Extremeist on the news.....
#31
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fairy Tokens = 9
Posts: 1,951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by CoobyS
The common denominator is that innocent lives are lost and people get p1ssed off. In the same way we are p1ssed off at our fellow Londoners getting blown to bits, so are the Iraqi's (and their supporters) who have seen their people die.
I take it that you support the war in Iraq?
I take it that you support the war in Iraq?
Plus everyone complains the war was about oil... Well what would have happened if SH had decided that there would be no more oil sold to the west. OR it would be tripled in price?
It could have crippled the whole of western civilisation.
And finally, in his reign of control, he still killed more people than the war and allot of them were his own
#32
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by CoobyS
Right. So would you say that the UK's involvement in Iraq, albeit as a pillion passenger, has made us the target of terrorists? In other words, we are responsible, ultimately, for the terror attacks on 7/7?
#33
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by suprabeast
For a start SH was dangerous and needed to be removed, whether he had WMD's or not is irrelevant, he wouldnt allow the UN top check otherwise therefore the natural assumption is that he did.
Plus everyone complains the war was about oil... Well what would have happened if SH had decided that there would be no more oil sold to the west. OR it would be tripled in price?
It could have crippled the whole of western civilisation.
And finally, in his reign of control, he still killed more people than the war and allot of them were his own
Plus everyone complains the war was about oil... Well what would have happened if SH had decided that there would be no more oil sold to the west. OR it would be tripled in price?
It could have crippled the whole of western civilisation.
And finally, in his reign of control, he still killed more people than the war and allot of them were his own
#34
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by suprabeast
For a start SH was dangerous and needed to be removed, whether he had WMD's or not is irrelevant, he wouldnt allow the UN top check otherwise therefore the natural assumption is that he did.
Plus everyone complains the war was about oil... Well what would have happened if SH had decided that there would be no more oil sold to the west. OR it would be tripled in price?
It could have crippled the whole of western civilisation.
It could have crippled the whole of western civilisation.
And finally, in his reign of control, he still killed more people than the war and allot of them were his own
The whole Iraq war is based on lies, deception and spin to try and justify invading another country because we want to plunder their resources. If that's how you want to behave, you have to expect people will retaliate.
#35
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by RedFive
Wouldn't logic then imply that the attacks would be carried out by Iraqis or Afghans ? (devils advocate).
#36
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fairy Tokens = 9
Posts: 1,951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by OllyK
Dangerous as in an actual threat, or dngerous becuase the spin doctors wanted you to think that to legitimise the invasion?
#37
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by suprabeast
HE WAS DEEMED AN ACTUAL THREAT
#38
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by suprabeast
HE WAS DEEMED AN ACTUAL THREAT
One then has to ask at what point GW and TB actually knew that info was false and wether it was spin to get the public on board. I doubt we will ever know, but the way things all came to a head rather quickly and without a second resolution does make me wonder why there was suddenly (after several years) such a big rush.
#39
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by CoobyS
Yes he was an actual threat to the Western economy because being a leader of a country with the highest untapped oil per barrel produced ratio, should he have refused to play ball we would have been in grave danger of economic collapse. A fact openly admitted to by the UK/US Governments.
#40
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Flatcapdriver
Rubbish. There was very little oil coming out of Iraq during that time anyway given the embargos forced through by the West so other than the oil for food programme it didn't have that much impact. What everyone forgets is that there are plenty of oil reserves about at present and what is forcing prices up is high demand coupled with a lack of refining capacity. Oil prices have doubled over the last couple of years and there has been no economic collapse.
Think long term, we're not talking about a couple of years.
Read the US Governments own papers which warn of the coming shortages and were made public a year before the invasion.
#41
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by CoobyS
You're missing the point that Iraq has the largest untapped supplies. Therefore, to get control over these for the problems in the next 20 or so years that will arise from shortages in the West, it was justified we invade Iraq.
Think long term, we're not talking about a couple of years.
Read the US Governments own papers which warn of the coming shortages and were made public a year before the invasion.
Think long term, we're not talking about a couple of years.
Read the US Governments own papers which warn of the coming shortages and were made public a year before the invasion.
#42
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: West Yorks.
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Jap2Scrap
I think that a possible flaw in your assumption that it's wholly a conquering invasion is that it's anything but conquering. Let's be honest, if the US and UK wanted outright control of Iraq nothing could stop them taking it. It's the softly, softly, let's not tread on any toes approach that has landed our troops in the mess they're in. Exposed and vulnerable to resistance by trying to present a peaceful force rather than an invasion.
#43
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Jap2Scrap
I think that a possible flaw in your assumption that it's wholly a conquering invasion is that it's anything but conquering. Let's be honest, if the US and UK wanted outright control of Iraq nothing could stop them taking it. It's the softly, softly, let's not tread on any toes approach that has landed our troops in the mess they're in. Exposed and vulnerable to resistance by trying to present a peaceful force rather than an invasion.
#44
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by MJW
But the US and UK do have total control over Iraq with the puppet government they installed ! The only reason Saddam was removed because he wasn't playing ball with the oil supplies - the US and UK governments couldn't give a flying f**k about the Iraqi people, as demonstrated during the years Saddam was our best buddy. Human rights ? Nah, here Saddam wanna buy some more weapons from us ? And 'peaceful forces' is a bit of an oxymoron isn't it ? Cluster bombs and depleted uranium rounds aren't PR tools !
#45
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by CoobyS
I made no assumption of the sort. Any kid would tell you that Iraq is far from conquered.
#47
BANNED
Join Date: May 2002
Location: scotland home of the brave
Posts: 13,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by CoobyS
I think that is being used as an excuse by the terrorists. They know full well that if we didn't invade Iraq then we'd face the economic repercussions of an oil crisis, almost like in 1973 when the US nearly invaded Saudi Arabia. Also, in invading Iraq, we are helping them rid their way of life and adopt the Western demoncracy approach - the only way to live. Mark my words, 5 years from now we will see Iraqis enjoying Big Macs rather than strapping exposives to themselves and needlessly blowing themselves up.
All we're doing is helping them.
All we're doing is helping them.
cooby would u enjoy bigmacs while a foreign government an invader is stealing your wealth while giving u bigmacs
i bet u would
#48
BANNED
Join Date: May 2002
Location: scotland home of the brave
Posts: 13,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by astraboy
you dont seriously believe that do you?
Iraq was invaded because of its oil reserves were ripe for the taking.
Everything else, the repression of the kurds, the human rights atrocities and a despot running the place were all incidental to the fact the country is rich in oil and the americans wanted it. A fact reflected by the way american forces surrounded the oil ministry to defend its infastructure once it had been captured, yet didnt bat an eyelid while the hospitals were looted.
If the americans were so upset about the treatment of the natives, it does beg the question of why they hung the kurds out to dry and stood to one side while saddam hussein gassed them en masse for daring to stage an uprising in the north after Gulf War Part 1.
astraboy.
Iraq was invaded because of its oil reserves were ripe for the taking.
Everything else, the repression of the kurds, the human rights atrocities and a despot running the place were all incidental to the fact the country is rich in oil and the americans wanted it. A fact reflected by the way american forces surrounded the oil ministry to defend its infastructure once it had been captured, yet didnt bat an eyelid while the hospitals were looted.
If the americans were so upset about the treatment of the natives, it does beg the question of why they hung the kurds out to dry and stood to one side while saddam hussein gassed them en masse for daring to stage an uprising in the north after Gulf War Part 1.
astraboy.
well said astra and also usa gave him evil weapons to use it on the iranians too
#49
BANNED
Join Date: May 2002
Location: scotland home of the brave
Posts: 13,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by OllyK
The problem is we assume the western way is best and right, that isn't necessarily the case for everybody and while we impose our will on others, people will resist and make their displeasure known however they can. Iraq is just another example of the west (America) meddling in the Middle East for largely its own ends and we just happen to be along for the ride this time.
America is THE super power, no other army can really match them in terms of destructive capability, so those who want to resist have to resort to non-conventional methods, much as the French resistance did during the German invasion in WW2. We have to realise that to many people in Iraq and the Middle East in general, what we are doing is seen as comparable to Germany.
America is THE super power, no other army can really match them in terms of destructive capability, so those who want to resist have to resort to non-conventional methods, much as the French resistance did during the German invasion in WW2. We have to realise that to many people in Iraq and the Middle East in general, what we are doing is seen as comparable to Germany.
thanks mate well said i quote
"like one guy said our apache helicopters and f-16's are our suicide bombers".
they dont have an army
#50
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: West Yorks.
Posts: 4,130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Yes, it's great now the Iraqis are free : they're free to choose from literally several American contractors to re-build the infrastructure that was destroyed by American bombs. But they'll have to pay for it themselves of course ...
In fact, the contract for re-building Iraq was awarded to Bush's long time buddies Bechtel (who's former list of upper management reads like a who's who of US government). Strange that isn't it ?
In fact, the contract for re-building Iraq was awarded to Bush's long time buddies Bechtel (who's former list of upper management reads like a who's who of US government). Strange that isn't it ?
#51
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by moses
cooby would u enjoy bigmacs while a foreign government an invader is stealing your wealth while giving u bigmacs
i bet u would
i bet u would
#52
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by moses
when did i miss something who was on and what channel
He actually avoided the question about whether UK citizens are a legitimate targets for suicide bombers, I took the answer as being yes.
He was on there having a debate with a chap from the Muslim Interfaith Organisation and accused him of not being a 'proper Muslim' - very poor show in my opinion.
You either kill EVERYBODY, like some on here think, or you agree that EVERYONE has a right to life. Until Muslim people feel some sort of justice and equality then people like this mad man will find people to listen to him - and agree within him.
Whether actually banning him from speaking and deporting him to somewhere will actually change anything I dont know.
Also 'engaging' with the Muslim community, in order to wash their hands of any responsibility for recent events is one of the dirtiest tricks played by New Labour.
If more bombs go off, it really will be the responsibility of the Muslim community as these people have now agreed to 'resolve' these issues in the UK, so they are on the hook for it, in my opinion. NL is free to carry on Crusading through the Middle East as Bush's bum chum and can now blame someone else even more conveniently than before.
Why dont we just stop creating these situations? Seems simple to me.
Asif
#53
BANNED
Join Date: May 2002
Location: scotland home of the brave
Posts: 13,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
thanks alot bros i missed it, u know anyone who taped it bros
i was watching newsnight and then watched a few star plus asian soaps![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
kahin to hoga, kyunki saas be khabi bahu thee and before that kausati
my wife records it for me when im at work i luv it
and 11.05 836 channel islamic one i watch agenda my fave programme
i was watching newsnight and then watched a few star plus asian soaps
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
kahin to hoga, kyunki saas be khabi bahu thee and before that kausati
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
and 11.05 836 channel islamic one i watch agenda my fave programme
#55
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by moses
thanks alot bros i missed it, u know anyone who taped it bros
i was watching newsnight and then watched a few star plus asian soaps![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
kahin to hoga, kyunki saas be khabi bahu thee and before that kausati
my wife records it for me when im at work i luv it
and 11.05 836 channel islamic one i watch agenda my fave programme
i was watching newsnight and then watched a few star plus asian soaps
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
kahin to hoga, kyunki saas be khabi bahu thee and before that kausati
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
and 11.05 836 channel islamic one i watch agenda my fave programme
Dont know anyone who has it, try the CH4 Website
Asif
#56
BANNED
Join Date: May 2002
Location: scotland home of the brave
Posts: 13,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Talking](images/icons/icon10.gif)
Originally Posted by AsifScoob
LOL, my Mum loves that stuff.
Dont know anyone who has it, try the CH4 Website
Asif
Dont know anyone who has it, try the CH4 Website
Asif
inshallah will do
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#57
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by moses
inshallah will do
bros i never ever did like asian soaps but i got hooked u know the time we come back from work at night and the food is ready the maw and wife r watchin the soaps and u get hooked
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Oh, time to go and watch Big Brother!
Asif
#58
BANNED
Join Date: May 2002
Location: scotland home of the brave
Posts: 13,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by AsifScoob
LOL, Ive been there. Mum is banned from watching that stuff now, she was literally glued to it, not eating, going to sleep, she went mad!!
Oh, time to go and watch Big Brother!
Asif
Oh, time to go and watch Big Brother!
Asif
bros same prob here my mums always glued on it only time she moves is to read salat and eat
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
lol big brother that kamal is a backstabbing c;unt
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dr Hu
Computer & Technology Related
10
31 January 2013 10:13 PM