Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

He must really hate her!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08 March 2006, 10:45 AM
  #61  
davyboy
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
davyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Leslie
I don't think any of us are qualified to say what the outcome of this case should be. There may well be others reasons which we do not know in respect of their relationship and which he is not prepared to talk about.

As the law stands, he is entitled to refuse so the courts had no option but to give the decision that they have done.

Les
SN would be a dull place if we all sat on the fence
Old 08 March 2006, 11:09 AM
  #62  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
I'm with 84 (post #34) - what happened if the guy got her pregnant, then they split? According to this ruling, IF consent is the key point, then he could legally force her to have an abortion!!

There was also this case, in the US: http://bbs.scoobynet.co.uk/showthread.php?t=409407 which is in the opposite direction.
At the moment - she isn't pregnant. There are a few cells frozen in liquid nitrogen that they both equally "own" and contributed to.
Old 08 March 2006, 11:10 AM
  #63  
Stainy
Scooby Regular
 
Stainy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

For the people that are siding with the woman on this one, what are your views if he had found a new partner and SHE was infertile and he wanted HIS embryo's for implant into her? (lights blue touch paper)
Old 08 March 2006, 11:17 AM
  #64  
Frosty The Snowman
Scooby Regular
 
Frosty The Snowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Perhaps if there was just a simple form saying something along the lines of...

I relinquish all rights and responsibilties for the child created using the sperm/egss/embryo donated

and a similar one when they are being used...

I will not hold anyone responsible in any was for the child created using these sperm/eggs/embryo.

That would allow there to be a bit more choice in what is a bit of a minefield to legislate fairly for.

I can see what people are saying about the legislation in place but as I said earlier I don't think I would personally oppose what she wants to do just as long as a court could guarantee that I was not held responsible in any way for the child, that in itself can be a problem unless the decision is made and then upheld at appeal at the highest court in the land.

The decision made by the courts is the correct one according to the law as it stands but I think with a bit of flexibility it would end up a little more fair for both parties.
Old 08 March 2006, 11:23 AM
  #65  
Frosty The Snowman
Scooby Regular
 
Frosty The Snowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Stainy
For the people that are siding with the woman on this one, what are your views if he had found a new partner and SHE was infertile and he wanted HIS embryo's for implant into her? (lights blue touch paper)
In that case he could get another egg doner and use his semen to fertilise them and use them as part of and IVF treatment for the infertile woman. In this case I think the embryos were specifically created for her as she was going to become infertile.
Old 08 March 2006, 11:26 AM
  #66  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OllyK
At the moment - she isn't pregnant.
NSS
Old 08 March 2006, 11:31 AM
  #67  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Frosty The Snowman
Perhaps if there was just a simple form saying something along the lines of...

I relinquish all rights and responsibilties for the child created using the sperm/egss/embryo donated

and a similar one when they are being used...

I will not hold anyone responsible in any was for the child created using these sperm/eggs/embryo.

That would allow there to be a bit more choice in what is a bit of a minefield to legislate fairly for.

I can see what people are saying about the legislation in place but as I said earlier I don't think I would personally oppose what she wants to do just as long as a court could guarantee that I was not held responsible in any way for the child, that in itself can be a problem unless the decision is made and then upheld at appeal at the highest court in the land.

The decision made by the courts is the correct one according to the law as it stands but I think with a bit of flexibility it would end up a little more fair for both parties.
And what about the kid coming and pestering "Daddy" when Mummy isn't very nice to it and by this time you are married and have a familiy? Need to have an injunction to prevent the kid from ever contacting the father as well.
Old 08 March 2006, 11:39 AM
  #68  
Frosty The Snowman
Scooby Regular
 
Frosty The Snowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OllyK
And what about the kid coming and pestering "Daddy" when Mummy isn't very nice to it and by this time you are married and have a familiy? Need to have an injunction to prevent the kid from ever contacting the father as well.
Oh definitely agree there and it's probably the hardest bit to legislate for. At the end of the day if at all possible there should be anonimity, not possible here. If any medical need should arise then it is completely up to the donor whether hey want to get involved. This again would be a minefield of course cos you may get a stranger turn up 20 years down the line needing a kidney or they're going to die.
Old 08 March 2006, 11:57 AM
  #69  
Stainy
Scooby Regular
 
Stainy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Frosty The Snowman
In that case he could get another egg doner and use his semen to fertilise them and use them as part of and IVF treatment for the infertile woman. In this case I think the embryos were specifically created for her as she was going to become infertile.
Yeah, but you get my gist. I'm trying to put the boot on the other foot and see what opinions are like then (not that I expect the answer to be anything other than, 'he should be able to use it too' because otherwise they would shoot themselves in the foot).

I suppose I should have said what if these embryo's were saved because he was becoming infertile and now he had a new partner that he wanted to use them with.
Old 08 March 2006, 12:08 PM
  #70  
davegtt
Scooby Senior
 
davegtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Women are selfish creatures and only see things from their own perspective the majority of the time. See's probably sat there thinking how nasty hes being to her without giving a thought to anything he's feeling.

Take away their rights, lock them in the kitchen, thats what I say

Seriously though good on the courts coming through for the blokes for a change, all too often we see unfair rulings over men in favour of women.
Old 08 March 2006, 12:29 PM
  #71  
Spring Heeled Jack
Scooby Regular
 
Spring Heeled Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: was he a creature, an alien, or a man wearing some strange costume and a hidden jumping apparatus
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by davyboy
SN would be a dull place if we all sat on the fence
Absolutely. Comes across as a right moaning cow to me.

I'm glad she's not on my case.
Old 08 March 2006, 12:49 PM
  #72  
TheBigMan
Scooby Regular
 
TheBigMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's come to the courts. As such there can be no room for sentiment.

I can't see it as anything other than 100% the correct decision - no matter how it must be hurting the poor woman.

A person (male or female) has the right to choose whether they are a parent or not. As much as a horrible situation this is - the right decision has been made.

It would have been "nice" of the man to have allowed her to have "their" child - but i do not think we should string him up by his bollox for making an informed decision that affects him at a moral level.

It's a horrid situation, and another example that in some cases our scientific advances can open a whole new can of worms when we least expect it.

Courts have made an impartial decision disregarding all sentiment - it is their job to do so and their decision is 100% correct.


IMO.

Last edited by TheBigMan; 08 March 2006 at 01:02 PM.
Old 08 March 2006, 12:59 PM
  #73  
Tiggs
Scooby Regular
 
Tiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

she's nuts......why would she want a child where the father wants nothing to do with it? is she even in a relationship?

being able to have kids is luck of the gods, she lost her chance....could have been worse, she could have died! She should think herself lucky and get on with life.

having a child is not a right, its a gift that you either get or dont get.
Old 08 March 2006, 01:04 PM
  #74  
TheBigMan
Scooby Regular
 
TheBigMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tiggs
she's nuts......why would she want a child where the father wants nothing to do with it? is she even in a relationship?

being able to have kids is luck of the gods, she lost her chance....could have been worse, she could have died! She should think herself lucky and get on with life.

having a child is not a right, its a gift that you either get or dont get.
....arguably a tad harsh?
Old 08 March 2006, 01:13 PM
  #75  
davyboy
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
davyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tiggs
She should think herself lucky and get on with life
You really need to let more cancer sufferers hear your words of wisdom.

I'm sure they'll be grateful.
Old 08 March 2006, 01:15 PM
  #76  
Wurzel
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
 
Wurzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wildberg, Germany/Reading, UK
Posts: 9,707
Likes: 0
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by davyboy
You really need to let more cancer sufferers hear your words of wisdom.

I'm sure they'll be grateful.
I think it is called survival of the fittest and natural selection.

There is nowt we can do about it except prolong the pain with drugs.

When it is your time to go then it is your time to go!
Old 08 March 2006, 01:17 PM
  #77  
davyboy
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
davyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Someone people can make a full recovery from cancer, does that make them super human?
Old 08 March 2006, 01:19 PM
  #78  
TheBigMan
Scooby Regular
 
TheBigMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wurzel
I think it is called survival of the fittest and natural selection.

There is nowt we can do about it except prolong the pain with drugs.

When it is your time to go then it is your time to go!
I think we're talking about preserving reproductive matter - not dying!!

BTW - If memory serves me correctly, quite a few people have actually survived cancer.
Old 08 March 2006, 01:20 PM
  #79  
Wurzel
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
 
Wurzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wildberg, Germany/Reading, UK
Posts: 9,707
Likes: 0
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by davyboy
Someone people can make a full recovery from cancer, does that make them super human?
No it just means it was not their time to go! people recover from illness all the time but when ya gona go ya gona go simple as that.
Old 08 March 2006, 01:22 PM
  #80  
AudiLover
Scooby Regular
 
AudiLover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Why did they combine the sperm and eggs before freezing. They could have just assed sperm later down the line.
Old 08 March 2006, 01:23 PM
  #81  
TheBigMan
Scooby Regular
 
TheBigMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wurzel
No it just means it was not their time to go! people recover from illness all the time but when ya gona go ya gona go simple as that.
Ok, and the relevance of this with regards to this thread or any post within??

....random.
Old 08 March 2006, 01:24 PM
  #82  
Wurzel
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
 
Wurzel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wildberg, Germany/Reading, UK
Posts: 9,707
Likes: 0
Received 73 Likes on 54 Posts
Default

go back to post 75 and you will see the relevence.
Old 08 March 2006, 01:24 PM
  #83  
davyboy
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
davyboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Some country and western
Posts: 13,488
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheBigMan
Ok, and the relevance of this with regards to this thread or any post within??

....random.
Simple rules of posting.

Read title, read posts, think if you can add anything to the thread, make post.

Simple
Old 08 March 2006, 01:33 PM
  #85  
TheBigMan
Scooby Regular
 
TheBigMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Wurzel
go back to post 75 and you will see the relevence.
You have misunderstood it.

<women can be infertile after being treated for cancer>
Old 08 March 2006, 01:48 PM
  #86  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tiggs
she's nuts......why would she want a child where the father wants nothing to do with it? is she even in a relationship?

being able to have kids is luck of the gods, she lost her chance....could have been worse, she could have died! She should think herself lucky and get on with life.

having a child is not a right, its a gift that you either get or dont get.
You're going soft in your old age, did you get your leg over last night or something?
Old 08 March 2006, 01:53 PM
  #87  
KiwiGTI
Scooby Regular
 
KiwiGTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Frosty The Snowman
I can see what people are saying about the legislation in place but as I said earlier I don't think I would personally oppose what she wants to do just as long as a court could guarantee that I was not held responsible in any way for the child, that in itself can be a problem unless the decision is made and then upheld at appeal at the highest court in the land.
Why has it got to be about rights and responsibility? Nothing would ever change the fact that this would be his biological child, there would be an emotional bond.

If he said yes and let her have it he is no better than the men that do a runner and don't care for their children. She is treating it like a commodity.

If I were him I would have extreme difficulty letting her do this because I would want to be a parent for my son or daughter.

She is an evil cow.
Old 08 March 2006, 02:19 PM
  #88  
Frosty The Snowman
Scooby Regular
 
Frosty The Snowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Bedfordshire
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KiwiGTI
Why has it got to be about rights and responsibility? Nothing would ever change the fact that this would be his biological child, there would be an emotional bond.

If he said yes and let her have it he is no better than the men that do a runner and don't care for their children. She is treating it like a commodity.

If I were him I would have extreme difficulty letting her do this because I would want to be a parent for my son or daughter.

She is an evil cow.
Never said it would change the fact it's his biological child. They did this so that they were still able to have children after her treatments, I don't know why she didn't just have the eggs frozen but whatever happened this is the only chance she has to have a biological child of her own.

Not really sure if there would be an emotional bond as I would have thought that is built by time being spent with the child, for example a foster parent could have an emotional bond with the foster child.

I can't say this is anything like a man doing a runner and not caring for his child.

I agree with the outcome of the court case because that is how the law stands at the moment, however, if I was in his position I would be happy for her to have the child if I were not held responsible later on down the line. Whats to say she's not in a loving relationship and her husband/partner is happy with what she wants.
Old 08 March 2006, 02:29 PM
  #89  
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool

Originally Posted by Clarebabes
Am I rightly thinking that most of the negative comments on here have been made by men? If I am, then as a woman myself who has been through childbirth, I can understand why she has gone this far to have "her" embryos saved and possibly implanted in the future.
And that is a typically female attitude as well! She is not saving "her" embryos at all, they are "their" embryos. If they were already inside her body, fair enough, but they ain't.

It's not the same as withdrawing consent after you are pregnant either, that is asking the woman to undergo some sort of procedure to allow termination, which is unacceptable. This has not forced the omwan in question t undergo anything (except stress and upset, but I'm sure it hasn't been easy for him either).

The right decision was made.

She can always adopt. Now that really is a caring thing to do. Loving someone elses unwanted child and giving them a chance. I love my kids unconditonally because they are mine, but to adopt, well, people who do that deserve respect. She is being rather selfish to say the least.

Geezer
Old 08 March 2006, 02:34 PM
  #90  
davegtt
Scooby Senior
 
davegtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

And to give the excuse he doesnt have to have anything to do with it is stupid too, Imagine 20years down the line some young person knocking on your door, Hi your my Daddy, if you had a concience it'd be a bit hard to tell them too **** off wouldnt it.


Quick Reply: He must really hate her!



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:01 PM.