Iraq
#32
Originally Posted by Angry
Your gonna need to look further than a publicly editable Wiki Suresh.
Not gonna read the NAC report then?
Speaks volumes mate
Not gonna read the NAC report then?
Speaks volumes mate
Wikipedia is good enough for me and pretty much confirms the conspiracy theory. I'm at work and have a ton of things to do before I go on holiday for 3 weeks so no downloading and reading of reports for me.
Hope that clarifies your wrong thinking.
Suresh
#33
Fair enough, would you let me e-mail the report to you for future reading?
It really does place a different light on current events.
ps Boos?
It really does place a different light on current events.
ps Boos?
Last edited by Angry; 26 August 2005 at 03:15 PM.
#34
What does a 90 page manifesto for the US defence industry prove ?
Thats honestly your "proof" of a conspiracy to cause 9/11 from within the US ? Pretty retarded way of conspiring. Publish a 90 page PDF on the web.
Thats honestly your "proof" of a conspiracy to cause 9/11 from within the US ? Pretty retarded way of conspiring. Publish a 90 page PDF on the web.
#35
Originally Posted by dsmith
What does a 90 page manifesto for the US defence industry prove ?
I never said it was proof of a conspiracy, simply makes the statement that things would be made easier for the administration if another pearl harbour happened and that for America to remain strong it must be at war.
If you dont find that worrying(particularly the last bit) then I greive for humanity.
The tone of the report is what worries me, like I said read the damn thing, then comment on it.
How can you possibly hope to discuss this when you havent even read it?
Originally Posted by dsmith
Thats honestly your "proof" of a conspiracy to cause 9/11 from within the US ? Pretty retarded way of conspiring. Publish a 90 page PDF on the web.
Last edited by Angry; 26 August 2005 at 03:30 PM.
#36
Originally Posted by Angry
Fair enough, would you let me e-mail the report to you for future reading?
It really does place a different light on current events.
ps Boos?
It really does place a different light on current events.
ps Boos?
Suresh
P.S. boos is Dutch for Angry. Pronounced "bow-ce" (bow as in bow and arrow)
#37
Fair enough, I can see that people here dont want to challenge their currently held beliefs on these issues.
I've said my peice(and then some), the evidence to support what I am saying is out there and being championed by many people, but if you choose to ignore it then fair enough.
I'll relent on this issue as its getting me nowhere, except closer to my next nicotene hit!
Have a good holiday Suresh.
Sayonara
I've said my peice(and then some), the evidence to support what I am saying is out there and being championed by many people, but if you choose to ignore it then fair enough.
I'll relent on this issue as its getting me nowhere, except closer to my next nicotene hit!
Have a good holiday Suresh.
Sayonara
Last edited by Angry; 26 August 2005 at 03:46 PM.
#38
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 1,219
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Suresh
I did. Wikipedia says this about FDR and Pearl Harbor:
"It has become a staple of postwar revisionist history that Roosevelt knew all about the planned attack on Pearl Harbor but did nothing to prevent it so that the U.S. could be brought into the war as a result of being attacked. There is no evidence to support this theory."
Maybe you could find something that proves it is true on the 'where truth prevails' website??
Good weekend.
Suresh
"It has become a staple of postwar revisionist history that Roosevelt knew all about the planned attack on Pearl Harbor but did nothing to prevent it so that the U.S. could be brought into the war as a result of being attacked. There is no evidence to support this theory."
Maybe you could find something that proves it is true on the 'where truth prevails' website??
Good weekend.
Suresh
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bravo2zero_sps
Non Scooby Related
8
20 November 2002 08:29 PM