Pug 306 GTi-6 part 2 !!!
#31
Scooby Regular
Originally Posted by ForesterBoy
General $hite build quality. No wonder French cars dont last. Cant remember the last time I saw a decent 405 Mi16 / Citroen BX 16v / AX GT etc. etc.
Dont know where you got that from, look after them and they last - I have an immaculate 92 405 Mi16 which i've just sold and an immaculate 1991 205 GTi.
Neither of them have any rust or crap build quality.
Both have outlasted the likes of R5 GTT's, Escort RS's etc.
With French cars you seem to get 1 bad one in 10. All of the Pug's i've owned have been good on reliability and build quality. They aren't up to German stds but i've always enjoyed them.
#32
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lancs, UK
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Same here, the GTi-6 is a 1996 P-Reg so 9 years old at the end of this year, but my R5 GT Turbo is a 1990 H-Reg and was 15 years old last week, still looks well, only the odd spot of rust here & there, but minimal rattles and never ever fails to start first time!
#33
I had 3 new GTi-6s in a row when I lived out in Germany, ah the tax free life!! A Blaze Yellow P reg, a black S reg and a Red T reg with all the Pug sports parts - twin lamps, alumininium rear spoiler, 17" TSW Venom wheels etc etc anyway they all had one or 2 troubles and were still great cars. I graduated to 306GTi-6's from 205GTI's and 306 DT so I will always have a soft spot for them. Superb fun on A & B roads, fast enough on Autobahns and great fun round the 'ring and nearby roads! Poor build quality, great drivers car. When I changed my last '6' for a Turbo 2000 scoob a lot of people asked why and many even felt the scoob was less exciting than the 6 even if it was faster....then I got a P1 and they all changed their minds...I wonder why?
So the rose tinted glasses of the past say great car, part of my motoring history, but the fact is I wouldn't want to own one again, give me the new Golf GTi any day and in real terms even that can't be much more expensive today than the GTI-6 - it was an expensive toy from new.
So the rose tinted glasses of the past say great car, part of my motoring history, but the fact is I wouldn't want to own one again, give me the new Golf GTi any day and in real terms even that can't be much more expensive today than the GTI-6 - it was an expensive toy from new.
#34
Originally Posted by Robertio
What sort of mpg are you seeing? have you had the lambda checked/replaced? - I always see 32-36mpg from mine, no matter how it is driven (300-400 miles per tank, even around the Evo triangle). That's easily twice what I used to get from my Impreza. With a wideband on the car AFRs only richen up over the last couple of hundred rpm.
IMHO for B-roads a Williams is slightly more fun, but for motorways, etc the 6 is a nicer place to be (and has significantly better build quality - only French car I've been in that feels like it will last). From a magazine point of view a Williams would be the best hot hatch made, but as an ownership proposition the pug has it's nose in front.
The 6-speed box is too closely stacked, an extra 3mph/thousand in 6th would make all the difference, when in potter mode I end up going 1st-3rd-6th, and don't have to change down until speed drops below 30mph. The only really annoying problem with the car is that radio reception is absolutely terrible.
IMHO for B-roads a Williams is slightly more fun, but for motorways, etc the 6 is a nicer place to be (and has significantly better build quality - only French car I've been in that feels like it will last). From a magazine point of view a Williams would be the best hot hatch made, but as an ownership proposition the pug has it's nose in front.
The 6-speed box is too closely stacked, an extra 3mph/thousand in 6th would make all the difference, when in potter mode I end up going 1st-3rd-6th, and don't have to change down until speed drops below 30mph. The only really annoying problem with the car is that radio reception is absolutely terrible.
It's not only me who skips gears then, LOL, its just daft and pointless using all six gears for pottering around.
Radio reception is dodgy on mine too.
Does anyone HONESTLY think that the auto wipers are not $hite ? It might not be so bad if the auto setting had not done away with the intermittent setting so you had a choice. I've driven many Pugs with the auto setting, and they all seem to have a mind of their own and one will work very differently to the next. They might work well on a pricey BMW or something like that, with better / more expensive components used, but you know its all been done on the cheap with Peugeot and it shows IMO, which is a shame.
This might all sound like fairly trivial stuff, but overall spoils the car a bit as a daily driver, and dont they look dated nowdays when you start looking round at other cars?
Good to see the old Mi16 etc. You rarely see a rusty one, that is true. Still cant be many left. The one I thought was good and often overlooked was the 309 GTi, such sweet handling, but once again not great build / cheap materials used and they've all but dissapeared now.
Last edited by ForesterBoy; 24 August 2005 at 10:51 PM.
#35
Originally Posted by ForesterBoy
You'll think I'm joking, but I'm not when I say I reckon no better economy than my classic turbo scoob, overall with mixed driving, i.e. lucky to ever see 30mpg. Lambda's not been replaced, it was spot on perfect for the mot the other day though.
It's not only me who skips gears then, LOL, its just daft and pointless using all six gears for pottering around.
Radio reception is dodgy on mine too.
Does anyone HONESTLY think that the auto wipers are not $hite ? It might not be so bad if the auto setting had not done away with the intermittent setting so you had a choice. I've driven many Pugs with the auto setting, and they all seem to have a mind of their own and one will work very differently to the next. They might work well on a pricey BMW or something like that, with better / more expensive components used, but you know its all been done on the cheap with Peugeot and it shows IMO, which is a shame.
This might all sound like fairly trivial stuff, but overall spoils the car a bit as a daily driver, and dont they look dated nowdays when you start looking round at other cars?
Good to see the old Mi16 etc. You rarely see a rusty one, that is true. Still cant be many left. The one I thought was good and often overlooked was the 309 GTi, such sweet handling, but once again not great build / cheap materials used and they've all but dissapeared now.
It's not only me who skips gears then, LOL, its just daft and pointless using all six gears for pottering around.
Radio reception is dodgy on mine too.
Does anyone HONESTLY think that the auto wipers are not $hite ? It might not be so bad if the auto setting had not done away with the intermittent setting so you had a choice. I've driven many Pugs with the auto setting, and they all seem to have a mind of their own and one will work very differently to the next. They might work well on a pricey BMW or something like that, with better / more expensive components used, but you know its all been done on the cheap with Peugeot and it shows IMO, which is a shame.
This might all sound like fairly trivial stuff, but overall spoils the car a bit as a daily driver, and dont they look dated nowdays when you start looking round at other cars?
Good to see the old Mi16 etc. You rarely see a rusty one, that is true. Still cant be many left. The one I thought was good and often overlooked was the 309 GTi, such sweet handling, but once again not great build / cheap materials used and they've all but dissapeared now.
We're missing the point somewhat.
#37
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 10,954
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Forester dude - never had any issues like you say with my Phase 1. They also didn't have the rain sensing sh!te weight addition Never went under 30mpg and I ragged the **** out of it, the 6sp was a joy, missed it in every car since that didn't have 6.
Mine was on lowered springs (25mm) and cornered almost as fast as my MY99 UK turbo on Eibachs, bumpsteer, droplinks and alignment from Powerstation.............
Phase 1 was far better, actually stood out from the run of the mill, unlike peugeot using up the parts bin with the phase 2. They were also a bit more edgy on the limit (equals more fun ). Plus they looked the nuts with the bumpers fully coded and the phase 2 rear lights
Mine was on lowered springs (25mm) and cornered almost as fast as my MY99 UK turbo on Eibachs, bumpsteer, droplinks and alignment from Powerstation.............
Phase 1 was far better, actually stood out from the run of the mill, unlike peugeot using up the parts bin with the phase 2. They were also a bit more edgy on the limit (equals more fun ). Plus they looked the nuts with the bumpers fully coded and the phase 2 rear lights
#38
Originally Posted by Rich D
No auto wipers on my Rallye or my Phase 1, no aircon either!
#40
In reality, the 306 GTi-6 IS the best hot hatch until the 182. The 172 came close but the GTi-6/Rallye was still that bit better.
Reading most reports, a 2004 Clio 182 is only "equally as good" as the 306. So, a car designed 8 years after can still only "match" the 306.
There you have it!!
Reading most reports, a 2004 Clio 182 is only "equally as good" as the 306. So, a car designed 8 years after can still only "match" the 306.
There you have it!!
#41
Originally Posted by Senior_AP
In reality, the 306 GTi-6 IS the best hot hatch until the 182. The 172 came close but the GTi-6/Rallye was still that bit better.
Reading most reports, a 2004 Clio 182 is only "equally as good" as the 306. So, a car designed 8 years after can still only "match" the 306.
There you have it!!
Reading most reports, a 2004 Clio 182 is only "equally as good" as the 306. So, a car designed 8 years after can still only "match" the 306.
There you have it!!
#42
Originally Posted by TurboMav
spot on
Why thank you good sir. That is the exact reason why I bought one as a track car.
.......that coupled with the fact that a Clio williams is
A) Over-priced.
B) Insurance group 20!!!!
C) Not as good as the 306 anyway.
#44
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lancs, UK
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ScoobyJawa
Phase 1 was far better, actually stood out from the run of the mill, unlike peugeot using up the parts bin with the phase 2. They were also a bit more edgy on the limit (equals more fun ). Plus they looked the nuts with the bumpers fully coded and the phase 2 rear lights
#45
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lancs, UK
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ForesterBoy
Yep, they're best off without it all. The Air-con is troublesome too. By the time it's past a few years old it's likely to have faults and problems that you're allways pi$$ing around with.
It's those 2 pipes behind the rad that corrode.
#47
Originally Posted by Senior_AP
"In reality, the 306 GTi-6 IS the best hot hatch until the 182. The 172 came close but the GTi-6/Rallye was still that bit better.
Reading most reports, a 2004 Clio 182 is only "equally as good" as the 306. So, a car designed 8 years after can still only "match" the 306.
There you have it!! "
Sorry i do not agree agree. 8 years later means alot more legislations regarding safety, and emissons. Safety is important and so is emissons and so it is not as clean cut as you have made it out regarding the 182 Vs 306 Gti.
Kam
"In reality, the 306 GTi-6 IS the best hot hatch until the 182. The 172 came close but the GTi-6/Rallye was still that bit better.
Reading most reports, a 2004 Clio 182 is only "equally as good" as the 306. So, a car designed 8 years after can still only "match" the 306.
There you have it!! "
Sorry i do not agree agree. 8 years later means alot more legislations regarding safety, and emissons. Safety is important and so is emissons and so it is not as clean cut as you have made it out regarding the 182 Vs 306 Gti.
Kam
#48
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lancs, UK
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kammy
Sorry i do not agree agree. 8 years later means alot more legislations regarding safety, and emissons. Safety is important and so is emissons and so it is not as clean cut as you have made it out regarding the 182 Vs 306 Gti.
So what is your point!?
#51
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lancs, UK
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ForesterBoy
New Clio is EURO NCAP rated at 5 stars, phase 2 Peugeot 306 is rated 3 stars.
The Clio is the safer place to be.
The Clio is the safer place to be.
#53
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Lancs, UK
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just spotted that there is a stupidlty cheap P1 GTi-6 on eBay for £1700 "Buy it now" and that is a hell of a lot of car for the money... looks ok as well, not a shed!?
Make a great track car
Make a great track car
#54
Had my Astor GTI 6 for 2 months and love it - previous to this i've had 3 Integrales, 944 S2, 2 Classic scoobs, Elise S160 and Audi S3 and the 306 is easily as much fun and quick in the real world as any of them and costs peanuts to run in comparison
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM