Can you get 350bhp on a standard '99 UK intercooler?
#31
Originally Posted by R19KET
OMG, some of you guys are getting very tolerant in your old age
Daz, apart from changing from a VF28, to a marginally larger VF34, what did you do, to go from the 330bhp/300ftlbs you got at ScoobyClinic, to the 399bhp/382ftlbs at Well Lane.
Mark.
Daz, apart from changing from a VF28, to a marginally larger VF34, what did you do, to go from the 330bhp/300ftlbs you got at ScoobyClinic, to the 399bhp/382ftlbs at Well Lane.
Mark.
So in short evreything was different. Bloody sceptics!!! lol
Would be glad to take anyone out so they can see first hand. Would be glad to be proved wrong
#34
And what is it with all these BS statements and I quote "Home of the UK's "Quickest" 4dr Impreza 0 to 190.1mph in 1.25 miles...."
Think I'll claim the one for home of the UK's quickest impreza with an alpine stereo, a tech wheels, and hairs from a dog called fluke on the seats"
Mark, I am not denying that 399bhp from a VF34 is somewhat optimistic as you will see from my earlier threads I have openly said this.
If I was going to bull**** about my RR results they'd be a tad more impressive than 399/ 382. Realistically I am looking at around 350- 360 therefore answering the thread that YES 350bhp is possible on a standard TMIC.
And as for OMG and tolerance I hope this was intolerant enough for you.
Think I'll claim the one for home of the UK's quickest impreza with an alpine stereo, a tech wheels, and hairs from a dog called fluke on the seats"
Mark, I am not denying that 399bhp from a VF34 is somewhat optimistic as you will see from my earlier threads I have openly said this.
If I was going to bull**** about my RR results they'd be a tad more impressive than 399/ 382. Realistically I am looking at around 350- 360 therefore answering the thread that YES 350bhp is possible on a standard TMIC.
And as for OMG and tolerance I hope this was intolerant enough for you.
Last edited by dazdavies; 25 November 2005 at 06:47 PM.
#35
Scooby Regular
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
From: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Daz,
Sceptical, because some of us know how big a VF34 is, amused, because I know what Andy's attitude would be like had someone else mapped the car
As for my "location" details, you're right, they are a bit out dated now
Mark.
Sceptical, because some of us know how big a VF34 is, amused, because I know what Andy's attitude would be like had someone else mapped the car
As for my "location" details, you're right, they are a bit out dated now
Mark.
#36
Originally Posted by R19KET
Daz,
Sceptical, because some of us know how big a VF34 is, amused, because I know what Andy's attitude would be like had someone else mapped the car
As for my "location" details, you're right, they are a bit out dated now
Mark.
Sceptical, because some of us know how big a VF34 is, amused, because I know what Andy's attitude would be like had someone else mapped the car
As for my "location" details, you're right, they are a bit out dated now
Mark.
Last edited by dazdavies; 25 November 2005 at 09:12 PM.
#37
Steady on Daz calling Mark a ****** is a bit strong as I can't see where he implied that you a liar He just said he was sceptical and frankly I am and I suspect are many others for good reason.
I can except 350bhp though as this is achieveable with that turbo, but its on its limit IMO. As for VE, well I know the stuff you have to do to get good power from small turbos and I'd like to have done the heads like yours on my car to finish it off. I think that if I had done and added headers and a 3" exhaust then I'd be seeing the same power (I bloody hope so!). As it is I managed 333bhp with ported headers and 2.5" exhaust with Subaru silencers.
I'm puzzled why you didn't go FMIC or at least STi8 TMIC with that spec in the first place? Another point is that on my tests the MY99/00 TMIC got way too hot too easily and this was cumulative on track to very high levels (70C+). I can only imagine that with the 6MT and VF35 then things are just much worse Have you done much heat management?
F
I can except 350bhp though as this is achieveable with that turbo, but its on its limit IMO. As for VE, well I know the stuff you have to do to get good power from small turbos and I'd like to have done the heads like yours on my car to finish it off. I think that if I had done and added headers and a 3" exhaust then I'd be seeing the same power (I bloody hope so!). As it is I managed 333bhp with ported headers and 2.5" exhaust with Subaru silencers.
I'm puzzled why you didn't go FMIC or at least STi8 TMIC with that spec in the first place? Another point is that on my tests the MY99/00 TMIC got way too hot too easily and this was cumulative on track to very high levels (70C+). I can only imagine that with the 6MT and VF35 then things are just much worse Have you done much heat management?
F
#38
As i Have stated all along, I too think that 350-360 is a much more realistic figure. Believe you me I want the Front mount more than anything. It's just down to budget at the mo.
As soon as I clear things with the other car Then i will have a bit more to play with. Then I will be looking at The garrett/IHI hybrid that Roger Clark do (p20 with ported shroud) probably an APS front mount however i do like the look of the Greddy one too. 740's then another trip To Andy to get it mapped. Although I may get him to come here on this occasion.
As for exhaust, I have the GT spec headers, TSL group A down pipe, TSL de-cat centre and the Firestorm backbox. There isnt any heat management at present other than the two side boneet vents opened up and the removal of the undertrays. Nothing to do with heat management though I just couldnt be arsed to put them back until I am well and trully finished.
I totally agree with what you say about the top mount its not upto the job with power above 350. Its ok with temps like they are at the mo but in the summer it certainly struggles.
I do intend to replace it ASAP with a FMIC
Here's the well lane Dyno sheet http://www.scoob.co.uk/dyno399.jpg
As soon as I clear things with the other car Then i will have a bit more to play with. Then I will be looking at The garrett/IHI hybrid that Roger Clark do (p20 with ported shroud) probably an APS front mount however i do like the look of the Greddy one too. 740's then another trip To Andy to get it mapped. Although I may get him to come here on this occasion.
As for exhaust, I have the GT spec headers, TSL group A down pipe, TSL de-cat centre and the Firestorm backbox. There isnt any heat management at present other than the two side boneet vents opened up and the removal of the undertrays. Nothing to do with heat management though I just couldnt be arsed to put them back until I am well and trully finished.
I totally agree with what you say about the top mount its not upto the job with power above 350. Its ok with temps like they are at the mo but in the summer it certainly struggles.
I do intend to replace it ASAP with a FMIC
Here's the well lane Dyno sheet http://www.scoob.co.uk/dyno399.jpg
Last edited by dazdavies; 25 November 2005 at 10:17 PM.
#40
Scooby Regular
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
From: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Daz,
I'm sorry you took offence at my posts. The question of "tolerance" was directed at those people who would normally rip the p155 out of your ludicrous Well Lane figures, where instead they used a series of and !!!
For someone who insists he doesn't believe his own WL figures, stating they are more likely some 50bhp less, it's somewhat strange that you take offence at others suggesting the same
Since we both, in fact all agree that your Well Lane figures are boll0x, how, and where do you consider I implied you're a liar ?
With regard to me being a first class ******, well if you're going to do something, at least be "first class" at it
However, in this case, I have to concede to you being a cut above me
Mark.
I'm sorry you took offence at my posts. The question of "tolerance" was directed at those people who would normally rip the p155 out of your ludicrous Well Lane figures, where instead they used a series of and !!!
For someone who insists he doesn't believe his own WL figures, stating they are more likely some 50bhp less, it's somewhat strange that you take offence at others suggesting the same
Since we both, in fact all agree that your Well Lane figures are boll0x, how, and where do you consider I implied you're a liar ?
With regard to me being a first class ******, well if you're going to do something, at least be "first class" at it
However, in this case, I have to concede to you being a cut above me
Mark.
#41
Originally Posted by R19KET
Daz,
I'm sorry you took offence at my posts. The question of "tolerance" was directed at those people who would normally rip the p155 out of your ludicrous Well Lane figures, where instead they used a series of and !!!
For someone who insists he doesn't believe his own WL figures, stating they are more likely some 50bhp less, it's somewhat strange that you take offence at others suggesting the same
Since we both, in fact all agree that your Well Lane figures are boll0x, how, and where do you consider I implied you're a liar ?
With regard to me being a first class ******, well if you're going to do something, at least be "first class" at it
However, in this case, I have to concede to you being a cut above me
Mark.
I'm sorry you took offence at my posts. The question of "tolerance" was directed at those people who would normally rip the p155 out of your ludicrous Well Lane figures, where instead they used a series of and !!!
For someone who insists he doesn't believe his own WL figures, stating they are more likely some 50bhp less, it's somewhat strange that you take offence at others suggesting the same
Since we both, in fact all agree that your Well Lane figures are boll0x, how, and where do you consider I implied you're a liar ?
With regard to me being a first class ******, well if you're going to do something, at least be "first class" at it
However, in this case, I have to concede to you being a cut above me
Mark.
Had you read my post properly you would have comprehended that I wasnt claiming at any time that I believed the Well Lane figures. My post was supporting the original post that 350bhp is achievable on a standard UK spec top mount intercooler as that is the figure that i believe I am running. Or are you now saying that Well Lane's figures are more than 50bhp out in this instance?
Ladies and gentlemen, members of the jury the defence rests!!!!
#42
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Originally Posted by R19KET
With regard to me being a first class ******, well if you're going to do something, at least be "first class" at it
However, in this case, I have to concede to you being a cut above me
Mark.
R19KET
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 1999
Location: 0 to 190.1mph in 1.25 miles, but I bet it would be quicker if I had Well Lane rolling road figures..
Posts: 2,255
However, in this case, I have to concede to you being a cut above me
Mark.
R19KET
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 1999
Location: 0 to 190.1mph in 1.25 miles, but I bet it would be quicker if I had Well Lane rolling road figures..
Posts: 2,255
#43
Scooby Regular
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
From: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Daz,
I suggest that you re read my posts, because you seem to lack the capacity to digest the content first time around !
NOWHERE do I imply doubt over your 350bhp claim, I did in fact say we AGREED about the WL figures ! So no futile dispute there then
Nor will you ever find me trying to portraying myself as any sort of Subaru god, guru, or any other such nonsense
The problem, is that you chose to reply to my original post, in a rude, and un called for manor.
Even after I make quite clear what I said, you continually accuse me of posting things that only exist in your twisted imagination, and you still continue to be rude, and offensive.
Please feel free to believe your figures are whatever you want them to be.
Mark.
I suggest that you re read my posts, because you seem to lack the capacity to digest the content first time around !
NOWHERE do I imply doubt over your 350bhp claim, I did in fact say we AGREED about the WL figures ! So no futile dispute there then
Nor will you ever find me trying to portraying myself as any sort of Subaru god, guru, or any other such nonsense
The problem, is that you chose to reply to my original post, in a rude, and un called for manor.
Even after I make quite clear what I said, you continually accuse me of posting things that only exist in your twisted imagination, and you still continue to be rude, and offensive.
Please feel free to believe your figures are whatever you want them to be.
Mark.
#44
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 1
From: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
#47
[QUOTE=dazdavies] YES i do accept that this is at the top of its range but that has not been in dispute all along. Indeed throughout my posts I have said that this is a more realistic figure but you still carried on with your futile dispute thus making you the bigger of the ******* here.
Had you read my post properly [QUOTE]
If you knew 350bhp was reasonable on a TMIC then why not say that in the first place instead of the pub boast 399bhp?
Who are you implying are the other w4nkers then?
I don't think you have read other peoples posts thoroughly.
F
Had you read my post properly [QUOTE]
If you knew 350bhp was reasonable on a TMIC then why not say that in the first place instead of the pub boast 399bhp?
Who are you implying are the other w4nkers then?
I don't think you have read other peoples posts thoroughly.
F
#48
Floyd,
Thats exactly what I did yesterday in my first post.
As for the w4nkers statment I wrongly called mark one yesterday, he called me one back I merely stated that he was the bigger one of the two of us.
I was not refering to anyone else is this manner.
I hope that clears it up.
I was wrong to call Mark that it just pi$$es me off when people automatically think you are bull****ting as Mark did yesterday.
The "pub boast" was immediatly followed up with a statement about well lane reading high and 350bhp being a safe bet.
I hope that diffuses this thread a little.
Chrome, Thanks for your positive comments
Thats exactly what I did yesterday in my first post.
As for the w4nkers statment I wrongly called mark one yesterday, he called me one back I merely stated that he was the bigger one of the two of us.
I was not refering to anyone else is this manner.
I hope that clears it up.
I was wrong to call Mark that it just pi$$es me off when people automatically think you are bull****ting as Mark did yesterday.
The "pub boast" was immediatly followed up with a statement about well lane reading high and 350bhp being a safe bet.
I hope that diffuses this thread a little.
Chrome, Thanks for your positive comments
Last edited by dazdavies; 26 November 2005 at 04:38 PM.
#50
what bhp did you have ATW's only reason i ask when i rolling roaded my evo 5(when I had it) i made 360bhp atf a guy with less spec and less boost made 350bhp atf but made 30bhp atw's less than me (he had a brake or diff prob cant remember which one) which made his power about right for the car.
That may be the reason for your high ish bhp atf ?
That may be the reason for your high ish bhp atf ?
#51
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (234)
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 14,406
Likes: 0
From: Over 500ft/lbs of torque @ just 1.1bar
Daz: re your edit.....
but on another thread you do boast.....
.....without mention of the RR reading high.
Bob.
PS. Popcorn?
Originally Posted by dazdavies
Floyd,
My first post did exactly that, It wasnt a pub boast. Everybody knows that Well lane read High that why i stated that i thought 350 bhp was a safe bet.
As for the ******* I was refering to, I wrongly called mark one yesterday he called me one back. I merely stated that at the time he was the biggest one of the two of us.
I wasnt refering to anyone else in this manner.
I hope that clears it up.
It just pisses me off when people automatically think you are bull****ting like mark did yesterday hence the ****** statment which, i agree, was in your own words "a bit strong".
My first post did exactly that, It wasnt a pub boast. Everybody knows that Well lane read High that why i stated that i thought 350 bhp was a safe bet.
As for the ******* I was refering to, I wrongly called mark one yesterday he called me one back. I merely stated that at the time he was the biggest one of the two of us.
I wasnt refering to anyone else in this manner.
I hope that clears it up.
It just pisses me off when people automatically think you are bull****ting like mark did yesterday hence the ****** statment which, i agree, was in your own words "a bit strong".
Originally Posted by dazdavies
Mine is currently circa 400 bhp with 382 ft/lbs However my internals have been done and after my third gearbox breakage i am now on the six speed sti 8 gear box. BUt i am running a bigger turbo.
Bob.
PS. Popcorn?
#52
Originally Posted by R19KET
Daz,
Astonishing.......... I give up
Mark.
Astonishing.......... I give up
Mark.
Good one Bob, stir it up a little.
#55
Scooby Regular
Joined: May 1999
Posts: 2,637
Likes: 0
From: SSO2003 2nd, SSO2005 1st, SSO2006 2nd, TACC Rd4 5th 4wd: In my car ;-)
Daz,
At no point did I say, or think you were "bull****ting". Since you posted the WL figures were high, and 350bhp a more realistic figure, and I stated several time that we agreed about the figures, just what do you consider I thought you were bull****ting about ? more over, where am I supposed to have implied it, let alone said it ???
The problem with this thread, is that you keep "STATING" things I Neither SAY, or THINK.
Let's just agree that you misinterpreted what I said, and call it a day
Mark.
At no point did I say, or think you were "bull****ting". Since you posted the WL figures were high, and 350bhp a more realistic figure, and I stated several time that we agreed about the figures, just what do you consider I thought you were bull****ting about ? more over, where am I supposed to have implied it, let alone said it ???
The problem with this thread, is that you keep "STATING" things I Neither SAY, or THINK.
Let's just agree that you misinterpreted what I said, and call it a day
Mark.
#58
Anyway, to answer the original question, yes you can get 350 on a MY99 TMIC. It wouldn't be sensible on track or prolonged heavy road use in summer but why would you want to use one at that level of power?
F
F
#60
Oh yeah! Silly me. Lets build a 350bhp engine on a shoe string and expect it to last more than 5 mins So if the question was can you get 350 on a MY99 TMIC? Then yes, but don't rely on it for very long IMO.
That performance comes at a cost and unless you are skillful, lucky or Bob then you should save your pennies if you want to go quick!
F
That performance comes at a cost and unless you are skillful, lucky or Bob then you should save your pennies if you want to go quick!
F