Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related
View Poll Results: Do you agree with the death penalty
Yes I agree with the death penalty
65.25%
No I do not agree with the death penalty
24.58%
I think natural life inprisonment is sufficient
14.41%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 118. You may not vote on this poll

Time for the death penalty - referendum time?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21 March 2005, 04:28 PM
  #31  
Tiggs
Scooby Regular
 
Tiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

just imagine all these posters with their kids...."stop fighting or i'll smack you"
Old 21 March 2005, 04:33 PM
  #32  
mr & mrs carlos uk300
Scooby Regular
 
mr & mrs carlos uk300's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i believe in an eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth.
Old 21 March 2005, 04:35 PM
  #33  
GrollySTI
Scooby Regular
 
GrollySTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Ex'e'er
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mr & mrs carlos uk300
i believe in an eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth.
Does that mean we have to rape the rapists?

Bagsy not me
Old 21 March 2005, 04:38 PM
  #34  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by _Meridian_
And just to put it in a nutshell: the state says killing is wrong, and to prove it, it's going to kill you. Notice any logical problem there?
By your inference the state says imprisonment is right, so we can all imprison people? No. I thought the classic definition was that the state has the exclusive right of force.

Fully agree with your rape comment though - and with many other crimes, too.
Old 21 March 2005, 04:39 PM
  #35  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tiggs
just imagine all these posters with their kids...."stop fighting or i'll smack you"
Nothing wrong with that. Spare the rod....
Old 21 March 2005, 04:44 PM
  #36  
paulr
Scooby Regular
 
paulr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by johnfelstead
it doesnt work as a deterant, people are wrongly found guilty, so no thanks.
Agreed,it doesnt really deter people and while i'm no friend to murderers ,the whole hullabaloo surrounding the execution that you get in the US,well to me, it brings out the worst in people.
Old 21 March 2005, 04:55 PM
  #38  
_Meridian_
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
_Meridian_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mancs
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Are you suggesting the criminal justice system should be guided by cost? I really hope not.


M
Old 21 March 2005, 05:58 PM
  #40  
mynickers
Scooby Regular
 
mynickers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London(ish)
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would normally say no, still do, like someone said, doesn’t bring out the best in the folks over the pond. You’d hope we were less barbaric than public flogging. But on the other hand, in a secular culture, it's pretty clear that there is a general lack of morals, i.e. the only thing that stops people doing things is getting caught or punished. If a few years of bird doesn't put off people from murder and rape, then maybe an electric chair will..

I think there is a difference between criminals that attack and kill each other, and paedophiles and serial killers etc, I think these people are ill / sick, and I personally doubt that they would be deterred, you’d have to be totally screwed in the head to even want to do those things,

And I think fox hunters should chase tabloid journalists instead of fox's??

Last edited by mynickers; 21 March 2005 at 06:05 PM.
Old 21 March 2005, 06:01 PM
  #41  
Tiggs
Scooby Regular
 
Tiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mynickers
I would normally say no, but it's pretty clear that in this day and age, there is a general lack of morals,??

as opposed to when??

cave men?

Vikings?

Romans?

Victorian London and Jack the Ripper?
Old 21 March 2005, 06:02 PM
  #42  
Brit_in_Japan
Scooby Regular
 
Brit_in_Japan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: No longer Japan !
Posts: 1,742
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Reasons against the death penalty include:-

1. It will create "martyrs" of terrorists and help those fanatics to perpetuate and spread their cause.
2. It will make criminals more desperate to escape when they think they will face the death penalty. One often cited example in which people think the death penalty is justified is where a policeman has been killed. If the police killer thinks he will get the death penalty if caught, what has he to lose by fighting his way out of trouble? You can only be executed once, whether for killing one or several people.
3. The justice system does get it wrong. Just look at the Guildford Four and the Birmingham Six, not to mention many other cases from the past where people were executed even though the convictions were far from safe. If there was another terrorist attrocity in the country (God forbid) then the pressure to bring someone to justice might just lead to a miscarriage of justice. At least if they are imprisoned rather than executed then there is a chance that the miscarriage can be put right.
4. Juries will be less likely to convict if they think that someone may get the death penalty as a result.
5. As someone pointed out earlier, the death penalty is no deterrent. The US executes more people than any other first world country and it's not exactly helped there has it?
6. Last but not least there is the argument that it is fundamentally immoral for the state to take away human life, irrespective of what the crime was.

Death penalty? No thank you.
Old 21 March 2005, 08:54 PM
  #44  
lightning101
Scooby Regular
 
lightning101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Never do names esp. Joey, spaz or Mong
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I likethe headline "Lotto Rapist Loses *****" and the machine was "Guinevere"
Old 21 March 2005, 09:04 PM
  #45  
GCollier
Scooby Regular
 
GCollier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1998
Posts: 1,198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by **************
I seriously believe there would be more for the reinstatement of capital punishment than against it.
Capital punishment often seems like an appealing and popular option at first as a knee-jerk reaction to events. There are plenty of things I see on the news and my first thoughts are something like shoot the fvcker and send his family the bill for the bullet...but on balance the negatives of capital punishment (which have already been pointed out) far outweight the positives.

So I would be very surprised if it would gain popular support in the country as a whole in a referendum where everyone was free to reflect and vote in a non-emotional manner.

Gary.
Old 21 March 2005, 09:13 PM
  #46  
lightning101
Scooby Regular
 
lightning101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Never do names esp. Joey, spaz or Mong
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Another worrying trend is the length of time a sentence for serious crime can be reduced to although the reasons are obvious i.e. the average cost for community rehabilitation order (formerly known as a probation order) is £1,710 and for a community punishment order (formerly known as a community service order) £1,500. Compared with prison this is very cheap - it costs around £22,000 to keep someone in prison for a year.
Old 21 March 2005, 09:26 PM
  #47  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Thumbs down

Originally Posted by GCollier
So I would be very surprised if it would gain popular support in the country as a whole in a referendum where everyone was free to reflect and vote in a non-emotional manner.
And with our lovely media, that's not the UK you're talking about.
Old 21 March 2005, 09:30 PM
  #48  
hades
Scooby Regular
 
hades's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: From Kent to Gloucestershire to Berkshire
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I like to think in simplistic/pragmatic terms. Therefore, I'd say the death penalty for murderes is worth it IF it saves more innocents than it kills - i.e. if you can know that the threat of the death penalty will cut murders by 5 every year, it's actually worth the risk of one wrong conviction every year. This may sounds a callous viewpoint, and I know that if I was the one wrong conviction or related to the wrong person, it would be a terrible personal tradgedy. However, this is no more the case than it would have been had I been one of the 5 innocent victims of a murderer. To my mind 1 tradgedy is better than 5 (although 0 is clearly preferable)

Only trouble is, it's very difficult to prove that death sentence does prevent murderers. In some cases, if they know they're dead if they get caught, they have nothing to lose, so might as well kill again.

Therefore, if someone can prove that the death penalty actually works as a deterent, I'll support it.
Old 21 March 2005, 09:38 PM
  #49  
GCollier
Scooby Regular
 
GCollier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1998
Posts: 1,198
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
And with our lovely media, that's not the UK you're talking about.
True, and I did wonder as I wrote that what might happen if some nation-shocking murder/torture case happened at the same time as a referendum and was picked up on by the media.

But that aside, I think in general the issue is one where most people would vote against if allowed to reflect on the for and against points for a few minutes.

Gary.
Old 21 March 2005, 10:01 PM
  #50  
mynickers
Scooby Regular
 
mynickers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: London(ish)
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tiggs
as opposed to when??

cave men?

Vikings?

Romans?

Victorian London and Jack the Ripper?
As opposed to when it was less of a secular culture, at least a set of religoius morals meant people had a higher reason not to do things other than, whether they'll get caught, and if they do how long they'll be out with good behaviour.

There has been a definate and well recorded break down of community, both from a religious, and family point of view. So there is less guidence, and less moral framework for people growing up than there has been over the past 20 or 30 years IMO. In terms of right and wrong, deterants.

There was a time, when an elder could put kids on the street right, do that now and risk getting stabbed!
Old 21 March 2005, 10:35 PM
  #51  
lubo
Scooby Regular
 
lubo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 685
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Back to basics I say...theres too much debating and thinking...kids and the elderly were never picked upon as much as they are now. Nature gets rid of its runts why shouldnt we. People who want to eat, rape, violate etc members of society are never going to change/reform so get rid.
Old 21 March 2005, 11:15 PM
  #52  
Buckrogers
Scooby Regular
 
Buckrogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bring it back if the evidence is beyond doubt and the death penalty fits the crime.

Unfortunatley, NO goverment will ever bring it back IMHO.
Old 22 March 2005, 08:07 AM
  #53  
jasey
Scooby Senior
 
jasey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you want to deter ALL criminality then you would be better starting off with having Prisons that are more like prisons than Hotels.

I would re-introduce slopping out as a matter of course.

Anyone caught with drugs (In Prison) would be kept in Solitary confinement for a year - with no outside visits for the duration of their sentence.

Pool tables, computers, TVs etc would be taken away from all prisons.

Let's make prison somewhere you don't get three square meals, newpapers delivered to your door and as much drugs as you want !

If that still doesn't deter the determined criminals then we can look at the death penalty !
Old 22 March 2005, 12:28 PM
  #54  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And they should bring back the birch as well!

Les
Old 22 March 2005, 12:31 PM
  #55  
STi wanna Subaru
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
STi wanna Subaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 16,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rik-1
looking at recent English history will show many cases of mistakes made.

An innocent persons life is worth more than all the criminals you would have killed, put together.
Totally agree.
Old 22 March 2005, 12:51 PM
  #56  
Ted Maul
Scooby Regular
 
Ted Maul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London Town
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yes, but only if the criminal wishes it,. Let them choose life imprisonment or death
Old 22 March 2005, 03:47 PM
  #57  
Mr Sympathy
Scooby Regular
 
Mr Sympathy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Home to a T25 and a WRX PPP
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mynickers

And I think fox hunters should chase tabloid journalists instead of fox's??
Fantastic idea..as long as they can shoot them at the end?
Old 22 March 2005, 04:42 PM
  #58  
_Meridian_
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
_Meridian_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mancs
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by jasey
If you want to deter ALL criminality then you would be better starting off with having Prisons that are more like prisons than Hotels.

I would re-introduce slopping out as a matter of course.

Anyone caught with drugs (In Prison) would be kept in Solitary confinement for a year - with no outside visits for the duration of their sentence.

Pool tables, computers, TVs etc would be taken away from all prisons.

Let's make prison somewhere you don't get three square meals, newpapers delivered to your door and as much drugs as you want !

If that still doesn't deter the determined criminals then we can look at the death penalty !

I take it that you found your stay in prison really comfortable? You are talking from experience right, not just parroting what you read in Mein Kampf, sorry, the Daily Mail?


M
Old 22 March 2005, 07:25 PM
  #59  
jasey
Scooby Senior
 
jasey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by _Meridian_
I take it that you found your stay in prison really comfortable? You are talking from experience right, not just parroting what you read in Mein Kampf, sorry, the Daily Mail?


M
No I'm talking about the BBC showing prison officers delivering papers to the guests in Kilmarnock Prison (no doubt as the youngster they were supposed to be protecting was hanging himself) and the Scottish Executive setting aside £10 Million to pay to the poor old souls having to slop out in PHD Jail !

Last edited by jasey; 22 March 2005 at 07:39 PM.
Old 22 March 2005, 08:20 PM
  #60  
_Meridian_
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
_Meridian_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Mancs
Posts: 2,806
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

So, as I said, your only experience of prison is what you gathered from the media? I'll concede it wasn't from the Daily Fascist though. You think that life in prison is luxury because they have papers and a TV? I bet I could make your life hell no matter what luxuries you had, and the same is true of prison. If prison is so nice, why are crims so desperate to avoid it? They tell their lawyers that any punishment is fine, as long as it's not prison.


M


Quick Reply: Time for the death penalty - referendum time?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:55 PM.