Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

IPod Nano just launched

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16 September 2005, 03:16 PM
  #61  
wez_sti
Scooby Regular
 
wez_sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: All over...so who needs a car!
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by angrynorth

Eh? More like the trilogy. The iPod 60g and 20g run 15 hours of battery.
your right, but thats for music, think it drops to something like 4hrs for a slide show, so can expect battery life to that at best, though probaly less..
Old 16 September 2005, 03:40 PM
  #62  
angrynorth
Scooby Regular
 
angrynorth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Was Manc now Camden
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

5 hours for slideshows with music to be precise. The current iPods are built for music and slideshows and their battery life reflects that. I'd be over the moon if Apple decided to enable video playback on the current pods, but they won't.

But if Apple do release an all new video iPod then it will be built to cope with video demands meaning a longer battery life.
Old 16 September 2005, 03:43 PM
  #63  
messiah
Scooby Regular
 
messiah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Surviving as a soldier of fortune on the Los Angeles underground...
Posts: 7,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My battery probably doesn't last as long as it should as I always have it set to shuffle between the 1200+ tracks I have on it, and I keep skipping forward too.
Old 16 September 2005, 03:46 PM
  #64  
wez_sti
Scooby Regular
 
wez_sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: All over...so who needs a car!
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by angrynorth

5 hours for slideshows with music to be precise. The current iPods are built for music and slideshows and their battery life reflects that. I'd be over the moon if Apple decided to enable video playback on the current pods, but they won't.

But if Apple do release an all new video iPod then it will be built to cope with video demands meaning a longer battery life.
wouldnt be suprised if they did, more a software issue than hardware i imagine.

they could prob release a more effiecent battery in the not too distant future too
Old 16 September 2005, 03:50 PM
  #65  
messiah
Scooby Regular
 
messiah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Surviving as a soldier of fortune on the Los Angeles underground...
Posts: 7,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by angrynorth
Eh? More like the trilogy. The iPod 60g and 20g run 15 hours of battery.
I was under the impresion that when Apple dropped the 30gb model, they also upgraded the battery for the 60gb & "new" 20gb. Although I think I read that in a PC magazine!

AFAIK it's the screens backlight that has a big effect on battery life - something you'll need all the time during video playback.

aren't Apple also planning on making music video's available through iTunes?
Old 16 September 2005, 03:52 PM
  #66  
messiah
Scooby Regular
 
messiah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Surviving as a soldier of fortune on the Los Angeles underground...
Posts: 7,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a Q on battery life.

Does anyone know how degrafmentation affects battery life? I'd imagine my iPods HDD is quite fragmented as I have a habit of updating tracks then going back to add the artwork etc...
Old 16 September 2005, 03:59 PM
  #67  
wez_sti
Scooby Regular
 
wez_sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: All over...so who needs a car!
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by messiah

I have a Q on battery life.

Does anyone know how degrafmentation affects battery life? I'd imagine my iPods HDD is quite fragmented as I have a habit of updating tracks then going back to add the artwork etc...
i'm guessing it would 'effect' it, needing to move to diferent parts of the disc all the time, no idea how much though!
Old 16 September 2005, 04:02 PM
  #68  
angrynorth
Scooby Regular
 
angrynorth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Was Manc now Camden
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wez_sti
wouldnt be suprised if they did, more a software issue than hardware i imagine.
Software and hardware. Realtime decoding of 30fps video is hard work. Not likely on a non specific device.


Originally Posted by wez_sti
they could prob release a more effiecent battery in the not too distant future too
Likely on new devices.

Originally Posted by messiah
I was under the impresion that when Apple dropped the 30gb model, they also upgraded the battery for the 60gb & "new" 20gb. Although I think I read that in a PC magazine!

AFAIK it's the screens backlight that has a big effect on battery life - something you'll need all the time during video playback.

aren't Apple also planning on making music video's available through iTunes?
The battery for all of the normal iPods is 15 hours now. I once read in a PC magazine that Apple had stopped making iPods altogether so I would take what you read in them with a pinch of salt. Go with what is on the Apple site.

Obviously the backlight affects battery but its not always on (unless specified) so it doesn't have that big an impact.

Apple already makes music videos available for download through iTunes and they have been doing so for quite some time now. It doesn't mean that the current iPods are capable of playback though, just that you can view them in iTunes.

The iPod HD defraggles itself on the fly (like OSX) so I wouldn't be to concerned about it.

To improve your battery life, encode your tracks in AAC which is less processor dependant.
Old 16 September 2005, 04:08 PM
  #69  
wez_sti
Scooby Regular
 
wez_sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: All over...so who needs a car!
Posts: 1,739
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by angrynorth


To improve your battery life, encode your tracks in AAC which is less processor dependant.
just spent hours converting all my track to MP3 from AAC! only apple's software tends to recognise it, makes burning cd's a bit tricky!
Old 16 September 2005, 04:09 PM
  #70  
angrynorth
Scooby Regular
 
angrynorth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Was Manc now Camden
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wez_sti
just spent hours converting all my track to MP3 from AAC! only apple's software tends to recognise it, makes burning cd's a bit tricky!
iTunes can burn CD's and uses AAC as its default playback format. So if you are getting an iPod you will be using iTunes anyway.
Old 16 September 2005, 04:10 PM
  #71  
messiah
Scooby Regular
 
messiah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Surviving as a soldier of fortune on the Los Angeles underground...
Posts: 7,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tracks already in AAC -encoded to 192kbs. I also read on apple's site that the preamp and graphic equaliser settings (sorry, forgot the proper name!) take up a but of processing power. I found the default to be too quiet and too flat, so all my tracks are set to "R&B" and the preamp set to 40% - how much this drops battery life by I have no idea, but would be interesting to find out.

If the iPod defrag's itself on the fly, is there any point in giving it the occasional "wipe clean"?
Old 16 September 2005, 04:12 PM
  #72  
TopBanana
Scooby Regular
 
TopBanana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 9,781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Double lossy compression.. hmmm...
Old 16 September 2005, 04:16 PM
  #73  
angrynorth
Scooby Regular
 
angrynorth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Was Manc now Camden
Posts: 2,689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by messiah
Tracks already in AAC -encoded to 192kbs. I also read on apple's site that the preamp and graphic equaliser settings (sorry, forgot the proper name!) take up a but of processing power. I found the default to be too quiet and too flat, so all my tracks are set to "R&B" and the preamp set to 40% - how much this drops battery life by I have no idea, but would be interesting to find out.

If the iPod defrag's itself on the fly, is there any point in giving it the occasional "wipe clean"?
I restore my iPod once a year, not gaining much by doing it though. I mainly do it to make sure that the free space is erased properly if I take a chunk of tracks or data off.

To be honest I am not 100% sure of how much extra battery the Preamp/EQ would use, I would imagine its not much though as its not spinning the disk to do it - which is where the battery hits come from.
Old 16 September 2005, 04:19 PM
  #74  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Bah humbug, iPod Nano, that was so last week
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
millwrx
Drivetrain
20
20 October 2015 03:12 PM
Billet
ScoobyNet General
42
14 October 2015 10:38 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
WRXrowdy
Computer & Technology Related
6
15 September 2015 08:56 PM



Quick Reply: IPod Nano just launched



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:16 PM.