top gear, jc crashes into a hedge !!
#31
#33
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 2,266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Could it maybe have had a chassis from a newer car as part of a repair or restoration ? Then the car would be A reg as far as the VIN plates are concerned even if everything else is earlier - only way I can think that explains it.
#34
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Could be Import and was given an age related plate on the year it was registered in this country?
Many ex-miltary Landrovers (lightweights in particular) go around sporting plates dating from the mid 1980's when they were built in the 70's. Mine originally had a 1976/77 "R" plate, yet it was built in 1969.
I later had it re-registered as a 1969 "G" reg to qualify for tax exemption![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Many ex-miltary Landrovers (lightweights in particular) go around sporting plates dating from the mid 1980's when they were built in the 70's. Mine originally had a 1976/77 "R" plate, yet it was built in 1969.
I later had it re-registered as a 1969 "G" reg to qualify for tax exemption
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#35
Scooby Regular
![Default](images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by ALi-B
I later had it re-registered as a 1969 "G" reg to qualify for tax exemption ![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Lol1](images/smilies/lol1.gif)
I think your theory is the most likely.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM