Notices
ScoobyNet General General Subaru Discussion

Today at Elvington. 204.3mph +207.4 + 210.1mph.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08 October 2005 | 06:35 PM
  #151  
wrc350bhp's Avatar
wrc350bhp
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Default

welldone andy isnt ur car approx 200k lighter than nearest scoob rival after being weighed?
Old 16 October 2005 | 09:47 PM
  #152  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

It's 140kg lighter than Marks Sti5 and approx 30kg lighter than Pavlos RA.

Andy
Old 16 October 2005 | 09:59 PM
  #153  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

Originally Posted by AlanG
I'd just like to say that what you've done in the last few months is unbelievable Andy for someone that has learned his trade on his own without the backing of major companies and the expertise which goes with them.
This makes it all the more awe inspiring in what you've achieved. Well done!

Maybe it's just me, but it's quite difficult to comprehend how quick your car really is without experiencing it in the flesh, but with the figures you've obtained so far, are you not scared a little?(just a teensy bit? )
Oh Yes !
.
.
Originally Posted by AlanG
I mean look at what you've got. A car which was designed, when? in the '70's? a car with no safety cage? etc.
Surely you must be looking into aerodynamics (under floor) to continue running at these speeds or higher? !
Gaffa tape over lights, grilles, windows etc.. a bit Heath Robinson. lol
I have spent considerable time on the underside aero Alan, taken it all off again though before anyone copied it ! The tape on the lights was more to keep them in place lol
.
.

Originally Posted by AlanG
What would you like to look into now with where you're going with Subaru's?
Not sure to be honest ? Thought about an auto box/3.3 conversion/shorter lighter bodyshell but all these take it away from being a genuine 'scooby'
Any suggestions ?
.
.

Originally Posted by AlanG
Rabbling on.. just concerned on the safety aspect now. It's serious s*it you're doing
Yea, I know. Do you think a cage would have made much difference if it had gone on its roof at 200+ mph on Elvingtons abrasive concrete surface ? I recon it would have been ground down to the doorhandles in no time !
It's not something I intend to do again.... in the near future anyway
.
.


Here is an RX7 in trouble at 215mph and they have a decent shape to them !


http://www.stupidvideos.com/?VideoID=567

Last edited by Andy.F; 16 October 2005 at 10:03 PM.
Old 16 October 2005 | 10:13 PM
  #154  
j joyce's Avatar
j joyce
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Dublin,Ireland.
Thumbs up

man. Congratulations guys.
Old 16 October 2005 | 10:26 PM
  #155  
stevebt's Avatar
stevebt
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 16,732
Likes: 33
Default

Here is an RX7 in trouble at 215mph and they have a decent shape to them !
your only a hop, skip and a jump away from that, but it always happens to the other fellow
Old 16 October 2005 | 10:28 PM
  #156  
flat4_ire's Avatar
flat4_ire
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,418
Likes: 0
From: Ireland-The One And Only
Default

Originally Posted by stevebt
your only a hop, skip and a jump away from that, but it always happens to the other fellow
i can just imagine the head on the driver "yes yes wooohooooo ooooooooooohhh shhhhiitt!!!!"
Old 16 October 2005 | 10:39 PM
  #157  
R19KET's Avatar
R19KET
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
From: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Default

Andy,

Just noticed,

Just to correct you Tim, Turbo Dynamics supplied, Mark arranged
Your generosity just overwhelms me


Mark.

Last edited by ex-webby; 17 October 2005 at 01:22 AM.
Old 16 October 2005 | 11:06 PM
  #158  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

Well you did say they wanted to use my car for publicity Mark !

Andy

Last edited by ex-webby; 17 October 2005 at 01:22 AM.
Old 18 October 2005 | 02:11 PM
  #159  
Carl Davey's Avatar
Carl Davey
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,787
Likes: 0
From: Aberdeenshire
Default

Just seen this thread although heard about the feat when it happened.

Must say congratulations are in order. I find it a very exciting time to be around the Subaru tuning scene. With yourself, Paul and Mark pushing the limits of these cars to seemingly unheard of domains i can't help but feel awe for the marque. It seems like every month there is some sort of record broken. 210.2mph is just completely hatstand in my book. I don't like it beyond 140 and you guys are doing that on the 1/4 weekend in weekend out.

I can't wait to see what you do next Andy but please fit a cage before you go 200+ again. It may seem pointless but then it may just be enough to save a life.

By the way, 210.2mph is Mach 0.28.
Old 18 October 2005 | 02:35 PM
  #160  
P20SPD's Avatar
P20SPD
Drag it!
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,866
Likes: 0
From: Flame grilled Wagon anyone?
Default

If your going to go, go in style

Andy, will you go for the 1.25 record at the end of October?
(If not, give me the keys )

Steven
Old 18 October 2005 | 04:57 PM
  #161  
Clarkie172's Avatar
Clarkie172
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
From: In a house
Default

slow that isnt it? lol
Old 18 October 2005 | 05:59 PM
  #162  
AlanG's Avatar
AlanG
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Default

Not sure to be honest ? Thought about an auto box/3.3 conversion/shorter lighter bodyshell but all these take it away from being a genuine 'scooby'
Any suggestions ?
I think it’s a tough call for you to make Andy.

I agree, going down the route of 3.3, auto, etc may not be the right thing to do.

As it is just now, your car has an engine, transmission, suspension etc which is pretty much obtainable through various outlets and performance shops, so anyone can get results close to what you’ve achieved if they have the money, time and inclination to do it.
This is what makes it all the more awe inspiring with what you’ve done. You use a 4 cylinder EJxx block (99% of Imprezas have one..) and modify everything around it to get where you are today.

Going down the 3.3 route I feel won’t have the same impact, because some guys won’t be able to relate to it with their own car and drag results.
It’s like watching these drag cars (funny cars) with their tremendous outputs and ¼ mile times on the strip. The only similarity to Joe Bloggs car is the body *shape* which looks *similarish* to their own! Everything else has nothing to do with the original car. Very impressive to watch but pretty much unobtainable to the average guy on the street.

The problem you have just now is that every challenge that’s been set to you over the years has been addressed and proven. Now you’re at the top of the tree, what else is left to figure out?
You’ve proven yourself on handling, on track, on rolling road, on the ¼ mile... what’s left? If there is anything you can think of, that’s where you want to be focusing your attention providing Subaru’s is where you want to be at.
Perhaps EVO’s or Skylines for example could be the next area you look at? Despite some very fast and powerful cars from Mitsubishi and Nissan, who’s to say they can’t be improved upon over the methods employed just now.
Look what you did with Subaru’s…
Old 18 October 2005 | 06:20 PM
  #163  
R19KET's Avatar
R19KET
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
From: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Default

Alan,

Not certain that I agree with you. For a start, whilst Andy's results are FANTASTIC, the Rigoli's still hold the outright 1/4 mile record, at IIRC 8.95. Surely that would be Andy's target before moving on ?

As to going the 3.3lt route, would people relate to it any less than our 2.35lt stroked engines ? isn't it just a natural progression ?

Mark.
Old 18 October 2005 | 07:23 PM
  #164  
wrc350bhp's Avatar
wrc350bhp
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy.F
It's 140kg lighter than Marks Sti5 and approx 30kg lighter than Pavlos RA.

Andy
did say ur NEAREST rival, u know who that is
Old 18 October 2005 | 07:53 PM
  #165  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

How much does weight affect top speed though ?
I'd swap the slippier shape of a new age car for 200kg anyday when it comes to top speed !
I'd want to keep my engine though
Old 18 October 2005 | 08:07 PM
  #166  
highlander68k's Avatar
highlander68k
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,273
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by R19KET
Alan,

Not certain that I agree with you. For a start, whilst Andy's results are FANTASTIC, the Rigoli's still hold the outright 1/4 mile record, at IIRC 8.95. Surely that would be Andy's target before moving on ?
Mark.
The Rigoli record is 8.881 seconds @ 154mph in a WRX wagon. It's red - so that MUST be the fastest colour to have and NOT blue as we all thought

Last edited by highlander68k; 18 October 2005 at 08:42 PM.
Old 18 October 2005 | 08:27 PM
  #167  
Andy.F's Avatar
Andy.F
Subaru Tuning Specialist
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Default

That explains why my inlet manifold works then Jon

Chasing 1/4 mile times to the 8's would make the car into a 'drag' car though. At the moment it is still an all rounder, all that needs changed for handling are the wheels/tyres.

The Rigoli car has had to go to an auto box, teeny radiator, solid rear axle, methanol fuel and no centre diff. It will struggle to turn in the paddock never mind a handling circuit !

Andy
Old 18 October 2005 | 08:43 PM
  #168  
AlanG's Avatar
AlanG
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Default

the Rigoli's still hold the outright 1/4 mile record, at IIRC 8.95.
Already answered by Andy in that it has an auto box.


As to going the 3.3lt route, would people relate to it any less than our 2.35lt stroked engines ? isn't it just a natural progression ?
I can understand where you're coming from Mark and can agree to an extent to it being a natural progression, but if you read my previous post about seriously quick drag cars, the *really* quick ones only bear a passing resemblance to the marque it's meant to be. All the mechanicals tend to be from another manufacturer.

As it is just now, relating to the 2.35 is achievable to the average man on the street as there are many suppliers out there willing to take money in exchange for one of those type of engines, which drop straight in, in place of the original 2.0

How many 3.3's do you know of that are out there and have all the fabrication work necessary to fit in an Impreza available to the buying public?

Once that happens (if it does), then yes i can see more people relating to it, cause comparisons can be made between a run of the mill 3.3 and a tuned 3.3 IYSWIM. Same way as the 2.0/2.2 etc has been tuned and compared through the years.
Old 18 October 2005 | 08:49 PM
  #169  
AlanG's Avatar
AlanG
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Default

the Rigoli's still hold the outright 1/4 mile record, at IIRC 8.95. Surely that would be Andy's target before moving on ?
Good point and no doubt Andy has looked at it.
What happens when he beats that? Where does he go from there?

Hmm.. Did you notice i said..."when he beats that?".


Andy
Have you ever failed at any challenge?
Old 18 October 2005 | 11:18 PM
  #170  
R19KET's Avatar
R19KET
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
From: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Default

Alan,

Someone has to start these things off, before you're going to get products available off the shelf, so to speak.

How do you think all the tuning parts we have available to us now came to fruition ? 2.0lt, 2.2lt, 2.35lt, 2.5lt, and next, the 3.0, and 3.3lt

Andy,

The Rigoli car has had to go to an auto box, teeny radiator, solid rear axle, methanol fuel and no centre diff. It will struggle to turn in the paddock never mind a handling circuit !
And ?

You have a stripped out car with a 20lt fuel tank, and gaffer tape your car up how practical is that for most people ?

It depends whether you want to beat the Rigoli's or not

I can think of a few people who'd like to see you take the record, and I'm sure they'd help give you a push round the paddock if you need one

Mark.
Old 18 October 2005 | 11:33 PM
  #171  
Trout's Avatar
Trout
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 1999
Posts: 15,271
Likes: 0
From: UK
Default

I would have thought 3.3 would be great for tuners - thats 50% more pistons, rods, bearings and valves for every engine that the wannabe punter wants in his car too

The results remain fabulous - I think autobox is not the way forward. It had already been said (by those who know down under) that 9s could not be done with a manual box. Well that is that theory out of the window.

How about an 8s manual run?

There is more to come as you keep telling us Andy - find a day when clutch, NOS, engine, wind, traction, IAT, right foot and left hand all work together in congruent synchronicity - what will it produce then?

Rannoch
Old 18 October 2005 | 11:38 PM
  #172  
ZEN Performance's Avatar
ZEN Performance
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,859
Likes: 0
From: Wellingborough, Northamptonshire
Default

For the record my car is more like 60kg heavier than Andy's!

(cheeky oik!)

Paul
Old 18 October 2005 | 11:44 PM
  #173  
AlanG's Avatar
AlanG
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Default

How do you think all the tuning parts we have available to us now came to fruition ?
By people like you who are able and keen enough to try and push the boundaries of Subaru tuning.
The 3.3 is a different kettle of fish though, requiring a fair amount of engineering and ingenuity to get it to fit in an Impreza engine bay and get it to work.
Coupled with that you have the cost factor which takes into account costs versus results.

Do you honestly think there will be a market place for such a thing?, bearing in mind the capabilities the Subaru has now with the 4 cylinder blocks?
I can't see it.

As Rannoch says, it would be great for tuners. I see it as being a great marketing tool showing what a tuner is capable of doing and the lengths they are prepared to go to further the boundaries of Impreza performance, but as a next stage tuning level for the guy on the street?.. nahh!
Old 18 October 2005 | 11:47 PM
  #174  
Puff The Magic Wagon!'s Avatar
Puff The Magic Wagon!
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 16,978
Likes: 15
From: From far, far away...
Default

I was just reading today about some Cossie doing 202mph....






Go Andy!!



Old 19 October 2005 | 01:43 PM
  #175  
Tim W's Avatar
Tim W
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Default

Alan, Pat (and a few others) has already shown us that an SVX 3.3 engine bolts into an Impreza engine bay on the standard mounts, the only real problem is deciding where to put the intercooler or radiator...there isn't really sufficient room to fit both together in the engine bay, which leaves you with some interesting choices when it comes to looks...taking a leaf from the Jun drift GDB and locating the radiator in the boot is probably the answer, but it doesn't look very nice
Old 19 October 2005 | 02:34 PM
  #176  
Puff The Magic Wagon!'s Avatar
Puff The Magic Wagon!
Moderator
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 16,978
Likes: 15
From: From far, far away...
Default

No reason you couldn't extend the front of the car David Wallis stylee
Old 20 October 2005 | 10:53 AM
  #177  
AlanG's Avatar
AlanG
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 3,040
Likes: 0
From: Glasgow
Default

I've never seen any pics of this mythical 3.3 that Pat's got!

Even assuming it's real, you've typed up another reason for a 3.3 not being a feasible next stage tuning option for the masses.

Funny look front end.. radiator in the boot..
Old 20 October 2005 | 02:37 PM
  #178  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Default

Alan,

I have!

Hayward & scott made the exhaust, it runs a pair of GT25's at either side of the engine bay, it is for pats type-r track car (fully caged and will be wide arched) the cams went to piper and they shagged a set, so provided a set of billet cams FOC (well same price as a regrind) the heads are at SMG being ported/polished etc.. when they come back the engine is being stripped checked and rebuilt using 22b pistons IIRC..

It will then be reassembled and thrown in the car complete with a 6spd dog box, and most likely fully active diffs front centre and rear controlled by his Pectel T10 or a life racing F90

However the big problem is, pat is building his other Type R as a road car or ED425 as its known this will be using a 2.5 and a small garrett.. when he eventually finishes this, (which has now been painted) he will start on the next one, which he isnt planning on doing before spring

However he isnt in a hurry to do it at all.. but If you want to go to "Rally Colin"'s place Im sure he wouldnt mind if you had a look

David
Old 20 October 2005 | 04:10 PM
  #179  
Ralph Wiggum's Avatar
Ralph Wiggum
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
From: Slaaah or Slough
Default

congrats to andy f utterly brilliant
Old 21 October 2005 | 03:20 PM
  #180  
Tim W's Avatar
Tim W
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 1999
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Default

I think the Silver car is elsewhere David, the caged shell is still there though...


Quick Reply: Today at Elvington. 204.3mph +207.4 + 210.1mph.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:28 AM.