Whatever Happened to Pete Croney
and hoped everything would work out... 
13 May 2006 | 10:45 AM
#32
i had dealings with him at scoobysport and wasn't impressed tbh, had a new engine fitted but it took them 4 attempts just to stop it from overheating, never made a deadline for me, just not impressed. if he was still in buisness i would not be seen in there again.
13 May 2006 | 09:09 PM
#33
I see a post I made, probably 12th February has been totally removed. It was there last night and I re-read it when I saw this thread had been brought back to the top. That is bang out of order. A bit Big Brotherish.
It had sat here for 3 months only to be zapped in the last 24 hrs. I have no problem with sensorship, (if it is necessary) but I do expect the common courtesy of an e-mail to say it is being removed and why. I accept this board is not a democracy and do try to toe the line.
My removed post stated quite simply that at every twist and turn I gave Croney a way out and an opportunity to settle the matter fairly.
The court case could have been moved to Basildon but he elected to come to Teesside, in person and was represented by a lady solicitor. The Court case was totally avoidable as he will have realised in hindsight when arrogance, eloquence and misrepresentation did not wash with the judge.
As I sat listening in court, I wondered if he (Croney) really believed what he was telling the judge. Anyway the judge did not as was evidenced in his summing up.
www.geocities/harveysmith3000
It had sat here for 3 months only to be zapped in the last 24 hrs. I have no problem with sensorship, (if it is necessary) but I do expect the common courtesy of an e-mail to say it is being removed and why. I accept this board is not a democracy and do try to toe the line.
My removed post stated quite simply that at every twist and turn I gave Croney a way out and an opportunity to settle the matter fairly.
The court case could have been moved to Basildon but he elected to come to Teesside, in person and was represented by a lady solicitor. The Court case was totally avoidable as he will have realised in hindsight when arrogance, eloquence and misrepresentation did not wash with the judge.
As I sat listening in court, I wondered if he (Croney) really believed what he was telling the judge. Anyway the judge did not as was evidenced in his summing up.
www.geocities/harveysmith3000
Last edited by harvey; 13 May 2006 at 09:33 PM.
13 May 2006 | 10:22 PM
#34
Originally Posted by harvey
I see a post I made, probably 12th February has been totally removed. It was there last night and I re-read it when I saw this thread had been brought back to the top. That is bang out of order. A bit Big Brotherish.
It had sat here for 3 months only to be zapped in the last 24 hrs. I have no problem with sensorship, (if it is necessary) but I do expect the common courtesy of an e-mail to say it is being removed and why. I accept this board is not a democracy and do try to toe the line.
My removed post stated quite simply that at every twist and turn I gave Croney a way out and an opportunity to settle the matter fairly.
The court case could have been moved to Basildon but he elected to come to Teesside, in person and was represented by a lady solicitor. The Court case was totally avoidable as he will have realised in hindsight when arrogance, eloquence and misrepresentation did not wash with the judge.
As I sat listening in court, I wondered if he (Croney) really believed what he was telling the judge. Anyway the judge did not as was evidenced in his summing up.
www.geocities/harveysmith3000
It had sat here for 3 months only to be zapped in the last 24 hrs. I have no problem with sensorship, (if it is necessary) but I do expect the common courtesy of an e-mail to say it is being removed and why. I accept this board is not a democracy and do try to toe the line.
My removed post stated quite simply that at every twist and turn I gave Croney a way out and an opportunity to settle the matter fairly.
The court case could have been moved to Basildon but he elected to come to Teesside, in person and was represented by a lady solicitor. The Court case was totally avoidable as he will have realised in hindsight when arrogance, eloquence and misrepresentation did not wash with the judge.
As I sat listening in court, I wondered if he (Croney) really believed what he was telling the judge. Anyway the judge did not as was evidenced in his summing up.
www.geocities/harveysmith3000
Agree with you wholeheartedly Harvey, I cannot understand the logic applied for removal of posts. Certain posts are defamatory, insulting and iciterful but are left in their entire glory. Your post was an account of actual events only for some jobsworth to vape it! Go figure?
14 May 2006 | 01:14 PM
#35
Scooby Regular
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,370
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by JohnD
This is getting to sound a bit like Friends Reunited!
Who remembers Mad Gypsy?
JohnD
Who remembers Mad Gypsy?
JohnD
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
toyney83
General Technical
10
02 October 2015 09:38 PM
