Why DO The Toffs Think THey Are Above The Law??
13 February 2006, 11:29 AM
#31
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
PSL,
Will you throw the working class huntsmen into gaol as well then, or would your innate sense of inverted snobbery prevent you from doing that.
You like fishing as well don't you?
Les
Will you throw the working class huntsmen into gaol as well then, or would your innate sense of inverted snobbery prevent you from doing that.
You like fishing as well don't you?
Les
Last edited by Leslie; 13 February 2006 at 12:01 PM.
13 February 2006, 11:30 AM
#32
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Logged Out
Posts: 10,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Eddie Temple
Typical nouveaux riche. Over-opinionated and under-informed. Simply bubbling with reasons for why the world should take you or your poxy beliefs seriously. The type who like to own animals like they would wear accessories. Fluffy cats to make up for your emotional shortcomings or big dogs to fill that gap where your family jewels should hang.
The audacity. How ******* dare you.
The audacity. How ******* dare you.
*Comments rendered void alert!*
Don't you just love those that get tough using a second username.
13 February 2006, 11:50 AM
#33
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Croydon - returned to democracy! Yay!!
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Eddie Temple
Typical nouveaux riche. Over-opinionated and under-informed. Simply bubbling with reasons for why the world should take you or your poxy beliefs seriously. The type who like to own animals like they would wear accessories. Fluffy cats to make up for your emotional shortcomings or big dogs to fill that gap where your family jewels should hang.
The audacity. How ******* dare you.
The audacity. How ******* dare you.
Then again, if you actually had any class or breeding you'd know that already...
But please, do feel free to give us the benefit of your enlightened opinions on the actual subject this thread concerns. Assuming you have any, that is, and are capable of actually expressing them.
SB
13 February 2006, 11:53 AM
#34
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 4,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Whether you're pro or anti hunting we can probably all agree that new labia are incapable of drafting meaningful, enforceable legislation that does anything more than create 2 days of headlines.
13 February 2006, 11:55 AM
#36
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: £1.785m reasons not to be here :)
Posts: 6,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Eddie Temple
Typical nouveaux riche. Over-opinionated and under-informed. Simply bubbling with reasons for why the world should take you or your poxy beliefs seriously. The type who like to own animals like they would wear accessories. Fluffy cats to make up for your emotional shortcomings or big dogs to fill that gap where your family jewels should hang.
The audacity. How ******* dare you.
The audacity. How ******* dare you.
**** you too
And you are?
(Edit to add, probably some **** who thinks he has God given right to go careering round the countryside on horseback chasing an animal to an horrendous death, in the name of either a)recreation B) sport or c) pest control depending on which one of his faces he's talking out of today)
Last edited by Diablo; 13 February 2006 at 12:02 PM.
13 February 2006, 11:56 AM
#37
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: £1.785m reasons not to be here :)
Posts: 6,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MattOz
Diablo,
I was going to say that you had fair points mate.
Just a shame that ET landed and pointed his finger at you! 
Cheers
Matt
I was going to say that you had fair points mate.
Just a shame that ET landed and pointed his finger at you! Cheers
Matt
13 February 2006, 12:07 PM
#38
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Eddie Temple
Typical nouveaux riche. Over-opinionated and under-informed. Simply bubbling with reasons for why the world should take you or your poxy beliefs seriously. The type who like to own animals like they would wear accessories. Fluffy cats to make up for your emotional shortcomings or big dogs to fill that gap where your family jewels should hang.
The audacity. How ******* dare you.
The audacity. How ******* dare you.
13 February 2006, 12:19 PM
#39
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pslewis
Why do they think they can hunt even though it's illegal!!!???
They are the first to jump up and down if a union goes on strike and damages one of their businesses!!
I'll not post photo's of foxes getting killed ...... you can google for those yourself, I'm assuming that why my last post got deleted?
I propose that we throw the Huntsmen into prison for 4 weeks ..... should be interesting, I wonder what the inmates would make of them??
Big Gay Billy who looks after the showers might want them to feel what a fox feels like as it is chased down and terrified!!
Pete
They are the first to jump up and down if a union goes on strike and damages one of their businesses!!
I'll not post photo's of foxes getting killed ...... you can google for those yourself, I'm assuming that why my last post got deleted?
I propose that we throw the Huntsmen into prison for 4 weeks ..... should be interesting, I wonder what the inmates would make of them??
Big Gay Billy who looks after the showers might want them to feel what a fox feels like as it is chased down and terrified!!
Pete
you continue to be a spoon-fed idiot and you do not understand the legislation. the government left sufficient technical loop holes in the bill to allow hunting to continue in a modified form while placating the antiquated class-warrior left of the party with the illusion of a "ban". why? because they knew that a total ban was unworkable, unpoliceable and would create embarassing and repetitive civil disobedience, not least in the run-up to a general election. this is called politics.
for the millionth time.
13 February 2006, 12:23 PM
#40
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Logged Out
Posts: 10,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Holy Ghost
**
you continue to be a spoon-fed idiot and you do not understand the legislation. the government left sufficient technical loop holes in the bill to allow hunting to continue in a modified form while placating the antiquated class-warrior left of the party with the illusion of a "ban". why? because they knew that a total ban was unworkable, unpoliceable and would create embarassing and repetitive civil disobedience, not least in the run-up to a general election. this is called politics.
for the millionth time.
you continue to be a spoon-fed idiot and you do not understand the legislation. the government left sufficient technical loop holes in the bill to allow hunting to continue in a modified form while placating the antiquated class-warrior left of the party with the illusion of a "ban". why? because they knew that a total ban was unworkable, unpoliceable and would create embarassing and repetitive civil disobedience, not least in the run-up to a general election. this is called politics.
for the millionth time.
13 February 2006, 12:27 PM
#42
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by pslewis
Why do they think they can hunt even though it's illegal!!!???
They are the first to jump up and down if a union goes on strike and damages one of their businesses!!
I'll not post photo's of foxes getting killed ...... you can google for those yourself, I'm assuming that why my last post got deleted?
I propose that we throw the Huntsmen into prison for 4 weeks ..... should be interesting, I wonder what the inmates would make of them??
Big Gay Billy who looks after the showers might want them to feel what a fox feels like as it is chased down and terrified!!
Pete
They are the first to jump up and down if a union goes on strike and damages one of their businesses!!
I'll not post photo's of foxes getting killed ...... you can google for those yourself, I'm assuming that why my last post got deleted?
I propose that we throw the Huntsmen into prison for 4 weeks ..... should be interesting, I wonder what the inmates would make of them??
Big Gay Billy who looks after the showers might want them to feel what a fox feels like as it is chased down and terrified!!
Pete
13 February 2006, 12:28 PM
#43
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: The rarefied atmosphere.
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Diablo
LOL
**** you too
And you are?
**** you too
And you are?
Just look at the pair of you. You hope I will make justifications for what I do? Well I won't. I do what I do and God help you if you get in my way.
Good day son.
13 February 2006, 12:33 PM
#45
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Logged Out
Posts: 10,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Eddie Temple
Someone who likes a bit of sport. Someone who rides roughshod over the views of people who don't matter. People like you and Bradley. Contemptible.
Just look at the pair of you. You hope I will make justifications for what I do? Well I won't. I do what I do and God help you if you get in my way.
Good day son.
Just look at the pair of you. You hope I will make justifications for what I do? Well I won't. I do what I do and God help you if you get in my way.
Good day son.
13 February 2006, 12:33 PM
#46
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sbradley
There's no x in 'nouveau' you knobber.
Then again, if you actually had any class or breeding you'd know that already...
But please, do feel free to give us the benefit of your enlightened opinions on the actual subject this thread concerns. Assuming you have any, that is, and are capable of actually expressing them.
SB
Then again, if you actually had any class or breeding you'd know that already...
But please, do feel free to give us the benefit of your enlightened opinions on the actual subject this thread concerns. Assuming you have any, that is, and are capable of actually expressing them.
SB
The perception that hunting is confined to the well off and well heeled is laughable as is the correlation between the ALF having a point (in this instance) and Al Qaeda, which does not. Terrorism for one, but not for another?
13 February 2006, 12:40 PM
#47
People say it is ok to kill a fax, as we kill thousands of birds/cows etc.
Apply the same rule here then .....our armed forces kill thousands of Iraqi's, so does that make it ok for me to kill one it he was walking down the street?
Ok it maybe a silly example, but those with open minds will see where i am coming from.
Apply the same rule here then .....our armed forces kill thousands of Iraqi's, so does that make it ok for me to kill one it he was walking down the street?
Ok it maybe a silly example, but those with open minds will see where i am coming from.
13 February 2006, 12:46 PM
#48
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Moley_WRX
People say it is ok to kill a fax, as we kill thousands of birds/cows etc.
Apply the same rule here then .....our armed forces kill thousands of Iraqi's, so does that make it ok for me to kill one it he was walking down the street?
Ok it maybe a silly example, but those with open minds will see where i am coming from.
Apply the same rule here then .....our armed forces kill thousands of Iraqi's, so does that make it ok for me to kill one it he was walking down the street?
Ok it maybe a silly example, but those with open minds will see where i am coming from.
Before anyone tries to cast doubt on that statement with protestations about the legality of the war in Iraq, as far as the Attorney General was concerned (and I disagreed) the war was legitimate and hence the act of killing (by soldiers) took place as an act of faith in their chain of command.
13 February 2006, 12:51 PM
#49
Originally Posted by Flatcapdriver
Nope. We don',t because there is a legal foundation for member of the armed forces to kill in a war situation which doesn't exist in a civilian context outside of that framework.
Before anyone tries to cast doubt on that statement with protestations about the legality of the war in Iraq, as far as the Attorney General was concerned (and I disagreed) the war was legitimate and hence the act of killing (by soldiers) took place as an act of faith in their chain of command.
Before anyone tries to cast doubt on that statement with protestations about the legality of the war in Iraq, as far as the Attorney General was concerned (and I disagreed) the war was legitimate and hence the act of killing (by soldiers) took place as an act of faith in their chain of command.
13 February 2006, 12:59 PM
#50
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Moley_WRX
But it is legal to kill these chickens and cows, but illegal to kill the fox, so again does my thoery not apply?
Anyway, if some of you could see the way some poultry farms are run (within the law) you'd soon stop worrying about hunting on the basis of animal rights but as I said, this subject is about perception as much as anything else.
13 February 2006, 01:07 PM
#51
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Croydon - returned to democracy! Yay!!
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I said there's no x in nouveau.
It may well be the plural form, but the term 'nouveau riche' doesn't use the plural form. So I stand by my comment.
As an aside, I'm almost certain that Inbreddie Eddie is actually a socialist who is trying to drag the reputation of the right down to the gutter. Which probably means he's PSL's alter ego...
SB
Originally Posted by Flatcapdriver
Yes, there is. It's the plural form.
As an aside, I'm almost certain that Inbreddie Eddie is actually a socialist who is trying to drag the reputation of the right down to the gutter. Which probably means he's PSL's alter ego...
SB
13 February 2006, 01:19 PM
#52
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sbradley
I said there's no x in nouveau.
It may well be the plural form, but the term 'nouveau riche' doesn't use the plural form. So I stand by my comment.
As an aside, I'm almost certain that Inbreddie Eddie is actually a socialist who is trying to drag the reputation of the right down to the gutter. Which probably means he's PSL's alter ego...
SB
It may well be the plural form, but the term 'nouveau riche' doesn't use the plural form. So I stand by my comment.
As an aside, I'm almost certain that Inbreddie Eddie is actually a socialist who is trying to drag the reputation of the right down to the gutter. Which probably means he's PSL's alter ego...
SB
13 February 2006, 01:30 PM
#53
Originally Posted by Flatcapdriver
Actually, it does. Check it out on Google if you don't believe me.
SB's right.
It's a homophone : Nouveau Riche or Nouveaux Riches.
13 February 2006, 02:07 PM
#55
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Croydon - returned to democracy! Yay!!
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks for the backup, SJ, and for the magnaminous response, Mr Flatcap.
If only all SN discussions could be resolved so amicably...
SB
If only all SN discussions could be resolved so amicably...
SB
13 February 2006, 02:09 PM
#56
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SJ_Skyline
SB's right.
It's a homophone : Nouveau Riche or Nouveaux Riches.
Who does Nouveau Riche play for BTW?
Ah the devil makes work for idle hands!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
