Blunkett is back
#31
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
All IMHO
Great, he is working with pensions - our money!, last time he was in charge of other peoples money i seem to remember he used it to buy rail tickets for his slapper and forgot to mention it - it is not a case of the amount more the principal or his lack of them bother me., oh and there's the matter of did he or didn't he help push along his slappers nannys asylum claim.
Hardly a man with his eye (so to speak) on the ball.
Good old Blair, keep it up!
Great, he is working with pensions - our money!, last time he was in charge of other peoples money i seem to remember he used it to buy rail tickets for his slapper and forgot to mention it - it is not a case of the amount more the principal or his lack of them bother me., oh and there's the matter of did he or didn't he help push along his slappers nannys asylum claim.
Hardly a man with his eye (so to speak) on the ball.
Good old Blair, keep it up!
#32
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by Johnny E
Well whatever turns u on toss p0tt, I'm off to bed with my sexy bit of greyhound, see ya tomorrow
Hates his job yet can't be arsed to move?
Hates the Gov. but works for them?
Pete
#33
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by Paul Habgood
oh and there's the matter of did he or didn't he help push along his slappers nannys asylum claim.
And if he did?? Why not?? Use your positions of power I say!! Didn't affect anyone!!
Pete
#35
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by carl
I'm never sure whether the vote is determined by The Sun, or whether they just lean the way the vote is going. The former implies that some 5 million people are influenced by what a rag with less intellect than a 5-year old tells them to do. Which is a worry
#36
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pslewis
And if he did?? Why not?? Use your positions of power I say!! Didn't affect anyone!!
Pete
Pete
Blunkett is a man of poor judgement and not right for government - still hardly suprising Blair picked him then.
All again imho
#37
"I quite like Blunkett, he seems to be about the only honest popular Labour MP. I don't agree with his ideas, but at least he is honest about things, nanny included."
haha - that'd be the bloke that fiddled the visa for his ****-piece's nanny, then lied about it? possibly the MOST honest Labour MP, but far from being actually honest
haha - that'd be the bloke that fiddled the visa for his ****-piece's nanny, then lied about it? possibly the MOST honest Labour MP, but far from being actually honest
#38
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 2005 sso, 1/4 finals,3rd in 60ft; 2004 sso,semi finals,2nd in 60ft time; 2003 standard car 2nd 60ft
Posts: 4,909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by unclebuck
Shame the token black lesbian lost her seat to George Galloway.
LMFAO
LMFAO
#39
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: 2005 sso, 1/4 finals,3rd in 60ft; 2004 sso,semi finals,2nd in 60ft time; 2003 standard car 2nd 60ft
Posts: 4,909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
pete are you going to say sorry when it all crashes in 2 to 3 yrs???
#42
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by pslewis
You were, what?? 10 when the Tory Party got kicked out?
You know absolutely NOTHING!!
Pete
You know absolutely NOTHING!!
Pete
#43
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Luminous
I quite like Blunkett, he seems to be about the only honest popular Labour MP. I don't agree with his ideas, but at least he is honest about things, nanny included.
#44
According to PSL then, its all ok to fiddle the system as long as you are in power and have the chance to do so.
He obviously agrees with NL having a foundation of lies, spin and cheating.
Les
He obviously agrees with NL having a foundation of lies, spin and cheating.
Les
#45
Originally Posted by Leslie
According to PSL then, its all ok to fiddle the system as long as you are in power and have the chance to do so.
He obviously agrees with NL having a foundation of lies, spin and cheating.
Les
He obviously agrees with NL having a foundation of lies, spin and cheating.
Les
#46
Originally Posted by NewLabour
The foundation of lies, spin and cheating is part of our heritage dating back before parliament even existed. It's just that NEW LABOUR do it better.
Now they seek only to serve only themselves at the expense of the populace.
#47
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NewLabour
The foundation of lies, spin and cheating is part of our heritage dating back before parliament even existed. It's just that NEW LABOUR do it better.
#48
Originally Posted by Slartibartfast
Utter rubbish! Until recently politicians had integrity coupled with the desire to serve the nation.
Now they seek only to serve only themselves at the expense of the populace.
Now they seek only to serve only themselves at the expense of the populace.
#49
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ajm
Is this username a permanent fixture Alan, or just opportunistic trolling, poaching on pslewis's niche?
#50
Originally Posted by ajm
Thanks for the PM's earlier, but you still havn't answered my question.
#52
Originally Posted by ajm
You did not answer the question. I do know the answer though...
If you cared to look at my previous posts in all my guises you'd see that I've always been anti tory and pro labour.
The smiley looks more and more desperate every time you use it, if you want answers to your questions then try begging a bit harder than you already have and I *might* deign to give you an answer much as I might throw a dog a scrap from the table.
#53
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ajm
You did not answer the question. I do know the answer though...
#54
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NewLabour
You mean your question earlier on this thread? Do try to be more specific alex.
If you cared to look at my previous posts in all my guises you'd see that I've always been anti tory and pro labour.
The smiley looks more and more desperate every time you use it, if you want answers to your questions then try begging a bit harder than you already have and I *might* deign to give you an answer much as I might throw a dog a scrap from the table.
If you cared to look at my previous posts in all my guises you'd see that I've always been anti tory and pro labour.
The smiley looks more and more desperate every time you use it, if you want answers to your questions then try begging a bit harder than you already have and I *might* deign to give you an answer much as I might throw a dog a scrap from the table.
Oh and the signifies enjoyment, not desperation, however "desperate" you may be to interpret it otherwise!
#56
Originally Posted by ajm
No need to get tetchy just because I picked you up on a lame attempt to muscle in on pslewis's "swim". So much for honour amongst trolls, I guess you must be desperate for material now!
Oh and the signifies enjoyment, not desperation, however "desperate" you may be to interpret it otherwise!
Oh and the signifies enjoyment, not desperation, however "desperate" you may be to interpret it otherwise!
The proof of my contentions lies in the numerous posts I've made on the subject previously.
#57
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by NewLabour
Sounding more and more desperate with every denial. Keep at it you may be able to convince yourself.
The proof of my contentions lies in the numerous posts I've made on the subject previously.
The proof of my contentions lies in the numerous posts I've made on the subject previously.
You have limited your field because you are desperate for material.... I think if one were to run a thumb across your edge one would find it was distinctly dull these days!
#58
Originally Posted by ajm
Your previous posts have been on any subject you thought would be annoying. However this time is different. Why bother registering "NewLabour" if not an opportunistic attempt to cash in on the Labour victory, a market pslewis and his misdirected left wing puppets have already got cornered?
You have limited your field because you are desperate for material.... I think if one were to run a thumb across your edge one would find it was distinctly dull these days!
You have limited your field because you are desperate for material.... I think if one were to run a thumb across your edge one would find it was distinctly dull these days!
Your contentions are incorrect in every sense, we have a fresh term of NEW LABOUR to enjoy, 4-5 yrs worth in fact. Great isn't it?
#60
It's a resounding no, you just don't choose to see it that way. I prefer to do my posting in accordance with the zeitgeist and my own beliefs. In that I'm 100% consistent.
Shame you can't see it or you *might* get the joke rather than being the butt of it.
Shame you can't see it or you *might* get the joke rather than being the butt of it.