I have a summons
17 December 2005 | 09:18 PM
#31
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,892
Likes: 0
From: In the Flatlands of Lincolnshire
Best of luck m8. As most of the threads have said proper legal advice is best. I had a instance a few years ago in a mates left hand drive porsche with the cops who followed us because of the lines he took then they p!$$ed off when they saw it was LHD. a shame as I was looking forward to a grilling then pointing out where the steering wheel was.
A note to Pslewis all the majority of TŁ$t's you see racing round your area are young kids with little corsa's and VTR's not sensible scooby drivers who enjoy the open road!
A note to Pslewis all the majority of TŁ$t's you see racing round your area are young kids with little corsa's and VTR's not sensible scooby drivers who enjoy the open road!
17 December 2005 | 09:23 PM
#32
Originally Posted by pslewis
So, its ok for the local CHAVS to race around the streets of my town at 2am on a Saturday morning , is it? Just because the roads are empty??
How about the people trying to sleep??
Nah, a speed limit is a speed limit ............ it is NOT a target!
Pete
How about the people trying to sleep??
Nah, a speed limit is a speed limit ............ it is NOT a target!
Pete
17 December 2005 | 09:26 PM
#33
Originally Posted by 360ste
Best of luck m8. As most of the threads have said proper legal advice is best. I had a instance a few years ago in a mates left hand drive porsche with the cops who followed us because of the lines he took then they p!$$ed off when they saw it was LHD. a shame as I was looking forward to a grilling then pointing out where the steering wheel was.
A note to Pslewis all the majority of TŁ$t's you see racing round your area are young kids with little corsa's and VTR's not sensible scooby drivers who enjoy the open road!
A note to Pslewis all the majority of TŁ$t's you see racing round your area are young kids with little corsa's and VTR's not sensible scooby drivers who enjoy the open road!
17 December 2005 | 09:34 PM
#34
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 32,398
Likes: 1
From: Old Codgers Home
Just because you have a Scooby rather than a Corsa doesn't cut-it in my world ................ just means that you are a Chav with some money!! 
NOT saying cookster is a CHAV .............. just illustrating a point that speeders should be caught and thrown to the wolves - you are a potential killer whether you drive a Scooby or a Corsa.
The mentallity is EXACTLY the same!
Pete
NOT saying cookster is a CHAV .............. just illustrating a point that speeders should be caught and thrown to the wolves - you are a potential killer whether you drive a Scooby or a Corsa.
The mentallity is EXACTLY the same!
Pete
17 December 2005 | 09:43 PM
#36
Originally Posted by pslewis
Just because you have a Scooby rather than a Corsa doesn't cut-it in my world ................ just means that you are a Chav with some money!!
NOT saying cookster is a CHAV .............. just illustrating a point that speeders should be caught and thrown to the wolves - you are a potential killer whether you drive a Scooby or a Corsa.
The mentallity is EXACTLY the same!
Pete
NOT saying cookster is a CHAV .............. just illustrating a point that speeders should be caught and thrown to the wolves - you are a potential killer whether you drive a Scooby or a Corsa.
The mentallity is EXACTLY the same!
Pete
I drive my car sensibly everyday but now and again you give it a little push to appreciate the power then carry on as normal.
17 December 2005 | 09:52 PM
#38
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 32,398
Likes: 1
From: Old Codgers Home
Originally Posted by 360ste
well put
OK, lets put something else out there, "Go and steal a Scooby, its OK as long as the owner is Insured!!"
There we go ............ it's illegal - but, it doesn't really matter!!
Where do you draw the line??
Pete
17 December 2005 | 10:00 PM
#39
Originally Posted by pslewis
Carry on being a criminal ..................... thats what you are saying.
OK, lets put something else out there, "Go and steal a Scooby, its OK as long as the owner is Insured!!"
There we go ............ it's illegal - but, it doesn't really matter!!
Where do you draw the line??
Pete
OK, lets put something else out there, "Go and steal a Scooby, its OK as long as the owner is Insured!!"
There we go ............ it's illegal - but, it doesn't really matter!!
Where do you draw the line??
Pete
17 December 2005 | 10:01 PM
#40
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,892
Likes: 0
From: In the Flatlands of Lincolnshire
Seeing as you talk about breaking the law. Your threads put you on that level, for committing act of LIABLE as casting dispersions on peoples character can be classed as liable, if they take offence to it!!!!
17 December 2005 | 10:03 PM
#42
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 32,398
Likes: 1
From: Old Codgers Home
Originally Posted by 360ste
Seeing as you talk about breaking the law. Your threads put you on that level, for committing act of LIABLE as casting dispersions on peoples character can be classed as liable, if they take offence to it!!!!
Shut UP!!
Pete
17 December 2005 | 10:05 PM
#43
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 32,398
Likes: 1
From: Old Codgers Home
Originally Posted by paulg1979
I know when it is safe to go fast.
Hence the limit, hence you will get fined if you exceed it.
You do NOT know if a family will pull onto that empty motorway, on the way home for Xmas, at 3am ..... with their children asleep in the back .........
The children YOU will be murdering!!!!!
I would rather you steal cars!!
Pete
17 December 2005 | 10:06 PM
#44
Originally Posted by cookstar
I didnt think long before this thread would turn into the usual ****e 
Cheers
Cheers
I'm not really an angry person. Just playing with Plewis!!
17 December 2005 | 10:06 PM
#46
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 32,398
Likes: 1
From: Old Codgers Home
Originally Posted by cookstar
I didnt think long before this thread would turn into the usual ****e
Cheers
Cheers
Pete
17 December 2005 | 10:07 PM
#47
Originally Posted by 360ste
Seeing as you talk about breaking the law. Your threads put you on that level, for committing act of LIABLE as casting dispersions on peoples character can be classed as liable, if they take offence to it!!!!
17 December 2005 | 10:09 PM
#49
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 33,828
Likes: 0
From: Stroke it baby!
Originally Posted by pslewis
As long as there are those who think it's OK to risk others lives then you will find me defending the innocents!!
Pete
Pete
Thats just fine Pete. Carry on Son
17 December 2005 | 10:18 PM
#52
Originally Posted by 360ste
Same as paul. Take it easy ALL
Take it easy ALL
17 December 2005 | 10:21 PM
#54
Originally Posted by 360ste
I know what damage red wine did to me last wednesday especially followed by pints of beer after. Good job off work next day. Hope your Sunday is not too bad.
17 December 2005 | 10:29 PM
#56
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by pslewis
The Police, Me and the general Public do NOT think you know!!
Hence the limit, hence you will get fined if you exceed it.
You do NOT know if a family will pull onto that empty motorway, on the way home for Xmas, at 3am ..... with their children asleep in the back .........
The children YOU will be murdering!!!!!
I would rather you steal cars!!
Pete
Hence the limit, hence you will get fined if you exceed it.
You do NOT know if a family will pull onto that empty motorway, on the way home for Xmas, at 3am ..... with their children asleep in the back .........
The children YOU will be murdering!!!!!
I would rather you steal cars!!
Pete
Pete
19 December 2005 | 09:00 AM
#57
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,034
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cookstar
At the time i said i was unaware that the pads were worn as i had a five year old child in the car and pointed this out.
Yes i was speeding and am not disputing this fact, the speed "guestimated" was stupid though 90 in a 50, if this had been the case i would have been more worried about the wrath of kiddies mum more than police, i reckon realisticly i was doing about 70-75. Which i will hold my hands up to but not 90.
How much evidence do the police need for prooving speed as there was no speed gun etc, only a "police pilot speedometer" but i believe this was the speed recorded while catching me up..!
I quote for the brakes from the summons "On 14.07.2005 at 19.27 hrs the defendant used a subaru impreza EN02 *** on a12 Colchester Road. The vehicle was fitted with a braking system which was not maintained in good and efficient working order in that the brake pads were worn beyond servicable life (metal to metal), the nearside front pad was worn to greater excess than the offside front.
When they were changed both sides were worn evenly as well, FFS
This just seems like on big pi$$ take
Cookie
Yes i was speeding and am not disputing this fact, the speed "guestimated" was stupid though 90 in a 50, if this had been the case i would have been more worried about the wrath of kiddies mum more than police, i reckon realisticly i was doing about 70-75. Which i will hold my hands up to but not 90.
How much evidence do the police need for prooving speed as there was no speed gun etc, only a "police pilot speedometer" but i believe this was the speed recorded while catching me up..!
I quote for the brakes from the summons "On 14.07.2005 at 19.27 hrs the defendant used a subaru impreza EN02 *** on a12 Colchester Road. The vehicle was fitted with a braking system which was not maintained in good and efficient working order in that the brake pads were worn beyond servicable life (metal to metal), the nearside front pad was worn to greater excess than the offside front.
When they were changed both sides were worn evenly as well, FFS
This just seems like on big pi$$ take
Cookie
martin
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post