Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Cranial osteopathy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24 February 2006, 09:00 AM
  #122  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by **************
I would apply this to the treatment of very young babies also, again which would explain why there is little evidence of paedatric cranial osteopathy being a success. You asked for proof in the way of x-rays etc. Well no one is going to x-ray a babies head unless its absolutely medically necessary.
A DBPC test wouldn't require X-rays, it was due to the lack of any DBPC test or other clinical results that I suggested other evidence that "may" be available.

If all the tests of cranial osteopathy have been done on adults then I find those results completely irrelevant as I am, and so are the others here, talking about paedatric cranial osteopathy on a very young child and that is very different to cranial osteopathy on an adult, for the very reason which you have already explained, the bones that form the skull being easily manipulated in a baby and not possible in an adult.
So are you saying you accept CO doesn't work for adults?

Find me test results that have been carried out on babies that categorically show cranial osteopathy didn't work for them. I bet there arn't any based on the above reasons (ethical and medical reasons) and all the results are for adults being tested.
As I said above a Double blinding may cause some issues, but a single blinded placebo controlled test on babies would be very easy to carry out and would have no ethical issues relating to it.

There seems to be a reluctance from the CO practitioners to get their techniques formally tested and accepted within the mainstream for some reason. There are a number of cliams that they make which can also be tested:

Cranial osteopaths claim they are trained to feel a very subtle, rhythmic shape change that is present in all physical tissues. This is known as the involuntary mechanism or the cranial rhythm. The movement is said to be very subtle, and it takes practitioners with a very finely developed sense of touch to feel it.
Some testing was carried out (I linked to the article before) where they asked a number of CO practitioners to detect this rhythm in the same patient. There was no consitency in the frequency of the rhythm as reported by the CO practioners, in otherwords they couldn't agree amongst themseleves about the frequency of the pulsing. As a side note, mainstream medicine could detect no pulsing other than a circulatory pulse which is at a much higher frequency than claimed by the CO practitioners. That CO practitioners can't agree amonst themseleves on the central theory suggests to me that their theory is somewhat flawed.
Old 24 February 2006, 09:09 AM
  #123  
Suresh
Scooby Regular
 
Suresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 4,622
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Mr.Logic

So have you found any evidence showing the effiacy of CO yet??
Yes and I am satisfied, so this doesn't require an answer anymore.
Old 24 February 2006, 10:20 AM
  #124  
Ted Maul
Scooby Regular
 
Ted Maul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London Town
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

alternative treatment!? our baby hospital told all the mothers in the classes to use a CO as soon as possible. no mumbo witch doctor stuff here, this was specifically recommended by the paediatric doctors...

ps - first hand experience (for waht it counts to the pedantics here) was extremely helpful to our little boy
Old 24 February 2006, 10:48 AM
  #125  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ted Maul
alternative treatment!? our baby hospital told all the mothers in the classes to use a CO as soon as possible. no mumbo witch doctor stuff here, this was specifically recommended by the paediatric doctors...

ps - first hand experience (for waht it counts to the pedantics here) was extremely helpful to our little boy
Would you be prepared to state the hospital and doctor concerned?
Old 24 February 2006, 01:37 PM
  #127  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by **************
No but I am positive it has far more effect on babies due to how their bones can be manipulated compared to those of an adult. I have only been referring to paedatric cranial osteopathy in my argument and not cranial osteopathy as a whole as its the paedatric treatment that I have seen the results of 1st hand.

I had one session on myself out of interest to see if it could help me with stress levels at the time and what ever they did (which was more than just a head massage) it did something because it made me feel very different afterwards and had a very noticeable effect but for me I didn't think the cost for myself warranted continuing the treatment. For my son the cost was not an issue and the reason for treatment was far more important and the results were far more obvious.
I'll ask a couple of questions if I may.
1) Do you think there is something special about OC praticioners or could anybody do it?
2) Does the skull need to be manipulated in a very specific way, or is it just the manipulation that is important. What about the amount of pressure used?
Old 24 February 2006, 02:50 PM
  #128  
Ted Maul
Scooby Regular
 
Ted Maul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: London Town
Posts: 983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ollyk you have pm
Old 24 February 2006, 05:27 PM
  #129  
RobinSherwood
Scooby Regular
 
RobinSherwood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There are reasons why CO may help the problems being discussed, but it is not the reasons the Cranial Osteopath would think it works.

At the practice I manage we treat a lot of glue ear, constant infections (ear, throat etc.,..) as well as many other things. Part of the treatment we give would have a similar effect to some of the massage etc given as part of CO, though it is more specifically targeted so we would expect it to be more effective. We would not be surprised to see a child also suffering for instance with eczema (or various other complaints as well) as the root cause of both problems is connected.

Our approach is not alternative medicine but an advanced form of conventional medicine.

So yes I can see CO might help.

I don't think it is appropriate for me to go into this in any greater detail in this forum but I hope that helps a little.

Kind regards,

Robin

Last edited by RobinSherwood; 24 February 2006 at 05:44 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kronja
Dealer and Third Party Supplier Queries
34
28 April 2009 11:50 AM
ulsterscooby
Ireland & Northern Ireland
3
12 November 2007 09:30 AM
scoobypreza
Non Scooby Related
27
03 November 2004 12:13 AM



Quick Reply: Cranial osteopathy



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:00 PM.