Traffic light* system for labelling food. i.e. fruit and veg are 'green'. Things full of sugar and fat would be 'red'. Simple it is. BUT the food companies are b up in arms about it - for good reason (to them anyway!!) as it would mean that sales of anything 'red' would go down the toilet! They're trying to delay/amend the proposals. Wonder what will happen??? Get back to me and admit that I'm not paranoid if the proposals get watered down ...

Dave

PS: anyway, they are ALL out to get me so I can't be paranoid .... :-)
you freak. only kidding

i'd like to think that the traffic light system wouldn't work. why? because a balanced diet is all about exactly that. a balance. i'm no expert on nutrition but i eat healthily and am sure that a mix of everything is required to keep oneself healthy (and that goes for the stuff they'd class as 'red' too). everything in moderation as they say so the traffic light system wouldn't work with my family (digs out tub of hagen daas ).

with regard to your previous comment tho' people have the freedom to eat and shop where they want. i'm sure the government would like us all to do as we're told but as individuals we're responsible for our own choices and taking care of ourselves is one of them. sadly i don't think a great deal of the population is bothered about such fundamentals so are happy to be unhealthy. if being unhealthy makes people easier to control then fine but as i say, that's down to the individual, oh, and the agency that's putting mind controlling drugs in the water supply
Old 21 March 2005, 08:55 PM
  #50  
Vegescoob
Scooby Regular
 
Vegescoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not much success with SN minds! Up the doseage.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
Abx
Subaru
22
09 January 2016 05:42 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
lozgti1
Non Scooby Related
8
28 September 2015 03:49 AM



Quick Reply: Blair Pays Lip Service To Oliver



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:09 AM.