Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

SUSPECTED BOMBER SHOT ...SKY CITING POLICE SOURCES

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 22 July 2005, 02:06 PM
  #211  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flatcapdriver
Moses. You make a good point here so maybe you can help me to understand a few more things. It seems to me that its mainly young Asians of Pakistani origin who are so disaffected that they start bombing the crap out of everyone whereas the Indian community appears more at ease with being British. Assuming this is correct, why is this? Secondly, whilst its easy to lay responsibility at someone else's door I believe that the Muslim community has a part to play in rooting out these muppets just as I would if I knew some sad chav like creature spouting BNP like propaganda in the white community.
Indians are, by and large Hindu rather than Muslim. It is not a popular religion outside of India compared to the likes of Christianity or Islam. There is also a certain "brotherhood" amongst Muslims which kind of means "you harm one, you harm all". While this unity had its place in the past when the Christians were crusading, in this day and age it can lead to certain issues about whether you put your country or you brothers first. I suppose we could argue that we should be putting humans first regardless.
Old 22 July 2005, 02:07 PM
  #212  
GC8
Scooby Regular
 
GC8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ffs, Gupta is a Hindu name and we are talking about Islamic fundamentalists.
Old 22 July 2005, 02:08 PM
  #213  
SJ_Skyline
Scooby Senior
 
SJ_Skyline's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Limbo
Posts: 21,922
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by TheBigMan
Shot at point blank after being pinned down.

why was it necessary to busss five caps in his ***??? Surely if he's caught, it's better to use him as a source of info instead of dipping him, flipping him and pistol wippin' him??
Would you be willing to give him 1/2 a chance to detonate a bomb by pressing a button?

Sky were suggesting earlier that police had orders to shoot to kill
Old 22 July 2005, 02:09 PM
  #214  
moses
BANNED
Support Scoobynet!
 
moses's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: scotland home of the brave
Posts: 13,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flatcapdriver
Moses. You make a good point here so maybe you can help me to understand a few more things. It seems to me that its mainly young Asians of Pakistani origin who are so disaffected that they start bombing the crap out of everyone whereas the Indian community appears more at ease with being British. Assuming this is correct, why is this? Secondly, whilst its easy to lay responsibility at someone else's door I believe that the Muslim community has a part to play in rooting out these muppets just as I would if I knew some sad chav like creature spouting BNP like propaganda in the white community.

first of all my fellow asian brothers the sikhs and hindus, even together they dont even make half of the muslim community

and yes they got probs too as we all do in our communities, my sikh brothers still practice their religion fully but my hindu brothers most of them have surrendered their religion for business and money making and something that is left in the house while the muslims and sikhs, their religion is a part of their life and everyday living

their was no problem in the uk before the salman rushdie ******* thing, thats when muslims came on the media, before hand for over 60 to 70 yrs no probs at all

west needed a new enemy, after the commies and it was islam, and my other asian brothers their countries aint been invaded , india etc or people slaughtered like the muslims have been in all over the world, countries colonised and corrupt dictators backed in egypt, saudia and other countries

the oppression of the palestinians etc and butchering of iraqis from 1990 right up to 2005

this is the difference and in pure islam mate, their is no nationalism, i aint no fecking pakistani or brit first, im a muslim and them im scottish and pakistan and british

see what i mean, as a muslim i will be faithful to my country and my people muslims and non muslims in britain, thats what islam means, and to defend my land scotland from invaders and other dangers.

nationalism in our culture was created by the colonialist masters of our lands of old, split them into syria, iraq, saudia arabia oman, uae etc, they were all known as the muslim lands of arabia , not countries

in islam the muslim brotherhood and sisterhood is like a body

when the leg feels the pain the body will feel it, something like that, quoted by the mouth of our prophet peace be upon him

a brotherhood, when one nation gets butchered all of them feel it

i will give u an example

flat mate, look at zimbabwe, thats nothing compared to what happens in muslim countries, lets say tomorrow mugabe says lets slay all whites in zimbabwe, trust me mate, your gonna feel it big time

thats how we feel

talking about asians, im closer to my sikh brothers from any non muslim asians, i luv hindu brothers and sisters too but its a punjabi thing
to be closer to your own community muslims and sikhs from asian lands
so to the point

if the same happened to other asian communities trust me they would be in anger too
Old 22 July 2005, 02:12 PM
  #215  
moses
BANNED
Support Scoobynet!
 
moses's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: scotland home of the brave
Posts: 13,927
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Diamond Dave
I said help stop them. By way of talking to the police etc.
Don't tell me I'm talking **** when you don't read it properly.

You don't seem many suicide chavs do you? Novas packed with high explosives


Shoot the fukcers would be the obvious answer but not really going to work is it.
Communication and co-operation for starters.


It is members of the muslim community though.
Even Tony can't take the blame for a load of Guptas wanting to blow **** up.


lol like gc8 said gupta is a hindu name shows how much u know about islam

sorry for saying u r talking ****e them but it was a silly question to ask

how can u shoot a suicide bomber when u dont know who it is and regarding chavs, yes they murder, mug and do alot of evil things too so i say lets stop them shall we and its up to the white community or christians to do that if that is the case as u are saying muslims should do something about these fanatics

who r these fundamentalists, the hate preachers, its up to the government to chuck them out, they didnt do it and suffered for it

its the government no one else to blame
Old 22 July 2005, 02:13 PM
  #216  
hawkthescoobslayer
Scooby Regular
 
hawkthescoobslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Life's Ruf
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

is it just me or does this statement alone make you chuckle

"i aint no fecking pakistani or brit first,
im a muslim and them
im scottish and
pakistan and
british"

I honestly don't think you really know who the **** you are
Old 22 July 2005, 02:14 PM
  #217  
GC8
Scooby Regular
 
GC8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SJ_Skyline
Would you be willing to give him 1/2 a chance to detonate a bomb by pressing a button?

Sky were suggesting earlier that police had orders to shoot to kill
Without wanting to be argumentitive; I dont think that that is possible due to a Police officer's 'personal office' status. Im sure that a PC could confirm this.

Simon
Old 22 July 2005, 02:18 PM
  #219  
hawkthescoobslayer
Scooby Regular
 
hawkthescoobslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Life's Ruf
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GC8
Without wanting to be argumentitive; I dont think that that is possible due to a Police officer's 'personal office' status. Im sure that a PC could confirm this.

Simon
depends on the situation, if orders are given that innocent lives are paramount and that threats MUST be neutralized quickly. there are many ways of wording things in such a way as to be politically correct BUT doing what SHOULD be done IMHO
Old 22 July 2005, 02:22 PM
  #220  
GC8
Scooby Regular
 
GC8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Youre missing the point; my contention is that you cant order a Police officer to shoot anyone; unlike a soldier.....

Simon
Old 22 July 2005, 02:22 PM
  #221  
RedFive
Scooby Regular
 
RedFive's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by moses
their was no problem in the uk before the salman rushdie ******* thing, thats when muslims came on the media, before hand for over 60 to 70 yrs no probs at all
As an aside and slightly off topic: immediately after the fatwa on Rushdie, 40 out of 41 "Islam" countries condemned the fatwa. Iran dropped it in (I think) 1998. Little known facts.
Old 22 July 2005, 02:23 PM
  #222  
Flatcapdriver
Scooby Regular
 
Flatcapdriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by moses
first of all my fellow asian brothers the sikhs and hindus, even together they dont even make half of the muslim community

and yes they got probs too as we all do in our communities, my sikh brothers still practice their religion fully but my hindu brothers most of them have surrendered their religion for business and money making and something that is left in the house while the muslims and sikhs, their religion is a part of their life and everyday living

their was no problem in the uk before the salman rushdie ******* thing, thats when muslims came on the media, before hand for over 60 to 70 yrs no probs at all

west needed a new enemy, after the commies and it was islam, and my other asian brothers their countries aint been invaded , india etc or people slaughtered like the muslims have been in all over the world, countries colonised and corrupt dictators backed in egypt, saudia and other countries

the oppression of the palestinians etc and butchering of iraqis from 1990 right up to 2005

this is the difference and in pure islam mate, their is no nationalism, i aint no fecking pakistani or brit first, im a muslim and them im scottish and pakistan and british

see what i mean, as a muslim i will be faithful to my country and my people muslims and non muslims in britain, thats what islam means, and to defend my land scotland from invaders and other dangers.

nationalism in our culture was created by the colonialist masters of our lands of old, split them into syria, iraq, saudia arabia oman, uae etc, they were all known as the muslim lands of arabia , not countries

in islam the muslim brotherhood and sisterhood is like a body

when the leg feels the pain the body will feel it, something like that, quoted by the mouth of our prophet peace be upon him

a brotherhood, when one nation gets butchered all of them feel it

i will give u an example

flat mate, look at zimbabwe, thats nothing compared to what happens in muslim countries, lets say tomorrow mugabe says lets slay all whites in zimbabwe, trust me mate, your gonna feel it big time

thats how we feel

talking about asians, im closer to my sikh brothers from any non muslim asians, i luv hindu brothers and sisters too but its a punjabi thing
to be closer to your own community muslims and sikhs from asian lands
so to the point

if the same happened to other asian communities trust me they would be in anger too
What worries me about the above statements is that you mention commonality with Sikhs, Hindus etc but your attitude comes across as as very divisive when it comes to Whites and Western society of which you make no mention other than in the negative. Now correct me if I'm wrong but the general consensus amongst other posters is that all sides need to get together in the UK to sort this out and yet you mention you're Muslim, Pakistani and then Scottish in that order which strikes me as if you don't want to become British nor partake of anything that is British.

Understand that I'm not having a pop at you but it comes across as if (as a normal, moderate person) as if you have something against the UK so its seems a small leap for the more fanatical to take the blame game even further. Read what I've said as constructive rather than negatively.
Old 22 July 2005, 02:25 PM
  #223  
Jap2Scrap
Scooby Regular
 
Jap2Scrap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GC8
Without wanting to be argumentitive; I dont think that that is possible due to a Police officer's 'personal office' status. Im sure that a PC could confirm this.

Simon
I've heard that's right. Only someone under the umbrella of "armed forces" can be ordered to kill.
Old 22 July 2005, 02:35 PM
  #225  
brihoppy
Scooby Regular
 
brihoppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SJ_Skyline
Would you be willing to give him 1/2 a chance to detonate a bomb by pressing a button?

Sky were suggesting earlier that police had orders to shoot to kill
its SOP for soldiers in iraq/afghanistan to shoot any one they believe to be a suicide bomber, and the advice is to shoot them in the head if possible to reduce the chance of triggering a detonation...we use what are called combat indicators to judge a threat, though its not always clear, and then we are expected to justify it in investigation...as long as we can do that, whether they were a bomber is irrelevant...accidents may very well happen...those coppers had to make sure that guy was dead if they really believed him to have a bomb...it would be their SOP as well, and quite right...
Old 22 July 2005, 02:35 PM
  #226  
GC8
Scooby Regular
 
GC8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Im not going to argue about it; either I correct or I am incorrect. I believe that I am correct based on the knowledge that I have.

Simon
Old 22 July 2005, 02:36 PM
  #227  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by **************
So how do you think SO19 work then?
I think it's a subtle distinction between being ordered and being given the choice to shoot if you feel the need due to the threat level etc. As a police officer, the ultimate decision is yours, as a soldier it may not be.
Old 22 July 2005, 02:37 PM
  #228  
GC8
Scooby Regular
 
GC8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by brihoppy
its SOP for soldiers in iraq/afghanistan to shoot any one they believe to be a suicide bomber, and the advice is to shoot them in the head if possible to reduce the chance of triggering a detonation...we use what are called combat indicators to judge a threat, though its not always clear, and then we are expected to justify it in investigation...as long as we can do that, whether they were a bomber is irrelevant...accidents may very well happen...those coppers had to make sure that guy was dead if they really believed him to have a bomb...it would be their SOP as well, and quite right...
Ideally youd shoot them through the mouth as this will destroy the part of the brain that controls movement, they couldnt even press a button in the throes of death. Pleasant eh?
Old 22 July 2005, 02:41 PM
  #229  
wez_sti
Scooby Regular
 
wez_sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: All over...so who needs a car!
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry

Cant believe some people almost seem to be excusing these actions. we havent invaded Iraq with the intention of taking it over and making it part of the commonwealth, we went in to remove a dictator that was killing his own people in their thousands. if we'd of killed him and just left them to it there would be anarchy, much worse than there is now.

Do you also think Mugabie (sp) should just be left to it?? personally i'd like the f*cker executed. but again we'd need a milatary presence there for a while after to try and restore order.

it is widely known that these extremists are after a huge islamic state, they believe that 90% of what is now western europe belongs to them and they'll do anything to get it.

if we were INVADED (which Iraq has not been!!!) then yes i'd fight, but i'd fight the milatary, not blow up innocent men women and children. they've even killed muslims in these attacks. how fecking crazy must they be!?!
Old 22 July 2005, 02:42 PM
  #231  
Dieseldog
Scooby Regular
 
Dieseldog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 813
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GC8
Ideally youd shoot them through the mouth as this will destroy the part of the brain that controls movement, they couldnt even press a button in the throes of death. Pleasant eh?
or you could drop a big safe/piano on them. Very effective in the cartoons
Old 22 July 2005, 02:44 PM
  #232  
GC8
Scooby Regular
 
GC8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Did you know that, with the aid of an 'Acme' product 'Wile E Coyote' actually caught 'Road Runner' in one episode?

Simon
Old 22 July 2005, 02:45 PM
  #233  
GC8
Scooby Regular
 
GC8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

.....if only the f*cker had been running down a canyon.....
Old 22 July 2005, 02:52 PM
  #234  
davegtt
Scooby Senior
 
davegtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wez_sti
Cant believe some people almost seem to be excusing these actions. we havent invaded Iraq with the intention of taking it over and making it part of the commonwealth, we went in to remove a dictator that was killing his own people in their thousands. if we'd of killed him and just left them to it there would be anarchy, much worse than there is now.

Do you also think Mugabie (sp) should just be left to it?? personally i'd like the f*cker executed. but again we'd need a milatary presence there for a while after to try and restore order.

it is widely known that these extremists are after a huge islamic state, they believe that 90% of what is now western europe belongs to them and they'll do anything to get it.

if we were INVADED (which Iraq has not been!!!) then yes i'd fight, but i'd fight the milatary, not blow up innocent men women and children. they've even killed muslims in these attacks. how fecking crazy must they be!?!
I see what your saying and I, thats me, I, Agree, doesnt mean that these extremeists agree.... they might have a completely different view of it. Yes I agree we went into Iraq to take down Saddam but at the same time we've blown the country to bits, killed many innocents and have basically taken residence in their country.... So Im sure you can see from there point of view that we invaded Iraq, even if that was not the intention. Although the strange point is that its not Iraqi's fighting back, its Britains..... thats the annoying thing which makes the situation hard to understand for alot of people
Old 22 July 2005, 02:52 PM
  #235  
New_scooby_04
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
New_scooby_04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GC8
Did you know that, with the aid of an 'Acme' product 'Wile E Coyote' actually caught 'Road Runner' in one episode?

Simon
I'm sorry mate, I don't believe you!

I can see the incidences of fare dodging decreasing after this! Lost count of the number of times I've seen people try and jump the barriers on the tube, with no ill intentions towards anyone other than not paying their fare! Not anymore I guess!

NS04
Old 22 July 2005, 02:53 PM
  #236  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wez_sti
Cant believe some people almost seem to be excusing these actions. we havent invaded Iraq with the intention of taking it over and making it part of the commonwealth, we went in to remove a dictator that was killing his own people in their thousands. if we'd of killed him and just left them to it there would be anarchy, much worse than there is now.
So if some country waltzed in to the UK on the basis that they didn't like the way TB was running things, you'd be OK with it? Sure we got rid of Saddam and for that many in Iraq may be grateful, but to most people over there they see US and UK forces occupying their streets and setting up a new government with puppets - would you be happy in the same situation?

Do you also think Mugabie (sp) should just be left to it?? personally i'd like the f*cker executed. but again we'd need a milatary presence there for a while after to try and restore order.
I don't like what Muggabe is doing, but I don't see that gives us the right to invade and depose him, he is not threatening us directly (neither as it turns out was Saddam).

it is widely known that these extremists are after a huge islamic state, they believe that 90% of what is now western europe belongs to them and they'll do anything to get it.
Widely? Can you back that up, because widely hasn't made it to Derbyshire it would seem.

if we were INVADED (which Iraq has not been!!!) then yes i'd fight, but i'd fight the milatary, not blow up innocent men women and children. they've even killed muslims in these attacks. how fecking crazy must they be!?!
Crazy maybe, but they don't have the means to fight a "traditional" war. Not condoning it, but if they marched on London with AK47s on display, how long do you think they'd last?
Old 22 July 2005, 03:01 PM
  #237  
khany
Scooby Regular
 
khany's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What do you do if you see a scooby full of asians with rucksacks?
Old 22 July 2005, 03:02 PM
  #238  
davegtt
Scooby Senior
 
davegtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

presume theyre going to the lake district for some good roads and a spot of camping?
Old 22 July 2005, 03:05 PM
  #239  
STi wanna Subaru
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
STi wanna Subaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 16,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by khany
What do you do if you see a scooby full of asians with rucksacks?
How many asains? My guess is they'd be at least 8 crammed into a car the size of a scoob
Old 22 July 2005, 03:05 PM
  #240  
khany
Scooby Regular
 
khany's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 159
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by davegtt
presume theyre going to the lake district for some good roads and a spot of camping?


Quick Reply: SUSPECTED BOMBER SHOT ...SKY CITING POLICE SOURCES



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:17 AM.