Iwan

Some interesting ideas and concepts posed in that video, but also some mistakes (even to someone not like me who's not an expert) like "a B-52 flew into the Empire state building in 1945". Er no, that was a B-25, BIG difference. I watched that part of the vid twice and the speaker definately says B-52, which is a pretty obvious error.

They also claim the part of the pentagon that the "plane" hit was a part that was specially reinforced. Here's a video of an F-4 Phantom hitting a reinforced concrete structure and being totally atomised. So it "can" happen.

http://www.jokaroo.com/extremevideos/plane_vs_wall.html

You have to wonder what other errors/assumptions are in there.

Still lots of interesting and unexplained points nevertheless, I do think there's a lot that we aren't being told. Not sure if I can make the full leap to conpiracy theory though.

judgejules

Yeah, I thought about that video (tomorrows world) when I was watching the movie, shame the Pentagon wasn't build like the side of a Nuclear power station though, considering it had windows etc.

I mean, how could the fuselage punch through so far and the engines make no impact at all, and for all intents and purposes just disappear?

There is definitely something very fishy about it all, I don't care what anyone says it did not happen the way we were meant to think.

J

Want Best STI

glad i got u all thinking! i see what you mean errors dont help when its presented but the rest is all making sense to me! the thing went through 9 re-enforced walls! no marks of the wings nor the tail on the building anywhere also nothing on the floor?
this is just 1 point!
did you all see while the buildings were falling about 10 floors below you can see small flashes and clearly see windows being lown out.. yet another indication that its proper demolition. oh and ONLY the demolition team cleared up??? and got rid of the evidence before anyone could examine

KiwiGTI

I saw the supposed explosions blowing windows out on the floors below, but surely with so much stuff coming down it would have forced air pressure to build up below and in some cases this would have been enough to blow windows.

I'm not a fan of conspiracies, usually if more than 1 person knows then the truth gets out so they are self-defeating. However I'm not convinced that the whole truth has been told about 9/11.

Iwan

Yup I would put money on the small "explosions" being debris or air pressure getting forced out. The last documentary I saw said the inner core of the building collapsed ahead of the other shell, which could explain what was seen - but then so could charges going off inside.

I still think there are lots of unexplained parts to the story, but I can't quite bring myself to believe it was all planned by Bush to give an excuse to go to war with Afghanistan/Iraq.

TimmyboyWRX

althought in order to pipe oil out of certain areas the cheapest route was to run a pipeline through afganistan, and under the taliban this was impossible. strangely enough they get removed from power on the pretext of war against terror, and within 6 months BP/Amoco have the contract to build pipelines across that region to supply oil needed for american interests.

just one of the other sides to the story

interesting documentary tho raised alot of points.

one thing missed out tho, surely the 'plane' flying at 500mph over interstate highway at what, 20ft above the ground?, wouldve caused enough airpressure to blow cars off the road and at least onto their roofs....now where were those cars in any pics>? because surely the highway wasnt deserted during those few minutes?

Trout

iTrader: (1)

When it comes to conspiracy theories I always trust to Occam's Razor

FlightMan

Ahh, someone else who has seen "Contact"

Want Best STI

the floors did have sparks too though! wasntnt just blowing out.. there were eye witnesses to say that there deffo were explotions

banny sti

iTrader: (68)

I see where people are coming from with so many discrepencies and strange going ons but surely this was not done by the Bush administration, surely they have more respect for human life than that. Too kill 1000's of their own citizens to create an excuse to go to war ? (was there not supposed to be about 40,000 people in the WTC) That is really scarey stuff, could they do it, would they do it. I really dont know.

However in order to pull off something of this magnitude the sheer number of people that would have to involved is staggering, somebody would have squealed by now maybe ? Will we ever know the whole truth, I doubt it.

frayz

iTrader: (7)

incredible,

One of the most interesting things ive ever watched