Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Valentino Rossi

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 26 July 2005, 04:02 PM
  #61  
Jap2Scrap
Scooby Regular
 
Jap2Scrap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by The Chief
And besides i dont think we'll ever see the likes of someone like Senna again - like Rossi the guy was in a class of his own!
I believe Montoya passed 8 cars on one lap just this last weekend
Old 26 July 2005, 04:04 PM
  #62  
Edcase
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Edcase's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Throwing myself down a mountain at every opportunity...
Posts: 6,794
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CrisPDuk
So in fact you're feeling the need to point out that Les said something that has no relevance to my reply then
FFS give it a rest, I was pointing out the part of leslies original post which was the main thrust of this original point, which you either misinterpreted or conveniently overlooked in favour of arguing something that Leslie had already agreed with!!!

As he has also said in his last post.

Please don't troll.
Old 26 July 2005, 04:24 PM
  #63  
rr_ww
Scooby Regular
 
rr_ww's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Croydon (ish)
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Leslie
IDid not realise about traction control for bikes has been in for that long, I don't think that Rossi had it though which explains his slow start. Hope that does not progress to automatic gear change/launch control and even some form of aerodynamics in the future.

Les
The problem with TC on bikes is some riders like to be able to spin the tyre. McCoy is a great example he found that when he spun the tyre just so. It kept it cool. Which is not what you'd expect but it works for him. And some riders use it it turn the bike slightly or because they came from dirt track roots.

Launch Control is another stupid difficult thing to get right. You cant just say any difference in wheel speed Front to Rear and retard the power slightly. So you might think to get round this have a sensor that measures front fork extension. But for some riders the perfect launch has the front wheel hanging 2" above the tarmac. Its very very complicated.

Aero has been used in bikes for a few years now. And as with F1 makes leaps every year. However, on a car the aero is fundamentally uniform corner for corner. Whereas on a bike the whole thing is laid over in the corners. And if you have super slippery shapes (stopit )then its difficult to get the thing to lean over. So you have to make the aero good for corners (to coin a phrase) from more than 1 angle.

Theres loads more. But I'll leave it you to find on the internet. Heres some suggestions though. Look up "Frame stiffness vs Flex" and "Why the Yam has a reverse rotation crankshaft"

Bikes are far more different that cars when it comes to what makes a good race version.

Last edited by rr_ww; 26 July 2005 at 04:27 PM.
Old 26 July 2005, 08:51 PM
  #64  
JRS
Scooby Regular
 
JRS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: next door to some AWSOME classic racing cars.
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by The Chief
And besides i dont think we'll ever see the likes of someone like Senna again - like Rossi the guy was in a class of his own!
Yer spot on there m8
Old 26 July 2005, 09:13 PM
  #65  
rgv_stu
Scooby Regular
 
rgv_stu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cirencester
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

iirc doohan was allways a **** starter, allways warmed the tyres up before making a move on the pack, never did him any harm either really
Old 26 July 2005, 11:35 PM
  #66  
CrisPDuk
Scooby Regular
 
CrisPDuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Cheshire end of the emasculated Cat & Fiddle
Posts: 9,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by Edcase
FFS give it a rest, I was pointing out the part of leslies original post which was the main thrust of this original point, which you either misinterpreted or conveniently overlooked in favour of arguing something that Leslie had already agreed with!!!

As he has also said in his last post.

Please don't troll.
As I have already pointed out, on more than one occasion, I actually disagreed with a specific part of Leslie's (I'll leave it for you to troll back and find out for yourself) post, not as you seem to be implying, his whole post, so **** off

As for trolling, don't judge others by your own standards
Old 27 July 2005, 08:03 AM
  #67  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the info rr ww, very interesting and I did not know how far they had got into using the clever stuff. Better buy a magazine again! They never seem to mention much about that on the commentaries.

Yes I can't see how they could get too much out of wings given the different angles involved etc and also don't think there would be much of an advantage with automatic gear changing. Always wondered why they bothered with those little winglets on the ZX12R. Probably to catch the customer!

Like most of us I am sure, I really enjoy the spectacle of the back wheel sliding in the high speed corners and would find it disappointing if that was stopped with some kind of computerised system on the 'bikes. I used to enjoy laying it over on roundabouts and coming out with the front wheel tapping the ground as well. I suppose the Yam won't do that then Used to try to avoid the high siders though!

Yes I can understand that setting a 'bike up is very different to a car of course. Never ridden one on racing tyres either, I would imagine the difference is at least as much as it was on cars. It was amazing what you could do in a car on the right set of tyres. The flex bit is worth looking up too. The less flex I built into a car the better it handled every time.

Les

Last edited by Leslie; 27 July 2005 at 08:07 AM.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:01 PM.