Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

BEAT BY SEAT CUPRA R

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 21 September 2005, 12:49 PM
  #181  
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why do you think its accurate...?

I'll soon correct you
Old 21 September 2005, 12:50 PM
  #182  
ScooBStu
Scooby Regular
 
ScooBStu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LCR's handle like a barge as pointed out by when of your fellow owners. I dont really enjoy straight line racing - it doesnt EVER put a smile on my face - Doing a quick back road however always does and the scooby is miles better at this whether in dry or wet conditions - Thats why I bought mine not to thrash it down a slip road - A bit sad if you bought your car to do that!!!

Also the LCR only costs £500 to remap up to 275BHP or whatever. Why did Seat not release it with this power - Because the chasis cant handle it - too much wheel spin and it loses driveability.

If they had released it with this power it would have hit the headlines more than it ever did and ever will.

They do look nice though and I wouldnt mind one but my scooby is miles better - Uk standard Turbo.
Old 21 September 2005, 12:55 PM
  #183  
Antgti
Scooby Newbie
 
Antgti's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by homerjay
if your more concerned about the image a car gives you then your a very sad individual imo...

why would you give a flyin **** what anyone else thinks about your 'image'???
He is right here, the scoobs are unfortunatly receiving a chav imag purely because some of the muppets who can now afford the 4k examples on the market, But this does happen to every car once price drops to a certain level, and will happen to the LCR as well. I think the Civic type-r has gone from a thinking mans hot hatch to a boyo's motor of choice as the prices have crashed down to 7k, as soon as the cars become affordable more **** ending up owning them, and what they do in them and to them tarnishes everyone else. Even the fake versions. i am always surprised at the amount of fake WRX's there are going round ( sports dressed up with the bonnett and wheels)

But for ome reason the scooby has always been a little bit more chav compared to its arch nemisis Lancer Evo. I think it boils down to numbers on the road, i would love to know what the ratio of NA to Turbo is in the Impreza sales in the UK. I bet its very low in NA form.


end of day you pays your money and makes your choice, everyone to there own. And for those who keep hammering on about i beat this i beat that, shut up! tak it to the race track, the public roads are too crowded to be racing at silly speeds, i woul be careful what you say on a public forum, details etc, as Big Brother is always watching, there has ben enough people caught out by this in the past, i think we have all seen the threads referring to this.......

Play safe!
Old 21 September 2005, 01:01 PM
  #184  
theotherphil
Scooby Regular
 
theotherphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

That figure was taken from letstorquebhp but I will go out and time it with my AP22. I have a UK Turbo 2000 with decat and remap making "approx" 280bhp (bum dyno). I get 11.8secs 0-100 and 4.67secs to 60 with the AP22
Old 21 September 2005, 01:03 PM
  #185  
Mitchy260
Scooby Regular
 
Mitchy260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They never released it in 275bhp format as FWD is the killer! They would have needed to develop some sort of lsd to cope and that would have bumped the price of the car up. (emissions/fuel economy/insurance etc)

1 person has said the LCR doesn't handle that good but i wouldn't call it a barge! It laps various circuits in around the same time as the CTR/clio sport so it cant be that bad.

Bob..Something to do with, you cant deduct 0-60 from the 0-100 time to get an accurate 60-100? Why not?

Is it because, you actually have to start at 60 in gear, overcome what lag there is and off you go? or roll through 60mph from a lower speed, say in 3rd gear from 50mph and then starting the clock as it passes 60? hence increasing the 60-100 time.

Doing it that way is a good indication of a cars 60-100 i think!

Lets torque have done it for all cars so overall it is a good comparison.

Last edited by Mitchy260; 21 September 2005 at 01:06 PM.
Old 21 September 2005, 01:06 PM
  #186  
StickyMicky
Scooby Regular
 
StickyMicky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Zed Ess Won Hay Tee
Posts: 21,611
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

good thread lads
Old 21 September 2005, 01:09 PM
  #187  
Mitchy260
Scooby Regular
 
Mitchy260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by theotherphil
That figure was taken from letstorquebhp but I will go out and time it with my AP22. I have a UK Turbo 2000 with decat and remap making "approx" 280bhp (bum dyno). I get 11.8secs 0-100 and 4.67secs to 60 with the AP22
Is that on standard td04 turbo?

Readings seem a bit optimistic to me as i bet you cant transfer that onto santapod. I cant remember the last time i heard or seen a UK tuned car on standard turbo producing any worthwhile results. Ive seen a lot of uk scoobies coming out with 14.5 sec 1/4's and many who cant launch for sh*t!

AP22 is only as accurate as the guy that programmes the settings! I had 1 and there are far too many variables! Got rid of it after a week!
Old 21 September 2005, 01:12 PM
  #188  
ReggieMY99
Scooby Regular
 
ReggieMY99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mitchy ffs.. the time you spend here could be spend on earning money so that you again one day can afford (running) a scoob


everyone here knows that the scooby isnt a straight line racer but a rally bread car hence the awd grip and handling thats why ive always liked scoobs

so you beat a scoob in your seat, congrats m8 that is really something..

ive beat seat cupras here, sure they are quick but a lot of cars is, so instead of the silly straight line **** racing i always invite muppets like you to come to the country side and have a go on the hills and twisties

i know whos gonna end up on their roof.. and og yea grow up and drive safely you have a quick car you know that yourself, so you dont need to come here and show off cause we really dont care, we love our scoobs for the handling, the awd and the wonderfull flat4 rumble

have a nice day boy racer...
Old 21 September 2005, 01:19 PM
  #189  
Mitchy260
Scooby Regular
 
Mitchy260's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Okay, this drivel has gone far enough so ill let you argue amongst yourselves from now on! The scooby is a great car, just not as quick as you'd like to think though! Mitchy is leaving the building

Has been fun though
Old 21 September 2005, 01:22 PM
  #190  
ScooBStu
Scooby Regular
 
ScooBStu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have heard of the super Seat Ibiza round Teesside and he has quite a reputation for being a boy racer - Goes to all the cruises - i.e. Redcar, Teesside park etc!!!!
Old 21 September 2005, 01:25 PM
  #191  
GONZO
Scooby Regular
 
GONZO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink Scooby slayers

Originally Posted by davedipster
Scoobs are not the quickest things on the road you know

dipster
As already stated, Imprezas aren't the quickest cars on the road. I love MY94 WRX, but after all, it's a rally car you know, for those of you that have lost sight of our heritage. On the proper WRC rally stages, our cars (scoobies) along with the other wrc monsters, get regularly pi**ed on by front wheel drive junior wrc on occasions, or even front wheel drive privateers, on certain tarmac stages. But these cars are nowherew, on the loose stages - Bring on the Cupra r, BMW M3 etc etc on a forest stage - most of these get stuck in a muddy carpark, whilst watching the stages of my local Bmth Winter rally. Just appreciate the car for what it is, and realise that other like minded people enjoy their performance cars for the same reason.
Enjoy your motoring,
Gonzo.
Old 21 September 2005, 01:26 PM
  #192  
noobscoob
Scooby Regular
 
noobscoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sorry guys but to a non petrolhead type person..any sporty version of a car looks chav thanks to the lax power brigade.

cars are now coming with 19 inch alloys as standard..bling bling

8 speaker sound systems....pumpin' base

fat chrome exhausts......phat!!!!

chrome fuel cap....... suits you sir!!!!

blue headlamps and bee sting aerial... halfords gift voucher!


that pretty much describes a barryboy,it also describes most standard hot new performance cars..so stfu about the subrau being chav because if you drive a performance car.. the chances are in the eyes of joe public you look like a one..well that or you are suffering from small **** syndrome.

regarding the mitsy,yeah the evo gets more respect..i shall give that another few months..seeing as the amount of evo 3s and 4s on autotrader and other publications is getting very very large..and those prices keep a dropping. soon kev down the road will have one anf then its bye bye good reputation..hello ASBO.

if you dont want to look like a chav..get a nissan micra 1.3 and look like elton john instead ps..leons come with 18s and ''slammed'' skirts all round. hardly conservative and upmarket ..eh geeza!!!

Last edited by noobscoob; 21 September 2005 at 01:36 PM.
Old 21 September 2005, 01:32 PM
  #193  
theotherphil
Scooby Regular
 
theotherphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mitchy260
Is that on standard td04 turbo?

Readings seem a bit optimistic to me as i bet you cant transfer that onto santapod. I cant remember the last time i heard or seen a UK tuned car on standard turbo producing any worthwhile results. Ive seen a lot of uk scoobies coming out with 14.5 sec 1/4's and many who cant launch for sh*t!

AP22 is only as accurate as the guy that programmes the settings! I had 1 and there are far too many variables! Got rid of it after a week!
The MY95 UK Saloon runs a TD05 turbo as standard. I get a 13.59 sec 1/4 @ 105mph on the road. I am sure I can easily beat that on a sticky strip.

As you obviously know nothing of the AP22, I shall explain that the unit calibrates itself prior to each reading for the incline of the vehicle. The results for times and distances are accurate straight out of the box. The BHP figures are calculated from the user's entered data (weight and cd figures).
Old 21 September 2005, 01:33 PM
  #194  
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mitchy260
Is that on standard td04 turbo?

Readings seem a bit optimistic to me as i bet you cant transfer that onto santapod. I cant remember the last time i heard or seen a UK tuned car on standard turbo producing any worthwhile results. Ive seen a lot of uk scoobies coming out with 14.5 sec 1/4's and many who cant launch for sh*t!

AP22 is only as accurate as the guy that programmes the settings! I had 1 and there are far too many variables! Got rid of it after a week!
An easy 13.4secs when I was on that spec and that was on a v slippery day @ Pod, with a slipping clutch.

Agreed that 0-100mph may be a little optimistic on that spec (if it's on a TD04).


Bob
Old 21 September 2005, 01:35 PM
  #195  
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Mine was on a TD04.
Old 21 September 2005, 01:37 PM
  #196  
homerjay
Scooby Regular
 
homerjay's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by noobscoob
if you dont want to look like a chav..get a nissan micra 1.3 and look like elton john instead ps..leons come with 18s and ''slammed'' skirts all round. harly conservative and upmarket ..eh geeza!!!
WHAT!? micra's are the most 'chav' car available today!

in fact, bolx not its not, coz any car is not 'chav', is the c*nt inside thats 'chav'
Old 21 September 2005, 01:37 PM
  #197  
theotherphil
Scooby Regular
 
theotherphil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 962
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Agreed that 0-100mph may be a little optimistic on that spec (if it's on a TD04).
Read above, the UK MY95 Turbo saloon has a TD05 as standard fitment. There is a few other mods but am maxing out the airflow meter and 380cc injectors. As said, I guesstimate 280bhp. Andy F mapped the Apexi PFC.
Old 21 September 2005, 01:40 PM
  #198  
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mitchy260
They never released it in 275bhp format as FWD is the killer! They would have needed to develop some sort of lsd to cope and that would have bumped the price of the car up. (emissions/fuel economy/insurance etc)

1 person has said the LCR doesn't handle that good but i wouldn't call it a barge! It laps various circuits in around the same time as the CTR/clio sport so it cant be that bad.

Bob..Something to do with, you cant deduct 0-60 from the 0-100 time to get an accurate 60-100? Why not?

Is it because, you actually have to start at 60 in gear, overcome what lag there is and off you go? or roll through 60mph from a lower speed, say in 3rd gear from 50mph and then starting the clock as it passes 60? hence increasing the 60-100 time.

Doing it that way is a good indication of a cars 60-100 i think!

Lets torque have done it for all cars so overall it is a good comparison.
To record a 60-100mph time you would not necessarily be in the same gear as you would be for doing a 0-100mph run. Thats why its not an accurate to simply deduct one number from another.

FFS LetsTorque is some poxy website that can be put up by anyone. Its not a bible of truth. They just deduct one figure from another. Autocar test the acceleration from 30-70mph properly. They both measure rolling 40mph, so why not use the accuratley tested figures?
Old 21 September 2005, 01:41 PM
  #199  
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Phil: I wrote my reply before reading yours.
Old 21 September 2005, 01:45 PM
  #200  
Antgti
Scooby Newbie
 
Antgti's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This is another example of why Forums can somtimes be bad, all this my **** is bigger than your **** rubbish.

Thought everyone here was a petrol head of some sort, so can't everyone just appreciate everyone elses cars, i know i do when i go up the pod.

Next minute you'll be arguing about diesels vs petrols ( well that seems to be the usual debate on the Vag forums)

Chill!!!!
Old 21 September 2005, 01:48 PM
  #201  
Aztec Performance Ltd
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
 
Aztec Performance Ltd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its all just a laugh mate

People seem to love these threads
Old 21 September 2005, 01:52 PM
  #202  
chippy17
Scooby Regular
 
chippy17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

have been reading this thread with much amusement and I can tell you you are all wrong with one aspect: rear wheel drive is the best!
Old 21 September 2005, 01:56 PM
  #203  
Antgti
Scooby Newbie
 
Antgti's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chippy17
have been reading this thread with much amusement and I can tell you you are all wrong with one aspect: rear wheel drive is the best!
Bollocks to that, side wheel drive, do some amazing dougnuts.......
Old 21 September 2005, 02:01 PM
  #204  
chippy17
Scooby Regular
 
chippy17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Antgti
Bollocks to that, side wheel drive, do some amazing dougnuts.......
that is the point much more fun than either, I will say in the dry on a b road not much could keep up with my old E30 M3 (although you had to be ragging it) and anyway as has been stated earlier the point of loving driving is not, IMO, about outright speed neccessarily, I take satisfaction from drifting my London runaround (Renny 5 1.2ltr!!!) round a roundabout in the wet at 20mph as I do caning my classic scooby at license losing speeds!
Old 21 September 2005, 02:18 PM
  #205  
Antgti
Scooby Newbie
 
Antgti's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by chippy17
that is the point much more fun than either, I will say in the dry on a b road not much could keep up with my old E30 M3 (although you had to be ragging it) and anyway as has been stated earlier the point of loving driving is not, IMO, about outright speed neccessarily, I take satisfaction from drifting my London runaround (Renny 5 1.2ltr!!!) round a roundabout in the wet at 20mph as I do caning my classic scooby at license losing speeds!
Yep thats why i thought the ickle citreon C2 GT i had recently as a courtesy car was so much fun, so so so chuckable!!!
Old 21 September 2005, 02:24 PM
  #206  
GONZO
Scooby Regular
 
GONZO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink HAVING FUN

Originally Posted by chippy17
that is the point much more fun than either, I will say in the dry on a b road not much could keep up with my old E30 M3 (although you had to be ragging it) and anyway as has been stated earlier the point of loving driving is not, IMO, about outright speed neccessarily, I take satisfaction from drifting my London runaround (Renny 5 1.2ltr!!!) round a roundabout in the wet at 20mph as I do caning my classic scooby at license losing speeds!
Chippy - top point about your R5 - it's all relative you know. Loose it on a r-bout, and you might buckle a wheel, loose it in the scoob, and your'e lucky to get away with it, cos of the high nos involved on the speedo. I seem to remember the late, great James Hunt saying after his slide down the ladder wealth wise, that he reckoned he had more fun driving flat out in his mini van than he'd had in all his supercars he'd owned.
Gonzo.
Old 21 September 2005, 03:04 PM
  #207  
chippy17
Scooby Regular
 
chippy17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks guys, it is just scary how fast modern cars are, even my classic Impreza doesn't get close to its limits until you are breaking the law in a big way, I dread to think how fast you have to be going in a full on STI RA TYPE C thingy etc...

I love cars period, I have my favourites whether they are logical choices or not eg huge fan of M BMWs/Subarus but hate Vauxhalls, no reason for this really and I know many Vauxhalls are very good cars but I just can't bring myself to own one, it is all personal choice and I think that is great.

Sorry don't really know what I am trying to say!!!!

I love these kind of threads because it is always fun to argue which car is faster/better than which but ultimately so much depends on conditions and driver, I bet Ayrton Senna in my Renny 5 would keep up with a Golf GTi in the wet on a b road driven my average joe, stretching it a little but you get my point...blah blah blah
Old 21 September 2005, 03:53 PM
  #208  
RR
Scooby Regular
 
RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Teesside
Posts: 638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ScooBStu
I have heard of the super Seat Ibiza round Teesside and he has quite a reputation for being a boy racer - Goes to all the cruises - i.e. Redcar, Teesside park etc!!!!
I have never been to a cruise in my life. I have never been to Teeside park to a cruise or Redcar to a cruise, in the last 12 months i have been to Redcar car park once and at that time i was talkling to TheotherPhil. Actually i have never been to any cruise in any area within my whole life. There are people who have claimed to have come across my car but the truth is they never had. My car does less than 50miles per week on average so its unlikely to be seen anywhere but in my garage.
Old 21 September 2005, 04:04 PM
  #209  
Darren 01
Scooby Regular
 
Darren 01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Leigh on Sea
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Had a LCR with APR chip (265bhp) for 2years and 53k miles! Fantastic car with great straight line speed when moving. Best all-round car I have owned for value/performance!!!


I’m with Pete though. It did suffer from body roll and overstear! Rarely suffered understear…


Hated off the line wheel spin and wheel hop. Got right on my t!ts!


PS I now have a WRX STI type UK PPP
Old 21 September 2005, 04:13 PM
  #210  
pippyrips
Scooby Regular
 
pippyrips's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Bebind the wheel of my red rice rocket
Posts: 5,585
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Antgti
Yep thats why i thought the ickle citreon C2 GT i had recently as a courtesy car was so much fun, so so so chuckable!!!
bloody right - i had a C2 VTR for a day and thought iwas brill - granted it wasn't my car and would never treat mine like that but that was a fun day


Quick Reply: BEAT BY SEAT CUPRA R



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:34 PM.