LCR 225 vs CTR vs MY03 WRX
#61
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: From Kent to Gloucestershire to Berkshire
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not convinced that the scoob has been "designed with the PPP in mind". I think it's more that Prodrive determined the rest of the car is capable of taking a PPP within the existing drivetrain. On a WRX around perhaps 320lbft starts threatening integrity of gearbox / clutch - I know someone who killed a clutch, gearbox and rear diff very quickly with ~380bhp/330lbft.
On an LCR, you will probably find that there will be a number it is also capable of without really reducing the life (I have no idea what that number is). The other thing to note is that scoobs will stress the drivetrain when doing fast launches a lot more than the LCR - as the Leon will either wheelspin some power away, or invoke T/C and drop the power.
If I were in that situation, my reaction would be to check with all the people who have owned modded LCRs, see what miles they've done and what failures.
On an LCR, you will probably find that there will be a number it is also capable of without really reducing the life (I have no idea what that number is). The other thing to note is that scoobs will stress the drivetrain when doing fast launches a lot more than the LCR - as the Leon will either wheelspin some power away, or invoke T/C and drop the power.
If I were in that situation, my reaction would be to check with all the people who have owned modded LCRs, see what miles they've done and what failures.
#62
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Leigh on Sea
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I too am an ex LCR owner. It was APR chipped and very swift indeed.
Best all-round car I have owned. Put 53k miles on her so know them pretty well. No mechanical failures either. Was running so sweat when I sold it.
I have only had the WRX STI PPP a few weeks so still getting used to it.
I will certainly not be trying to race any chipped LCR’s! there really would not be much in it at all in a straight line 80-120!!!
If it was slightly damp or raining there would be no contest from the lights. The STI is viscous on take off! So is the WRX!!
LCR is far from dangerous in the wet though. Keep the ESP switched on and drive like a Looney and it will keep you on the tarmac. Even sorts it out if you get it sideways. Which is fairly easy? Lift off mid corner…
Good points LCR
Looks better than a WRX (I Think)
Faster when chipped
Seats are better
Cheaper insurance
Cheaper than a WRX
Great motorway cruiser
Bad points
Has an initial bit of body roll on turn in before settling down
Bit crashey over bumps
Wheel hop when the wheels spin.
WRX with decent back box sounds much better
Best way is to test drive them both then choose. Both very capable cars....
Best all-round car I have owned. Put 53k miles on her so know them pretty well. No mechanical failures either. Was running so sweat when I sold it.
I have only had the WRX STI PPP a few weeks so still getting used to it.
I will certainly not be trying to race any chipped LCR’s! there really would not be much in it at all in a straight line 80-120!!!
If it was slightly damp or raining there would be no contest from the lights. The STI is viscous on take off! So is the WRX!!
LCR is far from dangerous in the wet though. Keep the ESP switched on and drive like a Looney and it will keep you on the tarmac. Even sorts it out if you get it sideways. Which is fairly easy? Lift off mid corner…
Good points LCR
Looks better than a WRX (I Think)
Faster when chipped
Seats are better
Cheaper insurance
Cheaper than a WRX
Great motorway cruiser
Bad points
Has an initial bit of body roll on turn in before settling down
Bit crashey over bumps
Wheel hop when the wheels spin.
WRX with decent back box sounds much better
Best way is to test drive them both then choose. Both very capable cars....
#63
Once again cheers for the comments, opinions..
Just to throw a bit of a spanner into the works.. I test drove a 182 (with Cup pack) which the dealer let me hold onto for the afternoon . Totally sublime handling for a FWD car OK it's not as quick in a straight line as the Scoob is but it makes up for it in the way it attacks anything with a corner. The ESP didn't appear to be particularly intrusive although did sap some power when trying to launch it in a hurry. 2nd, 3rd and 4th were great for some proper B-road looning and there was a confidence inspiring level of grip from the 205/45 R16s. Cruising at 70mph was a bit of a chore though. There just wasn't the torque available in 5th to go from 60-90 in a hurry and on occasions the 182 felt a little on the sluggish side. But that was my only real gripe with the car apart from the slightly dated but functional interior.
Now to arrange the LCR drive.. and hopefully not get distracted by anything else
-Sal-
Just to throw a bit of a spanner into the works.. I test drove a 182 (with Cup pack) which the dealer let me hold onto for the afternoon . Totally sublime handling for a FWD car OK it's not as quick in a straight line as the Scoob is but it makes up for it in the way it attacks anything with a corner. The ESP didn't appear to be particularly intrusive although did sap some power when trying to launch it in a hurry. 2nd, 3rd and 4th were great for some proper B-road looning and there was a confidence inspiring level of grip from the 205/45 R16s. Cruising at 70mph was a bit of a chore though. There just wasn't the torque available in 5th to go from 60-90 in a hurry and on occasions the 182 felt a little on the sluggish side. But that was my only real gripe with the car apart from the slightly dated but functional interior.
Now to arrange the LCR drive.. and hopefully not get distracted by anything else
-Sal-
#64
Originally Posted by Mitchy260
As far as im aware the 1.8T is good for 350bhp/330lbft on standard engine and gearbox.
Jabbasport are 1.8t specialists and they have tested the engines to breakdown point.
The 1.8t as used in the 210/225 already come with strengthened forged pistons/crank and rods.
Many people have done in excess of 60000 miles on Jabba/Revo/AMD remaps and ive yet to read a horror story concerning the remap.
Jabbasport are 1.8t specialists and they have tested the engines to breakdown point.
The 1.8t as used in the 210/225 already come with strengthened forged pistons/crank and rods.
Many people have done in excess of 60000 miles on Jabba/Revo/AMD remaps and ive yet to read a horror story concerning the remap.
so do jabba offer any kind of warranty with their work ?? i did look on the jabba site but it said nothing about warranties. what i did find facinating though was the statement:
"with this efficiency the engine will produce more power with no added stresses"
that's quite a remarkable statement imo.
with regard to the lcr v wrx thing though i'd have thought the wrx would be the better choice if you're after 350bhp though as this kind of power must be wasted on a fwd car.
#65
It is in the first 2 gears, however once into 3rd a FWD car with that amount of power will be very fast.
All you need to do is go over onto the Audi/VW/Seat/Skoda forums and ask at how many have had remaps and ask how many have had problems with them.
There are thousands of owners throughout the Vag group and ive yet to read 1 horror story.
More stress can only be assumed, but as far as stats go, there's not a lot to back this ''more stress'' up with
Perhaps they chose the 3.2 V6 because they wanted a N/A car?
All you need to do is go over onto the Audi/VW/Seat/Skoda forums and ask at how many have had remaps and ask how many have had problems with them.
There are thousands of owners throughout the Vag group and ive yet to read 1 horror story.
More stress can only be assumed, but as far as stats go, there's not a lot to back this ''more stress'' up with
Perhaps they chose the 3.2 V6 because they wanted a N/A car?
#66
Originally Posted by Mitchy260
It is in the first 2 gears, however once into 3rd a FWD car with that amount of power will be very fast.
All you need to do is go over onto the Audi/VW/Seat/Skoda forums and ask at how many have had remaps and ask how many have had problems with them.
There are thousands of owners throughout the Vag group and ive yet to read 1 horror story.
More stress can only be assumed, but as far as stats go, there's not a lot to back this ''more stress'' up with
Perhaps they chose the 3.2 V6 because they wanted a N/A car?
All you need to do is go over onto the Audi/VW/Seat/Skoda forums and ask at how many have had remaps and ask how many have had problems with them.
There are thousands of owners throughout the Vag group and ive yet to read 1 horror story.
More stress can only be assumed, but as far as stats go, there's not a lot to back this ''more stress'' up with
Perhaps they chose the 3.2 V6 because they wanted a N/A car?
MAF's tend to be a big issue, although that can affect std cars as well.
A recent one
http://www.seatcupra.net/forums/showthread.php?t=54787
#69
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: From Kent to Gloucestershire to Berkshire
Posts: 2,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 03-ctr
but then given the competition in the hot hatch arena, wouldn't you think that vag would have given the s3, lcr etc a bit more oomph if they thought the 1.8t was good for a 'reliable' 350bhp/330lb ft ?? kind of negates the need for developing a 3.2l engine in the r32, tt and s3
A large part of it is probably that the manufacturer is trying to give a margin for people who abuse the car - don't warm up/cool down, don't service regularly or well, drive like it was stolen etc, and yet still expect reliability.
#70
Originally Posted by Mitchy260
It is in the first 2 gears, however once into 3rd a FWD car with that amount of power will be very fast.
All you need to do is go over onto the Audi/VW/Seat/Skoda forums and ask at how many have had remaps and ask how many have had problems with them.
There are thousands of owners throughout the Vag group and ive yet to read 1 horror story.
More stress can only be assumed, but as far as stats go, there's not a lot to back this ''more stress'' up with
Perhaps they chose the 3.2 V6 because they wanted a N/A car?
All you need to do is go over onto the Audi/VW/Seat/Skoda forums and ask at how many have had remaps and ask how many have had problems with them.
There are thousands of owners throughout the Vag group and ive yet to read 1 horror story.
More stress can only be assumed, but as far as stats go, there's not a lot to back this ''more stress'' up with
Perhaps they chose the 3.2 V6 because they wanted a N/A car?
can't imagine that vag only developed the 3.2 v6 for want of an n/a car though. the development must have cost a fortune over a relatively simple remap and adds a significant mass to the front end too.
#71
Perhaps they kept it down to a 225 output for insurance/emissions/economy reasons??
The K04 turbo as used in the engine is only reliable for a safe 290bhp. Anything more and you need to upgrade to a bigger flowing turbo. However according to all the Vag based tuning companies the engines are good for a safe reliable 350bhp. All you need to do is fit a larger turbo/injectors etc
The boxer engine started life as a 208bhp example, im sure there are a few on here safely running 330 and more on these standard internals.
I get what your saying though as in the long run there must be an effect on the engines long term capability. It may have well cut it from a 200,000 mile engine to a 100,000 mile engine. We don't know yet
The K04 turbo as used in the engine is only reliable for a safe 290bhp. Anything more and you need to upgrade to a bigger flowing turbo. However according to all the Vag based tuning companies the engines are good for a safe reliable 350bhp. All you need to do is fit a larger turbo/injectors etc
The boxer engine started life as a 208bhp example, im sure there are a few on here safely running 330 and more on these standard internals.
I get what your saying though as in the long run there must be an effect on the engines long term capability. It may have well cut it from a 200,000 mile engine to a 100,000 mile engine. We don't know yet
Last edited by Mitchy260; 10 April 2005 at 11:24 PM.
#73
Originally Posted by davyboy
Ok, I am confused - can you get a pic
Dave
Dave
Davy- LCR = beam axle with conventional springs & shocks just like many an old school hatch & Mk1,2,3,4 Golfs etc.
The indepentant set up from S3 = wishbones either side as the 4wd dif (or Haldex unit on the S3/TT) & drive shafts need room & also conventional springs & shocks.
#74
Sjah555 , got it on Saturday (LCR ) that is , initial impressions are it's a very different beast.
I won't bore you with all the plus points of the Scoob , as you and everybody else know what they are already.
As for the Leon ( with Revo) , well , Yes it's quick , stormingly quick in gear , but it's definately going to be an art getting off the line in it.
Whereas in the Scoob , all you really had to worry about was bogging down & getting a lame take off as a result , with the Leon it's a tad more tricky...But not impossible , give me a couple more days!!!!!!
Personally I'm looking forward to the challenge of Front wheel drive , takes me back to my Clio 16v & 106xsi days.
As for the handling , well I am comparing 200 miles in this to 76000 miles in the Scoob, but it feels surefooted & exit speeds seem right up with the Scoob already...But it was dry at the weekend. Like I say I need more miles in this to get used to it , but if it ends up impressing me as much as the Scoob has done , I'll love it.
To sum up , fast , different , good looking , need more practice miles , well looking forward to it , missing the Scoob But the future looks Good!!!
I won't bore you with all the plus points of the Scoob , as you and everybody else know what they are already.
As for the Leon ( with Revo) , well , Yes it's quick , stormingly quick in gear , but it's definately going to be an art getting off the line in it.
Whereas in the Scoob , all you really had to worry about was bogging down & getting a lame take off as a result , with the Leon it's a tad more tricky...But not impossible , give me a couple more days!!!!!!
Personally I'm looking forward to the challenge of Front wheel drive , takes me back to my Clio 16v & 106xsi days.
As for the handling , well I am comparing 200 miles in this to 76000 miles in the Scoob, but it feels surefooted & exit speeds seem right up with the Scoob already...But it was dry at the weekend. Like I say I need more miles in this to get used to it , but if it ends up impressing me as much as the Scoob has done , I'll love it.
To sum up , fast , different , good looking , need more practice miles , well looking forward to it , missing the Scoob But the future looks Good!!!
#78
Nice one !
Originally Posted by Hotpants
Sjah555 , got it on Saturday (LCR ) that is , initial impressions are it's a very different beast.
I won't bore you with all the plus points of the Scoob , as you and everybody else know what they are already.
As for the Leon ( with Revo) , well , Yes it's quick , stormingly quick in gear , but it's definately going to be an art getting off the line in it.
Whereas in the Scoob , all you really had to worry about was bogging down & getting a lame take off as a result , with the Leon it's a tad more tricky...But not impossible , give me a couple more days!!!!!!
Personally I'm looking forward to the challenge of Front wheel drive , takes me back to my Clio 16v & 106xsi days.
As for the handling , well I am comparing 200 miles in this to 76000 miles in the Scoob, but it feels surefooted & exit speeds seem right up with the Scoob already...But it was dry at the weekend. Like I say I need more miles in this to get used to it , but if it ends up impressing me as much as the Scoob has done , I'll love it.
To sum up , fast , different , good looking , need more practice miles , well looking forward to it , missing the Scoob But the future looks Good!!!
I won't bore you with all the plus points of the Scoob , as you and everybody else know what they are already.
As for the Leon ( with Revo) , well , Yes it's quick , stormingly quick in gear , but it's definately going to be an art getting off the line in it.
Whereas in the Scoob , all you really had to worry about was bogging down & getting a lame take off as a result , with the Leon it's a tad more tricky...But not impossible , give me a couple more days!!!!!!
Personally I'm looking forward to the challenge of Front wheel drive , takes me back to my Clio 16v & 106xsi days.
As for the handling , well I am comparing 200 miles in this to 76000 miles in the Scoob, but it feels surefooted & exit speeds seem right up with the Scoob already...But it was dry at the weekend. Like I say I need more miles in this to get used to it , but if it ends up impressing me as much as the Scoob has done , I'll love it.
To sum up , fast , different , good looking , need more practice miles , well looking forward to it , missing the Scoob But the future looks Good!!!
-Sal-
PS. Does it have even a half decent exhaust note ?.. [please say yes ]
#79
Sadly NO !!!! Found my favourite little Tunnel & it sounded like a wet fart to be honest , but I tell you now I'm really growing fond of this little car , it's super stealth aswell , nobody seems to be aware of its potential. I like it!
#80
LCR test-drive !
Drove an LCR 225 in 'Emocion Red' yday lunch..
..impressed. Stealer was kind enough to bring the car down from N. London to work (~100 miles round trip ! ) and then went out for a spirited drive on a few known roads. Once rolling it did seem to shift without fuss but ESP did kick-in a little obtrusively during an attempted quick getaway . Nicely weighted steering feel (if a little low on feedback especially compared to the Clio 182 I drove on Sat'day) but not bad by any means. Looks.. aggressive but understated. Decent Q-car.
Revo conversion will make it much more of a beast IMO..
All in all - thumbs up for the LCR. Think it may have to be done !
-Sal-
..impressed. Stealer was kind enough to bring the car down from N. London to work (~100 miles round trip ! ) and then went out for a spirited drive on a few known roads. Once rolling it did seem to shift without fuss but ESP did kick-in a little obtrusively during an attempted quick getaway . Nicely weighted steering feel (if a little low on feedback especially compared to the Clio 182 I drove on Sat'day) but not bad by any means. Looks.. aggressive but understated. Decent Q-car.
Revo conversion will make it much more of a beast IMO..
All in all - thumbs up for the LCR. Think it may have to be done !
-Sal-
#81
Hi chaps,
scoobyjawa mentioned that there was a thread about the LCR on here so I thought I would have a read.
Seems that the LCR has done quite well, I was in a similar position last June when I wanted a new car and had 3 choices, 1 of which was a WRX STI..
In the end I went for the LCR due to the running costs and that from £475 to around £1k you could get a decent remap.
I ended up getting mine remapped with Oettinger, which is more expensive but does come with a warranty that matches the Seat warranty. Basically what Seat wont fix RSD (UK Oettinger dealer) will plus it's a German tuning company which means every remap has to be TUV approved so you know that you are getting a good remap.
To be honest there is little in it when it comes to the remaps, Jabba do seem to get better figures but in terms of on the road performance there would be nothing in it, a Jabba car could not pull 1 car length let alone 3 or 4 from a Revo, APR, AMD or Oettinger car.
I have also added a Full Milltek system inc a sports cat, it really makes a difference to the noise of the car, sounds a lot louder and had much deeper note to it and now and again you get some nice popping noise's!!
Anyway enough of me going on, have to say though very impressed with this forum, especially when it comes to talking about other cars, there is no sl*ging off just a genuine interest in cars.
Here are a few shots of mine:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4.../zainoside.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...ins/zaino2.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...s/PICT0554.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...s/DSC00097.jpg
scoobyjawa mentioned that there was a thread about the LCR on here so I thought I would have a read.
Seems that the LCR has done quite well, I was in a similar position last June when I wanted a new car and had 3 choices, 1 of which was a WRX STI..
In the end I went for the LCR due to the running costs and that from £475 to around £1k you could get a decent remap.
I ended up getting mine remapped with Oettinger, which is more expensive but does come with a warranty that matches the Seat warranty. Basically what Seat wont fix RSD (UK Oettinger dealer) will plus it's a German tuning company which means every remap has to be TUV approved so you know that you are getting a good remap.
To be honest there is little in it when it comes to the remaps, Jabba do seem to get better figures but in terms of on the road performance there would be nothing in it, a Jabba car could not pull 1 car length let alone 3 or 4 from a Revo, APR, AMD or Oettinger car.
I have also added a Full Milltek system inc a sports cat, it really makes a difference to the noise of the car, sounds a lot louder and had much deeper note to it and now and again you get some nice popping noise's!!
Anyway enough of me going on, have to say though very impressed with this forum, especially when it comes to talking about other cars, there is no sl*ging off just a genuine interest in cars.
Here are a few shots of mine:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4.../zainoside.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...ins/zaino2.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...s/PICT0554.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v4...s/DSC00097.jpg
#83
Nice pics and nice car mate .. ta for the comments.
In negotiations with the stealer as to what my P/X is worth.. but barring that hope that he offers me a reasonable amount so I can keep within my budgeted CTC and then we'll have a deal !
-Sal-
In negotiations with the stealer as to what my P/X is worth.. but barring that hope that he offers me a reasonable amount so I can keep within my budgeted CTC and then we'll have a deal !
-Sal-
#85
3k !.. hope you told them to go shove it where the sun don't shine (i.e. Staines, Surrey ).
Had quotes ranging from 4 - 5.5K for mine. Stealer has returned with offer of 4k which is a bit miserable, but car does not have A/C which is big no-no apparently. Gonna try wangle a few more £££ out of them but not looking good..
Shame..
-Sal-
Had quotes ranging from 4 - 5.5K for mine. Stealer has returned with offer of 4k which is a bit miserable, but car does not have A/C which is big no-no apparently. Gonna try wangle a few more £££ out of them but not looking good..
Shame..
-Sal-
#87
You need an A pillar from nomad and then there is a vast choice of gauges to choose from. I got boost (psi) and oil temp
http://www.xyberautos.com/catalog/de...hp?cPath=40_49
http://www.xyberautos.com/catalog/de...hp?cPath=40_49
#88
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 9,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I must say the SEAT dealer in cheltenham gave me a rather crap trade-in offer on my scoob, which is why I don't have an LCR sitting on the drive right now!
#89
Cheers Mitchy260 , will have to invest in a gauge or two me thinks , is it a DIY job or is it strictly a job for the PRO's.
SJAH555 , what's the latest , have you taken the plunge yet or are you still having your pants pulled down by the Dealers offering you peanuts for your Scoob.
SJAH555 , what's the latest , have you taken the plunge yet or are you still having your pants pulled down by the Dealers offering you peanuts for your Scoob.
#90
You can give it a go yourself if your not bad with wiring.
Im useless with the stuff so i got a mate to fit it all.
http://www.seatcupra.net/forums/show...ghlight=gauges
Post 6+7 for my gauges
Im useless with the stuff so i got a mate to fit it all.
http://www.seatcupra.net/forums/show...ghlight=gauges
Post 6+7 for my gauges
Last edited by Mitchy260; 17 April 2005 at 07:46 PM.