Please post your power graph scans..
#32
Ver3 sti, ej257 block, td05/06/garrett, around 17psi = 226kw atw
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a3...c/DSCF2351.jpg
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a3...c/DSCF2351.jpg
#33
Originally Posted by Stiver3
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...RRPrintout.jpg
Just had mine done...
321Hp, 280Lbft, Sti3 With Decat, Filter, Boost @ 18Psi
sorry about the small pic, cant seem to get it any bigger
Just had mine done...
321Hp, 280Lbft, Sti3 With Decat, Filter, Boost @ 18Psi
sorry about the small pic, cant seem to get it any bigger
#34
Originally Posted by megrac
Ver3 sti, ej257 block, td05/06/garrett, around 17psi = 226kw atw
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a3...c/DSCF2351.jpg
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a3...c/DSCF2351.jpg
#35
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,162
Likes: 0
From: Braintree - 321BHP, 285Lbft-Perfect Standard' Ish STi Ver. III
Originally Posted by SCOOBYD00
Rub it in... lol
What mods have you done??
#36
Originally Posted by Stiver3
Lol, Your running 290BHP!! And 275Lbft! Thats a great acheivement!
What mods have you done??
What mods have you done??
#37
Originally Posted by webmaster
BTW,
I think Floyd should go for a JDM Twin Scroll Engine next...... with only basic mods the power to weight ratio on his Classic would be awesome. It's flaming quick and so responsive in mine, so christ knows what it would feel like with over 100kg's less weight!
Regards,
Shaun.
I think Floyd should go for a JDM Twin Scroll Engine next...... with only basic mods the power to weight ratio on his Classic would be awesome. It's flaming quick and so responsive in mine, so christ knows what it would feel like with over 100kg's less weight!
Regards,
Shaun.
I'm already removing stuff to make the car lighter as well...
F
#38
350bhp 310lb/ft my93 wrx. megan headers, h&s 3" decat system, blitz sus induction, hybrid fmic, 440cc injectors, performance sx fuel reg, walbro pump, hks evc boost controller, custom mapped scoobyecu.
http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b2...ling060605.jpg
http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b2...ling060605.jpg
#40
Originally Posted by JDM_Wrx
350bhp 310lb/ft my93 wrx. megan headers, h&s 3" decat system, blitz sus induction, hybrid fmic, 440cc injectors, performance sx fuel reg, walbro pump, hks evc boost controller, custom mapped scoobyecu.
http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b2...ling060605.jpg
http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b2...ling060605.jpg
#41
Originally Posted by Scott.T
TEK2 TD04 Map, running with a VF28 Turbo Vs TEK3 VF28 Map
Spec :
MY00 UK Turbo
Full Decat
STi Panel Filter
VF28 turbo
Custom TEK remap (1.2 Bar)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v9...omparison2.jpg
Spec :
MY00 UK Turbo
Full Decat
STi Panel Filter
VF28 turbo
Custom TEK remap (1.2 Bar)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v9...omparison2.jpg
#42
Originally Posted by SCOOBYD00
Strong torque & BHP up to 6k. Bet thats a quick car on the road
Dropped the VF28 on at Easter and fiddled with the restrictor to settle the boost (VF28 has a smaller restrictor in the hose, compared to the TD04) and was very impressed with the result.
Needless to say, after the remap I was even more impressed..... I just wish I could map it myself now so an Apexi is being considered.
#43
#44
Floyd,
Just to further highlight the need for a conversion to twin scroll on your car!
Since the best way to compare is to overlay one run with another, I have done just that for the respective torque curves given for yours and mine.
Torque has been converted to lbft format, and the plots have been ever so lightly smoothed.
Imagine that extra punch in torque on your classic mate! Extra power and torque, but even better responsiveness and driveability..... the best of all worlds, if your not after HUGE power. But with that kind of torque (and power to match) would you really want anymore?
Regards,
Shaun.
Just to further highlight the need for a conversion to twin scroll on your car!
Since the best way to compare is to overlay one run with another, I have done just that for the respective torque curves given for yours and mine.
Torque has been converted to lbft format, and the plots have been ever so lightly smoothed.
Imagine that extra punch in torque on your classic mate! Extra power and torque, but even better responsiveness and driveability..... the best of all worlds, if your not after HUGE power. But with that kind of torque (and power to match) would you really want anymore?
Regards,
Shaun.
#45
Scooby Regular
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
From: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Shaun,
Do you have the repective boost pressures run ? Are you comparing the torque from two different turbo's, or two different turbo's run at two different boost pressures ?
From the graph, the Type C definately looks like it's running overboost.
Mark.
Do you have the repective boost pressures run ? Are you comparing the torque from two different turbo's, or two different turbo's run at two different boost pressures ?
From the graph, the Type C definately looks like it's running overboost.
Mark.
#46
Originally Posted by Scott.T
Yep, always has felt good even on the TD04 & TEK2.
Dropped the VF28 on at Easter and fiddled with the restrictor to settle the boost (VF28 has a smaller restrictor in the hose, compared to the TD04) and was very impressed with the result.
Needless to say, after the remap I was even more impressed..... I just wish I could map it myself now so an Apexi is being considered.
Dropped the VF28 on at Easter and fiddled with the restrictor to settle the boost (VF28 has a smaller restrictor in the hose, compared to the TD04) and was very impressed with the result.
Needless to say, after the remap I was even more impressed..... I just wish I could map it myself now so an Apexi is being considered.
#47
Originally Posted by Bob Rawle
#48
Originally Posted by R19KET
Shaun,
Do you have the repective boost pressures run ? Are you comparing the torque from two different turbo's, or two different turbo's run at two different boost pressures ?
From the graph, the Type C definately looks like it's running overboost.
Mark.
Do you have the repective boost pressures run ? Are you comparing the torque from two different turbo's, or two different turbo's run at two different boost pressures ?
From the graph, the Type C definately looks like it's running overboost.
Mark.
That comparison is purely to show the differences between Floyds and my torque curve at the state of tune associated with the graphs at that time.
The spike in the torque on my graph was from an intentional boost target for that rpm....... just for that extra shot up the backside.
Regards,
Shaun.
#49
#50
Scooby Regular
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
From: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Shaun,
I understand what you're saying, but if you show a "comparative" graph, suggesting the difference is purely down to the turbo, it could be misleading, unless the boost is known for both cars.
That's aside from one car being a Spec' C with different cams, and VVT heads, and the other being a Classic, with a VF35.
That's not to say that converting to a twin scroll wouldn't give very good results
Mark.
I understand what you're saying, but if you show a "comparative" graph, suggesting the difference is purely down to the turbo, it could be misleading, unless the boost is known for both cars.
That's aside from one car being a Spec' C with different cams, and VVT heads, and the other being a Classic, with a VF35.
That's not to say that converting to a twin scroll wouldn't give very good results
Mark.
#51
Mark, Shaun and I both had our cars on the RR a few weeks later at WRC after the PS run. At WRC I produced slightly less power 325BHP but a more realistic torque figure of 314lb/ft and with a similar 'curve'. The VF35 with UK cams still can do a reasonable job! Shaun's development car achieved similar torque to PS IIRC but I can't remember if he had made any changes since the first run?
I believe that with a twin scroll, headers etc and possibly a 3inch exhaust but the same everything else (my diy mods), I'll get a decent increase as well as a wider power delivery. Not sure if I'll get as much as Shaun's car ('cos he's got the cams and VVT) but I won't need to because my car is lighter!
The TD05 18g may be the universal solution to get 360BHP but the twinscroll may just do it better and with more panache!
F
I believe that with a twin scroll, headers etc and possibly a 3inch exhaust but the same everything else (my diy mods), I'll get a decent increase as well as a wider power delivery. Not sure if I'll get as much as Shaun's car ('cos he's got the cams and VVT) but I won't need to because my car is lighter!
The TD05 18g may be the universal solution to get 360BHP but the twinscroll may just do it better and with more panache!
F
#53
Like I said
Originally Posted by SCOOBYD00
Interested to see actual power graphs you lot have..
Heard all the talk but would like to see the figures...
We all know different rollers can massage stats but all the same it's of interest to me and many others I'm sure.
I know the rolling road is not everything.. but it provides a good clear indication of the hard cash you throw at these cars...
Please include car specs as detailed as you can.
From UK to JAP, WRX to 22B lets see em
Heard all the talk but would like to see the figures...
We all know different rollers can massage stats but all the same it's of interest to me and many others I'm sure.
I know the rolling road is not everything.. but it provides a good clear indication of the hard cash you throw at these cars...
Please include car specs as detailed as you can.
From UK to JAP, WRX to 22B lets see em
#54
Euro GT MY98
- Full exhaust 3"
- Headers 4-1
- Injectors 440
- Turbo IHI VF35
- Apexi Power FC
- Apexi AVC-R
- FMIC Hibryd
- BOV Forge
http://img37.exs.cx/img37/9372/25dscf30295wp.jpg
http://img209.exs.cx/img209/8840/subi3313uy.jpg
331,77 bhp @ 6.188 rpm
423,85 Nm @ 4.626 rpm
- Full exhaust 3"
- Headers 4-1
- Injectors 440
- Turbo IHI VF35
- Apexi Power FC
- Apexi AVC-R
- FMIC Hibryd
- BOV Forge
http://img37.exs.cx/img37/9372/25dscf30295wp.jpg
http://img209.exs.cx/img209/8840/subi3313uy.jpg
331,77 bhp @ 6.188 rpm
423,85 Nm @ 4.626 rpm
#55
MY set up at the time
USDM MY02 WRX
Helix up-pipe
Helix TBE
HKS panel filter
Vishnu IC y-pipe
NGK Iridium plugs (1 step colder)
ECUtek
295.7hp/285ftlbs (232whp)
http://scoobycity.co.uk/phpBB2/viewt...695&highlight=
USDM MY02 WRX
Helix up-pipe
Helix TBE
HKS panel filter
Vishnu IC y-pipe
NGK Iridium plugs (1 step colder)
ECUtek
295.7hp/285ftlbs (232whp)
http://scoobycity.co.uk/phpBB2/viewt...695&highlight=
#56
I have noticed that the torque plots of newage cars definately have some sort of overboost given the 'hump' they show at peak torque.
Is this due to the 'smarter' ECU's in later cars..?
Regarding RR's which one's are considered to be optimistic and which ones realistic (if any..!)..?
Is this due to the 'smarter' ECU's in later cars..?
Regarding RR's which one's are considered to be optimistic and which ones realistic (if any..!)..?
#58
Originally Posted by Saxito VTR
Euro GT MY98
- Full exhaust 3"
- Headers 4-1
- Injectors 440
- Turbo IHI VF35
- Apexi Power FC
- Apexi AVC-R
- FMIC Hibryd
- BOV Forge
http://img37.exs.cx/img37/9372/25dscf30295wp.jpg
http://img209.exs.cx/img209/8840/subi3313uy.jpg
331,77 bhp @ 6.188 rpm
423,85 Nm @ 4.626 rpm
- Full exhaust 3"
- Headers 4-1
- Injectors 440
- Turbo IHI VF35
- Apexi Power FC
- Apexi AVC-R
- FMIC Hibryd
- BOV Forge
http://img37.exs.cx/img37/9372/25dscf30295wp.jpg
http://img209.exs.cx/img209/8840/subi3313uy.jpg
331,77 bhp @ 6.188 rpm
423,85 Nm @ 4.626 rpm
#59
Originally Posted by BVM
MY set up at the time
USDM MY02 WRX
Helix up-pipe
Helix TBE
HKS panel filter
Vishnu IC y-pipe
NGK Iridium plugs (1 step colder)
ECUtek
295.7hp/285ftlbs (232whp)
http://scoobycity.co.uk/phpBB2/viewt...695&highlight=
USDM MY02 WRX
Helix up-pipe
Helix TBE
HKS panel filter
Vishnu IC y-pipe
NGK Iridium plugs (1 step colder)
ECUtek
295.7hp/285ftlbs (232whp)
http://scoobycity.co.uk/phpBB2/viewt...695&highlight=
#60
Originally Posted by jasonius
I have noticed that the torque plots of newage cars definately have some sort of overboost given the 'hump' they show at peak torque.
Is this due to the 'smarter' ECU's in later cars..?
Regarding RR's which one's are considered to be optimistic and which ones realistic (if any..!)..?
Is this due to the 'smarter' ECU's in later cars..?
Regarding RR's which one's are considered to be optimistic and which ones realistic (if any..!)..?