Speed Up Britain!
06 September 2005, 03:45 PM
#31
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wrighty69
those stupid plastic "cars" with a moped engine in the back that can only do 30 mph!
06 September 2005, 03:47 PM
#32
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wrighty69
Sod it ban Mopeds too! And disablity scooters and those stupid plastic "cars" with a moped engine in the back that can only do 30 mph!
Speed Up Britain are the bright young party of the UK, we think around problems rather than banning them.
All scooters and disability vehicles should be modified so they are capable of attaining the minimum speed limit! They will also be fitted with ISA to make sure they don't fall below it!
06 September 2005, 03:48 PM
#35
Mandatory fitting of NOS to all shopmobility chariots, not only will they all be able to achieve minimum speed but it will create jobs and help further technology in the propulsion industry!
06 September 2005, 03:49 PM
#36
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ray_li
AJM
why dont you ghet off your **** for change and do something about it instead of moaning to other SN members?
If you do stand up and do something I'll vote for you.
why dont you ghet off your **** for change and do something about it instead of moaning to other SN members?
If you do stand up and do something I'll vote for you.
06 September 2005, 04:20 PM
#44
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wrighty69
Tony and George have just done the ground work for us, i think its nown as I-rack, somewhere to the right of Tea-gypt!
06 September 2005, 04:24 PM
#45
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JTaylor
There are plenty more. Best get in before the Sceptics do....ore we could befriend bush
Could be a window of oppourtunity, and besides it would pi** him right off.
We'll get that bloke from "Start Your Own Country" to lend a hand.
06 September 2005, 04:45 PM
#48
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by JTaylor
Mwoohahahahahahaaaaaaa. It's all falling in to place I tell you.
SPEED SAVES or SS. What do you think?
SPEED SAVES or SS. What do you think?
New Labour did it, learn from history!
Then change to SS and invade Texas, then you could work up through America. (if its worth it!) or go south through Mexico and get lashed on tequilla, heading for Brazil where you can then seize all the cocaine, legalise it and use the revenue to drop fuel prices, fit minimum speed limiting devices and make up for the revenue lost in speeding fines.
06 September 2005, 04:47 PM
#49
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by drumsterphil
Anybody mentioned speedhumps, width restrictors etc?
Those NEED to go!
Those NEED to go!
06 September 2005, 04:52 PM
#50
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,540
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Also I hope you don't forget tractors, combine harvesters (in fact all agricultural machinery) in your Term 2 policies.
In fact maybe they are such a serious problem they should be a term 1 policy.
In fact maybe they are such a serious problem they should be a term 1 policy.
06 September 2005, 05:10 PM
#51
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by ajm
Right, some policies...
First Term (these are the less controversial ones)
1) Removal of uneccessary traffic lights
2) Removal of bus lanes
3) Removal of single occupancy lanes
4) Additional parking places
5) Design roads for speed, higher friction surfaces, banked turns
6) Remove hedges, fences, high grass etc designed to impede visibility at junctions to force you to stop
7) Removal of cycle lines at the traffic lights. Cycles must keep their place in the queue so cars don't have to re-overtake
8) Increase speed limits appropriately
9) Introduce minimum speed limits and minimum speed cameras
10) Operating hours for caravans and trucks
11) No more scamera vans
12) No speed cameras on safe and fast roads
13) Tax and insurance on bicycles
Second Term Policies (more controversial ones we will put in place once people have been conditioned to accept them)
1) Ban women drivers (there goes 50% of the vote, but its too late the suckers voted us back in! )
2) Ban cycles
3) Ban caravans
4) Introduce intelligent speed adaption that increases cars speed to minimum speed limit.
5) Intelligent lane selection. Force slow cars to pull over to let faster cars through.
Any more?
First Term (these are the less controversial ones)
1) Removal of uneccessary traffic lights
2) Removal of bus lanes
3) Removal of single occupancy lanes
4) Additional parking places
5) Design roads for speed, higher friction surfaces, banked turns
6) Remove hedges, fences, high grass etc designed to impede visibility at junctions to force you to stop
7) Removal of cycle lines at the traffic lights. Cycles must keep their place in the queue so cars don't have to re-overtake
8) Increase speed limits appropriately
9) Introduce minimum speed limits and minimum speed cameras
10) Operating hours for caravans and trucks
11) No more scamera vans
12) No speed cameras on safe and fast roads
13) Tax and insurance on bicycles
Second Term Policies (more controversial ones we will put in place once people have been conditioned to accept them)
1) Ban women drivers (there goes 50% of the vote, but its too late the suckers voted us back in!
)2) Ban cycles
3) Ban caravans
4) Introduce intelligent speed adaption that increases cars speed to minimum speed limit.
5) Intelligent lane selection. Force slow cars to pull over to let faster cars through.
Any more?
06 September 2005, 08:32 PM
#54
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Home
Posts: 14,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
FAO Deputy Leader AJM.
Policy needs updating. Stop. Further developments re: military operation to liberate the Americas. Stop. Must consider further amendments to policy including the use of cats to sustain the offensive. Stop.
Cell 555
Policy needs updating. Stop. Further developments re: military operation to liberate the Americas. Stop. Must consider further amendments to policy including the use of cats to sustain the offensive. Stop.
Cell 555
07 September 2005, 01:11 PM
#56
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Freak
what is your policy on cats 
*holds palms open and affixes cheesy grin*
You're just going to have to trust me!
</blair>
07 September 2005, 01:18 PM
#57
BANNED
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jasey@Work
Posts: 2,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ajm
<blair>look... you know... guys.... come on... this isn't about just cats, this about giving the people of Britain what they want and what they deserve.
*holds palms open and affixes cheesy grin*
You're just going to have to trust me!</blair>
*holds palms open and affixes cheesy grin*
You're just going to have to trust me!
</blair>
New ajm - New Threat !
All this speed up stuff is just a smoke screen for his non-indiginous feline extermination policies
07 September 2005, 01:59 PM
#58
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=Reality]At last - we get to ajm's real agenda
World Domination!
By taxing the countrys we invade up to the hilt, we can cut tax here, we could become a tax free haven.
No tax on booze and ciggies would partially solve the pensions problem, and relieve the NHS as people would die younger if they drank and smoked more!
We would'nt live as long but have a better time whilst we were still living.
Not only that if we made every other country use crappy electric cars, our emmisions wont matter!
MOT failures could be commisioned for having your catalytic converter in place. No need for lambda sensors either!
I'm just waiting for MI5 to knock at the door now!
World Domination!
By taxing the countrys we invade up to the hilt, we can cut tax here, we could become a tax free haven.
No tax on booze and ciggies would partially solve the pensions problem, and relieve the NHS as people would die younger if they drank and smoked more!
We would'nt live as long but have a better time whilst we were still living.
Not only that if we made every other country use crappy electric cars, our emmisions wont matter!
MOT failures could be commisioned for having your catalytic converter in place. No need for lambda sensors either!
I'm just waiting for MI5 to knock at the door now!
07 September 2005, 03:34 PM
#60
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sometimes the truth bites asspipes
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Going on the content of the fuel protest thread most people here can't afford to speed or are unwilling to fund the cost of their need for high velocity. Shame.